First description of a sporadic breast cancer in a woman with BRCA1 germline mutation
Metrics: PDF 1333 views | HTML 2337 views | ?
Elsa Curtit1,2,3,4,9, Vanessa Benhamo5, Nadège Gruel6,7, Tatiana Popova6, Elodie Manie6, Paul Cottu1, Odette Mariani8, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet8, Xavier Pivot2,3,4, Marc-Henri Stern6, Anne Vincent-Salomon5,8
1Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 75248 Paris, France
2Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, 25000 Besançon, France
3University of Franche-Comté, Medical Department, 25000 Besançon, France
4INSERM U1098, Medical Oncology Department, 25000 Besançon, France
5Université Paris Sciences Lettres, Medical Department, INSERM U934, Institut Curie, 75248 Paris, France
6Université Paris Sciences Lettres, Medical Department, INSERM U830, Institut Curie, 75248 Paris, France
7Department of Translational Research, Institut Curie, 75248 Paris, France
8Department of Pathology, Genetics and Immunology, Institut Curie, 75248 Paris, France
9Present affiliations: 2–4; affiliation when working on this case: 1
Elsa Curtit, e-mail: [email protected]
Keywords: breast cancer, BRCA1, HER2, sequencing
Received: June 22, 2015 Accepted: September 17, 2015 Published: September 29, 2015
We describe the case of a woman carrying a germline pathogenic BRCA1 mutation diagnosed with a breast cancer overexpressing HER2. Clinical presentation of the tumor, HER2-positivity, genomic profile and loss of the mutated BRCA1 allele in tumor evidence that BRCA1 is not inactivated in this breast cancer. It represents the first biological demonstration for the existence of a sporadic HER2-positive breast cancer independent from BRCA loss of function in a woman carrier of a deleterious BRCA1 mutation. In a context where targeted therapies based on BRCA loss of function in the tumor are developed, such case could have direct implications.
Microarray-based expression profiling studies have refined our comprehension of breast cancer biology and have triggered a paradigm in breast cancer taxonomy leading to the classification of breast cancers in at least five intrinsic subgroups . HER2-positive breast cancers and basal-like breast cancers constitute two of these subgroups.
Basal-like breast carcinomas belong to the triple-negative (TN) breast cancers family, with no expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and no HER2 overexpression (amplification). Initially, basal-like breast cancers were named after the expression of genes found in the myoepithelial / basal cells, located at the basal part of the mammary gland of the human breast, such as cytokeratins 5, 6, 14, 17 and an absence of ESR1 gene expression (ER negative) .
Germline mutations in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 (17q21) are one of the main known causes of hereditary early onset breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Germline mutations BRCA1 and BRCA2 explain around 20% of familial breast cancer [3–5]. Other rare variants in high penetrance genes such as PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, NBN, TP53, CDH1, PTEN, STK11 and NF1  confer moderate or high risk of developing breast cancer. BRCA1 gene acts as tumor suppressor and plays a role in maintenance of genomic stability through DNA damage recognition and repair (Figure 1). BRCA1 mutations are inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion with variable penetrance. BRCA1-related breast cancers follow the “two-hits hypothesis”: it implies that both BRCA-1 alleles are altered in the tumor. The “1st hit” is constituted by the germline mutation, which alters one allele of the BRCA1 gene. In familial BRCA cancers, the constitutional mutation is the first event and brings a loss of heterozygosity. The “2nd hit” appears in tumor cells with the loss of the second allele, commonly by a deletion. Thus, there is a loss of the expression of the BRCA1 wild type protein. BRCA1 encodes a protein with diverse biological functions playing pivotal roles in DNA repair (especially by homologous recombination), cell-cycle checkpoints, ubiquitylation and transcriptional regulation [7, 8]. Homologous recombination deficiency leads to defective double-strand break repair and genomic instability. A specific phenotype reflecting double-strand break repair pathway deficiency was described [7, 9] both in familial and in sporadic breast cancers. PARP inhibitors are new anti-cancer agents, which inhibit the enzyme poly ADP ribose polymerase involved in repairing single-strand breaks. The use of PARP inhibition in tumors with BRCA deficiency, based on the concept of synthetic lethality, induces cell death through the accumulation of DNA alterations in cells with multiple DNA repair deficits . Contrary to non-hereditary breast cancers, tumors arising in women carrying a germline BRCA1 mutation present preferentially with a basal-like subtype and thus in most cases a triple negative phenotype in ~85% of the cases [11–13].
Figure 1: BRCA1 function and consequences of BRCA1 germline mutation in somatic cells and breast cancer cells. A. BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene encodes a protein with diverse biological functions playing pivotal roles in DNA repair, cell-cycle checkpoints, ubiquitylation and transcriptional regulation. B. In patients with BRCA1 germline mutation, one allele of the gene is mutated and the second wild type allele encodes a BRCA1 functional protein. Germline biallelic mutations in BRCA1 are responsible for Fanconi anemia. C. In breast cancer cells with BRCA1 germline mutation, one allele of the gene is mutated and the other is lost (commonly by a deletion), which is responsible for a loss of heterozygosity. The lack of BRCA1 functional protein leads to deficient DNA repair and genomic instability conferring a BRCAness phenotype. The inhibition of PARP in these cells, based on the concept of synthetic lethality, majors genomic instability and leads to cell death.
HER2-positive breast cancers are mostly characterized by an amplification of the HER2 gene (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, located at 17q12) associated with gene overexpression and consequently high abundance of HER2 protein. HER2 is involved in growth, differentiation, and cell survival. Patients with HER2-positive tumors have a spontaneous poorer prognosis than other subtypes with significantly shortened disease-free survival and overall survival . The advent of trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting specifically the HER2 extracellular domain, has revolutionized the natural history and management of HER2-positive breast cancers [14–16].
The data describing HER2-positive breast cancers occurring in women carrying a germline BRCA mutation are rather poor and evidence rarity of such phenotype [17–22]. We report here the case of a 40 year-old woman carrying a pathogenic germline BRCA1 mutation and diagnosed with a HER2-positive breast cancer. Two scenarii might be possible to explain the case: (1) it is sporadic HER2-positive breast cancer developed in a patient with BRCA1 germline mutation and not causally linked to the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 loss-of-function and in such case we could introduce the notion of incidental genomic event, or (2) it is a rare subgroup of breast cancers occurring in patients carrying BRCA1 germline mutation in which BRCA1 loss of function and HER2 overexpression cooperate in the oncogenesis of the tumor. A series of molecular analyses including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), sequencing and SNP-array profiling were performed to characterize this tumor.
Presentation of the case
A 40-year-old premenopausal woman was referred to Institut Curie Medical Oncology Department with a newly diagnosed breast carcinoma. Approximately 2 months earlier, she had noted a lump in her right breast. Digital mammography showed heterogeneously dense breast parenchyma with no mass, architectural distortion or suspicious microcalcifications. Ultrasonography of the breast confirmed the presence of a solid hypoechogenic mass in the right breast, with irregular margins, measuring 20 × 15 mm. A core biopsy was performed and revealed a poorly differentiated invasive ductal carcinoma.
On initial physical examination, breasts were symmetric and soft. A 20 mm nodule was palpated in the right lower outer quadrant. The nipples and skin were normal, with no erosions or inflammatory lesions. No palpable lymph nodes were found. The left breast and the remainder of the examination were unremarkable. The results of routine hematologic and blood chemical tests were normal. A computed tomography of the chest, abdomen and pelvis and an isotopic bone scan showed no evidence of metastatic lesions.
The patient had no other medical condition and her medical history was restricted to an appendectomy at 16-year-old. Her mother and her maternal grandmother had ovarian cancer at the age of 50 and 57 respectively.
The patient underwent breast-conserving surgery of the right breast (Figure 2A) with concomitant excision of 2 sentinel nodes and 10 non-sentinel axillary nodes. Microscopic analysis of the tumor revealed an infiltrating ductal carcinoma poorly differentiated (Figure 2B), with high mitotic index, 20 mm in greatest dimension, Elston and Ellis grade was scored at 3/3. Foci of ductal carcinoma in situ were present in the vicinity of the main mass. Surgical margins were clear. On immunohistochemical stainings, the tumor was negative for ER (Figure 2C) and PR (Figure 2D). The tumor showed strong overexpression of HER2 (3+) revealed by a membrane labeling on immunohistochemical staining (Figure 3A) . CK5/6 and CK14 were not expressed. Lymphatic invasion was seen in 3 of 12 lymph nodes (Figure 2E) with tumor effraction of the capsule in one node.
Figure 2: Histopathological features of the breast excision specimen. A. Gross aspect of the breast surgical excision specimen B. Hematein-eosin saffron staining from the primary breast tumor C. Estrogen receptor immunostaining of the primary tumor. Less than 10% of positive nuclei D. Progesterone receptor immunostaining of the primary tumor. No positive nuclei E. Haematoxylin-eosin-saffron staining tissue section from axillary lymph node metastasis.
Figure 3: Confirmation of ERBB2 / HER2 amplification and overexpression. A. Strong immunostaining (CB11 antibody) of HER2 membrane protein B. FISH with ERBB2 probe on a tissue section of the invasive breast carcinoma. Ratio ERBB2/chromosome 17 centromeres = 3.3, confirming ERBB2 amplification C. SNP6.0 analysis with GAP 24 focused on the chromosome 17q1.2 locus showing ERBB2 amplification.
According to our therapy guidelines, the patient received 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 3 cycles of 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2), epirubicin (100 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) and 3 cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m2). Trastuzumab was started concomitantly with docetaxel at a loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks for one year. The patient received radiation therapy to the chest wall and regional lymph nodes, followed by an additional radiation boost to the mastectomy incision to a total dose of 60 Gy with a standard fractionation schedule.
The patient's young age and familial history of ovarian cancer (Figure 4A) triggered the testing for mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. She was found to carry a monoallelic c.3417delT;p.Ser1139ArgfsX16 BRCA1 mutation (Figure 4B1) and no BRCA2 mutation. The deletion alters the reading frame of the gene with occurrence of a codon, which encodes for a stop, 16 codons after the mutation (fsX16) and truncates the protein.
Figure 4: BRCA1 analyses and BRCAness. A. Familial pedigree: Circles indicate female family members, squares male family members, slashes deceased family members, and the diamond multiple persons (exact number [n] unknown). Red circle indicates the proband. BC: breast cancer; OC: ovarian cancer; 19— : year of birth; —yo: age of death (year-old). B. Classic Sanger sequencing of BRCA1 gene in the white blood cells (1) and in the tumor (2). At the tumor level the mutation in BRCA1 was also detected (wild type allele (T) and mutated allele (A)), however, at the lower allelic proportion compared to the germline. Taking into account the 40–50% of tumor cells within the sample, it is compatible with the loss of mutated allele in the tumor sample. C. SNP6.0 analysis with GAP assessing BRCAness of the tumor.
She opted for a prophylactic oophorectomy and chose to have breast surveillance follow up with regular mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. The oophorectomy sample material was without any pathologic signs. Eight years after the diagnosis of breast cancer, the patient is alive with no recurrence of the disease.
Confirmation of HER2 amplification and overexpression
FISH analysis highlighted the presence of 10 signals of the HER2 (ERBB2) probe and three centromeres of chromosome 17 with a ratio ERBB2/centromeres = 3.3 (Figure 3B). These data confirmed that HER2 was amplified in the tumor. SNP6.0 profile focused on HER2 also concluded amplification of the locus with copy number >8 (copy number around centromere of chromosome 17 is 2) (Figure 3C).
At the tumor level the mutation in BRCA1 was also detected, however, at the lower allelic proportion compared to the germline (Figure 4B2). The BRCA1 gene was not in an amplified region. Copy number and allelic status of BRCA1 locus inferred from SNP-arrays were 2 copies and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) (Supplementary Figure S1). Taking into account relatively low percentage of tumor cells within the sample (~40–50%) the sequencing data are compatible with the loss of mutated allele in the tumor sample.
Tumor genomic profile analysis
Mining SNP-array tumor genomic profile by the GAP method allowed recognition of absolute copy number and allelic content profiles . Normal contamination was estimated as ~50%; DNA index inferred from copy number profile was equal to 1.55, implying over-diploid or near-tetraploid DNA content (Figure 4C). According to several studies, the high level of genomic structural alterations is characteristic of BRCA1 or BRCA2 inactivation (so called BRCAness) in triple-negative breast and serous ovarian carcinomas [25–27]. We assessed BRCAness of a tumor based on the number of large-scale inter-chromosomal breakpoints (designated as Large-scale State Transitions, LSTs) in the annotated genomic profile. The number of LSTs in the tumor was found to be 16, which is lower than a cut-off for BRCAness (20 LSTs for tumors with DNA index ≥ 1.3) . Thus tumor genomic profile evidences intact functioning of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and no homologous recombination defect.
TP53 was not mutated (in hotspot exons 5 to 9). PTEN was also normal according to SNP-array profile (no gain, no loss and no LOH).
To conclude, clinical presentation of the tumor, proven HER2-positivity, absence of TP53 mutation, genomic profile without characteristic pattern of BRCA1 inactivated tumors (no genomic BRCAness) and loss of the mutated BRCA1 allele in tumor evidence that the case represented a HER2-positive breast cancer without BRCA1 inactivation.
Well-established molecular subtyping of sporadic and hereditary breast tumors allowed consideration of rare cases with unusual genotype/phenotype co-occurrence. In the present case report we considered HER2-positive breast tumor occurred in the BRCA1 germline mutated context. We addressed the question whether the patient with constitutive BRCA1 mutation diagnosed with HER2-positive carcinoma at young age have developed a carcinoma driven by BRCA1.
What is interesting about the presented case is the existence of a LOH in BRCA1 locus associated with the loss of the mutated allele in the tumor. At least 3 scenarii can be elaborated: 1/BRCA1 mutation do not drive the oncogenesis of the tumor hence such a mutation would be considered as a “genetic incidentalom”. There would be no linkage between BRCA1 mutation and the tumor and the tumor can be considered as a sporadic tumor. 2/ BRCA1 mutation triggers the initiation of the tumor but then does not control the tumor, this last been autonomous. Therefore it would be comparable to a “launch and forget” process. The lost of the mutated allele is fortuitous, due to genomic instability. 3/BRCA1 mutation does initiate the tumor and the apparition of mutations triggers a cascade of reparatory mechanisms. The loss of the mutated allele illustrates an attempt of DNA repair process with no effect on the tumor development.
Besides the study of BRCA1 alleles in the tumor, different patterns characterizing BRCA1-driven tumors have been accessed. Even though BRCA1 breast carcinomas harbor in the majority of the cases a TN phenotype (85% of the cases), luminal (ER-positive) or HER2-positive phenotypes also have been reported [22, 28]. In this case report, HER2 is amplified with copy number >8. Grusho et al analyzed in depth the number of HER2 copies per nuclei compared to the number of centromeres of chromosome 17 . None of the BRCA1 tumors demonstrated a high level of HER2 amplification. The level of amplification ranged around 2.4 ± 0.4. However, the co-existence of BRCA1 constitutive mutation and HER2 (even moderate) amplification have never been checked for the second genomic event required for the development of a hereditary tumor: BRCA1 wild type allele inactivation. Most frequently, the wild-type allele inactivation happen through LOH (loss of chromosome or chromosome part containing the gene locus) and rarely through deleterious somatic mutation . Tumor genomic profile does not display BRCAness, i.e. does not resemble the genomic profiles of TN breast tumors with homologous recombination deficiency as measured by the number of large-scale chromosomal breakpoints (LSTs) . Moreover, there is no TP53 mutation detected while the BRCA1 breast carcinomas demonstrate a TP53 mutation in almost all cases . All these data reinforced our first hypothesis, suggesting a sporadic HER2-positive breast cancer with no hallmarks of BRCA1-driven tumor in a woman with BRCA1 germline mutation.
Currently, new therapies are developed to target BRCA1-driven tumors. Based on the concept of synthetic lethality, PARP-inhibitors are tested in phase III trials (NCT02163694, NCT01945775, NCT02000622, NCT01905592) in women with advanced breast cancer and BRCA germline mutation. This case could explain the lack of response to PARP inhibitors in some of these patients. It emphasizes the importance of the genomic and molecular characterization of tumors. In women with BRCA1 germline mutation, the incidence of “sporadic” breast cancer, with an oncogenesis independent from BRCA loss of function, is unknown but this case proves that such tumors do exist and must be taken into account when developing targeted therapies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Histopathology and immunohistochemistry
Pathological examination of the specimen was performed on haematoxylin–eosin–saffron-stained tissue-sections. Expression of ER, PR, HER2, E-cadherin, cytokeratins 5, 6, 14, 8, 18 was assessed as previously described . Internal and external controls for each antibody were included in the experiments.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis
FISH experiments were carried out using the HER2/neu gene amplification detection system, following the instructions given by the supplier. A dual color FISH of ERBB2 and centromere of chromosome 17 (Path-Vysion HER-2 kit, Vysis) was performed.
Classical Sanger sequencings were performed for TP53 exons 4 to 10. Each PCR was performed on 30 ng of tumor DNA according to Manie et al . Amplification and bi-directionally sequencing was performed using Big Dye Terminator chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with an ABI PRISM 3700 DNA Analyzer. Primer sequences are available on request.
SNP-array profiling was performed using the chip Affymetrix SNP6.0 according to the manufacturer's protocol (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Briefly, 250 ng of gDNA were digested with both Nsp and Sty restriction enzymes in independent parallel reactions, ligated to the adaptors, and amplified by PCR using a universal primer. After purification of PCR products with SNP Clean magnetic beads (Agencourt Biosciences, Beverly MA), amplicons were quantified, fragmented, labeled, and hybridized to SNP6.0 arrays.
Analysis of genomic alterations profile
After normalization using Genotyping Console (GenomeWideSNP_6. hapmap270.na31.r1.a5) provided by Affymetrix (GTC3.0.1) SNP6 arrays were processed using the Genome Alteration Print (GAP) method to obtain absolute copy number profiles (24). Genomic BRCAness was evaluated based on the number of Large-scale State Transitions (LST) in tumor genomic profile as previously described (27). Briefly, an LST was defined as a chromosomal break (change in copy number or major allele counts) between adjacent regions of at least 10MB obtained after smoothing and filtering small-scale copy number variation (less than 3 Mb). Tumor profile is “BRCA1-like” if the number of LSTs is equal or larger than 15 (ploidy 2, near-diploid tumors) or 20 (ploidy 4, near-tetraploid tumors). Tumor ploidy was set to 2, if DNA index < 1.3, or 4 if DNA index ≥ 1.3; DNA index is average copy number calculated for tumor genome (27).
BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing
DNA was extracted from a blood sample according to standard procedures . The mutation screening of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 was performed by using the EMMA method with ad hoc primers . The PCR product showing an abnormal EMMA profile was sequenced in both directions using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing V1.1 Ready Reaction kit (Applied Biosystems) followed by electrophoresis in an ABI PRISM 3130XL. BRCA1 nucleotide position was numbered on the basis of the coding sequence NM_007294.2. The identified mutation was confirmed on a second DNA sample extracted from a buccal swab.
The BRCA1 mutation was confirmed in the tumor DNA by direct sequencing (see above) using a couple of specific primers surrounding the mutation c.3417delT; p.Ser1139ArgfsX16 (primer sequence available on request).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUNDING
To the patient who authorized research on her breast specimen, to Pierre Lebahar who provides guidance on writing this case report.
No specific funding for this work.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Authors have no conflict of interest in link with the contents of the manuscript.
– E Curtit, N Gruel, V Benhamo, T Popova, P Cottu have no conflict of interest
– D Stoppa–Lyonnet receives compensation as a consultant for Astra-Zeneca
– X Pivot receives honorarium from Roche, GSK, TEVA, Pierre Fabre and Amgen
– A Vincent-Salomon receives payment from Roche for speaking at conferences
Elsa Curtit, Nadège Gruel, Vanessa Benhamo, Tatiana Popova, Paul Cottu, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Xavier Pivot, Anne Vincent-Salomon conceived analyses and analyzed data. Nadège Gruel, Vanessa Benhamo, Anne Vincent-Salomon, carried out experiments. Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet diagnosed the breast cancer predisposition and identified the BRCA1 mutation. Elsa Curtit and Paul Cottu reviewed clinical data. All authors were involved in writing the paper and had final approval of the submitted version.
1. Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Thorsen T, Quist H, Matese JC, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98:10869–10874.
2. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:1938–1948.
3. Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, Liu Q, Cochran C, Bennett LM, Ding WA. Strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science. 1994; 266:66–71.
4. Wooster R, Neuhausen SL, Mangion J, Quirk Y, Ford D, Collins N, Nguyen K, Seal S, Tran T, Averill D. Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12–13. Science. 1994; 265:2088–2090.
5. Mavaddat N, Antoniou AC, Easton DF, Garcia-Closas M. Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 2010; 4:174–191.
6. Easton DF, Pharoah PDP, Antoniou AC, Tischkowitz M, Tavtigian SV, Nathanson KL, Devilee P, Meindl A, Couch FJ, Southey M, Goldgar DE, Evans DGR, Chenevix-Trench G, et al. Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:2243–2257.
7. Narod SA, Foulkes WD. BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004; 4:665–676.
8. Mullan PB, Quinn JE, Harkin DP. The role of BRCA1 in transcriptional regulation and cell cycle control. Oncogene. 2006; 25:5854–5863.
9. Turner N, Tutt A, Ashworth A. Hallmarks of “BRCAness” in sporadic cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004; 4:814–819.
10. Sonnenblick A, de Azambuja E, Azim HA, Piccart M. An update on PARP inhibitors-moving to the adjuvant setting. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015; 12:27–41.
11. Reis-Filho JS, Pusztai L. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction. Lancet. 2011; 378:1812–1823.
12. Metzger-Filho O, Tutt A, de Azambuja E, Saini KS, Viale G, Loi S, Bradbury I, Bliss JM, Azim HA Jr, Ellis P, Di Leo A, Baselga J, Sotiriou C, Piccart-Gebhart M. Dissecting the heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30:1879–1887.
13. Foulkes WD, Stefansson IM, Chappuis PO, Bégin LR, Goffin JR, Wong N, Trudel M, Akslen LA. Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95:1482–1485.
14. Dawood S, Broglio K, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH. Prognosis of women with metastatic breast cancer by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment: an institutional-based review. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28:92–98.
15. Hortobagyi GN. Trastuzumab in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353:1734–1736.
16. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012; 490:61–70.
17. Palacios J, Honrado E, Cigudosa JC, Benitez J. ERBB2 and MYC alterations in BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005; 42:204–205.
18. Adem C, Soderberg CL, Hafner K, Reynolds C, Slezak JM, Sinclair CS, Sellers TA, Schaid DJ, Couch F, Hartmann LC, Jenkins RB. ERBB2, TBX2, RPS6KB1, and MYC alterations in breast tissues of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2004; 41:1–11.
19. Espinosa AB, Tabernero MD, García-Macías MC, Primo D, Bernal AG, Cruz JJ, Ramos M, Font de Mora J, Gómez Alonso A, Orfao A. Her-2/neu Gene Amplification in Familial vs Sporadic Breast Cancer; Impact on the Behavior of the Disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003; 120:917–927.
20. Quenneville LA, Phillips KA, Ozcelik H, Parkes RK, Knight JA, Goodwin PJ, Andrulis IL, O’Malley FP. HER-2/neu status and tumor morphology of invasive breast carcinomas in Ashkenazi women with known BRCA1 mutation status in the Ontario Familial Breast Cancer Registry. Cancer. 2002; 95:2068–2075.
21. Palacios J, Honrado E, Osorio A, Cazorla A, Sarrió D, Barroso A, Rodríguez S, Cigudosa JC, Diez O, Alonso C, Lerma E, Sánchez L, Rivas C, Benítez J. Immunohistochemical characteristics defined by tissue microarray of hereditary breast cancer not attributable to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations differences from breast carcinomas arising in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Clin Cancer Res. 2003; 9:3606–3614.
22. Grushko TA, Blackwood MA, Schumm PL, Hagos FG, Adeyanju MO, Feldman MD, Sanders MO, Weber BL, Olopade OI. Molecular-cytogenetic analysis of HER-2/neu gene in BRCA1-associated breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2002; 62:1481–1488.
23. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Mangu PB, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology; College of American Pathologists. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:3997–4013.
24. Popova T, Manié E, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Rigaill G, Barillot E, Stern MH. Genome Alteration Print (GAP): a tool to visualize and mine complex cancer genomic profiles obtained by SNP arrays. Genome Biol. 2009; 10:R128.
25. Abkevich V, Timms KM, Hennessy BT, Potter J, Carey MS, Meyer LA, Smith-McCune K, Broaddus R, Lu KH, Chen J, Tran TV, Williams D, Iliev D, et al. Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107:1776–1782.
26. Birkbak NJ, Wang ZC, Kim JY, Eklund AC, Li Q, Tian R, Bowman-Colin C, Li Y, Greene-Colozzi A, Iglehart JD, Tung N, Ryan PD, Garber JE, et al. Telomeric allelic imbalance indicates defective DNA repair and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Cancer Discov. 2012; 2:366–375.
27. Popova T, Manié E, Rieunier G, Caux-Moncoutier V, Tirapo C, Dubois T, Delattre O, Sigal-Zafrani B, Bollet M, Longy M, Houdayer C, Sastre-Garau X, Vincent-Salomon A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Stern MH. Ploidy and Large-Scale Genomic Instability Consistently Identify Basal-like Breast Carcinomas with BRCA1/2 Inactivation. Cancer Res. 2012; 72:5454–5462.
28. Lee E, McKean-Cowdin R, Ma H, Spicer DV, Van Den Berg D, Bernstein L, Ursin G. Characteristics of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Patients With a BRCA1 Mutation: Results From a Population-Based Study of Young Women. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:4373–4380.
29. Manié E, Vincent-Salomon A, Lehmann-Che J, Pierron G, Turpin E, Warcoin M, Gruel N, Lebigot I, Sastre-Garau X, Lidereau R, Remenieras A, Feunteun J, Delattre O, de Thé H, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Stern MH. High frequency of TP53 mutation in BRCA1 and sporadic basal-like carcinomas but not in BRCA1 luminal breast tumors. Cancer Res. 2009; 69:663–671.
30. Laé M, Fréneaux P, Sastre-Garau X, Chouchane O, Sigal-Zafrani B, Vincent-Salomon A. Secretory breast carcinomas with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene belong to the basal-like carcinoma spectrum. Mod Pathol. 2008; 22:291–298.
31. Houdayer C, Caux-Moncoutier V, Krieger S, Barrois M, Bonnet F, Bourdon V, Bronner M, Buisson M, Coulet F, Gaildrat P, Lefol C, Léone M, Mazoyer S, et al. Guidelines for splicing analysis in molecular diagnosis derived from a set of 327 combined in silico/in vitro studies on BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Hum Mutat. 2012; 33:1228–1238.
32. Caux-Moncoutier V, Castéra L, Tirapo C, Michaux D, Rémon MA, Laugé A, Rouleau E, De Pauw A, Buecher B, Gauthier-Villars M, Viovy JL, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Houdayer C. EMMA, a cost- and time-effective diagnostic method for simultaneous detection of point mutations and large-scale genomic rearrangements: application to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in 1,525 patients. Hum Mutat. 2011; 32:325–334.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.