Laminarin promotes anti-cancer immunity by the maturation of dendritic cells
Metrics: PDF 1534 views | HTML 1379 views | ?
Kyeongeun Song1,2,*, Li Xu1,*, Wei Zhang1, Yun Cai1, Bian Jang1,2,3,4, Junghwan Oh2,3,4 and Jun-O Jin1
1Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China
2Marine-Integrated Bionics Research Center, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Korea
3Department of Biomedical Engineering and Center for Marine-Integrated Biomedical Technology (BK21 Plus), Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Korea
4Interdisciplinary Program of Biomedical Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Korea
*These authors have contributed equally to this work
Jun-O Jin, email: email@example.com
Keywords: laminarin, adjuvant, anti-cancer, dendritic cell maturation, cytotoxic lymphocyte activation
Received: December 28, 2016 Accepted: February 20, 2017 Published: March 14, 2017
This research evaluates the effects of laminarin on the maturation of dendritic cells and on the in vivo activation of anti-cancer immunity. In vivo treatment of C56BL/6 mice with laminarin increased the expression levels of co-stimulatory molecules and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in spleen dendritic cells. Laminarin enhanced ovalbumin antigen presentation in spleen dendritic cells and promoted the proliferation of OT-I and OT-II T cells. Laminarin also induced the maturation of dendritic cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes and protected interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α and proliferation of OT-I and OT-II T cells in tumors. The combination treatment of laminarin and ovalbumin inhibited B16-ovallbumin melanoma tumor growth and its liver metastasis by antigen-specific immune activation, including cytotoxic T lymphocyte activation and interferon-γ production. Thus, these data demonstrated the potential of laminarin as a new and useful immune stimulatory molecule for use in cancer immunotherapy.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen (Ag) presenting cells (APCs) that, after exposure to stimuli, undergo maturation, which presents as increased levels of co-stimulatory molecules and pro-inflammatory cytokine production and Ag presentation in T cells . Matured DCs activate adaptive immune responses, including T helper (Th) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activation [1, 2]. In mice, there are two primary populations of DCs: plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) and conventional DCs (cDCs). Of these, cDCs are further divided two main populations, CD8α+CD11c+ and CD8α-CD11c+, which display different abilities for Ag presentation and T cell activation . CD8α+CD11c+ cDCs have the selective ability to cross-present exogenous Ags in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules and induce activation of CD8 T cells . In contrast, CD8α-CD11c+ cDCs that make up the majority of murine cDCs capture extracellular Ags and present these Ags to CD4 T cells by creating a compound with the MHC class II .
Effective cancer immunotherapy induces cancer Ag-specific immune responses that kill cancer cells [6, 7]. Ag-specific CTL activation and antibody production against cancer Ags are the most common strategies to effectively kill cancer cells [6, 7]; however, in the tumor microenvironment, the interaction between cancer cells and immune cells leads to immune suppression, which exhibits as tumor growth and preserves tumor cells from immune responses . In addition, cancer Ags are not enough to induce Ag-specific CTL activation and antibody production because DCs and macrophages present low levels of cancer Ags and express low levels of co-stimulatory molecules [9, 10]. Therefore, adjuvant components, which strongly promote maturation of DCs, are required together with cancer Ags to enhance tumor immunity [6, 11].
Polysaccharides, including laminarin, fucoidan, and alginate from brown seaweed, present effective functions of biological activities [12–14] and promote activation of immune cells, such as DCs, macrophages, natural killer (NK) cells, T cells and B cells, and enhance anti-viral and anti-tumor responses [15, 16]. Laminarin is a polysaccharide extracted from brown seaweed and composed of (1→3)-beta-D-glucan and (1→6)-beta-linkage [17, 18]. Previous studies have demonstrated that laminarin induces activation of RAW 264.7 cells, the murine macrophage cell line, and bone-marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs) [19, 20], and the activation of BMDCs by laminarin-promoted Ag-specific CD4 T cell activation was achieved in vitro . Although the effects of laminarin on DC activation has been investigated in vitro, in vivo DC activation and the adjuvant effects of laminarin to induce anti-cancer immunity through Ag-specific immune activation have not been investigated. In this study, in vivo administration of laminarin to induce DC maturation and Ag-specific T cells to initiate anti-cancer effects and the effectiveness of laminarin functions as an adjuvant for the treatment of B16 melanoma in mouse model was investigated in vivo.
Laminarin-induced maturation of spleen DCs
Because laminarin promotes macrophage and DC activation in vitro [19, 20], the ability of laminarin to induce spleen DC activation in vivo was studied. Thus, C57BL/6 mice were injected intravenously (i.v.) with 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/kg of laminarin, and 10 mg/kg of fucoidan as a positive control. Twenty-four hours after injection, the activation of spleen DCs was analyzed using flow cytometry. The spleen DCs were defined as lingeage-CD11c+ cells in DAPI-live cells (Figure 1A), and treatments of 25 and 50 mg/kg of laminarin decreased the frequency and number of spleen DCs (Figure 1B and 1C), while the expression levels of co-stimulatory molecules and MHC class I and II were significantly increased (Figure 1D). The elevation of co-stimulatory molecules and MHC class I and II levels were similar to those achieved by fucoidan induction, which is a marine-derived polysaccharide with well-defined effects promoting DC maturation (Figure 1B, 1C, and 1D).
Figure 1: Laminarin-induced activation of spleen DCs in vivo. C57BL/6 mice were injected intravenously (i.v.) with 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/kg of laminarin and 10 mg/kg of fucoidan for 24 hours before the spleens were harvested. (A) Definition of spleen DCs. Lineage markers included CD3, Thy1.1, B220, Gr-1, CD49b, and TER-119. (B) Percentages of lineage-CD11c+ DCs in the spleens. (C) Mean of the absolute numbers of lineage-CD11c+ spleen DCs within live cells. (D) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of co-stimulatory molecules and MHC classes I and II in gated lineage-CD11c+ cells from the spleens were analyzed using flow cytometry. (E) mRNA levels. (F) Sera concentration of IL-6, IL-12p70, and TNF-α. (G) Intracellular IL-6, IL-12, and TNF-α production in spleen DCs. All data are representative of or the average of analyses of six independent samples (two mice per experiment, totaling three independent experiments). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Activated DCs produce pro-inflammatory cytokines; thus, whether laminarin can promote production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in spleen DCs was investigated. C57BL/6 mice were injected i.v. with 25 mg/kg of laminarin for 2, 4, or 24 hours, and mRNA expression levels of interlukin-6 (IL-6), IL-12p40, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were dramatically increased 2 hours after laminarin injection (Figure 1E). In addition, serum concentrations of IL-6, IL-12p40, and TNF-α substantially increased 24 hours after treatment with laminarin (Figure 1F). To determine whether laminarin-activated spleen DCs contributed to increases in pro-inflammatory cytokine production, intracellular cytokine production in spleen DCs was examined by injecting mice with 25 mg/kg of laminarin for 4 hours and incubating splenocytes in a monensin solution for 4 hours. Intracellular IL-6, IL-12p40, and TNF-α levels were substantially up-regulated after treatment with laminarin (Figure 1G), and consistent with co-stimulatory expression levels, laminarin-induced production levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines were similar to those induced with fucoidan. Thus, these data suggest that laminarin-induced activation of spleen DCs in vivo up-regulate co-stimulatory molecule expression and produce pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Laminarin-induced Th1 and Tc1 responses in vivo
Because laminarin induces activation of spleen DCs, laminarin-activated spleen DCs that subsequently promote CD4 and CD8 T cell responses in vivo were also studied. Mice were injected i.v. with 25 mg/kg of laminarin, which was repeated after three days. Treatment with laminarin promoted marked increases in the proportion of interferon-γ- (IFN-γ)- and TNF-α-producing CD4 and CD8 T cells, whereas T cells did not produce IL-4 and IL-17 (Figure 2A and 2B). Moreover, serum concentrations of IFN-γ and TNF-α also increased significantly after laminarin treatment (Figure 2C). Laminarin-treated splenocyte expressed significantly higher mRNA levels of T-bet (p < 0.01), which is a critical transcription factor for Th1 and Tc1 cells, and IFN-γ (p < 0.01) compared to the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-treated control (Figure 2D). In contrast, the mRNA levels of IL-4, IL-17A, GATA3, and RORγt, which are transcription factors for Th2 and Th17, were not altered by treatment with laminarin (Figure 2D). Therefore, these data suggest that laminarin-activated DCs promote Th1 and Tc1 responses in vivo.
Figure 2: Laminarin-promoted Th1 and Tc1 responses in vivo. C57BL/6 mice were injected i.v. with 25 mg/kg of laminarin for 3 days. The mice were injected again with the same amount of laminarin for an additional 3 days. (A) Percentage of IFN-γ, IL-17, IL-4, and TNF-α-producing cells within CD4 and CD8 T cells in the spleens, assessed using a flow cytometric analysis. (B) Mean percentages of IFN-γ- or TNF-α-producing CD4 and CD8 T cells. (C) Concentrations of IFN-γ and TNF-α in the mice sera. All data are representative of or the average of analyses of six independent samples (two mice per experiment, for a total of three independent experiments). (D) Gene expression in the spleens was measured 24 hours after laminarin injection. Data are the average of analyses of six independent samples (two mice per experiment, for a total of three independent experiments). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Laminarin-enhanced, Ag-specific immune responses
To determine whether laminarin induces Ag-specific immune responses, C57BL/6 mice were injected i.v. with a combination of 25 mg/kg of laminarin and 50 μg of ovalbumin (OVA), and MHC class I and II expression levels in spleen CD8α+ and CD8α- cDCs were examined. It was found that these cDCs were substantially up-regulated by the combination of laminarin and OVA 24 hours after treatment (Figure 3A and 3B). The capacity for Ag presentation in laminarin-stimulated spleen CD8α+ and CD8α- cDCs was also examined. Since there is only one commercially available anti-OVA peptide (257-264) antibody for detecting OVA peptide presentation, OVA peptide (257-264) presentation in spleen CD8α+ and CD8α- cDCs was measured. As shown in Figure 3C, the combination of laminarin and OVA treatment led to significant increases in the percentage of OVA peptide (257-264) positive CD8α+ and CD8α- cDCs, which indicated that these cDCs presented OVA peptide (257-264) on the surface. In contrast, OVA or laminarin treatments did not induce Ag presentation in these DCs. To further determine laminarin promotion of Ag-specific immune responses, 5(6)-Carboxyfluorescein N-hydroxysuccinimidyl ester (CFSE)-labeled OT-I and OT-II cells were transferred into CD45.1 congenic mice, and 24 hours later, the mice received PBS, OVA, laminarin, and a combination of laminarin and OVA for 3 days. The proliferation of OT-I and OT-II was substantially up-regulated by the combined laminarin and OVA treatment, whereas OVA or laminarin alone did not increase proliferation of OT-I and OT-II cells (Figure 3D). Thus, these data suggest that laminarin-enhanced Ag presentation in DCs promote Ag-specific T cell responses in vivo.
Figure 3: Laminarin-induced, Ag-specific immune responses. C57BL/6 mice were injected i.v. with PBS, 50 μg of OVA, 25 mg/kg of laminarin, and the combination of laminarin and OVA for 24 hours. (A) CD8α+ and CD8α- cDCs in the spleens and CD11c+ DCs (upper panel). Expression levels of MHC classes I and II were analyzed using flow cytometry (low panel). (B) MFI of MHC classes I and II in the CD8α+ and CD8α- cDCs. (C) Surface OVA peptide (257-264) presentation was measured in CD8α+ and CD8α- cDCs (left panel). Mean percentage of OVA peptide (257-264) positive cells in the CD8α+ and CD8α- cDCs (right panel). (D) Proliferation of adaptive transferred CFSE-labeled OT-I and OT-II T cells in the CD45.1 congenic mice were analyzed using flow cytometry (left panel). Mean percentage of proliferating cells (right panel). Data are the average of analyses of six independent samples (two mice per experiment, for a total of three independent experiments). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Laminarin-induced maturation of DCs in a tumor microenvironment
To evaluate the maturation effects of laminarin on DCs in a tumor microenvironment, C57BL/6 mice were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) with 1 × 106 B16 melanoma cells. Fifteen days after tumor cell injection, the mice were treated with 25 mg/kg of laminarin for 24 hours, and maturation of DCs in tumor draining lymph nodes (drLN) and spleens were examined. Treatment with laminarin induced significant increases in the CD40, 80, and 86 and MHC classes I and II expression levels in tumor drLNs and spleen DCs (Figure 4A). In addition, treatment with laminarin among tumor-bearing mice increased production of IL-6, IL-12p40, and TNF-α in serum (Figure 4B).
Figure 4: Laminarin-promoted maturation of drLNs and DCs in the tumor microenvironment. C57BL/6 mice were inoculated s.c. with 1 × 106 B16 melanoma cells or B16-OVA cells. Fifteen days after tumor injection, the mice were treated with PBS and 25 mg/kg of laminarin for 24 hours. (A) MFI of CD40, CD80, CD86, and MHC classes I and II levels were measured in the spleen and tumor drLNs and DCs. (B) Concentrations of IL-6, IL-12p40, and TNF-α in the mice sera. (C) Surface OVA peptide (257-264) presentation was measured in the tumor drLNs and DCs. (D) CFSE-labeled OT-I and OT-II T cell proliferation in B16-OVA tumor-bearing CD45.1 congenic mice were analyzed using flow cytometry. (E) The means of the absolute numbers of OT-I (left panel) and OT-II (right panel) cells in the tumor. (F) Percentage of IFN-γ+ and TNF-α+ cells in tumor-infiltrated OT-I and OT-II cells. All data are representative of or the average of analyses of six independent samples (two mice per experiment, for a total of three independent experiments). **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.
Next, laminarin induction of Ag-specific immune responses in the tumor microenvironment was examined. The combined laminarin and OVA treatment enhanced presentation of the OVA peptide in tumor drLNs and DCs compared to PBS, OVA, and laminarin separately treated controls (Figure 4C). The combination treatment strongly promoted OT-I and OT-II cell proliferation in B16-OVA tumor-bearing CD45.1 congenic mice (Figure 4D), and tumor infiltration of OT-I and OT-II cells in B16-OVA tumors was significantly increased by the combined treatment compared to PBS, OVA, and laminarin treatments (Figure 4E). In addition, the infiltrated OT-I and OT-II cells in the B16-OVA tumor produced remarkably higher levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α compared to the singular treatments (Figure 4F). These data suggest that laminarin-induced maturation of DCs in tumor environments including increased levels of co-stimulatory molecule expression, pro-inflammatory cytokine production, Ag presentation, and Ag-specific T cell activation.
The laminarin and OVA combination treatment prevented B16-OVA tumor growth by inducing Ag-specific immune responses
Laminarin-promoted maturation of DCs and activation of T cells in tumor microenvironments prompted examination of related anti-cancer effects. C57BL/6 mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 106 B16-OVA cells. Once tumors were well established on day 7, the mice were treated i.v. with PBS, OVA (50 μg), laminarin (25 mg/kg), and a combination of laminarin (25 mg/kg) and OVA (50 μg). Seven days after treatment, the mice received with the same amount of OVA and laminarin, and tumor sizes were monitored during treatment. The combination treatment substantially prevented B16-OVA tumor growth, whereas OVA and laminarin treatments did not inhibit tumor growth (Figure 5A). On the 21st day after treatment, the sizes of the tumor masses among mice treated with the combination treatment were significantly smaller than the tumor masses among the PBS-, OVA-, and laminarin-treated mice (Figure 5B). In addition, OVA specific IFN-γ production in splenocytes was examined using an ELISPOT analysis, and it was found that the combination of laminarin and OVA significantly increased the number of plots compared to PBS-, OVA-, and laminarin-treated splenocytes, which indicated that splenocytes from the mice given the combination treatment produced large amounts of IFN-γ in response to OVA peptides (257-264) and (323-339) compared to the mice treated with only PBS, OVA, or laminarin (Figure 5C). Furthermore, an in vivo cytotoxicity assay showed that specific lysis of OVA-pulsed target cells was approximately 80% in mice given the combination treatment. In contrast, OVA-pulsed target cells were not eliminated to a significant amount in the mice treated only with PBS, OVA, or laminarin (Figure 5D). These data suggest that the combination treatment induced in vivo anti-cancer effects in mice by activating Ag specific immune responses.
Figure 5: The combined laminarin and OVA treatment inhibited B16-OVA tumor growth. C57BL/6 mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 106 B16-OVA cells on the right side. Once tumors were well established on day 7, mice were injected i.v. with PBS, 50 μg of OVA, 25 mg/kg of laminarin, and the combination of laminarin and OVA, and 7 days later, the mice were treated with the same amount of OVA and laminarin again. (A) B16-OVA tumor growth curves on the right side of the mice. (B) The sizes of the tumor masses on day 21 after the B16-OVA tumor cell challenge. (C) OVA peptides (257-264) and (323-339) specific IFN-γ production in splenocytes was analyzed by ELISPOT analysis (upper panel), and the mean number of spots (lower panel). (D) CTL activity was assessed in vivo on day 21 after tumor injection by adoptively transferring splenocyte populations labeled with CFSE and loaded with SIINFEK with a control splenocyte population without a peptide labeled with CMTMR. Dot plots show the percentage of SIINFEK-loaded CFSE+ cells and non-peptide-loaded CMTMR+ cells (upper panel) and mean percentages of Ag specific lysis (lower panel). Data are from analyses of six individual mice (three mice per experiment, for a total of two independent experiments). **p < 0.01.
Combined laminarin and OVA treatments inhibit liver metastasis of B16-OVA melanoma cells
The effects of the combination of laminarin and OVA on tumor metastasis in mice were also investigated. C57BL/6 mice were treated i.v. with PBS, OVA (50 μg), laminarin (25 mg/kg), and a combination of laminarin (25 mg/kg) and OVA (50 μg). Three days after treatment, the mice were inoculated intrasplenically (i.s.) with 0.5 × 106 B16-OVA melanoma cells, and 3 days after this, the mice were treated i.v. with the same amount of OVA and laminarin. Fourteen days after tumor injection, the mice were killed and the spleens and livers were harvested. The combination treatment dramatically inhibited tumor growth in the spleen and tumor metastasis in the liver compared to PBS, OVA, or laminarin (Figure 6A and 6B). Consistent with tumor sizes in the spleen and metastasis in the liver, the weight of the spleens and livers were significantly lower among the mice treated with a combination of laminarin and OVA compared to mice only treated with PBS, OVA, and laminarin (Figure 6C). The splenocytes isolated from the mice given the combination treatment significantly increased the amount of IFN-γ in response to OVA peptides (257-264) and (323-339), whereas PBS, OVA, and laminarin alone did not induce IFN-γ production in splenocytes (Figure 6D). These data suggest that the combination of laminarin and OVA inhibited metastasis of melanoma cells by activating Ag specific immune responses.
Figure 6: Treatment with laminarin and OVA inhibited liver metastasis of B16-OVA tumor cells. C57BL/6 mice were treated i.v. with PBS, 50 μg of OVA, 25 mg/kg of laminarin, and the combination of laminarin and OVA. Three days after the treatment, the mice were inoculated i.s. with B16-OVA melanoma cells. On day 3 after the B16-OVA cell challenge, the mice again received the same amount of the laminarin and OVA treatment. (A) The size of the tumor masses in the spleens and liver metastasis of B16-OVA cells on day 14 after tumor injection. (B) The mean of the absolute number of B16-OVA metastasis in the livers. (C) Mean weights of spleens (left panel) and livers (right). (D) Splenocytes were harvested without tumor cells. OVA peptide-specific IFN-γ production in the splenocytes was analyzed using ELISPOT analysis (left panel). The mean number of IFN-γ positive spots (right panel). All data are representative of or the average of analyses of six independent samples (three mice per experiment, for a total of two independent experiments). *p<0.01, **p < 0.01.
Because cancer microenvironments promote immune suppression against cancer Ags, cancer immunotherapy remains a challenging task [7, 11, 21]. In the cancer microenvironment, cancer cells induce immune suppression, which interrupts the cancer Ag presentation capacity of DCs, consequently reducing cancer Ag specific Th and CTL activation [9, 22]. Therefore, an effective adjuvant that can induce maturation of DCs and boost cancer Ag specific immune responses in the cancer microenvironment is required for efficient cancer immunotherapy [6, 21, 23]. The findings of the present study indicate that laminarin-induced maturation of DCs in the spleens and tumor drLNs of the mice promoted OVA Ag specific Th and CTL activation. Furthermore, the combination of laminarin and OVA effectively prevented B16-OVA tumor cell growth in vivo by activating OVA specific immune responses. These data suggest that laminarin might be an effective adjuvant for cancer immunotherapy.
Natural polysaccharides extracted from marine products, including fucoidan, ascophyllan, and λ-carrageenan, have been shown to activate immune responses in in vivo mice models, especially maturation of DCs and activation of CTLs [14, 24–26]. In the present study, laminarin, a polysaccharide purified from Laminaria digitata, was found to induce maturation of DCs in vivo. Laminarin is also well known as an antagonist of Dentin-1 . Previous studies have shown that laminarin blocks Dectin-1 binding of particulate β (1-3)-glucans without stimulating downstream signaling [27–29]. However, other studies have shown that laminarin directly promotes immune cell activation by stimulating Dectin-1 [19, 20, 30, 31]. Fucoidan, a marine-derived polysaccharide, is a well-known antagonist of scavenger receptor-A (SR-A), which blocks signaling pathways [32–34]; however recent studies have found that fucoidan can induce DC and macrophage activation [14, 35–37]. Therefore, the antagonistic effect of laminarin still requires further investigation because the antagonistic effects of laminarin have not been examined for DCs [27–29], which express much higher levels of Dectin-1 on the surface compared to macrophages . In addition, activation and binding of Dectin-1 with toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2) causes intracellular signaling transduction . Therefore, the antagonistic effects of laminarin in relation to the TLR2/6 signaling pathway in DCs must be investigated. Future research will investigate the effects of laminarin on Dectin-1 knockout, TLR-2 knockout, and Dectin-1/TLR-2 double knockout mice to determine whether laminarin can induce spleen DC activation.
Our data showed that laminarin treatment induced decreases in the spleen DC number. In contrast with that the DC number in tumor drLN and spleen in tumor-bearing mice were significantly increased (Supplementary Figure 1). Since DCs cannot proliferate, this increase of DC numbers may be a result of augmented DC migration into the spleen and tumor drLNs [39, 40]. In tumor microenvironment, inhibited chemokine expression impairs DC migration to the spleen [39, 40]. Therefore, the different alteration of DC numbers by laminarin in the naïve and tumor-bearing mice may due to the tumor microenvironment promoted different chemokine levels in the mice. We speculate that laminarin may induce elevation of chemokine expression and promote DC migration to spleen and tumor drLNs in tumor-bearing conditions. In our further studies, we will examine the effect of laminarin on the expression of chemokines and their receptors in lymphoid tissues and DCs in the tumor-bearing mice.
Cancer cell interaction with immune cells promotes immune tolerance against cancer Ags , and cancer Ags are not fully presented by APCs in tumor microenvironments, which consequently inhibits activation of adaptive immune cells and promotes tumor growth [8, 9, 22]. Adjuvants for cancer immunotherapy induce cell-mediated immune response in response to cancer Ags to effectively kill cancer cells in tumor microenvironments [6, 21, 41]. In this study, laminarin-induced maturation of spleen and tumor drLNs and DCs in in vivo tumor microenvironments were investigated, and laminarin-induced maturation of both CD8α+ and CD8α- cDCs promoted Ag specific Th1 and CTL immune responses. Because the CTL immune response has been sought to effectively kill cancer cells, CD8α+ cDC activation and maturation has been demonstrated as a promising strategy for cancer immunotherapy [6, 7, 41]. In line with this, laminarin-promoted CD8α+ cDCs and Ag specific CTL activation might induce specific killing of OVA-pulsed splenocytes and OVA-expressing B16 melanoma cells in vivo.
Circulating cancer cells that induce recurrence and metastasis of cancer are the most difficult to treat and a major cause of mortality among cancer patients . Because Ag specific CTL immune responses can find and eliminate Ag-expressing cancer cells , Ag specific CTL activation is a powerful mechanism for killing circulating cancer cells. The present study found that the combination of laminarin and OVA inhibited metastasis of B16-OVA melanoma cells in mice livers in vivo by activating OVA specific IFN-γ production. Moreover, the combination of laminarin and OVA induced specific killing of OVA-pulsed splenocytes in tumor-bearing mice, which indicates that this combination promoted OVA specific CTL activation. These data suggest that laminarin-induced, OVA-specific CTL and Th1 immune responses may be able to kill circulating cancer cells and prevent cancer metastasis in vivo.
Previous studies have shown that polysaccharide promotes immunomodulatory effects. Interestingly, oral administration of polysaccharide induces anti-inflammatory immune responses [43, 44], while systemic injection such as i.v. or i.p. of polysaccharide promotes pro-inflammatory immune responses [24-26, 45]. It also has been shown that oral administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) cannot induce systemic immune responses, which LPS is the most powerful immune stimulatory molecules isolated from gram negative bacteria [46, 47]. Therefore, dependent on injection route, immune modulation effect of polysaccharide may be changed. We will examine the oral administration of laminarin effect in next study whether the laminarin can induce immune activation or suppression in the mouse.
In conclusion, these results provide several lines of evidence that laminarin is a novel immune-stimulating reagent that can induce DC maturation and Ag specific Th1 and CTL activation that can effectively kill Ag-expressing B16 melanoma cells in vivo. The immune stimulatory function of laminarin will be potentially useful for developing tumor immunotherapy reagents for human use.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice and cell lines
Six-week-old C57BL/6 mice, OT-I and OT-II TCR transgenic mice, and C57BL/6-Ly5.1 (CD45.1) congenic mice were obtained from the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center and kept under pathogen-free conditions. The mice were maintained at a controlled temperature of 20–22°C, humidity of 50–60%, and lighting of 12 h: 12 h, with free access to standard rodent chow and water. All experiments were carried out in agreement with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments for the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center (Mouse Protocol Number: SYXK-2010-0098). Mice were killed by CO2 inhalation euthanasia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. The murine melanoma cell line, B16F10 (ATCC, CRL-6475), expressing OVA (B16-OVA) was cultured in RPMI 1640 (Sigma Aldrich, 10% fetal bovine serum [FBS], 2 mM glutamine, 1 M HEPES, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol). All cell lines were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and air.
Chemicals and cytokines
Laminarin derived from Laminaria digitata was purchased from Invivogen, and chicken OVA was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Laminarin and OVA solutions were passed through an endotoxin-removal column (Detoxi-gel: Thermo Fisher Scientific) and subsequently filtered through an endotoxin removal filter (Zetapor Dispo: Wako). The endotoxin levels in the purified laminarin were evaluated using a Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay kit (Lonza). OVA peptide 257–264 (SIINFEKL) and OVA 323-339 (ISQAVHAAHAEINEAGR) were purchased from China Peptides (China).
Isotype control antibodies (Abs; IgG1, IgG2a, or IgG2b), CD11c (HL3), CD4 (GK1.5), CD8α (YTS169.4), CD40 (3/23), CD80 (16-10A1), CD86 (GL-1), anti-IL-4 (11B11), anti-IL-6 (MP5-20F3), and anti-IL-12/23p40 (C17.8) were obtained from BioLegend. Anti-MHC class I (AF6-88.5.3), anti-MHC class II (M5/114.15.2), anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2), anti-IL-17 (TCC11-18H10.1), and anti-TNF-α (MP6-XT22) were obtained from eBioscience.
Flow cytometry analysis
Cells were washed with PBS containing 0.5% BSA, pre-incubated for 15 min with unlabeled isotype control Abs, and labeled with fluorescence-conjugated Abs by incubation on ice for 30 min followed by washing with PBS. Cells were analyzed using a FACS Aria II (Becton Dickinson) and FlowJo 8.6 software (Tree Star). Cellular debris was excluded from the analysis by forward- and side-scatter gating. Dead cells were excluded by 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich) staining and gating the DAPI-negative population. As a control for nonspecific staining, isotype-matched irrelevant monoclonal Abs (mAbs) were used.
Spleen and tumor drLNs and DCs were analyzed as described by previous research [26, 48]. The tissues were cut into small fragments and digested, with 2% FBS containing collagenase for 20 min at room temperature. Cells from the digest were centrifuged into a pellet, and the pellet was re-suspended in 5 mL of a 1.077 histopaque (Sigma-Aldrich). Additional histopaque was layered below and EDTA-FBS was layered above the cell suspension, which was then centrifuged at 1700 g for 10 min. The light density fraction (< 1.077 g/cm3) was collected and incubated for 30 min with the following FITC-conjugated mAbs: anti-CD3 (17A2), anti-Thy1.1 (OX-7), anti-B220 (RA3-6B2), anti-Gr1 (RB68C5), anti-CD49b (DX5), and anti-TER-119 (TER-119). The lineage-CD11c+ cells were defined as cDCs, which were further divided into CD8α+ and CD8α- cDCs. Analysis was carried out on a FACS Aria II (Becton Dickinson).
Ex vivo T cell stimulation and intracellular cytokine staining
As described in detail previously , a single cell suspension prepared from spleen and tumor cells were stimulated in vitro for 4 hours with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (50 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 μM; both from Calbiochem), with the addition of monensin solution (Biolegend) during the final 2 hours. For intracellular cytokine staining, surface molecules were stained first, then fixed and permeabilized with a Cytofix/Cytoperm buffer (eBioscience) and subsequently incubated with anti-cytokine Abs in a Perm/Wash buffer (eBioscience) for 30 min. Control staining with isotype control immunoglobulin Gs (IgGs) was performed during all experiments.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
IL-6, IL-12p70, IFN-γ, and TNF-α concentrations in sera were measured in triplicate using standard ELISA kits (Biolegend).
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using Oligo (dT) and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega). The cDNA was subjected to real-time PCR amplification (Qiagen) for 40 cycles with annealing and an extension temperature of 60°C, on a LightCycler 480 real-time PCR system (Roche). Primer sequences were as follows: mouse β-actin forward, 5’-TGGATGACGATATCGCTGCG-3’; reverse, 5’-AG GGTCAGGATACCTCTCTT-3’; IL-6 forward, 5’-AAC GATGATGCACTTGCAGA-3’; reverse, 5’-GAGCA TTGGAAATTGGGGTA-3'; IL-12p40 forward, 5’-CAC ATCTGCTGCTCCACAAG-3’; reverse, 5’-CCGTCCG GAGTAATTTGGTG-3’; TNF-α forward, 5’-CCTTTC ACTCACTGGCCCAA-3’; reverse, 5’-AGTGCCTCT TCTGCCAGTTC-3’; T-bet forward, 5’-CAACAACC CCTTTGCCAAAG-3’; reverse, 5’-TCCCCCAAGCATT GACAGT-3’; GATA3 forward, 5’-CGGGTTCGGAT GTAAGTCGAGG-3’; reverse, 5’-GATGTCCCTGCTC TCCTTGCTG-3’; RORγt forward, 5’-CCGCTGAGAGG GCTTCAC-3’; reverse 5’-TGCAGGAGTAGGCCACA TTACA-3’; IFN-γ forward, 5’-GGATGCATTCATGAG TATTGC-3’; reverse, 5’-CTTTTCCGCTTCCTGAGG-3’; IL-4 forward, 5’-ACAGGAGAAGGGACGCCAT-3’; reverse 5’-GAAGCCCTACAGACGAGCTCA-3’; IL-17A forward, 5’-GCGCAAAAGTGAGCTCCAGA-3’; and reverse 5’-ACAGAGGGATATCTATCAGGG-3’.
C57BL/6 mice were treated i.v. with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 50 μg of OVA in PBS, and 25 mg/kg of laminarin or OVA mixed with laminarin in PBS on days 7 and 14 after a B16-OVA challenge. On day 21, the mice were killed, and splenocytes were harvested for further analysis.
OT-I and OT-II T cell proliferation
CD4 T cells from OT-II mice or CD8 T cells from OT-I mice were isolated from spleens using CD4 T cell or CD8 T cell isolation kits (Miltenyi Biotec), respectively. The cells were suspended in PBS/0.1% BSA solutions containing 10 μM of CFSE (Invitrogen) and incubated for 10 min. CFSE-labeled cells (1 × 106) were i.v. transferred into CD45.1 congenic mice, and 24 hours later, the mice were injected with PBS alone, 50 μg of OVA in PBS, 25 mg/kg of laminarin, and the combination of laminarin and OVA in PBS. At 72 hours after treatment, splenocytes were harvested and OT-I or OT-II T cell proliferation was determined by analyzing the CFSE fluorescence intensity using flow cytometry.
In vivo cytotoxicity assay
Mice were injected i.v. with a mixture of splenocytes differentially labeled with CFSE (200 nM) and loaded with 100 nM of SIINFEKL peptide, and spleen cells were labeled with 10 mM of CellTracker™ Orange CMTMR (Life technologies) and not loaded with a peptide. Then, 10 × 106 cells were injected per mouse, consisting of a mixture containing each target cell population. Splenocytes were collected 24 hours after injection of the target cells. The percentage of cancer cells killed was calculated using the formula described in previous research .
Intrasplenic B16-OVA injection
C57BL/6 mice were anesthetized with a ketamine mixture (10 μL of ketamine HCl, 7.6 μL of xylazine, 2.4 μL of acepromazine maleate, and 10 μL of H2O) injected into the peritoneal cavity. B16-OVA melanoma cells (0.5 × 106/50 μL) were injected into the spleen of the mice during open laparotomy for experimentation.
Mouse IFN-γ ELISPOTs were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Biolegend). In short, spleens were harvested from treated mice and mononuclear cells were isolated by density cuts. The cells were seeded at 50 × 103 cells/well in a pre-coated plate. The cells were stimulated with 2 μg/mL of OVA peptide (257–264; SIINFEKL) and OVA (323-339; ISQAVHAAHAEINEAGR) or a negative control peptide at 37°C for 24 hours. ELISPOT plates were counted automatically using a CTL ELISPOT reader (CTL Europe GmbH, Bonn, Germany), and the number of spots observed with a control peptide was subtracted from the number of spots observed with specific peptides for each mouse.
Results were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Data sets were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and a Tukey multiple comparison test using GraphPad Prism 4. P values smaller than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
DC, dendritic cell; cDC, conventional DC; Ag, antigen; APC, Ag presenting cell; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; Th, T helper; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IFN, interferon; OVA, ovalbumin.
J.O.J. designed the experiments and analyzed the data, and J.O.J. and J.O. wrote the paper. K.S., L.X., W.Z., C.Y., and B.J. performed the experiments and analyzed the data.
We thank the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center animal facility for maintaining the animals in this study. This study was supported by the Research Fund for International Young Scientists from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81550110507). W.Z. was supported by General Program of Shanghai public health clinical center (2016-07). J.O. was supported by a grant from Marine Biotechnology Program (20150220) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Republic of Korea.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
1. Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998; 392:245-252.
2. Moser M, Murphy KM. Dendritic cell regulation of TH1-TH2 development. Nature immunology. 2000; 1:199-205.
3. Vremec D, Pooley J, Hochrein H, Wu L, Shortman K. CD4 and CD8 expression by dendritic cell subtypes in mouse thymus and spleen. Journal of immunology. 2000; 164:2978-2986.
4. Shortman K, Heath WR. The CD8+ dendritic cell subset. Immunological reviews. 2010; 234:18-31.
5. Naik SH, Proietto AI, Wilson NS, Dakic A, Schnorrer P, Fuchsberger M, Lahoud MH, O'Keeffe M, Shao QX, Chen WF, Villadangos JA, Shortman K, Wu L. Cutting edge: generation of splenic CD8+ and CD8- dendritic cell equivalents in Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand bone marrow cultures. Journal of immunology. 2005; 174:6592-6597.
6. Banchereau J, Palucka AK. Dendritic cells as therapeutic vaccines against cancer. Nature reviews Immunology. 2005; 5:296-306.
7. Cohn L, Delamarre L. Dendritic cell-targeted vaccines. Frontiers in immunology. 2014; 5:255.
8. Zou W. Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2005; 5:263-274.
9. Ma Y, Shurin GV, Gutkin DW, Shurin MR. Tumor associated regulatory dendritic cells. Semin Cancer Biol. 2012; 22:298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.02.010.
10. Jager D, Jager E, Knuth A. Immune responses to tumour antigens: implications for antigen specific immunotherapy of cancer. Journal of clinical pathology. 2001; 54:669-674.
11. Palucka K, Banchereau J. Cancer immunotherapy via dendritic cells. Nature reviews Cancer. 2012; 12:265-277.
12. Smit AJ. Medicinal and pharmaceutical uses of seaweed natural products: a review. Journal of applied phycology. 2004; 16:245-262.
13. Fitton JH. Therapies from fucoidan; multifunctional marine polymers. Marine drugs. 2011; 9:1731-1760.
14. Jin JO, Zhang W, Du JY, Wong KW, Oda T, Yu Q. Fucoidan can function as an adjuvant in vivo to enhance dendritic cell maturation and function and promote antigen-specific T cell immune responses. PloS one. 2014; 9:e99396.
15. Tzianabos AO. Polysaccharide immunomodulators as therapeutic agents: structural aspects and biologic function. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2000; 13:523-533.
16. Mazmanian SK, Kasper DL. The love-hate relationship between bacterial polysaccharides and the host immune system. Nature reviews Immunology. 2006; 6:849-858.
17. Zvyagintseva TN, Shevchenko NM, Popivnich IB, Isakov VV, Scobun AS, Sundukova EV, Elyakova LA. A new procedure for the separation of water-soluble polysaccharides from brown seaweeds. Carbohydrate Research. 1999; 322:32-39.
18. Nelson T, Lewis B. Separation and characterization of the soluble and insoluble components of insoluble laminaran. Carbohydrate Research. 1974; 33:63-74.
19. Lee J, Kim Y, Kim H, Kim Y, Park W. Immunostimulatory effect of laminarin on RAW 264.7 mouse macrophages. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2012; 17:5404.
20. Xie J, Guo L, Ruan Y, Zhu H, Wang L, Zhou L, Yun X, Gu J. Laminarin-mediated targeting to Dectin-1 enhances antigen-specific immune responses. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2010; 391:958-962.
21. Dubensky TW Jr, Reed SG. Adjuvants for cancer vaccines. Seminars in immunology. 2010; 22:155-161.
22. Kaufman HL, Disis ML. Immune system versus tumor: shifting the balance in favor of DCs and effective immunity. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2004; 113:664-667.
23. Finn OJ. Cancer vaccines: between the idea and the reality. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2003; 3:630-641.
24. Zhang W, Oda T, Yu Q, Jin JO. Fucoidan from Macrocystis pyrifera has powerful immune-modulatory effects compared to three other fucoidans. Marine drugs. 2015; 13:1084-1104.
25. Luo M, Shao B, Nie W, Wei XW, Li YL, Wang BL, He ZY, Liang X, Ye TH, Wei YQ. Antitumor and Adjuvant Activity of lambda-carrageenan by Stimulating Immune Response in Cancer Immunotherapy. Scientific reports. 2015; 5:11062.
26. Zhang W, Okimura T, Xu L, Zhang L, Oda T, Kwak M, Yu Q, Jin JO. Ascophyllan functions as an adjuvant to promote anti-cancer effect by dendritic cell activation. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:19284-19298. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8200.
27. Gantner BN, Simmons RM, Underhill DM. Dectin-1 mediates macrophage recognition of Candida albicans yeast but not filaments. The EMBO journal. 2005; 24:1277-1286.
28. Brown GD, Taylor PR, Reid DM, Willment JA, Williams DL, Martinez-Pomares L, Wong SY, Gordon S. Dectin-1 is a major beta-glucan receptor on macrophages. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2002; 196:407-412.
29. Gersuk GM, Underhill DM, Zhu L, Marr KA. Dectin-1 and TLRs permit macrophages to distinguish between different Aspergillus fumigatus cellular states. Journal of immunology. 2006; 176:3717-3724.
30. Yin G, Li W, Lin Q, Lin X, Lin J, Zhu Q, Jiang H, Huang Z. Dietary administration of laminarin improves the growth performance and immune responses in Epinephelus coioides. Fish & shellfish immunology. 2014; 41:402-406.
31. Heim G, Walsh AM, Sweeney T, Doyle DN, O'Shea CJ, Ryan MT, O'Doherty JV. Effect of seaweed-derived laminarin and fucoidan and zinc oxide on gut morphology, nutrient transporters, nutrient digestibility, growth performance and selected microbial populations in weaned pigs. The British journal of nutrition. 2014; 111:1577-1585.
32. Hsu HY, Hajjar DP, Khan KM, Falcone DJ. Ligand binding to macrophage scavenger receptor-A induces urokinase-type plasminogen activator expression by a protein kinase-dependent signaling pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1998; 273:1240-1246.
33. Thelen T, Hao Y, Medeiros AI, Curtis JL, Serezani CH, Kobzik L, Harris LH, Aronoff DM. The class A scavenger receptor, macrophage receptor with collagenous structure, is the major phagocytic receptor for Clostridium sordellii expressed by human decidual macrophages. Journal of immunology. 2010; 185:4328-4335.
34. Zhang H, Su YJ, Zhou WW, Wang SW, Xu PX, Yu XL, Liu RT. Activated scavenger receptor A promotes glial internalization of abeta. PloS one. 2014; 9:e94197.
35. Jin JO, Park HY, Xu Q, Park JI, Zvyagintseva T, Stonik VA, Kwak JY. Ligand of scavenger receptor class A indirectly induces maturation of human blood dendritic cells via production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Blood. 2009; 113:5839-5847.
36. Kim MH, Joo HG. Immunostimulatory effects of fucoidan on bone marrow-derived dendritic cells. Immunology letters. 2008; 115:138-143.
37. Yang M, Ma C, Sun J, Shao Q, Gao W, Zhang Y, Li Z, Xie Q, Dong Z, Qu X. Fucoidan stimulation induces a functional maturation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. International immunopharmacology. 2008; 8:1754-1760.
38. Calugaru A, Cremer L, Lupu AR, Badulescu MM, Apetrei NS, Moscovici M, Mocanu G, Mihai D, Kerek F, Szegli G. Recognition and modulation of Dectin-1 and TLR-2 receptors by curdlan derivatives and purified natural extracts. Roumanian archives of microbiology and immunology. 2009; 68:119-124.
39. Vicari AP, Treilleux I, Lebecque S. Regulation of the trafficking of tumour-infiltrating dendritic cells by chemokines. Seminars in cancer biology. 2004; 14:161-169.
40. Tran Janco JM, Lamichhane P, Karyampudi L, Knutson KL. Tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells in cancer pathogenesis. Journal of immunology. 2015; 194:2985-2991.
41. Miconnet I, Coste I, Beermann F, Haeuw JF, Cerottini JC, Bonnefoy JY, Romero P, Renno T. Cancer vaccine design: a novel bacterial adjuvant for peptide-specific CTL induction. Journal of immunology. 2001; 166:4612-4619.
42. Valastyan S, Weinberg RA. Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell. 2011; 147:275-292.
43. Cui YQ, Jia YJ, Zhang T, Zhang QB, Wang XM. Fucoidan protects against lipopolysaccharide-induced rat neuronal damage and inhibits the production of proinflammatory mediators in primary microglia. CNS neuroscience & therapeutics. 2012; 18:827-833.
44. Kuznetsova TA, Besednova NN, Somova LM, Plekhova NG. Fucoidan extracted from Fucus evanescens prevents endotoxin-induced damage in a mouse model of endotoxemia. Marine drugs. 2014; 12:886-898.
45. Ramberg JE, Nelson ED, Sinnott RA. Immunomodulatory dietary polysaccharides: a systematic review of the literature. Nutrition journal. 2010; 9:54.
46. Inagawa H, Kohchi C, Soma G. Oral administration of lipopolysaccharides for the prevention of various diseases: benefit and usefulness. Anticancer research. 2011; 31:2431-2436.
47. Oketani K, Inoue T, Murakami M. Effect of E3040, an inhibitor of 5-lipoxygenase and thromboxane synthase, on rat bowel damage induced by lipopolysaccharide. European journal of pharmacology. 2001; 427:159-166.
48. Zhang W, Yu X, Kwak M, Xu L, Zhang L, Yu Q, Jin J. Maturation of dendritic cells by pullulan promotes anti-cancer effect. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:44644-44659. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10183.
49. Jin JO, Han X, Yu Q. Interleukin-6 induces the generation of IL-10-producing Tr1 cells and suppresses autoimmune tissue inflammation. Journal of autoimmunity. 2013; 40:28-44.
50. Hermans IF, Silk JD, Yang J, Palmowski MJ, Gileadi U, McCarthy C, Salio M, Ronchese F, Cerundolo V. The VITAL assay: a versatile fluorometric technique for assessing CTL- and NKT-mediated cytotoxicity against multiple targets in vitro and in vivo. Journal of immunological methods. 2004; 285:25-40.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.