Research Papers: Pathology:

High circulating activin A level is associated with tumor progression and predicts poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma

PDF |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2016; 7:13388-13399. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7796

Metrics: PDF 2519 views  |   HTML 3159 views  |   ?  

Mir Alireza Hoda, Anita Rozsas, Elisabeth Lang, Thomas Klikovits, Zoltan Lohinai, Szilvia Torok, Judit Berta, Matyas Bendek, Walter Berger, Balazs Hegedus, Walter Klepetko, Ferenc Renyi-Vamos, Michael Grusch, Balazs Dome and Viktoria Laszlo _


Mir Alireza Hoda1,2,*, Anita Rozsas1,3,*, Elisabeth Lang2, Thomas Klikovits1, Zoltan Lohinai3, Szilvia Torok3, Judit Berta3, Matyas Bendek3, Walter Berger2, Balazs Hegedus1,4, Walter Klepetko1, Ferenc Renyi-Vamos5, Michael Grusch2, Balazs Dome1,3,5,6,** and Viktoria Laszlo1,**

1 Translational Thoracic Oncology Laboratory, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

2 Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

3 National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary

4 MTA-SE Molecular Oncology Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary

5 Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Institute of Oncology and Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

6 Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

* These authors share the first authorship

** These authors are co-senior authors of this study

Correspondence to:

Viktoria Laszlo, email:

Balazs Hegedus, email:

Keywords: activin A, lung adenocarcinoma, biomarker, metastasis, follistatin, Pathology Section

Received: November 20, 2015 Accepted: February 09, 2016 Published: February 29, 2016


Activin A (ActA)/follistatin (FST) signaling has been shown to be deregulated in different tumor types including lung adenocarcinoma (LADC). Here, we report that serum ActA protein levels are significantly elevated in LADC patients (n=64) as compared to controls (n=46, p=0.015). ActA levels also correlated with more advanced disease stage (p<0.0001) and T (p=0.0035) and N (p=0.0002) factors. M1 patients had significantly higher ActA levels than M0 patients (p<0.001). High serum ActA level was associated with poor overall survival (p<0.0001) and was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor (p=0.004). Serum FST levels were increased only in female LADC patients (vs. female controls, p=0.031). Two out of five LADC cell lines secreted biologically active ActA, while FST was produced in all of them. Transcripts of both type I and II ActA receptors were detected in all five LADC cell lines. In conclusion, our study does not only suggest that measuring blood ActA levels in LADC patients might improve the prediction of prognosis, but also indicates that this parameter might be a novel non-invasive biomarker for identifying LADC patients with organ metastases.


Approximately 40 % of lung cancer patients have lung adenocarcinoma (LADC, a subtype of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Because there are differences with respect to prognoses between patients with the same stage, there is an urgent need to identify clinically useful non-invasive biomarkers that provide additional prognostic information to improve therapeutic decision-making and prediction of prognosis in this malignancy. There are only a few blood-based biomarkers currently investigated in LADC. Protein markers, for instance serum cytokeratin 19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1), have been investigated recently in patients with advanced LADC [1]. Other examples are carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) [2], serum amyloid A (SAA) [3, 4], cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) [2, 5], haptoglobin-alpha 2 (HAP2) [6, 7], apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) [6, 8], kallikreins (KLKs) [9-11], laminin C2 (lamC2) [5] and plasma fibrinogen [12]. The analysis of other circulating tumor-derived biomarkers like cell-free nucleic acids (such as DNA and microRNAs [13]), metabolites [14, 15] or circulating tumor cells (CTCs) [13, 16, 17] might also hold potential in predicting clinical outcome. However, taken together, the evidence for the prognostic significance of the above mentioned biomarkers is still rather modest [18].

Activin A (ActA), a member of the TGF-beta superfamily of cytokines, is formed via the covalent intracellular dimerization of two inhibin ßA (IHNBA) subunits [19]. ActA first binds to the type II activin receptors (ActR-IIA or ActR-IIB) on the cell surface, leading to the recruitment and phosphorylation of the type I activin receptor ActR-IB [20]. Receptor-regulated SMADs (R-SMADs) 2 and 3 are recruited to the receptor complex and phosphorylated by the type I receptor, which allows them to form complexes with SMAD4 and translocate to the nucleus where they are involved in the regulation of gene expression [20]. ActA is involved in a variety of biological functions including control of cellular differentiation, homeostasis of cell number and tissue architecture in multiple organs [21]. Follistatin (FST) is the natural antagonist of ActA, binding with high affinity to its ß subunit and preventing its interaction with the type II activin receptors [22]. The ActA/FST complex is then mainly internalized and degraded in the lysosomes [23].

Deregulated expression of - or mutations in - components of the activin signaling axis have been found in a broad range of malignancies. In cancer of the breast, liver and colon, activin signals were found to inhibit tumor cell growth and tumor tissue expressed decreased levels of ActA, increased levels of activin antagonists or demonstrated a loss of functional activin receptors or SMAD proteins [24-27]. In contrast, in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), esophageal ADC and malignant pleural mesothelioma, high ActA expression increased tumor cell aggressiveness [28-33]. The two studies that investigated the expression of ActA in clinical LADC samples yielded conflicting data. In the first study, overexpression of ActA in LADC tissue showed association with poor prognosis in stage I patients [34]. In the second study, decreased expression of ActA in the tumor tissue and a negative correlation of ActA protein level with lymph node (LN) metastasis was reported [35].

Overexpression of FST has been found in melanoma, prostate cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma [27, 36, 37]. Chen et al reported that FST serum levels of LADC patients are elevated and that this parameter might be a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of LADC [38]. In a preclinical model of SCLC, however, FST inhibited the formation of multiple organ metastases [39].

Because there has been no detailed analysis of circulating ActA and FST levels - and of their potential correlation - in LADC, we investigated the expressions of the members of the ActA/FST signaling system in LADC cell lines and, moreover, assessed plasma and serum levels of ActA/FST and correlated them with the patients’ clinicopathological parameters and survival.


Testing of activin A and follistatin ELISA assays

To test whether ActA/FST complexes interfere with the ELISA detection of ActA and/or FST alone, FST and ActA levels of plasma samples were determined after treatment either with recombinant human (rh)ActA or rhFST, respectively. No significant differences could be detected between ActA concentrations of the untreated plasma and the samples incubated with rhFST at different concentrations (2, 5, 100 ng/ml), demonstrating that the ActA ELISA detects both free (active) and FST-bound (inactive) ActA (Supplemental Figure 1A). In contrast, treatment of plasma with 50 and 100 ng/ml rhActA decreased the levels of measurable FST, indicating that only free (and not the ActA-bound form of) FST can be detected by the ELISA kit (Supplemental Figure 1B).

Circulating ActA levels are elevated in LADC patients in a stage-dependent manner

ActA level was measured in serum samples of 64 LADC patients and 46 age- and gender-matched controls and in plasma samples of 87 LADC patients and 66 age- and gender-matched control individuals (Supplemental Table 1). In the control group, the mean values of ActA serum and plasma concentrations were 457.2±119.6 pg/ml and 344.0±142.4 pg/ml, respectively (Figure 1A and Supplemental Figure 2A). In patients with LADC, these concentrations were significantly higher, with a mean serum value of 650.0±365.3 pg/ml and a mean plasma value of 561.6±500.5 pg/ml (p = 0.015 and p < 0.0001, respectively; Figure 1A and Supplemental Figure 2A).

In the case of 58 patients where ActA levels were determined in both plasma and serum samples, serum levels were significantly higher, with a mean value of 640.9±371.9 (vs. 461.4±257.2, p = 0.006, data not shown). Importantly, however, we found a strong correlation between plasma and serum ActA levels in this patient sub-cohort (Supplemental Figure 2B, R = 0.932, p < 0.0001). The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients with high and low ActA serum or plasma concentrations (dichotomized by the median) are presented in Table 1 and Supplemental Table 2, respectively. Blood ActA levels and disease stage showed significant positive correlations. However, no significant associations of circulating ActA levels with gender, age, therapy or smoking status were detected. We found no significant differences between ActA levels (serum or plasma) of never-, ex-, and current smokers (data not shown).

The ROC curve analysis showed a sensitivity of 60.9% (95% CI: 47.93-72.90 %) and a specificity of 65.2% (95 % CI: 49.8-78.7 %) of serum and 66.7 % sensitivity (95 % CI: 53.9-77.8 %) and 62.1% specificity (95% CI: 51.0-72.3%) of plasma ActA levels for correct diagnosis of LADC (data not shown). The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.637 (95 % CI: 0.534 to 0.741) in serum and 0.685 (95% CI: 0.6014-0.7682) in plasma (data not shown). We also observed a stage- and T and N status-dependent increase of circulating ActA concentrations (Figure 1B-1D, Supplemental Figure 2C-2E). Serum ActA levels were significantly elevated in stage IV patients as compared to controls or to patients with any earlier stage of the disease (Figure 1B). In line with this, stage IV LADC patients had significantly higher plasma ActA levels than controls or those with stage I-II disease (Supplemental Figure 2C). ActA levels were also significantly increased in both the serum (vs. control and T1 cases; Figure 1C) and in the plasma (vs. control; Supplemental Figure 2D) of T3 LADC patients. Furthermore, higher circulating serum (Figure 1D) and plasma (Supplemental Figure 2E) ActA levels were associated with increased LN metastasis. For detailed ActA serum and plasma concentrations of the patient and control cohorts, please refer to Supporting information (Supplemental Table 3).

Table 1: Clinicopathological characteristics of patients grouped by serum ActA level


Low ActA


High ActA



All patients


























Age (years)







< 62








≥ 62









ever smoker








never smoker



































































* two-sided χ2 test; **in case of one patient data were not available; ***9 patients received targeted therapy

Abbreviations: C(R)T=chemo- and/or radiotherapy; S=surgery; S+C(R)T=surgery and chemo- and/or radiotherapy; PT=palliative treatment

Serum ActA levels are elevated in patients with LADC and correlate with tumor progression.

Figure 1: Serum ActA levels are elevated in patients with LADC and correlate with tumor progression. A. ActA concentration is significantly higher in the serum samples of patients with LADC (p = 0.015, vs. controls). B., C., D. T and N status- and stage-dependent increase of serum ActA in LADC (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

High circulating ActA associates with organ metastasis, has diagnostic significance and correlates with poor overall survival in LADC

Both serum (Figure 2A) and plasma (Supplemental Figure 2F) ActA levels were significantly increased in patients with metastatic disease as compared to M0 patients (p < 0.001 in both cases). ROC curve analysis revealed that serum ActA had a sensitivity of 82.6% (95% CI: 61.2-95.1%) and a specificity of 63.4 %, (95 % CI: 46.9-77.9 %) to differentiate metastatic patients from M0 cases (Figure 2B). In plasma, the sensitivity was 70.3% (95% CI: 53.0-84.1%) with a specificity of 68.0% (95% CI: 53.3-80.5%; Supplemental Figure 2G). The AUC was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.693- 0.919) in serum (Figure 2B) and 0.743 (95% CI: 0.634-0.852 %) in plasma (Supplemental Figure 2G).

Figure 2:

Figure 2: A. Serum ActA concentration is elevated in patients with M1 disease (***p < 0.001). B. Serum ActA is a useful biomarker for the identification of organ metastatic LADC: AUC: 0.806 (95% CI: 0.693 to 0.919).

Because LN and organ metastatic LADCs were characterized by a significant increase in circulating ActA levels, we next used Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate the overall survival (OS) rate for patients with low and high serum (Figure 3) or plasma ActA (Supplemental Figure 3) levels. These classifications were based on the median values of ActA concentrations in our patient population. We found that LADC patients with high serum or plasma ActA levels had significantly shorter OSs than those with low circulating ActA concentrations (p < 0.0001, in the cases of both comparisons, Figure 3A and Supplemental Figure 3A). If we classified the patients according to their disease stage, low serum ActA levels were still significantly associated with benefit in OS in the stage I-II sub-cohort (p = 0.0047; Figure 3B) while a trend towards longer OS for patients with low ActA serum levels in the stage III and IV sub-cohorts did not reach significance (Figure 3B). Accordingly, stage I-II or stage IV patients with low plasma ActA levels had significantly better OS than the corresponding cases in the high plasma ActA level arms (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0465, respectively, Supplemental Figure 3B). Of note, stage III patients with low ActA plasma levels also tended to have better survival (Supplemental Figure 3B).

Kaplan-Meier curves for OS of LADC patients according to serum ActA level (cut-off value is the median).

Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier curves for OS of LADC patients according to serum ActA level (cut-off value is the median). A. LADC patients with high serum ActA levels had significantly shorter OS than those with low serum ActA levels (median OS was 7.9 vs. 39.6 months, HR: 0.2768, 95% CI 0.1450 to 0.5286; p < 0.0001). B. Low serum ActA was associated with a significant OS benefit in the subgroup of early-stage (I-II) cases (median OS was undefined vs. 6.4 months, HR: 0.05945, CI: 0.008380-0.4217, p = 0.0047). There was a tendency for longer OS in the high ActA group in stage III patients (median OS: 39.6 vs. 22.4 months, HR: 0.5349, CI: 0.1628-1.757) and in stage IV patients (median OS: 8.3 vs. 5.9 months, HR: 0.6951, CI: 0.2700-1.789).

Multivariate analysis (including standard prognostic parameters such as patient age, gender and tumor stage) also showed that serum and plasma ActA concentrations predicted outcome independent of other variables (p = 0.004 and 0.002, respectively; Table 2 and Supplemental Table 5). Further prognostic factor related to OS was disease stage in the ActA plasma cohort (p = 0.012).

Table 2: Cox regression model adjusted for patient characteristics of all cases (n=64)

Serum ActA level


Adjusted HR for death

95% CI

Adjusted p-value

Age, years
























Serum ActA level




Low ActA



High ActA



Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval

Serum FST level is elevated only in female LADC patients

Since the activity of circulating ActA is regulated by its bounding to FST, serum samples of 64 LADC patients and 46 age- and sex-matched controls were also analyzed for FST concentrations. There was no difference in the FST serum levels between controls and LADC patients (1685±536.1 pg/ml vs. 1912±1227 pg/ml, respectively, p = 0.621; Supplemental Figure 4A). When a separate analysis of males and females was conducted, we found similar serum FST levels in the male and female controls as well as in the male LADC patients (1766±578.9 pg/ml, 1623±503.6 pg/ml 1650±670.9 pg/ml, respectively). However, we detected significantly increased serum FST concentrations in female LADC patients (2249±1649 pg/ml, p = 0.031, vs. female controls, Supplemental Figure 4B).

There was no association between FST levels and ActA concentrations, TNM stage or OS (data not shown). Serum FST had no diagnostic value in the full cohort. In females, the sensitivity was 60.7% (95% CI: 40.5-78.5%) and the specificity was 61.5% (95% CI: 40.6-79.8%) with an AUC of 0.672 (95% CI: 0.5271-0.8163). No significant differences between ActA/FST ratios of controls and LADC patients were observed and there was no correlation between ActA/FST ratios and TNM stage or clinical outcome (data not shown).

ActA, FST and activin receptors are expressed in LADC cell lines

We analyzed the in vitro ActA and FST secretions of five different LADC cell lines by ELISA. ActA was detectable in the supernatants (SNs) of 3 cell lines (H1650, HCC827, H358). In two of these cell lines (H1650, HCC827), we found relatively low ActA concentrations (22.4 and 22.1 pg/ml, respectively), while H358 cells produced and secreted high amounts of the protein (530.6 pg/ml; Figure 4A). In the case of FST, all five cell lines secreted the protein: the concentrations varied between 151.6 pg/ml (H1975) and 624.8 pg/ml (A549) (Figure 4B).

It has been demonstrated previously that HepG2 hepatoma cells are responsive to ActA: In these cells, treatment with exogenous rhActA leads to the phosphorylation of SMAD2, and this assay is thus suitable to measure the activity of ActA [26]. When HepG2 cells were treated with conditioned SNs of the five different LADC cell lines, phosphorylation of SMAD2 was induced in two of the cell models (H1650, H358; Figure 4C).

We also measured the mRNA levels of activin receptors in five LADC cell lines by QPCR. Each cell line expressed the type II receptors ActR-IIA and ActR-II, as well as the type I receptor ActR-IB (Figure 4D).

Expression of the members of the ActA/FST system in LADC cell lines.

Figure 4: Expression of the members of the ActA/FST system in LADC cell lines. A. LADC cells were incubated for 24 hours in serum-free medium and ActA levels of the SNs were determined by ELISA. ActA was detected in the SN of three of five LADC cell lines. B. LADC cell SNs were obtained as described above and FST levels were determined by ELISA. High levels of FST were found in all five LADC cell SNs. C. Phosphorylation of SMAD2 in HepG2 cells treated with SNs of LADC cell lines. SNs of LADC cells were prepared as described above. HepG2 cells were treated with SNs or medium with or without recombinant ActA (0.5 ng/ml) for 30 min. Cells were then harvested, and phosphorylation of SMAD2 was measured by Western blot analysis, using beta-actin as loading control. SMAD2 was phosphorylated upon treatment with the SN of H1650 and H358 cells, showing that ActA produced by these cell lines has biologic activity. D. Expression of activin receptors in LADC cell lines, measured by QPCR, using GAPDH as reference for normalization. The transcripts of ActR-1B, 2A and 2B were detected in all five cell models.


Although a number of blood markers have been reported to predict prognosis in NSCLC, the results of these studies are heterogeneous [1-18]. To our knowledge, this is the first study to link elevated blood levels of ActA to disease progression and adverse outcome in LADC.

Depending on the tumor type, ActA can play a pro-, as well as an anti-tumor role. In breast, liver and colon cancer, ActA inhibits tumor growth [25-27]. Some other tumors, however, gain resistance to the growth-inhibitory effect of ActA. In these malignancies, ActA can even stimulate tumor cell proliferation and aggressiveness [29, 34].

The two studies that investigated the expression of ActA in LADC tissues delivered conflicting data. On the one hand, Shan et al. demonstrated that ActA protein levels are decreased in LADC samples and that low ActA expression correlates with more advanced disease stages [35]. On the other hand, Seder et al. reported mRNA and protein overexpression and a negative prognostic role of ActA in stage I LADC tissue [34]. Our current study reveals ActA as a novel circulating prognostic biomarker in LADC. It also provides the first evidence for a direct association of blood ActA concentrations and primary tumor size and LN metastasis in any human malignancy.

We demonstrate a strong association between circulating ActA levels and the T factor of primary LADCs. Our finding is supported by other studies on breast, endometrial, cervical and oral cancer [40-42] in which the major source of elevated circulating ActA was speculated to be the primary tumor tissue. It is important to mention that Seder et al. observed immunoreactivity in only 78 % of primary LADC samples [34], and that we found detectable ActA secretion only in three out of our five LADC cell lines. In addition to the cancer cells, other cell types in the tumor microenvironment such as cancer-associated fibroblasts [42] and neutrophils [43] could also contribute to the ActA production of the primary tumors.

When discussing the regulation of circulating ActA levels, the naturally produced activin-binding protein FST [44], must also be taken into account. In melanoma, prostate and hepatocellular carcinoma, a mechanism underlying the resistance to the growth inhibitory effect of ActA is FST overexpression [27, 36, 37]. Primary LADC cells express FST, and patients with this malignancy have elevated serum FST levels [38, 45]. Although FST was demonstrated to protect LADC cells from ActA-induced-apoptosis in vitro [38], others have shown an anti-proliferative effect of FST on LADC cells [34]. Here, we confirmed that LADC cells secrete FST in vitro. Interestingly, this was reflected by increased blood FST concentrations only in female patients. However, we found that the ELISA kit we used detects only the free form of FST (and not the ActA-bound). Of note, secretion of other binding partners of FST (e.g. bone morphogenetic proteins [46] or angiogenin [47]) may also influence the concentration of free FST in the blood.

With an assay measuring the phosphorylation of SMAD2 in HepG2 cells, we could also prove that - despite their high FST expressions - LADC cells secrete biologically active ActA protein. Besides FST overexpression, loss of activin receptor expression [24] is another mechanism to gain resistance to ActA. Our LADC cell lines expressed both type I and II activin receptors, suggesting that this is not the case in this tumor type. Other mechanisms (e.g. loss of SMAD4 or of the tumor suppressor p15INK4B) could also be involved in the resistance to the anti-tumor effect of ActA, as it was shown in other types of cancer [26, 48].

As for the role of ActA in lymphatic tumor spread, an earlier study on circulating ActA levels in breast cancer failed to show a correlation with N status, whereas in OSCC and esophageal carcinoma the presence of LN metastases was associated with elevated tumor tissue ActA expression [31, 49]. In a recent study from our group, in which the gene expression profile of tumorous and normal mediastinal LN samples of NSCLC patients were evaluated by microarray analysis, INHBA (the subunit of ActA), was one of the most highly up-regulated genes in metastatic LNs [50]. However, we also identified ActA as a potent anti-lymphangiogenic factor [51]. Nevertheless, in the same experimental study, ActA did not have an impact on the LN metastatic capacity of melanoma cells [51], suggesting that the net effect of ActA signaling on lymphatic tumor dissemination is not straightforward and that these controversial results warrant additional research.

Although a circulating factor that predicts the organ metastatic capacity of lung cancer would be of paramount clinical significance, we believe that no such blood biomarker has been described so far. A striking finding from this study is, therefore, that LADC patients with organ metastases had significantly higher blood ActA levels than those with M0 disease. Whether these elevated ActA levels are a cause or consequence of the metastatic dissemination remains to be elucidated. Nevertheless, our findings are supported by previous studies on breast and prostate cancer where elevated circulating ActA levels were associated with the presence of bone metastases [52, 53]. Overexpression of FST inhibited the organ metastasis of SCLC in vivo [39], further corroborating the role of ActA in the metastatic process.

In conclusion, our study, for the first time, demonstrates that blood ActA levels are elevated in LADC patients. Moreover, circulating ActA concentration at the time of diagnosis is an independent prognostic marker in this malignancy. Importantly, our data also suggest that both serum and plasma ActA are useful biomarkers for identifying LADC patients with organ metastatic disease. Although further independent and prospective studies are needed to fully explore the prognostic and diagnostic potential of the ActA/FST system in LADC, inhibitors of activin signaling are already being evaluated in clinical trials, highlighting the significance of this system in patients with malignant tumors.

Patients and Methods


In a combined cohort from two institutions (Division of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna (n = 25) and National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest (n = 68)), plasma and serum samples of patients with LADC were collected between 2011 and 2014 at the time of diagnosis or before surgical resection. Additional samples from healthy individuals and patients with COPD, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease (CVD), asthma and liver disease (that, as described in refs. [54-58], might also influence circulating ActA/FST levels) were also analyzed. Numbers of patients included in the study are summarized in Supplemental Table 1. All patients and controls had given informed consent and the sample collection was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Medical University of Vienna (#904/2009) and the National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology (2521-0 2010-1018EKU).

Collection of blood

Samples from LADC patients and controls were prepared from approximately 10 ml blood collected with EDTA vaccutainers for plasma or with BD vacutainer serum separator tube (#367985) or clot activator tube (#368815) for serum. Blood samples were centrifuged, aliquoted and stored at -80 °C until use as described in ref. [59].

ELISA assays

Quantikine ActA and FST ELISAs were purchased from the R&D Systems (DAC00B and DFN00, respectively). Sample preparation, standard curve generation and measurement of samples in duplicates were performed according to the guidelines of the manufacturer.

Cell lines

The H1975, H358, HCC827, A549 and H1650 LADC cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). All cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma) and 100 U/ml penicillin-100 Ag/ml streptomycin (Sigma). HepG2 hepatoma cells were cultured in MEM supplemented with 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1% non-essential amino acids and 10% FBS). All cell lines were maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.

Preparation of cell supernatants for ELISA and bioactivity assay

For ELISA measurements, LADC cell line supernatants (SNs) were obtained from T25 flasks with 1.5x106 cells after 24 hours incubation with 2 ml cell culture media without FBS. After centrifugation (800 rpm, 5 min, 24°C), aliquots were stored at -80°C until analysis.

Expression of activin receptors in LADC cell lines

Isolation of total RNA, cDNA synthesis and measurement of ACVR1B, ACVR2A, ACVR2B were performed as described previously [33]. Briefly, total RNA was isolated from LADC cells. 2µg RNA was reverse transcribed with MMLV reverse transcriptase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR (QPCR) was performed with SYBR Green (Life Technologies), as previously described [33], using an ABI Prism 7500 Fast SDS thermocycler (Life Technologies) and primers for ACVR1B (for: 5’-GCC CTC TGA CCC TTC CAT TG-3’; rev: 5’-CCC GCA GTG CCT CAT AAC TC-3’), ACVR2A (for: 5’-ACC CAG ATG CAG AGA CTA AC-3’; rev: 5’-ATG GCG CAA CCA TCA TAG AC-3’), ACVR2B for: 5’-TCA GCA CAC CTG GCA TGA AG-3’; rev: 5’-TCA TGG AAG GCC GTG ATG AG-3’) and GAPDH (for: 5’-agctcactggcatggccttc-3’; rev: 5’-acgcctgcttcaccaccttc-3’). GAPDH was used as reference for normalization and relative mRNA expression was calculated as 2(−ΔCT x 104).

ActA bioactivity assay

5x105 LADC cells were seeded in 2 ml cell culture medium in a six-well plate. Next day, SNs were collected. 5x105 HepG2 cells, seeded in a six-well plate, were washed with phosphate buffered saline and treated with 0.5 ml LADC supernatant or 0.5 ml growth medium with or without 0.5 ng/ml rhActA (R&D Systems, 338-AC). After 30 min incubation at 37°C, cells were harvested in lysis buffer. 20 µg protein were separated by SDS-Page, blotted onto PVDF membranes and blocked in 5% skim milk in TBST as published earlier [33]. Membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies (p-SMAD2, Cell Signaling, #3101; total SMAD2, Cell Signaling, #5339, dilution 1:1000 and beta-actin, Sigma, A5441, dilution 1:5000). Horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-rabbit/mouse antibodies (3% BSA, Dako) were used at 1:10 000 dilutions and developed with Clarity Western ECL reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Cut-off level for high and low ActA was set by the median. To determine statistical differences between two groups, t-test was applied. ANOVA was used with the post hoc Dunn-test for the comparison of more than two groups. Categorical data were compared using Fishers’ exact probability and chi-square tests. OS intervals were determined as the time period from initial diagnosis to the time of death. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS were evaluated for all patients in the study and the log-rank test was used to establish the significance of the difference. Multivariate analysis of the clinical parameters was performed using the Cox regression model. P values are given as two-sided and were considered statistically significant below 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the PASW Statistics 18.0 package (Predictive Analytics Software, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA).

Acknowledgments and Funding

This work was supported by the KTIA AIK 12-1-2013-0041 (AR, BD, VL) and the Oesterreichische Nationalbank Anniversary Fund (project number 14574 (MAH)) grants. Further support: OTKA (K109626, K108465 and SNN114490 to BD), the Herzfelder Foundation (MG), the Vienna Fund for Innovative Interdisciplinary Cancer Research (MAH), the Georg Stumpf Stipendium of the Austrian Society for Surgical Oncology (MAH) and the ESMO Translational Research Fellowship (ZL). The authors thank the excellent technical assistance of Barbara Dekan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest.


1. Ono A, Takahashi T, Mori K, Akamatsu H, Shukuya T, Taira T, Kenmotsu H, Naito T, Murakami H, Nakajima T, Endo M and Yamamoto N. Prognostic impact of serum CYFRA 21-1 in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study. BMC cancer. 2013; 13:354.

2. Salgia R, Harpole D, Herndon JE, 2nd, Pisick E, Elias A and Skarin AT. Role of serum tumor markers CA 125 and CEA in non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer research. 2001; 21:1241-1246.

3. Biran H, Friedman N, Neumann L, Pras M and Shainkin-Kestenbaum R. Serum amyloid A (SAA) variations in patients with cancer: correlation with disease activity, stage, primary site, and prognosis. Journal of clinical pathology. 1986; 39:794-797.

4. Khan N, Cromer CJ, Campa M and Patz EF, Jr. Clinical utility of serum amyloid A and macrophage migration inhibitory factor as serum biomarkers for the detection of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 2004; 101:379-384.

5. Korbakis D, Dimitromanolakis A, Prassas I, Davis GJ, Barber E, Reckamp KL, Blasutig I and Diamandis EP. Serum LAMC2 enhances the prognostic value of a multi-parametric panel in non-small cell lung cancer. British journal of cancer. 2015; 113:484-491.

6. Maciel CM, Junqueira M, Paschoal ME, Kawamura MT, Duarte RL, Carvalho Mda G and Domont GB. Differential proteomic serum pattern of low molecular weight proteins expressed by adenocarcinoma lung cancer patients. Journal of experimental therapeutics & oncology. 2005; 5:31-38.

7. Kang SM, Sung HJ, Ahn JM, Park JY, Lee SY, Park CS and Cho JY. The Haptoglobin beta chain as a supportive biomarker for human lung cancers. Molecular bioSystems. 2011; 7:1167-1175.

8. Cheng T, Dai X, Zhou DL, Lv Y and Miao LY. Correlation of apolipoprotein A-I kinetics with survival and response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Medical oncology. 2015; 32:407.

9. Molina R, Filella X, Auge JM, Fuentes R, Bover I, Rifa J, Moreno V, Canals E, Vinolas N, Marquez A, Barreiro E, Borras J and Viladiu P. Tumor markers (CEA, CA 125, CYFRA 21-1, SCC and NSE) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer as an aid in histological diagnosis and prognosis. Comparison with the main clinical and pathological prognostic factors. Tumour biology. 2003; 24:209-218.

10. Planque C, Li L, Zheng Y, Soosaipillai A, Reckamp K, Chia D, Diamandis EP and Goodglick L. A multiparametric serum kallikrein panel for diagnosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Clinical cancer research. 2008; 14:1355-1362.

11. Unal D, Eroglu C, Tasdemir A, Karaman H, Kurtul N, Oguz A, Goksu SS and Kaplan B. Is Human Kallikrein 11 in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated Chemoradiotherapy Associated with Survival? Cancer research and treatment. 2016; 48:98-105.

12. Zhu JF, Cai L, Zhang XW, Wen YS, Su XD, Rong TH and Zhang LJ. High plasma fibrinogen concentration and platelet count unfavorably impact survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases. Chinese journal of cancer. 2014; 33:96-104.

13. Rolfo C, Castiglia M, Hong D, Alessandro R, Mertens I, Baggerman G, Zwaenepoel K, Gil-Bazo I, Passiglia F, Carreca AP, Taverna S, Vento R, Peeters M, Russo A and Pauwels P. Liquid biopsies in lung cancer: the new ambrosia of researchers. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2014; 1846:539-546.

14. Wikoff WR, Hanash S, DeFelice B, Miyamoto S, Barnett M, Zhao Y, Goodman G, Feng Z, Gandara D, Fiehn O and Taguchi A. Diacetylspermine Is a Novel Prediagnostic Serum Biomarker for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Has Additive Performance With Pro-Surfactant Protein B. Journal of clinical oncology. 2015; 33:3880-6.

15. Fahrmann JF, Kim K, DeFelice BC, Taylor SL, Gandara DR, Yoneda KY, Cooke DT, Fiehn O, Kelly K and Miyamoto S. Investigation of Metabolomic Blood Biomarkers for Detection of Adenocarcinoma Lung Cancer. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention. 2015; 24:1716-23.

16. Krebs MG, Sloane R, Priest L, Lancashire L, Hou JM, Greystoke A, Ward TH, Ferraldeschi R, Hughes A, Clack G, Ranson M, Dive C and Blackhall FH. Evaluation and prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of clinical oncology. 2011; 29:1556-1563.

17. Wang J, Wang K, Xu J, Huang J and Zhang T. Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis. PloS one. 2013; 8:e78070.

18. Holdenrieder S, Nagel D and Stieber P. Estimation of prognosis by circulating biomarkers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer biomarkers. 2010; 6:179-190.

19. Schmierer B and Hill CS. TGFbeta-SMAD signal transduction: molecular specificity and functional flexibility. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2007; 8:970-982.

20. Attisano L, Wrana JL, Montalvo E and Massague J. Activation of signalling by the activin receptor complex. Molecular and cellular biology. 1996; 16:1066-1073.

21. Werner S and Alzheimer C. Roles of activin in tissue repair, fibrosis, and inflammatory disease. Cytokine & growth factor reviews. 2006; 17:157-171.

22. Shimonaka M, Inouye S, Shimasaki S and Ling N. Follistatin binds to both activin and inhibin through the common subunit. Endocrinology. 1991; 128:3313-3315.

23. Welt C, Sidis Y, Keutmann H and Schneyer A. Activins, inhibins, and follistatins: from endocrinology to signaling. A paradigm for the new millennium. Experimental biology and medicine. 2002; 227:724-752.

24. Jeruss JS, Sturgis CD, Rademaker AW and Woodruff TK. Down-regulation of activin, activin receptors, and Smads in high-grade breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2003; 63:3783-3790.

25. Razanajaona D, Joguet S, Ay AS, Treilleux I, Goddard-Leon S, Bartholin L and Rimokh R. Silencing of FLRG, an antagonist of activin, inhibits human breast tumor cell growth. Cancer Res. 2007; 67:7223-7229.

26. Hempen PM, Zhang L, Bansal RK, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Murphy KM, Maitra A, Vogelstein B, Whitehead RH, Markowitz SD, Willson JK, Yeo CJ, Hruban RH and Kern SE. Evidence of selection for clones having genetic inactivation of the activin A type II receptor (ACVR2) gene in gastrointestinal cancers. Cancer research. 2003; 63:994-999.

27. Grusch M, Drucker C, Peter-Vorosmarty B, Erlach N, Lackner A, Losert A, Macheiner D, Schneider WJ, Hermann M, Groome NP, Parzefall W, Berger W, Grasl-Kraupp B and Schulte-Hermann R. Deregulation of the activin/follistatin system in hepatocarcinogenesis. Journal of hepatology. 2006; 45:673-680.

28. Seder CW, Hartojo W, Lin L, Silvers AL, Wang Z, Thomas DG, Giordano TJ, Chen G, Chang AC, Orringer MB and Beer DG. INHBA overexpression promotes cell proliferation and may be epigenetically regulated in esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2009; 4:455-462.

29. Yoshinaga K, Yamashita K, Mimori K, Tanaka F, Inoue H and Mori M. Activin a causes cancer cell aggressiveness in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells. Annals of surgical oncology. 2008; 15:96-103.

30. Bufalino A, Cervigne NK, de Oliveira CE, Fonseca FP, Rodrigues PC, Macedo CC, Sobral LM, Miguel MC, Lopes MA, Paes Leme AF, Lambert DW, Salo TA, Kowalski LP, Graner E and Coletta RD. Low miR-143/miR-145 Cluster Levels Induce Activin A Overexpression in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas, Which Contributes to Poor Prognosis. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0136599.

31. Kelner N, Rodrigues PC, Bufalino A, Fonseca FP, Santos-Silva AR, Miguel MC, Pinto CA, Leme AF, Graner E, Salo T, Kowalski LP and Coletta RD. Activin A immunoexpression as predictor of occult lymph node metastasis and overall survival in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2015; 37:479-486.

32. Taylor C, Loomans HA, Le Bras GF, Koumangoye RB, Romero-Morales AI, Quast LL, Zaika AI, El-Rifai W, Andl T and Andl CD. Activin a signaling regulates cell invasion and proliferation in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:34228-34244. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5349.

33. Hoda MA, Munzker J, Ghanim B, Schelch K, Klikovits T, Laszlo V, Sahin E, Bedeir A, Lackner A, Dome B, Setinek U, Filipits M, Eisenbauer M, Kenessey I, Torok S, Garay T, et al. Suppression of activin A signals inhibits growth of malignant pleural mesothelioma cells. British journal of cancer. 2012; 107:1978-1986.

34. Seder CW, Hartojo W, Lin L, Silvers AL, Wang Z, Thomas DG, Giordano TJ, Chen G, Chang AC, Orringer MB and Beer DG. Upregulated INHBA expression may promote cell proliferation and is associated with poor survival in lung adenocarcinoma. Neoplasia. 2009; 11:388-396.

35. Shan Y and Li S. Expression of Cripto-1 gene protein and Activin-A in human lung adenocarcinoma tissue. Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2015; 28:739-743.

36. Stove C, Vanrobaeys F, Devreese B, Van Beeumen J, Mareel M and Bracke M. Melanoma cells secrete follistatin, an antagonist of activin-mediated growth inhibition. Oncogene. 2004; 23:5330-5339.

37. Tumminello FM, Badalamenti G, Fulfaro F, Incorvaia L, Crescimanno M, Flandina C, Sepporta MV and Leto G. Serum follistatin in patients with prostate cancer metastatic to the bone. Clinical & experimental metastasis. 2010; 27:549-555.

38. Chen F, Ren P, Feng Y, Liu H, Sun Y, Liu Z, Ge J and Cui X. Follistatin is a novel biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma in humans. PloS one. 2014; 9:e111398.

39. Ogino H, Yano S, Kakiuchi S, Muguruma H, Ikuta K, Hanibuchi M, Uehara H, Tsuchida K, Sugino H and Sone S. Follistatin suppresses the production of experimental multiple-organ metastasis by small cell lung cancer cells in natural killer cell-depleted SCID mice. Clinical cancer research. 2008; 14:660-667.

40. Reis FM, Cobellis L, Tameirao LC, Anania G, Luisi S, Silva IS, Gioffre W, Di Blasio AM and Petraglia F. Serum and tissue expression of activin a in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2002; 87:2277-2282.

41. Petraglia F, Florio P, Luisi S, Gallo R, Gadducci A, Vigano P, Di Blasio AM, Genazzani AR and Vale W. Expression and secretion of inhibin and activin in normal and neoplastic uterine tissues. High levels of serum activin A in women with endometrial and cervical carcinoma. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1998; 83:1194-1200.

42. Sobral LM, Bufalino A, Lopes MA, Graner E, Salo T and Coletta RD. Myofibroblasts in the stroma of oral cancer promote tumorigenesis via secretion of activin A. Oral Oncol. 2011; 47:840-846.

43. Chen Y, Wu H, Winnall WR, Loveland KL, Makanji Y, Phillips DJ, Smith JA and Hedger MP. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha stimulates human neutrophils to release preformed activin A. Immunol Cell Biol. 2011; 89:889-896.

44. Walton KL, Makanji Y and Harrison CA. New insights into the mechanisms of activin action and inhibition. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2012; 359:2-12.

45. Planque C, Kulasingam V, Smith CR, Reckamp K, Goodglick L and Diamandis EP. Identification of five candidate lung cancer biomarkers by proteomics analysis of conditioned media of four lung cancer cell lines. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009; 8:2746-2758.

46. Iemura S, Yamamoto TS, Takagi C, Uchiyama H, Natsume T, Shimasaki S, Sugino H and Ueno N. Direct binding of follistatin to a complex of bone-morphogenetic protein and its receptor inhibits ventral and epidermal cell fates in early Xenopus embryo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998; 95:9337-9342.

47. Gao X, Hu H, Zhu J and Xu Z. Identification and characterization of follistatin as a novel angiogenin-binding protein. FEBS letters. 2007; 581:5505-5510.

48. Destro A, Ceresoli GL, Baryshnikova E, Garassino I, Zucali PA, De Vincenzo F, Bianchi P, Morenghi E, Testori A, Alloisio M, Santoro A and Roncalli M. Gene methylation in pleural mesothelioma: correlations with clinico-pathological features and patient’s follow-up. Lung cancer. 2008; 59:369-376.

49. Wang Z, Zhang N, Song R, Fan R, Yang L and Wu L. Activin A expression in esophageal carcinoma and its association with tumor aggressiveness and differentiation. Oncol Lett. 2015; 10:143-148.

50. Grigoroiu M, Tagett R, Draghici S, Dima S, Nastase A, Florea R, Sorop A, Ilie V, Bacalbasa N, Tica V, Laszlo V, Mansuet-Lupo A, Damotte D, Klepetko W, Popescu I and Regnard JF. Gene-expression Profiling in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Invasion of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes for Prognosis Evaluation. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2015; 12:231-242.

51. Heinz M, Niederleithner HL, Puujalka E, Soler-Cardona A, Grusch M, Pehamberger H, Loewe R and Petzelbauer P. Activin A is anti-lymphangiogenic in a melanoma mouse model. The Journal of investigative dermatology. 2015; 135:212-221.

52. Incorvaia L, Badalamenti G, Rini G, Arcara C, Fricano S, Sferrazza C, Di Trapani D, Gebbia N and Leto G. MMP-2, MMP-9 and activin A blood levels in patients with breast cancer or prostate cancer metastatic to the bone. Anticancer Res. 2007; 27:1519-1525.

53. Leto G, Incorvaia L, Badalamenti G, Tumminello FM, Gebbia N, Flandina C, Crescimanno M and Rini G. Activin A circulating levels in patients with bone metastasis from breast or prostate cancer. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2006; 23:117-122.

54. Verhamme FM, Bracke KR, Amatngalim GD, Verleden GM, Van Pottelberge GR, Hiemstra PS, Joos GF and Brusselle GG. Role of activin-A in cigarette smoke-induced inflammation and COPD. The European respiratory journal. 2014; 43:1028-1041.

55. Ofstad AP, Gullestad L, Orvik E, Aakhus S, Endresen K, Ueland T, Aukrust P, Fagerland MW, Birkeland KI and Johansen OE. Interleukin-6 and activin A are independently associated with cardiovascular events and mortality in type 2 diabetes: the prospective Asker and Baerum Cardiovascular Diabetes (ABCD) cohort study. Cardiovascular diabetology. 2013; 12:126.

56. Hansen J, Rinnov A, Krogh-Madsen R, Fischer CP, Andreasen AS, Berg RM, Moller K, Pedersen BK and Plomgaard P. Plasma follistatin is elevated in patients with type 2 diabetes: relationship to hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and systemic low-grade inflammation. Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews. 2013; 29:463-472.

57. Voumvouraki A, Notas G, Koulentaki M, Georgiadou M, Klironomos S and Kouroumalis E. Increased serum activin-A differentiates alcoholic from cirrhosis of other aetiologies. European journal of clinical investigation. 2012; 42:815-822.

58. Hardy CL, Nguyen HA, Mohamud R, Yao J, Oh DY, Plebanski M, Loveland KL, Harrison CA, Rolland JM and O’Hehir RE. The activin A antagonist follistatin inhibits asthmatic airway remodelling. Thorax. 2013; 68:9-18.

59. Kirschner MB, Pulford E, Hoda MA, Rozsas A, Griggs K, Cheng YY, Edelman JJ, Kao SC, Hyland R, Dong Y, Laszlo V, Klikovits T, Vallely MP, Grusch M, Hegedus B, Dome B, et al. Fibulin-3 levels in malignant pleural mesothelioma are associated with prognosis but not diagnosis. British journal of cancer. 2015; 113:963-969.

Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 7796