Clinical Research Papers:

Optimal adjuvant therapy for resected hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review with network meta-analysis

Gui-Qi Zhu _, Ke-Qing Shi, Hua-Jian Yu, Sun-Yue He, Martin Braddock, Meng-Tao Zhou, Yong-Ping Chen and Ming-Hua Zheng

PDF  |  HTML  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2015; 6:18151-18161. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.4098

Metrics: PDF 2696 views  |   HTML 2529 views  |   ?  


Gui-Qi Zhu1,2,*, Ke-Qing Shi1,3,*, Hua-Jian Yu1,2, Sun-Yue He1,2, Martin Braddock4, Meng-Tao Zhou5, Yong-Ping Chen1,3, Ming-Hua Zheng1,3

1Department of Infection and Liver Diseases, Liver Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

2School of the First Clinical Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

3Institute of Hepatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

4Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca R&D, Loughborough, United Kingdom

5Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

*These authors have contributed equally to this work

Correspondence to:

Ming-Hua Zheng, e-mail: [email protected]

Meng-Tao Zhou, e-mail: [email protected]

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, adjuvant therapy, toxic effect, network meta-analysis, indirect comparison

Received: March 24, 2015     Accepted: May 26, 2015     Published: June 08, 2015


Objectives: Major adjuvant therapies (ATs) for resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) include chemotherapy, internal radiation therapy (IRT), interferon therapy (IFNT) and immunotherapy but the optimum regimen remains inconclusive. We aim to compare these therapies in terms of patient survival and recurrence rates.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases for randomized trials comparing the above four therapies until 31 March 2014. We estimated the HRs for survival and ORs for overall recurrence among different therapies. Toxic effects were also evaluated.

Results: Fourteen eligible articles were included. IFNT improved 5-year survival greatly (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.01–3.81, P = 0.034), whereas chemotherapy (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.03–2.02), IRT (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.02–3.33) and immunotherapy (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.05–9.12) all provided a poorer survival outcome after 1-year. Similarly, for 5-year survival rates, although differing, IRT did not provide a significant improvement in survival (HR 1.38, 95% CI 0.34–5.19) compared with IFNT. Chemotherapy (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.18–1.14) and immunotherapy (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.17–1.59) did not appear to provide benefit over IFNT. Chemotherapy was ranked the worst in overall recurrence (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.18–5.38) and most likely to cause toxic effects.

Conclusions: IFNT was the most efficacious AT regimen both for short and long term survivals. Immunotherapy and IFNT were the most two effective in preventing overall relapse for resected HCC.

Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 4098