Oncotarget

Research Papers:

Epigenetic inactivation of HOXA11, a novel functional tumor suppressor for renal cell carcinoma, is associated with RCC TNM classification

PDF |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:21861-21870. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15668

Metrics: PDF 1504 views  |   HTML 2233 views  |   ?  

Lu Wang, Yun Cui, Jindong Sheng, Yang Yang, Guanyu Kuang, Yu Fan, Jie Jin and Qian Zhang _

Abstract

Lu Wang1,3, Yun Cui1, Jindong Sheng1, Yang Yang1, Guanyu Kuang1, Yu Fan1,2, Jie Jin1, Qian Zhang1

1Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital and Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China

2Department of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China

3Department of Urology, National Urological Cancer Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China

Correspondence to:

Qian Zhang, email: [email protected]

Jie Jin, email: [email protected]

Keywords: HOXA11, methylation, renal cell carcinoma

Received: August 08, 2016     Accepted: January 16, 2017     Published: February 24, 2017

ABSTRACT

Epigenetic inactivation of HOXA11, a putative tumor suppressor, is frequently observed in a number of solid tumors, but has not been described in RCC (renal cell carcinoma). In this study, we investigated the expression, epigenetic changes and the function of HOXA11 in human renal cell carcinoma (RCC). HOXA11 was silenced or down-regulated in RCC cell lines and tissues. Methylation specific PCR (MSP) and bisulfite genomic sequencing (BGS) revealed that the HOXA11 promoter was hypermethylated in 5/6 RCC cell lines. Demethylation treatment resulted in demethylation of the promoter and increased HOXA11 expression in these cell lines. HOXA11 methylation was also detected in 68/95 (70.5%) primary RCC tumors, but only rare adjacent non-malignant renal tissues (13%, 3/23) showed hypermethylation of promoter. We also found that the methylation of HOXA11 was associated with higher TNM classification of RCC (p<0.05). Ectopic expression of HOXA11 led to significant inhibition of proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasion abilities and induced RCC cells apoptosis. Moreover, HOXA11 was found to inhibit Wnt signaling. Thus, our study demonstrated that HOXA11 function as a tumor suppressor in RCC, while it is frequently silenced by promoter methylation in RCC.


INTRODUCTION

Renal cell carcinoma represents 2-3% of human malignant neoplasms [1]. The incidence of renal cell carcinoma is increasing by about 2% annually [2]. It is burdened with a high mortality level, poor prognosis and insensitivity to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, thus it is considered one of the most important urological cancers [3, 4]. Therefore, it is critical to reveal the molecular mechanism underlying RCC tumorigenesis. Renal cell carcinoma develops as a result of inheritance which occurs due to the abnormalities in the genetic material as well as changes acquired as the environment impact [5]. The changes of environment correlate closely to the epigenetic, which has been reported to be a feature of various carcinomas including renal cell carcinoma. Over the past few years, aberrant epigenetic changes have been found in renal cell carcinoma [6].

HOXA11 is a member of HOX transcription factors, the HOX genes encode transcription factors that play an essential role in embryonic development and differentiation of adult cells [7]. HOX genes are also known to be involved in different stages of kidney organogenesis, from the early events in intermediate mesoderm to terminal differentiation of glomerular and tubular epithelia [8]. HOX genes consist of four clusters including A, B, C and D on four different chromosomes [9]. The HOXA cluster located on chromosome 7p15-7p14.2 consists of 12 genes including HOXA11 [10]. HOXA11 plays an important role in regulating cell differentiation and proliferation [11, 12]. The hypermethylation of HOXA11 promoter region has been reported in various cancers [1316]. However, the epigenetic alteration and function of HOXA11 in human renal cell carcinoma has not been explained. Therefore, to investigate the relationship between HOXA11 methylation and tumor development becomes important to further elucidate the tumorigenesis of RCC.

To gain better insight into the role of HOXA11 in RCC, we investigated the expression of HOXA11 in RCC tissues and cell lines and further characterized the HOXA11 hypermethylation. Thus, we next analyzed the association between clinicopathological parameters and HOXA11 methylation in RCC tissues. What’s more, functional research showed that HOXA11 inhibited RCC cell proliferation, migration and invasion ability and induced apoptosis. HOXA11 also inhibited Wnt signaling. Collectively, our data identifies HOXA11 as a functional tumor suppressor which is frequently methylated in renal cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

Epigenetic inactivation of HOXA11 in RCC cell lines

To examine the expression of HOXA11, RT-PCR was employed. HOXA11 was weakly expressed in 786-O, A498 and CAKI-2, no expression was found in CAKI-1, OSRC, 769P and KOTO-3. However, HOXA11 is robustly expressed in two approximately “normal” kidney cell lines (HK-2 : “normal” human proximal tubular cell line; HEK-293 : human normal embryonic kidney cell line) (Figure 1A). Aberrant methylation of HOXA11 promoter was observed in 5/6 RCC cell lines (786-O, A498, CAKI-1, 769P, OSRC and CAKI-2) by MSP. No promoter methylation of HOXA11 was detected in HEK-293 and HK-2 cells (Figure 1A). To analyze the correlation of HOXA11 expression and aberrant promoter methylation, RCC cell lines were treated with 5-Aza combined with or without TSA. Enhanced expression of HOXA11 was shown in 6 RCC cell lines (Figure 1B). In addition, the methylation status of HOXA11 reduced in 786-O and A498 cells. Even though no reduction of HOXA11 promoter was observed in OSRC cell, its unmethylated status was up-regulated after demethylation treatment (Figure 1C). The MSP results are consistent with Bisulfite Genomic Sequencing (BGS) results very well (Figure 1D). These results indicate that aberrant methylation of promoter decreased the HOXA11 expression.

Methylation and expression status of HOXA11 in RCC cell lines.

Figure 1: Methylation and expression status of HOXA11 in RCC cell lines. A. The mRNA expression and promoter methylation of HOXA11 was detected by RT-PCR and MSP in RCC cell lines, — represents negative control; BGS analysis of HOXA11 promoter methylation in HEK-293 cell; B. Detection of HOXA11 expression by RT-PCR after demethylation treatment with Aza or Aza +TSA, A: Aza, T: TSA; C. Demethylation treatment induced demethylation in RCC cell lines by MSP, M: mehylation, U: unmethylation; D. BGS analysis of HOXA11 promoter methylation after demethylation treatment, filled circles: methylated CpG site, open circles: unmethylated CpG site.

HOXA11 was frequently methylated and reduced in human primary RCC samples

To explore methylation changes of HOXA11 in RCC tissues and adjacent non-malignant renal tissues, 95 RCC samples and 23 adjacent non-malignant renal tissues were detected by MSP. As Table 1 showed that HOXA11 was found to be methylated in 70.5% (68/95) of primary RCC samples, while only 13% (3/23) of adjacent non-malignant renal tissues was found to be methylated in HOXA11 promoter region (Figure 2A). In addition, Real-time PCR was performed in 26 paired RCC tissues and adjacent non-malignant renal tissues. HOXA11 was reduced in 26/26 RCC tissues compared with adjacent non-malignant renal tissues (Figure 2B). In addition, immunohistochemistry was used to detected the HOXA11 protein expression in 15 paired RCC tissues and adjacent non-malignant renal tissues, expression of HOXA11 was decreased in 14/15 (p<0.05) RCC tissues (Figure 2C). Collectively, these results further demonstrated that HOXA11 is frequent down-regulated in tumors with higher methylation status in RCC.

Table 1: Methylation status of HOXA11 in primary RCC tissues and adjacent non-malignant renal tissues

RCC samples

HOXA10 promoter

Methylation percentage

Methylation

Unmethylation

Tumor

68

27

70.5%

Non-malignant

3

20

13%

HOXA11 expression and promoter methylation in primary RCC tissues and adjacent non-malignant renal tissues.

Figure 2: HOXA11 expression and promoter methylation in primary RCC tissues and adjacent non-malignant renal tissues. A. MSP analysis of HOXA11 methylation in primary RCC tissues and adjacent non-malignant renal tissues. B. Quantity analysis HOXA11 mRNA expression level in paired RCC tissues, N: adjacent non-malignant renal tissues, T: primary RCC tissues; C. Representative images of HOXA11 protein expression in RCC tissues and their adjacent non-malignant tissues determined by IHC (immunohistochemistry).

In addition, we further analyzed the correlation of HOXA11 methylation and patients’ clinical features. Table 2 listed the clinicopathological features of RCC patients and statistic results. Interestingly, methylation of HOXA11 was significantly associated with TNM (p<0.05). But no association was found with gender, age, side and nuclear grade (p<0.05).

Table 2: Association of HOXA11 methylation with clinicopathological features in RCC

Clinicopathological Feature

Methylated NO. (%)

Unmethylated NO. (%)

p value

Age

54±12.9

56±12.5

0.63

Gender

Male

44(71%)

18(29%)

0.86

Female

24(72.7%)

9(27.3%)

Side

Left

32(71.1%)

13(28.9%)

0.92

Right

36(72%)

14(28%)

TNM classification

pT1

41(63.1%)

24(36.9%)

0.013

pT2

6(100%)

0(0%)

pT3

18(85.7%)

3(14.3%)

pT4

3(100%)

0(0)

Nuclear grade

G1

5(50%)

5(50%)

0.42

G2

48(72.7%)

18(27.3%)

G3

15(78.9%)

4(22.1%)

HOXA11 suppresses RCC cells proliferation and induces cell apoptosis

The frequent down-regulation and methylation of HOXA11 in primary RCC tumors indicated that it might function as a tumor suppressor. Thus, we further explored the effects of HOXA11 in two HOXA11 deficient RCC cells (786-O, OSRC). CCK8 assay was used to assess the proliferation ability of cells transfected with HOXA11 and Vector. As it was showed in Figure 3A, HOXA11 significantly inhibit the proliferation of RCC cells. What’s more, results of colony formation assays showed that ectopic expression of HOXA11 significantly suppressed the numbers of cell colonies compared with the control cell (Figure 3C), indicating that HOXA11 indeed suppressed the tumorigenesis of RCC. Expression of HOXA11 was confirmed by RT-PCR (Figure 3B). To evaluate the mechanism of HOXA11 in cell proliferation, flow cytometric analyses of apoptosis was performed. We found that ectopic HOXA11 expression in 786-O and OSRC cells underwent significant apoptosis compared to controls (Figure 4A). Then, Real-time PCR and western-blot showed that ectopic expression of HOXA11 repressed the expression of Caspase7, Caspase8, Caspase9 and Cleaved parb. These results indicated that HOXA11 could suppress the RCC cells proliferation and induce apoptosis.

Ectopic expression of HOXA11 inhibits RCC cell proliferation and colony formation abilities.

Figure 3: Ectopic expression of HOXA11 inhibits RCC cell proliferation and colony formation abilities. A. CCK-8 assay showed an inhibition effect of HOXA11 on cell growth, *: p<0.05; B. RT-PCR showed HOXA11 expression in HOXA11- or vector-transfected cells, β-actin was used as a control. C. HOXA11 suppressed RCC cells (786-O and OSRC) colony formation, the experiment was repeated for three times as values of mean±SD, *: p<0.05.

Figure 4:

Figure 4: A. HOXA11 induced apoptosis in 786-O and OSRC cells by flow cytometry analysis following Annexin V and 7-AAD staining. Quantitative analyses of apoptotic cells in 786-O and OSRC, *: p<0.05. B. Effect of HOXA11 on expression of pro-apoptosis regulators in OSRC and 786-O examined by Real-time PCR and western blot analysis.

HOXA11 inhibits RCC cell invasion and migration

Wound-healing and Transwell assay were performed to explore the function of HOXA11 in RCC cells. As shown in Figure 5A, the wound-healing assay results showed that HOXA11 expressing cells were less proficient in closing an artificial wound than the empty vector tansfected cells on the confluent monolayer (p<0.05). In the Transwell assay, the number of migrated cells transfected with HOXA11 of each field was less compared with the control cells (Figure 5B, p<0.05). What’s more, HOXA11 decreased MMP9 and MMP2 expression, protein that promoted cell migration. Above results hint that HOXA11 suppresses the ability of invasion and migration in RCC cells.

Effects of HOXA11 on RCC cell migration and invasion.

Figure 5: Effects of HOXA11 on RCC cell migration and invasion. A. Ectopic expression of HOXA11 inhibit cell migration ability in 786-O and OSRC, pictures of wound-healing were captured at 0 h, 24 h and 30 h, p<0.05; B. Transwell assay shows migration results in HOXA11 unexpressed and re-expressed in RCC cells, bar graphs represent the numbers of migrating 786-O and OSRC cells, the experiment was repeated three times, *: p<0.05. C. Ectopic expression of HOXA11 inhibited migration related genes expression in OSRC and 786-O cells examined by qPCR and Western-blot.

Effect of HOXA11 on Wnt/β-catenin signaling

Canonical Wnt signaling pathway plays a significant role in RCC tumorigenesis. To explore the effect of HOXA11 on Wnt signaling pathway in RCC, Real-time PCR was employed. As the Figure 6A, 6B and 6C showed, the down-stream genes (c-myc, cyclinD1) of Wnt signaling pathway was apparently reduced in HOXA11 expressed cells compared with control cells. These results suggested that HOXA11 might function as antagonist of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Effect of HOXA11 on Wnt signaling down-stream target genes expression.

Figure 6: Effect of HOXA11 on Wnt signaling down-stream target genes expression. A, B. In OSRC and 786-O cells, over-expression of HOXA11 reduced c-myc and cyclinD1 expression, values are presented as mean±SD, p<0.05.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we found that HOXA11 was expressed broadly in human normal kidney tissues. However, it is frequently methylated and decreased in RCC tissues. Pharmacologic demethylation resulted in the demethylation and restoration of HOXA11 expression. We also found that HOXA11 functions as a tumor suppressor through antagonizing WNT/βcatenin signaling and inhibits RCC cells proliferation, migration and invasion. Our study demonstrated the role of HOXA11 in RCC and its regulation mechanism, and strongly supports the notion that HOXA11 is a tumor suppressor for multiple carcinomas.

HOX genes encode a DNA binding motif and regulate gene transcription [17]. However, the mechanisms of HOX genes in tumorigenesis have not been elucidated. HOXA11, one member of HOX genes, is often deleted in human cancers [18, 19]. The deletion of HOXA11 has been reported to cause a specific syndrome with skeletal defects and amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia [20]. Hypermethylation and low expression of HOXA11 was reported in different cancers, such as ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer, and it functions as a tumor suppressor [13, 21]. In breast cancer, HOXA11 has been proposed as a biomarker that could be used for early detection [22]. In ovarian cancer, the methylation of HOXA11 has been reported to be a poor prognostic marker [13]. Demthylation treatment with decitabine restored HOXA11 sensitivity to platinum in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in a Phase II clinical trial [21]. In addition, the down-regulation of HOXA11 contributes to the loss of tumor suppressive function in gastric cancer (GC). Cui et al. reported that HOXA11 was frequently methylated in human gastric cancer, ectopic expression of HOXA11 antagonized WNT/βcatenin signaling [22]. Also, in non-small lung cancer (NSCLC), hypermethylation of HOXA11 was reported to promote the progression of NSCLC by increasing the proliferation and migration [15]. These previous studies were associated with our results that HOXA11 was more likely to be methylated in RCC tissues than adjacent non-malignant renal tissues. Over-expression of HOXA11 inhibits RCC progression through suppressed WNT/βcatenin signaling. However, the detailed mechanism of HOXA11 tumor suppressive role needs more exploration.

It is currently believed that genetic and epigenetic events could interact to result in tumorigenesis [23]. To combine both genetic and epigenetic may provide a new viewpoint to further understand the pathogenesis of renal cell carcinoma. In addition to genetic changes, tumors can also be considered as an epigenetic disease, including DNA methylation, histone modification and RNA interference [24]. Recently, great attention has been aroused on the significance of DNA methylation for early diagnosis and prognosis prediction in RCC. DLEC1, a tumor suppressor in prostate, has been reported to be methylated in prostate. DLEC1 methylation was associated with higher PSA levels, higher Gleason score, and more advanced tumor stage, which could be a non-invasive epigenetic biomarker for prostate cancer [25]. DNA methylation includes hypermethylation of region rich in cytosine and guanine dinucleotides (CpG islands, CpGIs) within the promoter that results in the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (TSG) [26]. It has been reported that numerous genes (function as tumor suppressors) were hypermethylated in primary RCC, such as CDH1, APAF1, PCDH17, SFRP1, SFRP4 and TCF21. However, these genes are not methylated or rarely methylated in matched normal renal tissues [2729]. These genes participated in different aspects of tumorigenesis, including apoptosis, signal transduction, angiogenesis and tumor invasion. Another study reported that 55 genes of about 14,000 were methylated in ccRCC but not in normal controls in 38 ccRCCs and 9 matched normal kidney tissues [30]. Genome-scale methylation analysis is a potential tool to identify multiple gene profiles reflecting tumor behavior. Aberrant methylation of HOXA11 has been reported in several tumors [13, 21]. But the mechanism and roles involved in RCC have not been elucidated. Therefore, to further investigate the role of HOXA11 methylation in RCC development and identify its regulators are necessary. In our study, we found that methylation of HOXA11 was at a higher percentage in RCC tumors. Although no correlation was found between HOXA11 methylation and clinical features such as age, gender and nuclear grade, HOXA11 methylation was associated with TNM classification. It was known that tumor TNM stage was another independent predictor for overall survival. Thus, HOXA11 might be used as predictor for clinical survival.

In summary, our study identifies HOXA11 as a functional tumor suppressor and an important regulator of WNT/βcatenin signaling, with frequent epigenetic inactivation in RCC tumors. Our study further explained the role of HOXA11 in RCC tumorigenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Primary RCC samples

RCC samples and adjacent non-malignant renal tissues were included in this study. The samples were collected as fresh frozen tissue from Urology Department of Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China. All samples were collected with the patients’ informed consent. The application of these samples was approved by the hospital ethics committees. All cases were collected from primary surgical resection with no adjuvant therapy. The pathological diagnosis was confirmed at the Pathology Department, Institute of Urology, Peking University First Hospital. The classification of tumor histopathology was on the basis of 2002 AJCC TNM stage and a Fuhrman nuclear grade.

Cell culture and demethylation treatment

Seven RCC cell lines (786-O, A498, CAKI-1, CAKI-2, OSRC, 769P, KOTO-3) and two approximately “normal” kidney cell lines (HK-2 : “normal” human proximal tubular cell line; HEK-293 : human normal embryonic kidney cell line) were included in our study. The RCC cell lines were originally obtained from American Type Culture Collection, VA, USA. These cell lines were maintained in RPMI1640 or DMEM medium (Invitrogen, CA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 1% penicillin G and 1% streptomycin at 37 °C in humidified CO 2 (5%) incubator. RCC cells were split to a low density (30% confluence) for 12 h before drug treatment, then treated with 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (5-Aza; Sigma®, Hong Kong, China) at a concentration of 10 μM in the optional medium, which was exchanged every 24 h for 72 h, then RCC cells were further treated with 100 nmol/L histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA (trichostatin A) and 10 μM 5-Aza for additional 24 hours. In the end, RNA/DNA was isolated as described below.

DNA/RNA extraction and bisulfite modification

Total RNA of primary RCC tissues and cells was isolated by Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) according to the instruction. Genomic DNA of primary RCC tissues and cells were extracted according to the manufacturer’s instruction supplied by TIANamp Genomic DNA Kits (TIANGEN®, Shanghai, China). Then the DNA sodium bisulfite modification of genomic DNA was carried out with EpiTect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen, Hilded, Germany) as the instruction described.

Semiquantitative RT-PCR and real-time PCR

RNA quality and quantity analysis was evaluated using Agrarose gel electrophoresis with GoTaq® Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and spectrophotometry (ABI Prism 7500™ instrument, Applied Biosystems) with SYBR Green PCR Mix. First strand cDNA was synthesized with the TransScriptR First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen Biotech, Beijing). 1 μl cDNA was used for 12.5 μl PCR reaction. PCR primers and corresponding conditions were supplied in the Supplementary Table 1. β-actin was used as an internal control.

MSP and BGS

MSP (Methylation Specific PCR) reaction incorporated bisulfite-treated DNA, RNA enzyme-free H2O and GoTaq® Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in a final reaction volume of 12.5μl. MSP/USP products were analyzed using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The cycle condition and primers were presented in the Supplementary Table 1. The products of bisulfite-treated DNA were cloned into the pEASY-T5 zero vectors (TransGen Biotech Co. Ltd., Beijing), seven to eight clonies were randomly chosen and sequenced by BGS (Bisulfite Genomic Sequencing).

HOXA11 expression plasmid construction

The vector containing human full-length HOXA11 cDNA and the nagtive-control vector were obtained from YouBio company (Hunan, China). The sequence of the HOXA11 cDNA region was confirmed by the PCR and DNA sequencing. 786-O and OSRC cells were transfected with PLVX-IRES-ZS-HOXA11 and empty vector using LipofectamineR 3000 Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacture’s instruction.

Colony formation & cell proliferation detection

Cells were transfected with PLVX-IRES-ZS-HOXA11 and empty vector using Lip 3000. After 24 h of transfection, cells were seeded at a density of 400, 800, 1200 cells/well in 6-well plates to grow for 10-14 days with G418 (0.4 mg/ml). Then cells were fixed with 75% ethanol for 30 minutes, stained with 0.2% crystal violet (Beyotime, Nanjing, China) for 40 min and then colonies (>50 cells/clony) were counted. Cells were plated in 96-well plate at a density of 2000 cells/well, and cell proliferation ability was measured at 0, 24, 48, 72 h using CCK-8 assay (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). Absorbance was at a wavelength of 450 nm.

Wound-healing and transwell assay

RCC cells were grown to confluent monolayers on 6-well plates and carefully wounded using sterile tips, then washed twice with fresh medium. After incubation for 12 and 24 h, the wound images were taken with a microscope, then wound gap widths were measured. For Transwell assay, RCC cells were added to the upper chamber with a 24-well Transwell inserts (8μm pore filters, BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) at a density of 2×104 cells/chamber without serum. Then, medium with 10% FBS was placed in the lower well and incubated overnight followed by removal of cells remained in on the top chamber with cotton swabs. Finally, cells penetrated to the lower membrane surface were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with crystal violet and counted in three independent high-power fields (x200). The experiments were performed in triplicate.

Annexin V apoptosis assay

The RCC cells transfected with HOXA11- expressing vectors or empty vectors were harvested after transfected for 48 h. Then the cells were stained with Annexin V (FITC-conjugated) and 7-AAD (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) and then sorted by Becton Dickinson LSRII (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Western –blot analysis

Cells were plated 24 h before transfection, cells were harvested 48 h after transfection and total protein was extracted by KeyGEN BioTECH protein extraction kit (KGP1100). For western-blot analysis, protein were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking with 5% fat-free milk for three hours at room temperature, Blots were immunostained with primary antibodies and secondary antibodies respectively. The antibodies were as follows: Caspase 8 (D35G2); Caspase 9 (9502); cleaved-parb (5625); HOXA11 (Abcam, England); GAPDH (Transgen BIOTECH, China); MMP9 (3852S, CST); β-catenin (8480P, CST); Cyclin-D1 (2926P, CST); C-myc (5605P, CST).

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD) and SAS 9.0 software was employed. The statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher’s exact test, Student’s t test and Chi-square test. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 81272290, No.81572510, No.81370858 and No.81570683), Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (No.Z131107002213130) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No.7142161).

Jie Jin and Qian Zhang conceived and designed the experiments. Lu Wang performed the experiment and drafted the original manuscript. Yun Cui and Lian Zhang participated in the collection and analysis of data. Yu Fan, Jindong Sheng, Yang Yang, Guanyu Kuang assisted in the tumor specimen acquisition.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011; 61:69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107.

2. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Patard JJ, Mulders PF, Sinescu IC, European Association of Urology Guideline G. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol. 2010; 58:398-406. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.032.

3. Hung RJ, Moore L, Boffetta P, Feng BJ, Toro JR, Rothman N, Zaridze D, Navratilova M, Bencko V, Janout V, Kollarova H, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Mates D, et al. Family history and the risk of kidney cancer: a multicenter case-control study in Central Europe. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16:1287-90. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0963.

4. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature. 2013; 499:43-9. doi: 10.1038/nature12222.

5. Navai N, Wood CG. Environmental and modifiable risk factors in renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2012; 30:220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.10.001.

6. Slater AA, Alokail M, Gentle D, Yao M, Kovacs G, Maher ER, Latif F. DNA methylation profiling distinguishes histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Epigenetics. 2013; 8:252-67. doi: 10.4161/epi.23817.

7. Gehring WJ, Hiromi Y. Homeotic genes and the homeobox. Annu Rev Genet. 1986; 20:147-73. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.20.120186.001051.

8. Patterson LT, Pembaur M, Potter SS. Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 regulate branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud in the developing kidney. Development. 2001; 128:2153-61.

9. Krumlauf R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell. 1994; 78:191-201.

10. Rauch T, Wang Z, Zhang X, Zhong X, Wu X, Lau SK, Kernstine KH, Riggs AD, Pfeifer GP. Homeobox gene methylation in lung cancer studied by genome-wide analysis with a microarray-based methylated CpG island recovery assay. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104:5527-32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701059104.

11. Gross S, Krause Y, Wuelling M, Vortkamp A. Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 regulate chondrocyte differentiation upstream of Runx2 and Shox2 in mice. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e43553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043553.

12. Cheng W, Liu J, Yoshida H, Rosen D, Naora H. Lineage infidelity of epithelial ovarian cancers is controlled by HOX genes that specify regional identity in the reproductive tract. Nat Med. 2005; 11:531-7. doi: 10.1038/nm1230.

13. Fiegl H, Windbichler G, Mueller-Holzner E, Goebel G, Lechner M, Jacobs IJ, Widschwendter M. HOXA11 DNA methylation--a novel prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008; 123:725-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23563.

14. Whitcomb BP, Mutch DG, Herzog TJ, Rader JS, Gibb RK, Goodfellow PJ. Frequent HOXA11 and THBS2 promoter methylation, and a methylator phenotype in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003; 9:2277-87.

15. Hwang JA, Lee BB, Kim Y, Park SE, Heo K, Hong SH, Kim YH, Han J, Shim YM, Lee YS, Kim DH. HOXA11 hypermethylation is associated with progression of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2013; 4:2317-25. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1464.

16. Apostolidou S, Hadwin R, Burnell M, Jones A, Baff D, Pyndiah N, Mould T, Jacobs IJ, Beddows S, Kocjan G, Widschwendter M. DNA methylation analysis in liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2009; 125:2995-3002. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24745.

17. Qian YQ, Billeter M, Otting G, Muller M, Gehring WJ, Wuthrich K. The structure of the Antennapedia homeodomain determined by NMR spectroscopy in solution: comparison with prokaryotic repressors. Cell. 1989; 59:573-80.

18. Sander S, Bullinger L, Leupolt E, Benner A, Kienle D, Katzenberger T, Kalla J, Ott G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Barth TF, Moller P, Lichter P, Dohner H, et al. Genomic aberrations in mantle cell lymphoma detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Incidence and clinicopathological correlations. Haematologica. 2008; 93:680-7. doi: 10.3324/haematol.12330.

19. Nucci MR, Harburger D, Koontz J, Dal Cin P, Sklar J. Molecular analysis of the JAZF1-JJAZ1 gene fusion by RT-PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization in endometrial stromal neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007; 31:65-70. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213327.86992.d1.

20. Fryssira H, Makrythanasis P, Kattamis A, Stokidis K, Menten B, Kosaki K, Willems P, Kanavakis E. Severe Developmental Delay in a Patient with 7p21.1-p14.3 Microdeletion Spanning the TWIST Gene and the HOXA Gene Cluster. Mol Syndromol. 2011; 2:45-9. doi: 000334313.

21. Tommasi S, Karm DL, Wu X, Yen Y, Pfeifer GP. Methylation of homeobox genes is a frequent and early epigenetic event in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2009; 11:R14. doi: 10.1186/bcr2233.

22. Cui Y, Gao D, Linghu E, Zhan Q, Chen R, Brock MV, Herman JG, Guo M. Epigenetic changes and functional study of HOXA11 in human gastric cancer. Epigenomics. 2015; 7:201-13. doi: 10.2217/epi.14.92.

23. Kanwal R, Gupta S. Epigenetic modifications in cancer. Clin Genet. 2012; 81:303-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01809.x.

24. Waldmann T, Schneider R. Targeting histone modifications—epigenetics in cancer. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013; 25:184-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.01.001.

25. Zhang L, Zhang Q, Li L, Wang Z, Ying J, Fan Y, He Q, Lv T, Han W, Li J, Yang Y, Xu B, Wang L, et al. DLEC1, a 3p tumor suppressor, represses NF-kappaB signaling and is methylated in prostate cancer. J Mol Med (Berl). 2015; 93:691-701. doi: 10.1007/s00109-015-1255-5.

26. Xing T, He H. Epigenomics of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: mechanisms and potential use in molecular pathology. Chin J Cancer Res. 2016; 28:80-91. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.02.09.

27. Rydzanicz M, Wrzesinski T, Bluyssen HA, Wesoly J. Genomics and epigenomics of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: recent developments and potential applications. Cancer Lett. 2013; 341:111-26. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.08.006.

28. Costa VL, Henrique R, Danielsen SA, Eknaes M, Patricio P, Morais A, Oliveira J, Lothe RA, Teixeira MR, Lind GE, Jeronimo C. TCF21 and PCDH17 methylation: An innovative panel of biomarkers for a simultaneous detection of urological cancers. Epigenetics. 2011; 6:1120-30. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.9.16376.

29. Morris MR, Maher ER. Epigenetics of renal cell carcinoma: the path towards new diagnostics and therapeutics. Genome Med. 2010; 2:59. doi: 10.1186/gm180.

30. Ricketts CJ, Morris MR, Gentle D, Brown M, Wake N, Woodward ER, Clarke N, Latif F, Maher ER. Genome-wide CpG island methylation analysis implicates novel genes in the pathogenesis of renal cell carcinoma. Epigenetics. 2012; 7:278-90. doi: 10.4161/epi.7.3.19103.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 15668