Research Papers:

Predictive parameters for selection of electronic tissue compensation radiotherapy in early-stage breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery

Yanbo Song, Miao Zhang, Lu Gan, Xiaopin Chen, Tao Zhang, Ning J. Yue, Sharad Goyal, Bruce Haffty and Guosheng Ren _

PDF  |  HTML  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2016; 7:32835-32845. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9054

Metrics: PDF 2371 views  |   HTML 1932 views  |   ?  


Yanbo Song1, Miao Zhang2, Lu Gan1, Xiaopin Chen1, Tao Zhang1, Ning J. Yue2, Sharad Goyal2, Bruce Haffty2, Guosheng Ren1,3

1Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

2Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

3Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

Correspondence to:

Guosheng Ren, email: [email protected]

Keywords: breast cancer, radiotherapy, 3DCRT, electronic tissue compensation, anatomic parameter

Received: February 09, 2016     Accepted: April 09, 2016     Published: April 27, 2016


Electronic tissue compensation (eComp) is an external beam planning technique allowing user to manually generate dynamic beam fluence to produce more uniform or modulated dose distribution. In this study, we compared the effectiveness between conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and eComp for whole breast irradiation. 3DCRT and eComp planning techniques were used to generate treatment plans for 60 whole breast patients, respectively. The planning goal was to cover 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) with 95% of the prescription dose while minimizing doses to lung, heart, and skin. Comparing to 3DCRT plans, on the average, eComp treatment planning process was about 7 minutes longer, but resulted in lower lung V20Gy, lower mean skin dose, with similar heart dose. The benefits were more pronounced for larger breast patients. Statistical analyses were performed between critical organ doses and patient anatomic features, i.e., central lung distance (CLD), maximal heart distance (MHD), maximal heart length (MHL) and breast separation (BS) to explore any correlations and planning method selection. It was found that to keep the lung V20Gy lower than 20% and mean skin dose lower than 85% of the prescription dose, eComp was the preferred method for patients with more than 2.3 cm CLD or larger than 22.5 cm BS. The study results may be useful in providing a handy criterion in clinical practice allowing us to easily choose between different planning techniques to satisfy the planning goal with minimal increase in complexity and cost.

Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 9054