Abstract
Lucia D’Amico1,2, Dimas Belisario2, Giorgia Migliardi3, Cristina Grange4, Benedetta Bussolati5, Patrizia D’Amelio6, Timothy Perera7, Ettore Dalmasso8, Luca Dalle Carbonare9, Laura Godio10, Paolo Comoglio3, Livio Trusolino3, Riccardo Ferracini11, Ilaria Roato2
1Department of Biomedicine, Cancer Immunology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
2CeRMS, A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
3IRCC, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
4Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
5Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
6Gerontology Section, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
7Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium
8Urology Section, A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
9Clinic of Internal Medicine, Section D, Policlinico G.B. Rossi Verona, Verona, Italy
10Department of Pathology, A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
11Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, CTO Hospital, Torino, Italy
Correspondence to:
Ilaria Roato, email: [email protected]
Keywords: bone metastasis, renal cancer, cancer stem cells, c-MET, CCL20
Received: May 01, 2016 Accepted: May 29, 2016 Published: June 14, 2016
ABSTRACT
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are key players in bone metastasis. In some renal tumors CSCs overexpress the HGF receptor c-MET, speculating that c-MET targeting could lead to bone metastasis inhibition. To address this hypothesis we isolated renal CD105+/CD24−CSCs, expressing c-MET receptor from a primary renal carcinoma. Then, to study their ability to metastasize to bone, we injected renal CSCs in NOD/SCID mice implanted with a human bone and we tested the effect of a c-MET inhibitor (JNJ-38877605) on bone metastasis development. JNJ-38877605 inhibited the formation of metastases at bone implant site. We showed that JNJ-38877605 inhibited the activation of osteoclasts induced by RCC stem cells and it stimulated osteoblast activity, finally resulting in a reduction of bone turnover consistent with the inhibition of bone metastases. We measured the circulating levels of osteotropic factors induced by RCC stem cells in the sera of mice treated with c-Met inhibitor, showing that IL-11 and CCL20 were reduced in mice treated with JNJ-38877605, strongly supporting the involvement of c-MET in the regulation of this process. To address the clinical relevance of c-MET upregulation during tumor progression, we analysed c-MET in renal cancer patients detecting an increased expression in the bone metastatic lesions by IHC. Then, we dosed CCL20 serum levels resulting significantly increased in patients with bone metastases compared to non-metastatic ones. Collectively, our data highlight the importance of the c-MET pathway in the pathogenesis of bone metastases induced by RCC stem cells in mice and humans.
INTRODUCTION
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) commonly metastasizes to bone, indeed 35% of patients with advanced RCC develop bone metastases [1]. Bone lesions are osteolytic and worsen the prognosis, causing morbidity associated to the skeletal related events, such as pathological fractures, spinal cord compression or hypercalcemia and requirement for surgical treatment or palliative radiotherapy [2–3]. Despite the clinical relevance the mechanism by which RCC preferentially metastasizes to bone is poorly understood. The bone metastatic process requires a series of interactions between tumor cells and bone microenvironment, which release many factors activating bone resorption by osteoclasts (OCs) [4–6]. Recent work essentially focused on production of chemokines and interleukins by the sites of metastasis, which in turn attract cancer cells to explain different tropism for metastatic sites. Classically, this is the case for CCL21/CCR7 involved in lymph node metastasis, CCL27/CCR10 in skin metastasis or CCL20/CCR6 involved in metastases at multiple sites [7–8]. In particular, CCL20 has been produced by different cancer cells as pancreatic, breast and renal carcinoma [9]. Furthermore, high expression of interleukin-11 correlated with poor prognosis in clear-cell renal carcinoma, highlighting the clinical relevance of an early detection of IL-11 and CCL20 in renal carcinoma patients.
Our group recently demonstrated an important role for cancer stem cells (CSCs) in promoting bone metastasis formation in breast and lung cancer, opening the perspective to target CSCs to prevent or block the bone metastatic process [10–11]. Literature reports different attempts to characterize CSCs in RCC, resulting in the identification of CD105, CXCR4 and ALDH1 as the most reliable markers [12–15]. In other tumors as well as RCC, the expression of CD105 is related to the ability of initiating a metastatic process, for instance in breast cancer the subpopulation of cell expressing CD105 correlates with a high migratory ability [16] and in hepatocarcinoma, CD105 promotes the invasion and metastases of liver cancer cells [17].
The characterization of different mutations in some tyrosine kinases (TKs) expressed by RCC lead to the introduction of TK inhibitors in the treatment of RCC [18–19], which replaced immunotherapy as the standard of care for these patients, changing the therapeutic approach of RCC. c-MET, the HGF receptor, is normally involved in cell growth, differentiation and neo-vascularization, but its dysregulation has been implicated in tumor formation, invasion and angiogenesis [20]. In hereditary and sporadic papillary RCC patients activating mutations of c-MET have been identified [21–23] and over expression of c-MET has been also reported in clear cell carcinoma [24–26].
Since c-MET mediates the interaction between cancer cells and mesenchymal cells of the bone microenvironment [27], we propose it as a suitable candidate to disrupt bone metastatic process. TK and more specific MET inhibitors have been tested and clinical trials are ongoing for the treatment of RCC [28–29]. JNJ-38877605 is a highly selective c-MET ATP competitive kinase inhibitor [30], which induces cell death in tumor cells overexpressing c-MET protein or expressing constitutively activated c-MET protein. The expression of c-MET have been described on a RCC cell line derived from human bone [31], but its expression on RCC stem cells have not been investigated. Here we studied the ability of RCC stem cells to metastasize bone through a human-in-mice model of bone metastases, where a small fragment of human bone was implanted sub-cutis in NOD-SCID mice [10–11, 32–33], thereby providing a viable and active human microenvironment. Moreover, we reported the relevant role of c-MET in the bone metastatic process induced by RCC stem cells. Indeed, we were able to block the bone metastasis formation in mice by inhibiting c-MET with a selective and specific inhibitor, JNJ-38877605. Finally, c-Met expression was increased in renal cancer patients with bone metastasis and CCL20 was upregulated in the circulation of the same patients supporting the relevance to target c-Met to reduce renal cancer-derived bone metastases.
RESULTS
RCC stem cells express high level of c-MET
RCC stem cells were previously isolated from a primary clear cell renal carcinoma as CD105+CD24−cells and tested for stemness features. The negative counterpart CD105-CD24-cells did not show tumorigenic activity after injection in SCID mice [12]. We transduced CD105+CD24− RCC stem cells with a luciferase-expressing lentiviral vector and grew them as spheroids (Figure 1A). After SC injection these cells originated a tumor mass that recapitulated the heterogeneity of the primary tumor (Figure 1B), including a subpopulation of RCC stem cells expressing CD105 and c-MET (Figure 1C–1D). The percentage of CD105+/CD24−/c-MET+ cells was 65%.
Figure 1: RCC stem cells. CD105+CD24− RCC stem cells previously isolated from a primary clear cell renal carcinoma grew as spheroid (magnification × 40) (A). After SC injection these cells originated a tumor mass that recapitulated the heterogeneity of the primary tumor (B), including a subpopulation of RCC stem cells (C) expressing c-MET (D).
RCC stem cells metastasize to human bone
To determine the ability of RCC stem cells to directly induce bone metastases, we injected them subcutaneously (SC), close to the bone implant or through intracardiac route (IC) in NOD/SCID mice carrying a small piece of human bone, previously implanted in a flank. The number of mice in the experimental groups, time of mice survival, percentages of bone engraftment, and numbers of lung and bone metastases are indicated in Table 1. The human bone implants resulted viable, with mineralized areas, stromal cells and little or no necrosis evident in the grafts (Figure 2A). Human neo-vascularization was present, with numerous vessels expressing human CD34 (Figure 2B). RCC stem cells colonized human implanted bone after either IC or SC injection (Figure 2C–2D). IHC analysis of serial slices showed that tumor cells in bone lesions (Figure 2D) expressed CD105 and c-MET (Figure 2E, 2F). By isolating tumor cells from the implanted bone, we retrieved a cell population resembling the heterogeneity of the primary tumor, with about 10% of CD105+CD24− RCC stem cells (Figure 2G). To rule out metastatic seeding of RCC stem cells in bones of the hosts, we performed X-rays on the mice without detecting lesions in mouse bones, demonstrating a species-specific tropism of these cells to human bone (Figure S1).
Figure 2: RCC stem cells efficiently metastasize to bone. (A) H&E-stained section in control mice show the viable human bone (magnification × 20). (B) IHC staining for human CD34 confirmed the presence of human vascularization (magnification × 20). (C) H&E and IHC staining for vimentin confirmed the presence of bone metastasis in mice injected with RCC stem cells through IC route (magnification × 20 and × 60). (D–F) Serial slices of the human implanted bone show bone metastasis in mice injected SC with RCC stem cells. In the tumor lesions cells express both CD105 (E) and c-MET (F) (magnification × 20). (G) Flow citometry analysis of cells retrieved by bone shows a cell population resembling the heterogeneity of the primary tumor, with about 10% of CD105+CD24− RCC stem cells.
Table 1: In vivo results following JNJ treatment in tumor bearing mice
Mice group | N | Bone engrafment | Death | Lung metastasis | Bone metastasis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bone+CSC+veh | 31 | 30/31 (96,8) | 3/31 (9,6%) | 7/28 (25%) | 15/28 (53,6%) |
Bone+CSC+JNJ | 19 | 19/19 (100%) | 2/19 (10,5%) | 4/17 (23,5%) | 0/17 |
Bone+veh | 11 | 10/11 (90,1) | 1/11 (9%) | 0/10 | 0/10 |
Bone+JNJ | 11 | 10/11 (90,1) | 2/11 (18,2) | 0/9 | 0/9 |
CSC+veh | 6 | no bone implant | 1/6 | 1/5 |
|
CSC+JNJ | 6 | no bone implant | 0/6 | 1/6 |
|
RCC stem cells develop bone metastases with a c-MET dependent mechanism
To investigate whether c-MET has a role in the bone metastatic process induced by RCC stem cells, we treated mice with JNJ-38877605 (hereafter referred to as JNJ), a highly specific c-MET inhibitor, which was not toxic on RCC stem cell culture in vitro, also at high concentrations as demonstrated by the citoxicity assay (Figure S2). We monitored the growth and localization of these cells through IVIS, at different time points for 60 days. At 20 days the primary tumors were macroscopically evident and the luciferase signal increased progressively over the course of the study. Importantly, JNJ did not grossly affect tumor growth, with only a slight reduction in the first 20 days after implantation followed prompt alignment with untreated controls (Figure 3A). This result was also confirmed by the quantification of the mean luciferase intensity (Figure 3B) and of the endpoint tumor mass volume (Figure 3C). Of note, while JNJ treatment did not influence overall tumor growth kinetics, it manifestly inhibited the formation of metastases at bone implant site. Indeed, bone lesions were present in untreated mice, but they were absent in JNJ-treated mice (Figure 4A, 4B). The marked increase in bone remodeling due to bone metastases was evaluated through trichrome staining, which showed a larger area of new bone apposition consequent to the increased metastatic bone resorption in untreated mice (blue stain, Figure 4C) compared to JNJ-treated ones (Figure 4D).
Figure 3: RCC stem cell growth and in vivo localization. (A) Tumor growth was examined by BLI. Representative images of two animals after SC injection of RCC stem cells, at different time points (20, 40, 60 days). (B) At 20 days the primary tumors were macroscopically evident and the luciferase signal increased progressively over the course of the study. (C) JNJ did not significantly affect tumor growth and the endpoint tumor mass volume.
Figure 4: JNJ inhibits bone metastasis formation. (A) H&E stained section showed bone lesion in untreated mice, (B) whereas no bone metastasis was present in JNJ-treated mice. (C) The trichrome staining showed an increased bone remodeling due to bone metastases, with a larger area of new bone apposition consequent to the increased metastatic bone resorption in untreated mice (blue stain) compared to JNJ-treated ones (D) (magnification × 5).
Altogether these results support our hypothesis that RCC stem cells are osteotropic and induce bone metastases through the c-MET pathway involvement.
JNJ blocks bone metastasis by inhibiting stem cell-induced OC activation
Since renal cancer bone metastases are characterised by an increased bone resorption activity, which is mainly dependent on OCs, and considering that the c-MET/HGF pathway is involved in osteoclastogenesis, we investigated the effect of JNJ on OCs in vitro, thus avoiding interferences of bone microenvironment and RCC stem cells. In cultures of human PBMCs kept under pro-osteoclastogenic conditions, we added JNJ showing that it significantly reduced both the formation of large, multinucleated and TRAP+ OCs (Figure 5A) and the number of OCs compared to the control (Figure 5B).
Figure 5: Effects of JNJ on osteoclasts (OCs). (A) Human PBMCs cultured under pro-osteoclastogenic conditions differentiated into large, multinucleated and TRAP+ OCs, whereas JNJ treatment inhibited OC differentiation. (B) The number of OCs was significantly reduced by the JNJ treatment. (C) Histomorphometric analysis on human bone implants showed that RCC stem cells caused a significant increase of OC activity (percentage of erosion surface) in mice injected with RCC stem cells compared to control mice (animals not injected with RCC stem cells), suggesting a direct stimulation by RCC stem cells on the OC bone resorption activity. JNJ significantly decreased OC activity induced by RCC stem cells, p < 0.05. (D) RCC stem cells did not cause significant changes in osteoblast activity (osteoid thickness), while JNJ increased it, showing an anabolic effect p < 0.05. ES: erosion surface, BS: bone surface.
Beside the effect played on OCs in vitro, we addressed the effect of JNJ in vivo by performing histomorphometric analysis on human bone implants and on mice bones. In untreated mice, RCC stem cells caused a significant increase of OC activity as demonstrated by the augmented percentage of erosion surface, p < 0.001 (Figure 5C), suggesting a direct stimulation by RCC stem cells on the OC bone resorption activity. The treatment with JNJ resulted in a significantly decreased OC activity in mice injected with RCC stem cells, p < 0.05 (Figure 5C), whereas JNJ did not interfere with OC activity in control mice. This result suggests that JNJ indirectly affects OC bone resorption activity, because it interferes with RCC stem cell molecular signals, which stimulate OC activity. When coupled with the in vitro data, these results suggest that Met inhibition has a direct negative effect on OC differentiation and an indirect effect on OC activity, likely mediated by perturbation of paracrine signals from tumor cells.
Since c-MET/HGF pathway is also known to regulate osteoblasts (OBs), we investigated the effect of JNJ on OB activity in vivo. We observed that RCC stem cells did not cause significant changes in the osteoid thickness, while JNJ increased it, p < 0.05 (Figure 5D). These results suggest that JNJ treatment has an anabolic effect, strengthening the relevance to block the c-MET pathway in order to contrast the bone metastatic commitment of RCC stem cells.
JNJ treatment reduces the level of circulating osteolytic factors
To investigate the role of c-MET in promoting the bone metastatic process we measured the circulating levels of osteotropic factors induced by RCC stem cells in the sera of mice treated with c-Met inhibitor JNJ. Interestingly we were able to quantify the expression in tumor bearing mice of the human chemokines IL-11 and CCL20, known as key players in the regulation of cancer cell migration and progression from different solid tumors [34–36].
Importantly, JNJ treatment significantly reduced human IL-11. CCL20 levels resulted significantly higher in mice untreated with JNJ than in treated ones, p < 0.05 (Figure 6A–6B), strongly supporting the involvement of cMet in the regulation of the bone metastatic process.
Figure 6: IL-11 and CCL20 serum levels are reduced by JNJ treatment. (A) Human IL-11 and (B) CCL20 serum levels resulted significantly higher in mice untreated with JNJ than in treated ones, p < 0.05.
c-MET and CCL20 expression are increased in renal cancer patients with bone metastases
To further confirm our previous data on humans, we analysed c-Met expression in IHC of tumor samples from patients with primary renal carcinoma and bone metastases, the clinical data of patients are reported in Table S1. c-Met was detected on 9/12 primary tumors and in all (4/4) bone metastatic samples as shown in (Figure 7A–7D). In parallel, to further address the clinical relevance of c-Met upregulation during tumor progression, we dosed CCL20 in the serum of renal cancer patients with and without bone metastases and in healthy controls. CCL20 levels significantly increased in the sera of patients with bone metastases compared to non-metastatic ones, p < 0.05 (Figure 7E). All together these data sustain the clinical relevance of targeting c-Met as possible marker of renal cancer dissemination to the bone.
Figure 7: c-MET and CCL20 expression in human samples. (A, C) c-MET expression in primary RCC and (B, D) in bone metastastic samples (magnification × 20 and × 60). (E) CCL20 serum levels resulted significantly increased in the sera of patients with bone metastases compared to non-metastatic ones, p < 0.05.
DISCUSSION
The cellular mechanisms underlying tumor heterogeneity are subject of intense research in the cancer biology field. Indeed, cells within the tumour population itself often exhibit functional variety with distinct proliferative, differentiative and metastatic capacities.
Over recent years increasing data indicated the existence of CSCs in multiple solid tumors and compelling evidences highlight their role in promoting tumor dissemination to distant organs and in particular to bone [10–11]. A number of cell surface markers as CD133, CD44 or CD24 have been identified and utilized for the isolation of subsets enriched for CSCs [37–38]. In renal cancer, stem cells have been characterized as CD105+CD24− cells [12] and here we demonstrate that RCC stem cells directly metastasize to bone in NOD/SCID mice, previously implanted with a small fragment of human bone [33]. Bone metastasis derives by a complex cross-talk between cancer cells and bone microenvironment, thereby the presence of a “human pre-metastatic niche” as an implanted human bone is important to address the mechanisms leading tumor progression to bone [39–40].
Recent findings indicate that the MET tyrosine-kinase receptor is a sensor of adverse microenvironmental conditions (such as hypoxia) and drives cell invasion and metastasis [41]. In particular, it is involved in the bone metastatic process, because it is a mediator of the interactions between tumor cells and the bone microenvironment in breast cancer [27]. c-MET is widely expressed in human cancers [42] and also in CSCs isolated from different tumors such as glioblastoma [37], head and neck carcinoma [43], pancreatic [44] and colorectal cancer [45–46]. Here we report c-MET expression on CD105+ CD24− RCC stem cells which, implanted SC in NOD-SCID mice, recreate the heterogeneity of the primary tumor, including a subpopulation of RCC stem cells expressing CD105 and c-MET. Our data suggest that c-Met expression on RCC stem cells drives renal cancer progression to bone, since c-Met+ RCC stem cells directly formed bone lesions. Furthermore, a selective c-MET inhibitor treatment abrogated bone metastases development, indicating that HGF/c-MET signalling is relevant in the metastatic process induced by RCC stem cells. c-MET has been found to be highly expressed in prostate cancer bone lesions [47], and a c-MET inhibitor reduced bone metastasis progression in breast cancer [48]. Thus, our data confirm now a role for c-MET in the RCC-induced bone metastatic process, suggesting the relevance of targeting CSCs in order to avoid disease relapse and particularly development of bone metastases.
A characteristic of bone metastases from renal cancer is the presence of pure lytic lesions due to OC activation, accompanied by a striking neo-vascularization and by an entire substitution of the bone tissue with tumor cells. Here, we observed that RCC stem cells grow in the human implanted bone, where they prompt OC activation without affecting OB activity. JNJ inhibited the stimulatory activity of RCC stem cells on OCs, because it likely interferes with paracrine factors produced by RCC stem cells, which promote OC bone resorption. JNJ also affects OC differentiation and stimulates OB activity, thus it has an anabolic effect. This latter point is particular relevant because JNJ inhibits the bone metastasis formation and concomitantly it has a protective effect on bone through an anabolic action. As confirmation of a direct effect of c-MET inhibitors on bone metastases and bone cells, literature data reported clinical and pre-clinical evidences that cabozantinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting c-MET and VEGFR-2) has a double antitumoral and anti-bone resorptive effects in patients with advanced RCC [49]. Moreover, Santini et al. demonstrated that cabozantinib directly inhibits osteoclasts and reduces RANKL expression on osteoblasts [50].
Other than the effect of JNJ on RCC stem cells and on bone cells, we reported that this c-MET inhibitor interferes with serum levels of IL-11 and CCL20. IL-11 is a negative prognostic factor in renal cancer [34]; consistently, we observed that IL-11 levels were higher in sera of mice with bone metastasis than in non-bone metastasis ones. CCL-20 is expressed by different tumors [35–36, 44], where it contributes to cancer cell growth and in vivo invasion [45–46]. The link between CCL20 and CSCs-induced bone metastasis is not known. Here we showed that JNJ treatment reduced CCL20 levels in the sera of treated animals, which did not develop bone metastases, compared to the untreated mice. Finally, for a clinical perspective, we reported that CCL20 levels were higher in sera of renal cancer patients with bone metastases than in non-bone metastatic patients, suggesting a potential role of CCL20 in the bone metastases induced by RCC stem cells. Moreover, T regulatory (Treg) cells, infiltrating renal cancer, express high level of CCR6 [51] and its ligand CCL20 is expressed on tumor cells [48], representing a homing mechanism for Treg that favours the tumor immune escape. Although the function of CCL20 in RCC stem cell-mediated bone metastasis needs further investigation, it is tempting to speculate that blocking CCL20 signaling could be useful to inhibit both bone metastases and tumor immune escape.
In conclusion, we provide evidence for the ability of RCC stem cells to metastasize bone and we report the relevant role of c-MET in the bone metastatic process induced by RCC stem cells in mice and humans. Indeed, we were able to block the bone metastasis formation in mice by inhibiting c-MET with a selective and specific inhibitor.
Out of these findings strongly emerges the relevance to target CSCs in order to avoid tumor metastases. Thus, an integrated approach with the development of suitable ex vivo and in vivo models should lead to further characterization of the CSCs. High-resolution imaging technology together with the identification of stromal markers will improve our understanding of CSCs to more accurately recapitulate the niche of tumorigenic cells and to address novel mechanisms that operate in CSCs during tumor progression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The human-in-mice model of bone metastasis
Experimental animals were treated according to the national and international guidelines (the Italian legislative decree 116/92 and the European Community Directive 86/609 CEE) and with the authorization provided by the Italian Ministry of Health (as of D.M. 44/1994-A and subsequent integrations). All of the orthotopic xenograft models were established in NOD/SCID mice as previously described [33]. A small fragment of human bone, derived from the discarded femoral head of an adult patient submitted to total joint replacement (after the patient’s informed consent) was transplanted subcutaneously in the left flank of 72 NOD/SCID 4-week-old female mice (Charles River Laboratories Italia). The animals were divided in 3 groups: i) mice with bone implant, injected with RCC stem cells and treated with JNJ (19) or untreated (31); ii) mice with only bone implant treated with JNJ (11) and untreated (11); iii) mice only injected with RCC stem cells treated with JNJ (6) and untreated (6). RCC stem cells were injected subcutaneously (SC) close to the bone implant in 25 mice and by intracardiac (IC) route in 12 mice. For SC injections, 2,0 × 104 RCC stem cells were resuspended in PBS and Matrigel 1:2 (BD Biosciences) and injected in a volume of 100 μL using a 25-gauge needle. For the IC route, 1 × 103 RCC stem cells were injected in the left ventricle. The day after the RCC stem cell injection, we started a systemic treatment with JNJ by gauvage; the compound was administered at a daily dose of 40 mg/kg according to previous tested dose [52]. For 60 days, the development of tumor masses and metastases to bone and other organs was monitored by In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS). One of the parameter evaluated to determine the viability of the implant bone was the presence of circulating human IgG in mice sera by mean of a human IgG ELISA, purchased by ICL Inc.
Lentivirus production and RCC stem cell transduction
The production of lentivirus vector and RCC stem cell transduction were previously described [10]. Briefly, vector stocks were produced by transient transfection of the luciferase transfer plasmid, the packaging plasmids pMDLg/pRRE and pRSV.REV, and the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) envelope plasmid pMD2.VSV-G in 293T. The viral supernatants were filtered and viral particles were concentrated by ultracentrifugation according to Follenzi et al. [53]. The viral p24 antigen concentration was determined by HIV-1 p24 Core profile ELISA (Perkin-Elmer Life). The high-titer lentiviruses were added to RCC stem cells, which were incubated for 4 hours. RCC stem cells were tested for luciferase expression through the Luciferase Assay System (Promega Corp.), as described in the protocol kit. Importantly, we did not observe significant differences in tumor phenotypes associated with lentiviral transduction, as demonstrated by histological appearance and flow cytometry analysis (data not shown).
In vivo bioluminescence imaging
To perform IVIS analyses, mice were anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation then intraperitoneally injected with 15 mg/mL D-luciferin (Caliper Life Science). At various time points after tumor implantation (20, 45 and 60 days), the bioluminescence signals were monitored using the IVIS system 2000 series (Xenogen Corp.) consisting of a highly sensitive cooled CCD camera. Two kinetic bioluminescent acquisitions were collected between 0 and 20 min after D-luciferin injection to confirm the peak photon emission, which was recorded as maximum photon efflux per second; imaging times ranged from 1 to 60 sec, depending on the amount of luciferase activity. Data were analyzed using the total photon flux emission (photons/second) in the regions of interest (ROI) defined manually.
Isolation of bone metastatic cells
After 60 days, the mice were sacrificed, the human implanted bones were retrieved, finely minced and then digested by incubation for 30 min at 37°C in D-MEM containing collagenase I (Sigma-Aldrich) to isolate metastatic cells from the osteolytic lesions. After collagenase neutralization, the cells were washed by Hank’s balanced saline solution (Lonza), and red blood cells were lysed with Red Blood cell Lysis Solution (Promega). The cell suspension was forced through a graded series of meshes to separate the cell components from the stroma and aggregates. After filtration, to analyze the phenotype of these bone-derived cells, they were counted and stained for flow cytometry analysis with anti-human CD105PE (Invitrogen) and CD24FITC (BD Pharmingen). For every antibody, we also used the relative isotype control. Samples were analyzed in a FACs Calibur instrument and elaborated by Flowjo (Treestar).
Single cells were also plated in a serum-free DMEM-F12 selective medium (Gibco, Invitrogen) supplemented with 10 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF), 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF) (PeproTech), 5 μg/ml insulin and 0,4% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich). After one week, sphere formation was observed. Renal spheres were collected by gentle centrifugation, disaggregated with a Non-enzymatic Cell Dissociation Solution (Sigma-Aldrich), then stained with CD105 and CD24 to control the phenotype by FACs analysis.
Immunohistochemistry and histological analysis
Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissues fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, and bone tissues were decalcified with EDTA treatment until soft. Tissues were embedded in paraffin, and sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated through graded alcohols and subjected to antigen retrieval for immunohistochemistry. Sections were stained for H&E for morphological studies. The presence of human vessels was demonstrated by staining for anti-CD34 (clone QbndN/10) from Neomarkers, whereas tumors cells were stained by vimentin (clone R9) from DAKO, CD105 (clone 3A9) from Novus Biologicals and c-MET (clone C28) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. To identify the collagen fibers on the new bone, a trichrome stain was performed by Gomori’s trichrome stain kit (DAKO). TRAP staining was performed to identify osteoclasts, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche).
Histomorphometry
The samples were fixed in 70% ethanol and embedded undecalcified in methyl-methacrylate resin (Merck 800590, Germany). Bone sections were cut by using a microtome (Polycut S, Leica Microsystems) equipped with a carbide-tungsten blade, stained with Goldner’s stain, and mounted on microscope slides for histomorphometric measurements. The sections were obtained from three different levels of the methyl-methacrylate block, each separated by a thickness of 250 μm. Histomorphometric results were calculated as the mean of the values obtained from the three different levels as an approximation of a 3-D evaluation. This also avoids replicating the sampling of any single bone remodeling unit.
Measurements were performed by means of an image analysis system consisting of an epifluorescent microscope (Leica DM2500) connected to a digital camera (Leica DFC420 C) and a computer equipped with a specific software for histomorphometric analyses (Bone 3.5, Explora Nova).
Histomorphometric parameters were reported in accordance with the ASBMR Committee nomenclature [54]. All thickness/depth results (O.Th, MAR, E.De, W.Th) were corrected for obliquity of sections by multiplying by π/4.
Serum detection of IL-11 and CCL20
To analyze the expression of human IL-11 and CCL-20 in mice, we utilized the multi-analyte detection system Milliplex Map, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Molecule detection was performed with the instrument Luminex® 200™ (Luminex Corporation), and data were analyzed through the MILLIPLEX analyst software.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses on multiple simultaneous comparison were performed by one way ANOVA, whereas differences between two groups were performed by Student’s t-test with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (spssx/pc) software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The results were considered statistically significant for p < 0.05.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Antonio Cimino and Daniele Corino for technical support in immunohistochemistry.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Comoglio PM and Trusolino L received research grants from Janssen, a branch of Johnson&Johnson. Perera T is an employee of Janssen. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
FUNDING
This work was supported by CRT Foundation, by the Italian Ministry of Health: Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata e Giovani Ricercatori 2009 (GR 2009-1584485) and by Fondazione Ricerca Molinette ONLUS.
REFERENCES
1. Woodward E, Jagdev S, McParland L, Clark K, Gregory W, Newsham A, Rogerson S, Hayward K, Selby P, Brown J. Skeletal complications and survival in renal cancer patients with bone metastases. Bone. 2011; 48:160–166.
2. McKay RR, Kroeger N, Xie W, Lee JL, Knox JJ, Bjarnason GA, MacKenzie MJ, Wood L, Srinivas S, Vaishampayan UN, Rha SY, Pal SK, Donskov F, et al. Impact of bone and liver metastases on patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy. Eur Urol. 2014; 65:577–584.
3. Santini D, Procopio G, Porta C, Ibrahim T, Barni S, Mazzara C, Fontana A, Berruti A, Berardi R, Vincenzi B, Ortega C, Ottaviani D, Carteni G, et al. Natural history of malignant bone disease in renal cancer: final results of an Italian bone metastasis survey. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e83026.
4. Roato I. Interaction among cells of bone, immune system, and solid tumors leads to bone metastases. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013; 2013:315024.
5. Sterling JA, Edwards JR, Martin TJ, Mundy GR. Advances in the biology of bone metastasis: how the skeleton affects tumor behavior. Bone. 2011; 48:6–15.
6. Luo X, Fu Y, Loza AJ, Murali B, Leahy KM, Ruhland MK, Gang M, Su X, Zamani A, Shi Y, Lavine KJ, Ornitz DM, Weilbaecher KN, et al. Stromal-Initiated Changes in the Bone Promote Metastatic Niche Development. Cell Rep. 2016; 14:82–92.
7. Lazennec G, Richmond A. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: new insights into cancer-related inflammation. Trends Mol Med. 2010; 16:133–144.
8. Liu J, Zhang N, Li Q, Zhang W, Ke F, Leng Q, Wang H, Chen J. Tumor-associated macrophages recruit CCR6+ regulatory T cells and promote the development of colorectal cancer via enhancing CCL20 production in mice. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e19495.
9. Allavena P, Sica A, Vecchi A, Locati M, Sozzani S, Mantovani A. The chemokine receptor switch paradigm and dendritic cell migration: its significance in tumor tissues. Immunol Rev. 2000; 177:141–149.
10. Bertolini G, D’Amico L, Moro M, Landoni E, Perego P, Miceli R, Gatti L, Andriani F, Wong D, Caserini R, Tortoreto M, Milione M, Ferracini R, et al. Microenvironment-Modulated Metastatic CD133+/CXCR4+/EpCAM− Lung Cancer-Initiating Cells Sustain Tumor Dissemination and Correlate with Poor Prognosis. Cancer Res. 2015; 75:3636–3649.
11. D’Amico L, Patane S, Grange C, Bussolati B, Isella C, Fontani L, Godio L, Cilli M, D’Amelio P, Isaia G, Medico E, Ferracini R, Roato I. Primary breast cancer stem-like cells metastasise to bone, switch phenotype and acquire a bone tropism signature. Br J Cancer. 2013; 108:2525–2536.
12. Bussolati B, Bruno S, Grange C, Ferrando U, Camussi G. Identification of a tumor-initiating stem cell population in human renal carcinomas. FASEB J. 2008; 22:3696–3705.
13. Addla SK, Brown MD, Hart CA, Ramani VA, Clarke NW. Characterization of the Hoechst 33342 side population from normal and malignant human renal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008; 295:F680–687.
14. Gassenmaier M, Chen D, Buchner A, Henkel L, Schiemann M, Mack B, Schendel DJ, Zimmermann W, Pohla H. CXC chemokine receptor 4 is essential for maintenance of renal cell carcinoma-initiating cells and predicts metastasis. Stem Cells. 2013; 31:1467–1476.
15. Ueda K, Ogasawara S, Akiba J, Nakayama M, Todoroki K, Sanada S, Suekane S, Noguchi M, Matsuoka K, Yano H. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 identifies cells with cancer stem cell-like properties in a human renal cell carcinoma cell line. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e75463.
16. Wang X, Liu Y, Zhou K, Zhang G, Wang F, Ren J. Isolation and characterization of CD105+/CD90+ subpopulation in breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell line. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015; 8:5105–5112.
17. Li Y, Zhai Z, Liu D, Zhong X, Meng X, Yang Q, Liu J, Li H. CD105 promotes hepatocarcinoma cell invasion and metastasis through VEGF. Tumour Biol. 2015; 36:737–745.
18. Sheng X, Chi Z, Cui C, Si L, Li S, Tang B, Mao L, Lian B, Wang X, Yan X, Guo J. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: largest single-center retrospective analysis. Oncotarget. 2016; 7: 27044–54. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7395.
19. Haas NB, Manola J, Uzzo RG, Flaherty KT, Wood CG, Kane C, Jewett M, Dutcher JP, Atkins MB, Pins M, Wilding G, Cella D, Wagner L, et al. Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016.
20. Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Gherardi E, Vande Woude GF. Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003; 4:915–925.
21. Jeffers M, Schmidt L, Nakaigawa N, Webb CP, Weirich G, Kishida T, Zbar B, Vande Woude GF. Activating mutations for the met tyrosine kinase receptor in human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94:11445–11450.
22. Schmidt L, Duh FM, Chen F, Kishida T, Glenn G, Choyke P, Scherer SW, Zhuang Z, Lubensky I, Dean M, Allikmets R, Chidambaram A, Bergerheim UR, et al. Germline and somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the MET proto-oncogene in papillary renal carcinomas. Nat Genet. 1997; 16:68–73.
23. Schmidt L, Junker K, Weirich G, Glenn G, Choyke P, Lubensky I, Zhuang Z, Jeffers M, Vande Woude G, Neumann H, Walther M, Linehan WM, Zbar B. Two North American families with hereditary papillary renal carcinoma and identical novel mutations in the MET proto-oncogene. Cancer Res. 1998; 58:1719–1722.
24. Miyata Y, Kanetake H, Kanda S. Presence of phosphorylated hepatocyte growth factor receptor/c-Met is associated with tumor progression and survival in patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12:4876–4881.
25. Giubellino A, Linehan WM, Bottaro DP. Targeting the Met signaling pathway in renal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009; 9:785–793.
26. Gibney GT, Aziz SA, Camp RL, Conrad P, Schwartz BE, Chen CR, Kelly WK, Kluger HM. c-Met is a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24:343–349.
27. Previdi S, Maroni P, Matteucci E, Broggini M, Bendinelli P, Desiderio MA. Interaction between human-breast cancer metastasis and bone microenvironment through activated hepatocyte growth factor/Met and beta-catenin/Wnt pathways. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46:1679–1691.
28. Choueiri TK, Vaishampayan U, Rosenberg JE, Logan TF, Harzstark AL, Bukowski RM, Rini BI, Srinivas S, Stein MN, Adams LM, Ottesen LH, Laubscher KH, Sherman L, et al. Phase II and biomarker study of the dual MET/VEGFR2 inhibitor foretinib in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:181–186.
29. Vigna E, Comoglio PM. Targeting the oncogenic Met receptor by antibodies and gene therapy. Oncogene. 2015; 34:1883–1889.
30. Benvenuti S, Lazzari L, Arnesano A, Li Chiavi G, Gentile A, Comoglio PM. Ron kinase transphosphorylation sustains MET oncogene addiction. Cancer Res. 2011; 71:1945–1955.
31. Weber KL, Pathak S, Multani AS, Price JE. Characterization of a renal cell carcinoma cell line derived from a human bone metastasis and establishment of an experimental nude mouse model. J Urol. 2002; 168:774–779.
32. Kuperwasser C, Dessain S, Bierbaum BE, Garnet D, Sperandio K, Gauvin GP, Naber SP, Weinberg RA, Rosenblatt M. A mouse model of human breast cancer metastasis to human bone. Cancer Res. 2005; 65:6130–6138.
33. Roato I, Caldo D, Godio L, D’Amico L, Giannoni P, Morello E, Quarto R, Molfetta L, Buracco P, Mussa A, Ferracini R. Bone invading NSCLC cells produce IL-7: mice model and human histologic data. BMC Cancer. 2010; 10:12.
34. Pan D, Xu L, Liu H, Zhang W, Liu W, Liu Y, Fu Q, Xu J. High expression of interleukin-11 is an independent indicator of poor prognosis in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2015; 106:592–597.
35. Brand S, Olszak T, Beigel F, Diebold J, Otte JM, Eichhorst ST, Goke B, Dambacher J. Cell differentiation dependent expressed CCR6 mediates ERK-1/2, SAPK/JNK, and Akt signaling resulting in proliferation and migration of colorectal cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2006; 97:709–723.
36. Ghadjar P, Coupland SE, Na IK, Noutsias M, Letsch A, Stroux A, Bauer S, Buhr HJ, Thiel E, Scheibenbogen C, Keilholz U. Chemokine receptor CCR6 expression level and liver metastases in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:1910–1916.
37. Boccaccio C, Comoglio PM. The MET oncogene in glioblastoma stem cells: implications as a diagnostic marker and a therapeutic target. Cancer Res. 2013; 73:3193–3199.
38. Lim YC, Kang HJ, Moon JH. C-Met pathway promotes self-renewal and tumorigenecity of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma stem-like cell. Oral Oncol. 2014; 50:633–639.
39. Delitto D, Vertes-George E, Hughes SJ, Behrns KE, Trevino JG. c-Met signaling in the development of tumorigenesis and chemoresistance: potential applications in pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:8458–8470.
40. Boccaccio C, Luraghi P, Comoglio PM. MET-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibitors: an old liaison rooted in colorectal cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2014; 74:3647–3651.
41. Boccaccio C, Comoglio PM. Invasive growth: a MET-driven genetic programme for cancer and stem cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006; 6:637–645.
42. Trusolino L, Bertotti A, Comoglio PM. MET signalling: principles and functions in development, organ regeneration and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010; 11:834–848.
43. Previdi S, Abbadessa G, Dalo F, France DS, Broggini M. Breast cancer-derived bone metastasis can be effectively reduced through specific c-MET inhibitor tivantinib (ARQ 197) and shRNA c-MET knockdown. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012; 11:214–223.
44. Campbell AS, Albo D, Kimsey TF, White SL, Wang TN. Macrophage inflammatory protein-3alpha promotes pancreatic cancer cell invasion. J Surg Res. 2005; 123:96–101.
45. Schutyser E, Struyf S, Van Damme J. The CC chemokine CCL20 and its receptor CCR6. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003; 14:409–426.
46. Beider K, Abraham M, Begin M, Wald H, Weiss ID, Wald O, Pikarsky E, Abramovitch R, Zeira E, Galun E, Nagler A, Peled A. Interaction between CXCR4 and CCL20 pathways regulates tumor growth. PLoS One. 2009; 4:e5125.
47. Knudsen BS, Gmyrek GA, Inra J, Scherr DS, Vaughan ED, Nanus DM, Kattan MW, Gerald WL, Vande Woude GF. High expression of the Met receptor in prostate cancer metastasis to bone. Urology. 2002; 60:1113–1117.
48. Middel P, Brauneck S, Meyer W, Radzun HJ. Chemokine-mediated distribution of dendritic cell subsets in renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2010; 10:578.
49. Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T, Mainwaring PN, Rini BI, Donskov F, Hammers H, Hutson TE, Lee JL, Peltola K, Roth BJ, Bjarnason GA, Geczi L, et al. Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:1814–1823.
50. Santini D, Tonini G. Treatment of Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374:888–889.
51. Oldham KA, Parsonage G, Bhatt RI, Wallace DM, Deshmukh N, Chaudhri S, Adams DH, Lee SP. T lymphocyte recruitment into renal cell carcinoma tissue: a role for chemokine receptors CXCR3, CXCR6, CCR5, and CCR6. Eur Urol. 2012; 61:385–394.
52. Gastaldi S, Sassi F, Accornero P, Torti D, Galimi F, Migliardi G, Molyneux G, Perera T, Comoglio PM, Boccaccio C, Smalley MJ, Bertotti A, Trusolino L. Met signaling regulates growth, repopulating potential and basal cell-fate commitment of mammary luminal progenitors: implications for basal-like breast cancer. Oncogene. 2013; 32:1428–1440.
53. Follenzi A, Ailles LE, Bakovic S, Geuna M, Naldini L. Gene transfer by lentiviral vectors is limited by nuclear translocation and rescued by HIV-1 pol sequences. Nat Genet. 2000; 25:217–222.
54. Dempster DW, Compston JE, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR, Parfitt AM. Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res. 2013; 28:2–17.
