Oncotarget

Reviews:

A systematic review and meta-analysis of selected toxicity endpoints of alpelisib

PDF |  Full Text  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2020; 11:3793-3799. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27770

Metrics: PDF 1360 views  |   Full Text 1966 views  |   ?  

Misty Shields, Qianxing Mo, Melissa Armitage, Susan C. Sharpe and Ricardo L.B. Costa _

Abstract

Misty Shields1, Qianxing Mo2, Melissa Armitage3, Susan C. Sharpe4 and Ricardo L.B. Costa5

1 H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA

2 Department of Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA

3 Department of Pharmacy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA

4 Moffitt Biomedical Library, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA

5 Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA

Correspondence to:

Ricardo L.B. Costa,email: [email protected]

Keywords: alpelisib; adverse event; hyperglycemia; rash; diarrhea

Received: August 07, 2020     Accepted: September 24, 2020     Published: October 20, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Shields et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Alpelisib is a first-in-class α-specific phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with estrogen receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer. High absolute risk (AR) of relevant toxicities has been observed with this treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to improve the precision of the estimated AR of selected adverse events (AEs) associated with this new agent.

Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted in August 2019 to identify trials analyzing the anti-tumor efficacy and toxicity profile of alpelisib. Heterogeneity was assessed by using I2 statistics. Data were analyzed using random effect meta-analyses for AR. Eleven trials and 511 patients were included.

Results: There was no evidence of heterogeneity between studies regarding the AR of most AEs except for all-grade weight loss and grade 3–4 stomatitis. The number of serious AEs was clearly reported in only one study, of which the most common was hyperglycemia; the most common all-grade AEs were hyperglycemia (59%), diarrhea (56%), nausea (44%), and rash (38%). Grade 3/4 hyperglycemia and rash occurred in 28% and 10% of patients, respectively. No treatment-associated deaths were observed, and 18% of patients had to stop treatment due to toxicities.

Conclusions: Alpelisib is associated with clinically relevant AEs that can lead to treatment discontinuation. The most common AE was hyperglycemia. No treatment-related deaths were observed.


Introduction

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that can be classified according to the presence of transmembrane receptors (i.e., hormonal receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]) as assessed by immunohistochemistry analyses. Most breast cancers are estrogen receptor positive (ER+), and treatment with endocrine therapy (ET) improves outcomes among patients with these tumors [1, 2]. Notwithstanding the availability of effective ETs, disease progression is an almost universal challenge for patients with ER+ metastatic breast cancer. In this setting, therapies targeting intracellular mechanisms of ET resistance have improved outcomes and have changed clinical practices not only because of improved clinical outcomes but also because of the favorable toxicity profiles of targeted agents. As reviewed by our group, the now widely used CDK4/6 inhibitors are associated with a low absolute risk (AR) of serious adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuation rates [3]. Aberrations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is a common mechanism of ET resistance [4, 5], and inhibition of this pathway has also improved outcomes among patients with progressive ER+ breast cancer. In the pivotal phase 3 trial BOLERO, Baselga et al. showed that an oral mTOR inhibitor (everolimus) improved the median progression-free survival of patients with ER+ progressive metastatic breast cancer from 4.1 to 10.6 months (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.47; P < .001) [6]. In May 2019, alpelisib, a novel first-in-class oral small molecule PIK3CA-isoform–specific inhibitor [7], received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of metastatic ER+ breast cancer harboring PIK3CA mutations following progression of disease on or after treatment with ET. This approval was based on the results of the SOLAR-1 trial, in which alpelisib combined with fulvestrant improved the median progression-free survival of patients with this disease to 11.0 months compared with that of 5.7 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.85; P < .001) [8]. Notably, despite its clinical efficacy, treatment with alpelisib was associated with an increased AR of clinically relevant AEs. For example, the AR of serious AEs was 35%, and as much as 25% of patients discontinued treatment with alpelisib due to AEs.

The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to better define the toxicity profile of alpelisib in patients with solid tumors, with particular attention to selected AEs of interest.

Materials and Methods

Search strategy

A systematic literature search was performed in August 2019 by a medical librarian (S. C. S) across 3 major biomedical literature platforms: PubMed/MEDLINE (1946-), Elsevier’s Embase (1947-), and the Cochrane Library’s Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). A combination of free-text keywords, database-specific controlled subject headings, and Cochrane’s Randomized Controlled Trial search filters were used to design the search stratagem for all 3 databases (complete search strategies available in Supplementary Material). Apart from the search hedges, no other filters were applied during the course of the search. All search results were uploaded into Cochrane’s Covidence (https://www.covidence.org/) for deduplication, screening, reference management, and data extraction.

Selection of trials and data extraction

Our analysis included clinical trials of any phase in which alpelisib was used in nonpediatric populations and studies assessing efficacy or safety of alpelisib in combination with other treatments. Clinical trials were selected by the primary reviewer (R. L. B. C) and independently reviewed by 1 secondary reviewer (M. S.). The primary reviewer (R. L. B. C) made all final decision in cases of assessment discordance.

From included trials, we extracted the total number of patients evaluable for toxicity, the number of all grade AEs, the number of grades 3–4 toxicities, the number of deaths, and the number of patients who discontinued treatment because of treatment-related AE. Furthermore, we documented the number of selected all-grade AEs (i.e., fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, hyperglycemia, rash, alopecia, weight loss, decreased appetite, asthenia, stomatitis, mucosal inflammation, dysgeusia, and arthralgia). These AEs were selected because they were the most commonly observed AEs associated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR-targeted therapies or because of their clinical relevance. The relationship between AEs and treatment administration (i.e., treatment-related AEs vs all causality) was also documented when these data were available. From phase 1 dose-escalation studies, we extracted the number of toxicity events from the cohorts treated with the dose-regimen closest to the FDA-approved alpelisib dose-regimen (i.e., 300 mg daily on 28-day cycles).

Statistical methods

To obtain the pooled fixed-effect and random-effect estimates, we conducted meta-analyses of one-sample proportions using meta package in R 3.6.1 (https://www.r-project.org/). Heterogeneity was assessed via the I2 statistic, and the presence of study heterogeneity was examined using the Q-test. Finally, publication bias was evaluated via Egger’s test.

Results

Included and excluded studies

Our librarian-guided literature search yielded 258 studies with 6 duplicates obtained through PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. A total of 234 studies were excluded during the title and abstract screening. After text review, 7 additional studies were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, and data from them were extracted (Table 1). These studies included one phase 3, one phase 2, and nine phase 1 trials. None of the 11 trials reported the median follow-up time in their data presentation. Only 2 studies [9, 10] clearly reported AEs suspected to be treatment related (See Table 1).

Study flow diagram.

Figure 1: Study flow diagram. This double-column figure was created using PowerPoint. Abbreviations: FDA, Food and Drug Administration.

Table 1: Clinical trial publications included in the meta-analysisa

PubMed ID (year of publication)https://clinicaltrials.gov
ID
First authorPhaseType of cancerTrial clearly excluded patients with DMNo. patients evaluable for toxicityTumor stageCombinationNo. patients with ECOG PS ≥ 2Median Age, yNCI CTCAEs Scale
31091374 (2019) [8]NCT02437318Andre F3Breast cancerNo284MetastaticFulvestrant0634.03
27126994 (2017) [13]NCT01791478Mayer I1Breast CancerYes20bMetastaticLetrozole0534
30543347 (2019) [9]NCT01219699Juric D1Breast CancerNo9bMetastaticFulvestrant0NR4
29401002 (2018) [14]NCT01219699Juric D1Multiple histologyYes23bMetastaticNone6594
30588709 (2019) [15]NCT01387321Ando Y1Multiple histologyYes14bMetastaticNone1NR4
29850984 (2018) [16]NCT02038010Jain S1Breast cancerYes6bMetastaticT-DM1NRNR4.03
30880072 (2019) [17]NCT01623349Konstantinopoulos P1Multiple histologyNo6bMetastaticOlaparib0NR4.03
30723140 (2019) [18]NCT01923168Mayer I2Breast cancerNo130NonmetastaticLetrozole065.54.03
30167089 (2018) [10]NCT02051751Rodon J1Multiple histologyNo6bMetastaticPaclitaxel0NR4.03
28363909 (2017) [19]NCT01719380Van Geel RMJM1Colorectal cancerNo10MetastaticEncorafenib and Cetuximab0NR4
31678634 (2019) [20]NCT02282371Dunn LA1Head and Neck cancerYes3bMetastatic and nonmetastaticCetuximab and radiation therapy0NR4

Description of study participants

In the 11 included studies, a total of 511 patients were evaluable for toxicity. Six of the patients had ECOG performance status of 2, and the remainder had a performance status of 0 to 1. The median age of study participants was only reported in 3 studies (range, 53–62 years). Four of these trials enrolled 319 evaluable for toxicity patients with metastatic breast cancer; out of all 11 trials, there was 1 trial that enrolled patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer disease; 130 patients were evaluable for toxicity. The remainder of studies enrolled patients with other solid tumors (Table 1).

Study-to-study heterogeneity and publication bias

I2 statistics revealed that interstudy heterogeneity was 79% for all-grade weight loss (P < .01) and 90% for grade 3–4 stomatitis (P = .04). The results of heterogeneity testing between studies for selected all-grade and grade 3/4 AEs is presented in Tables 2 and 3. Testing for publication bias did not show significant results (See Supplementary Material).

Table 2: AR of selected all-grade AEs

All-grade AEFixed-effect AR, % (95% CI range)Random-effect AR, % (95% CI range)I2, %aP value
Alopecia0.20 (0.17; 0.24)0.20 (0.17; 0.24)00.88
Fatigue0.31 (0.27; 0.35)0.34 (0.26; 0.43)520.01
Asthenia0.19 (0.16; 0.23)0.19 (0.16; 0.23)00.54
Nausea0.44 (0.40; 0.49)0.44 (0.40; 0.49)00.25
Vomiting0.24 (0.20; 0.28)0.23 (0.17; 0.29)160.5
Diarrhea0.56 (0.52; 0.60)0.56 (0.52; 0.60)00.08
Weight loss0.22 (0.18; 0.26)0.19 (0.09; 0.35)79< 0.01
Decreased appetite0.34 (0.30; 0.38)0.34 (0.30; 0.38)00.71
Stomatitis0.27 (0.23; 0.32)0.28 (0.23; 0.33)100.45
Mucosal inflammation0.18 (0.14; 0.22)0.18 (0.14; 0.22)00.36
Dysgeusia0.18 (0.15; 0.22)0.18 (0.15; 0.22)00.24
Rash0.38 (0.33; 0.42)0.38 (0.33; 0.43)70.53
Pruritus0.18 (0.14; 0.21)0.18 (0.14; 0.21)00.73
Hyperglycemia0.60 (0.56; 0.64)0.59 (0.51; 0.66)370.04
Arthralgia0.12 (0.08; 0.16)0.12 (0.08; 0.16)00.32

Table 3: AR of selected grade 3-4 AEs

Grade ≥ 3 AEsFixed-effect AR, % (95% CI range)Random-effect AR, % (95% CI range)I2,%aP value
Fatigue0.03 (0.01; 0.04)0.03 (0.01; 0.04)00.95
Asthenia0.01 (0.00; 0.03)0.01 (0.00; 0.05)31
Nausea0.02 (0.01; 0.04)0.02 (0.01; 0.04)01
Vomiting0.01 (0; 0.002)0.01 (0; 0.002)00.94
Diarrhea0.05 (0.03; 0.08)0.04 (0.02; 0.09)190.58
Weight loss0.04 (0.02; 0.06)0.04 (0.02; 0.06)01
Decreased appetite0.00 (0; 0.02)0.00 (0; 0.02)01
Stomatitis0.02 (0.01; 0.04)0.01 (0.00; 0.30)900.04
Mucosal inflammation0.02 (0.01; 0.04)0.02 (0.01; 0.04)01
Rash0.10 (0.08; 0.13)0.10 (0.08; 0.13)00.84
Pruritus0.01 (0; 0.02)0.01 (0; 0.02)01
Hyperglycemia0.32 (0.28; 0.36)0.28 (0.21; 0.37)360.13
Arthralgia0 (0; 0.32)0 (0; 0.32)01

Absolute risk of serious AEs, death, and number of patients who discontinued treatment due to toxicity

The number of serious AEs was reported in only 1 trial [8], which noted that 99 out of 284 study participants experienced a serious AE (AR = 34.9%). AR for serious AEs was not pooled, as the other studies did not report the number of serious AEs. The most common serious AEs were hyperglycemia (10%), followed by diarrhea (3%), abdominal pain (2%), and acute kidney injury (2%), which were reported regardless of relation to treatment. The pooled random effect of AR of death was 1%, but none of the 8 deaths were clearly associated with alpelisib. Six patients died from cancer progression, 1 died from a second primary cancer progression, and 1 died from cardiopulmonary arrest (not specified). The pooled random effect AR of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was 18%. Notably, significant heterogeneity was observed I2 = 72% (P < .01) (see Figure 2).

Pooled AR of death and discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity.

Figure 2: Pooled AR of death and discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity. This double-column figure was created using the meta package in R 3.6.1. (A) Pooled AR of death. (B) Pooled AR of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity. Abbreviations: AR, absolute risk; CI, confidence interval.

Absolute risk of selected AEs

The most common all-grade, all-causality AEs were hyperglycemia, with a random-effect AR of 59% (95% CI, 0.51–0.66), followed by diarrhea (56%), nausea (44%), rash (38%), decreased appetite (34%), and fatigue (34%) (Table 2). Despite the number of all-grade AEs that could lead to weight loss (eg, nausea, diarrhea, and stomatitis), the AR of all-grade (19% [95% CI 0.09–0.35]) and grade ≥ 3 (4% [95% CI 0.02–0.06]) weight loss was observed in a small number of patients. All grade 3–4 AEs were observed in < 10% of patients, except for hyperglycemia (AR 28% [95% CI, 0.21–0.37]) and rash (AR 10% [95% CI, 0.08–0.13]) (Table 3). No grade 3–4 dysgeusia was observed, which is why the AR was not pooled.

DISCUSSION

In recent years, targeted therapies have improved the overall survival rates of patients with ER+ and HER2- metastatic breast cancer [11, 12]. For instance, CDK4/6 inhibitors have become standard treatments for these patients, as these agents significantly improve clinical outcomes and carry a low AR of serious AEs. In 2012, results from the pivotal BOLERO trial confirmed that inhibition of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway by everolimus leads to clinically meaningful improvement in outcomes [6]. In parallel, this oral mTOR inhibitor has been associated with significant AR of clinically relevant AEs, and treatment with lower-dose regimens of this drug has been used to allow for treatment continuation. Alpelisib is a first-in-class agent approved for the treatment of patients with ER+ and HER2- metastatic breast cancer harboring PIK3CA mutations [8]. Our systematic review summarized the available data on the toxicity profile of this new agent.

The majority of the patients included in this study had a diagnosis of breast cancer and were treated at the FDA-approved dose of alpelisib of 300 mg daily by mouth (see Table 1), thus strengthening the external validity of the results presented. There was no significant heterogeneity among the majority of ARs pooled, which likely suggests that most AEs reported in the 11 trials analyzed were treatment related. The most common all-grade AE was hyperglycemia (AR of 59%), and 28% of cases were grade 3/4 AEs with only one case of ketoacidosis found in our literature search (SOLAR-1 study). Hyperglycemia was also the most common serious AE. Remarkably, the trials in our analysis either excluded patients with a history of diabetes or mandated the documentation of an adequate glucose control at study entry (ie, fasting plasma glucose ≤ 140 mg/dL and glycosylated hemoglobin ≤ 6.4%). The obvious corollary is that treating physicians should be aware of this AE. As per the directions of the package insert, patients’ fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin levels should be closely and routinely monitored while on alpelisib, given the high AR of hyperglycemia, and treated promptly with oral anti-diabetic agents. Interestingly, other PI3K inhibitors have been associated with a toxicity profile similar to that of alpelisib, including an increased risk of hyperglycemia [11, 12]. Rash is also a possible complication from alpelisib and treatment with topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamine should be considered early on. Other clinically relevant AEs that were also observed included diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting; aside from hyperglycemia and rash, the AR of these grade 3–4 AEs was ≤ 10% (Table 3). Noticeably, none of the deaths reported in the 11 trials reviewed were related to alpelisib. One limitation of our meta-analysis is that we did not have access to individual patient data, which limited our ability to explore correlations between patient characteristics and the AR of AEs. Nonetheless as the authors did not report the median follow up time of study populations the time to initiation of AEs could not assessed. Given the ongoing development of clinical trials with alpelisib in the treatment of solid tumors (eg, NCT04208178, NCT04216472, NCT03386162, NCT03631953), strategies to diagnose and mitigate common AEs are needed.

In summary, treatment with alpelisib is associated with clinically relevant AEs, which, despite being closely monitored in clinical trials, have led to treatment discontinuation in as much as 20% of patients. Hyperglycemia is the most common AE associated with this novel agent. Patients treated with alpelisib require close monitoring, early diagnosis, and management of AEs.

Author contributions

Misty Shields and Ricardo L. B. Costa participated in design, data collection, extraction and analysis, and manuscript writing. Qianxing Mo data analysis and manuscript writing, Melissa Armitage design and manuscript writing, Susan C. Sharpe participated in data collection and manuscript writing.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Editorial assistance was provided by the Moffitt Cancer Center’s Scientific Editing Department by Dr. Paul Fletcher & Daley Drucker. No compensation was given beyond their regular salaries.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

R. L. B. Costa received honorarium from Bristol Meyers Squib, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo and Astra Zeneca; and research funding from Bristol Meyers Squib. M. Armitage received honorarium from Daiichi Sankyo. S.C. Sharpe, M. Shields and Q. Mo have no conflict of interests, external funding, or other resources to declare.

FUNDING

No funding was received for the conduct of this systematic review and meta-analysis.

References

1. Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Allred DC, Hagerty KL, Badve S, Fitzgibbons PL, Francis G, Goldstein NS, Hayes M, Hicks DG, Lester S, Love R, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28:2784–2795. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529. [PubMed].

2. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Mangu PB, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:3997–4013. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984. [PubMed].

3. Costa R, Costa RB, Talamantes SM, Helenowski I, Peterson J, Kaplan J, Carneiro BA, Giles FJ, Gradishar WJ. Meta-analysis of selected toxicity endpoints of CDK4/6 inhibitors: Palbociclib and ribociclib. Breast. 2017; 35:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.016. [PubMed].

4. Schiff R, Massarweh SA, Shou J, Bharwani L, Mohsin SK, Osborne CK. Cross-talk between estrogen receptor and growth factor pathways as a molecular target for overcoming endocrine resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10:331S–336S. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-031212. [PubMed].

5. Johnston SR. Clinical efforts to combine endocrine agents with targeted therapies against epidermal growth factor receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and mammalian target of rapamycin in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12:1061s–1068s. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2125. [PubMed].

6. Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, Burris HA 3rd, Rugo HS, Sahmoud T, Noguchi S, Gnant M, Pritchard KI, Lebrun F, Beck JT, Ito Y, Yardley D, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:520–529. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1109653. [PubMed].

7. Fritsch C, Huang A, Chatenay-Rivauday C, Schnell C, Reddy A, Liu M, Kauffmann A, Guthy D, Erdmann D, De Pover A, Furet P, Gao H, Ferretti S, et al. Characterization of the novel and specific PI3Kalpha inhibitor NVP-BYL719 and development of the patient stratification strategy for clinical trials. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014; 13:1117–1129. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0865. [PubMed].

8. Andre F, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G, Campone M, Loibl S, Rugo HS, Iwata H, Conte P, Mayer IA, Kaufman B, Yamashita T, Lu YS, Inoue K, et al. Alpelisib for PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:1929–1940. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1813904. [PubMed].

9. Juric D, Janku F, Rodon J, Burris HA, Mayer IA, Schuler M, Seggewiss-Bernhardt R, Gil-Martin M, Middleton MR, Baselga J, Bootle D, Demanse D, Blumenstein L, et al. Alpelisib Plus Fulvestrant in PIK3CA-Altered and PIK3CA-Wild-Type Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Phase 1b Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019; 5:e184475. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4475. [PubMed].

10. Rodon J, Curigliano G, Delord JP, Harb W, Azaro A, Han Y, Wilke C, Donnet V, Sellami D, Beck T. A Phase Ib, open-label, dose-finding study of alpelisib in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. Oncotarget. 2018; 9:31709–31718. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25854. [PubMed].

11. Im SA, Lu YS, Bardia A, Harbeck N, Colleoni M, Franke F, Chow L, Sohn J, Lee KS, Campos-Gomez S, Villanueva-Vazquez R, Jung KH, Chakravartty A, et al. Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381:307–316. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1903765. [PubMed].

12. Sledge GW Jr, Toi M, Neven P, Sohn J, Inoue K, Pivot X, Burdaeva O, Okera M, Masuda N, Kaufman PA, Koh H, Grischke EM, Conte P, et al. The Effect of Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant on Overall Survival in Hormone Receptor-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer That Progressed on Endocrine Therapy-MONARCH 2: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019; 6:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4782. [PubMed].

13. Mayer IA, Abramson VG, Formisano L, Balko JM, Estrada MV, Sanders ME, Juric D, Solit D, Berger MF, Won HH, Li Y, Cantley LC, Winer E, et al. A Phase Ib Study of Alpelisib (BYL719), a PI3Kalpha-Specific Inhibitor, with Letrozole in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0134. [PubMed].

14. Juric D, Rodon J, Tabernero J, Janku F, Burris HA, Schellens JHM, Middleton MR, Berlin J, Schuler M, Gil-Martin M, Rugo HS, Seggewiss-Bernhardt R, Huang A, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase alpha-Selective Inhibition With Alpelisib (BYL719) in PIK3CA-Altered Solid Tumors: Results From the First-in-Human Study. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36:1291–1299. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7107. [PubMed].

15. Ando Y, Iwasa S, Takahashi S, Saka H, Kakizume T, Natsume K, Suenaga N, Quadt C, Yamada Y. Phase I study of alpelisib (BYL719), an alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Sci. 2019; 110:1021–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.13923. [PubMed].

16. Jain S, Shah AN, Santa-Maria CA, Siziopikou K, Rademaker A, Helenowski I, Cristofanilli M, Gradishar WJ. Phase I study of alpelisib (BYL-719) and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after trastuzumab and taxane therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018; 171:371–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4792-0. [PubMed].

17. Konstantinopoulos PA, Barry WT, Birrer M, Westin SN, Cadoo KA, Shapiro GI, Mayer EL, O’Cearbhaill RE, Coleman RL, Kochupurakkal B, Whalen C, Curtis J, Farooq S, et al. Olaparib and alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor alpelisib for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20:570–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30905-7. [PubMed].

18. Mayer IA, Prat A, Egle D, Blau S, Fidalgo JAP, Gnant M, Fasching PA, Colleoni M, Wolff AC, Winer EP, Singer CF, Hurvitz S, Estevez LG, et al. A Phase II Randomized Study of Neoadjuvant Letrozole Plus Alpelisib for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer (NEO-ORB). Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 25:2975–2987. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3160. [PubMed].

19. van Geel R, Tabernero J, Elez E, Bendell JC, Spreafico A, Schuler M, Yoshino T, Delord JP, Yamada Y, Lolkema MP, Faris JE, Eskens F, Sharma S, et al. A Phase Ib Dose-Escalation Study of Encorafenib and Cetuximab with or without Alpelisib in Metastatic BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2017; 7:610–619. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0795. [PubMed].

20. Dunn LA, Riaz N, Fury MG, McBride SM, Michel L, Lee NY, Sherman EJ, Baxi SS, Haque SS, Katabi N, Wong RJ, Xiao H, Ho AL, et al. A Phase 1b Study of Cetuximab and BYL719 (Alpelisib) Concurrent with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Stage III-IVB Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020; 106:564–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.050. [PubMed].


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 27770