Oncotarget

Research Papers:

The role of miRNA-133b and its target gene SIRT1 in FAP-derived desmoid tumor

PDF |  Full Text  |  How to cite  |  Press Release  |  Order a Reprint

Oncotarget. 2020; 11:2484-2492. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27622

Metrics: PDF 1 view  |   Full Text 2 views  |   ?  

Maria Teresa Rotelli _, Maria Grazia Refolo, Catia Lippolis, Aldo Cavallini, Arcangelo Picciariello, Domenico Piscitelli and Donato Francesco Altomare

Abstract

Maria Teresa Rotelli1,*, Maria Grazia Refolo3,*, Catia Lippolis1, Aldo Cavallini4, Arcangelo Picciariello1, Domenico Piscitelli1 and Donato Francesco Altomare1,2

1 Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (DETO), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy

2 IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy

3 Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Department of Clinical Pathology, National Institute of Gastroenterology, “Saverio de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy

4 Surgical Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (DETO), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy

* These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence to:

Maria Teresa Rotelli,email: mariateresa.rotelli@uniba.it

Keywords: desmoid tumor; miRNA; familial adenomatous polyposis; B-catenin; Wnt pathway

Received: March 18, 2020     Accepted: May 14, 2020     Published: June 30, 2020

ABSTRACT

Signaling pathways have a key role in driving the uncontrolled development of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)- associated and sporadic desmoid tumors (DTs).

The relationship between the Wnt/b-catenin signaling pathway and DTs has been extensively studied, but no reliable biomarkers able to detect their histological subtype have been identified for the accurate diagnosis.

In this study we studied the differences in miRNA expression between sporadic (20 patients) and FAP-associated DTs (7 patients) using microarray confirmed by quantitative PCR (qPCR). The analysis showed 19 dysregulated miRNAs. Among them miR-133b levels were significantly lower in FAP-associated DT than in sporadic DT. Therefore, two mRNAs, associated to miR-133b and β-catenin expression, the SIRT1 and ELAVL1were analyzed.

The qPCR analysis showed that SIRT1 mRNA levels were significantly up-regulated in FAP-associated DT than in sporadic DT, whereas no differences in ELAVL1 expression was observed between these two DT types. In addition, a negative correlation was observed between miR-133b and SIRT1 in FAP-associated DTs, but not in sporadic DTs.

The miR-133b-SIRT1-β-catenin axis may represent a novel mechanism underlying progression of FAP-associated DT.


Introduction

Desmoid tumor (DT) is a rare, mesenchymal benign tumor, characterized by monoclonal, fibroblastic proliferation [1] with local invasiveness, high risk of recurrence and even mortality, despite metastatization never occurs. Due to the high heterogeneity of tumor biology and the absence of histological and biological markers, it was defined by Lewis as an “enigma” [2].

Since no standardized or evidence-based treatment approach is available, the management of these patients is still left to an individualized therapeutic strategy tailored on the pathological findings. However, due to the high risk of recurrence, and the possible onset of multifocal DTs, traditional surgical approach has recently been replaced by other conservative medical treatments including anti-oestrogen therapy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as a first option [36].

Most of the desmoid tumors (85-90%) occur sporadically, have a benign prognosis and about 85% of them show a mutation in CTNNB1 gene encoding β-catenin protein. Three main distinct mutations on this gene have been identified (41A, 45F, and 45) [7]. The stability of mutated β-catenin results in the intra-nuclear accumulation of this protein which subsequently stimulates Wnt pathway.

However, the mechanism whereby the mutation status affects biological behavior has not been extensively investigated. The CNNTB1 mutations have been found in approximately 85% of DTs by routine Sanger sequencing, however, using a highly sensitive technique like next-generation sequencing (NGS), they may account for 90–95% of sporadic DT cases [8].

Desmoid tumors associated to familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (Gardner’s syndrome) occur in about 10-15% of cases [9], are rarer than sporadic DTs and may have a severe prognosis when they infiltrate or compress vital organs or their vascularization. In these DTs, the germline mutations in APC gene are responsible for the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin. In fact, the APC gene encodes for a scaffolding multi-domain protein crucially involved in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Therefore the loss of the APC function leads to activation of Wnt signaling as demonstrated by the accumulation of nuclear β-catenin [10].

While the risk of death in sporadic DT is low [10], FAP-associated DTs are the most frequent cause of death in patients with FAP (18-31%) after the colon has prophylactically been removed [11, 12].

It must be emphasized that the disruption of the Wnt signaling represents a common pathway in both DT forms, but sporadic and FAP-associated DTs are associated with mutually exclusive molecular alterations (CTNNB1 and APC mutations in sporadic and FAP-associated DT, respectively) [13].

During the past decade, other factors involved in the complex mechanisms of human tumorigenesis have been identified, including the microRNAs (miRNAs), short non-coding RNAs that play a prominent role in a variety of physiologic and pathologic biologic processes, including fibrosis [14] and DT [15, 16].

In a previous study we have investigated a possible correlation between miRNA expression and CTNNB1 mutations in sporadic DTs [17]. In this study we aim to find out the differences in miRNA expression between sporadic and FAP-associated DTs.

Results

miRNA profile by microarray

Nineteen of 2,080 miRNAs identified by the microarray analysis resulted differently expressed in FAP-associated DT compared to sporadic DT. In particular, 17 miRNAs were down-regulated and 2 miRNAs were up-regulated (Table 1).

Table 1: Nineteen miRNAs differently expressed in FAP-associated DTs versus sporadic DTs by Microarray

miRNA nameFAP-associated DTSporadic DTRegulationFold change (FC)Log FCp value
miR-133b1,255,72down–22,27–4,485,19E-05
miR-149-3p0,711,91down–2,29–1,204,49E-07
miR-324-5p3,195,06down–3,64–1,878,28E-05
miR-331-3p3,386,66down–9,71–3,281,41E-03
miR-361-5p2,325,29down–7,83–2,974,12E-03
miR-409-3p4,075,99down–3,80–1,924,92E-03
miR-6010,503,87down–10,36–3,371,24E-06
miR-6230,982,34down–2,58–1,373,75E-03
miR-664b-3p1,434,70down–9,66–3,271,79E-06
miR-7600,363,74down–10,38–3,389,23E-07
miR-1236-5p3,064,09down–2,04–1,032,21E-06
miR-1273d1,583,26down–3,20–1,682,78E-03
miR-13055,653,97up3,231,697,37E-04
miR-31381,162,83down–3,17–1,675,22E-07
miR-44960,702,74down–4,12–2,041,62E-03
miR-4707-5p4,742,67up4,212,077,93E-05
miR-4728-3p0,794,65down–14,58–3,876,58E-04
miR-4742-5p1,622,71down–2,14–1,109,84E-04
miR-5006-5p0,071,33down–2,40–1,263,44E-04

Concordance of miRNA expression between microarray-based technique and RT-qPCR assays was obtained (Figure 1).

Comparison of the miRNA expression between microarray and RT-qPCR assay.

Figure 1: Comparison of the miRNA expression between microarray and RT-qPCR assay. Comparison of microarray (Log2 Fold-change) and RT-qPCR data (Log2 (2-ΔΔCq)) was determined for each miRNA (n =19). In RT-qPCR assays, ΔΔCq = ΔCq (sporadic DTs) - ΔCq (FAP-associated DTs). The correlation (rho) and p data were determined by non-parametric Spearman’s test where a single point represents the main value of each miRNA.

Down-regulation of the miR-133b showed the larger fold change (about 20-fold) in FAP derived DT compared to sporadic DT. The RT-qPCR analysis confirmed the low levels of miR-133b in FAP-derived compared to sporadic DTs (Figure 2).

miR-133b levels in FAP-associated DT (FAP-DT), Sporadic DT (Spor DT) and GIST.

Figure 2: miR-133b levels in FAP-associated DT (FAP-DT), Sporadic DT (Spor DT) and GIST. The distribution is represented by a dot blot graph (mean ± SEM). The miRNA values were obtained by RT-qPCR analysis and ΔCt method with U6 for normalization was used. The differences were evaluated by non-parametric Mann–Whitney test and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

mRNA profiling

RT-qPCR analysis of the expression of ELAV1 and SIRT1mRNA in DT showed that ELAVL1 levels were similar between the two DT types, while SIRT1 was down-regulated in FAP-associated compared to sporadic DT (Figure 3).

mRNA levels in two DT subtypes ELAVL1 (ELAV like RNA binding protein 1) and SIRT1 (Silent Mating Type Information Regulation 2 Homolog 1) mRNA levels in FAP-associated DT (FAP-DT) and sporadic DT (Spor DT).

Figure 3: mRNA levels in two DT subtypes ELAVL1 (ELAV like RNA binding protein 1) and SIRT1 (Silent Mating Type Information Regulation 2 Homolog 1) mRNA levels in FAP-associated DT (FAP-DT) and sporadic DT (Spor DT). The distribution is represented by a dot blot graph (mean ± SEM). The levels were obtained by RT-qPCR analysis and ΔCt method with β-actin for normalization was used. The differences in mRNA expression were evaluated by non-parametric Mann–Whitney test and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The association between miR-133b and SIRT1 expression, measured by Spearman’s rank correlation test, is reported in Table 2 showing a trend of positive correlation in sporadic DTs and a negative correlation in FAP-associated DT.

Table 2: Correlation between SIRT1 mRNA and miR-133b in FAP-associated and sporadic DTs

miR-133b
rho*p
FAP-associated DT
SIRT1-0.540.21
Sporadic DT
SIRT10.230.34

DISCUSSION

Our study has explored differentially expressed miRNAs in FFPE samples of patients with FAP- associated and sporadic DTs by microarray following by RT-qPCR analysis to confirm the microarray results.

The analysis identified 19 altered miRNA levels between the two DT types and, among them, miR-133b showed very low levels in FAP-derived DTs compared to sporadic DTs.

The miRNA-133b was originally defined as muscle-specific microRNAs, but other authors have found that miR-133b, associated with other miRNAs or alone, is frequently found in various human cancer with a complex regulatory networks [18].

Although it is recognized that miR-133b was usually down-regulated in various types of human cancer, such as bladder, prostate, gastric, colon cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) [1923], other tumor types showed an increased miR-133b which promotes cancer progression, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cervical carcinoma [2425].

Overall, these data suggest that different expression of miR-133b could play a role as tumor suppressor or tumor promoter in malignant tumors. In addition, miR-133b expression and SIRT1 activation have been also associated with a number of fibrotic conditions including Crohn’s disease, renal and skin fibrosis [2628].

Our data showed that the expression of miR-133b was significantly lower in FAP-associated than in sporadic DTs supporting a probable different role of this miRNA in these two DT types.

The complexity of the miR-133b role is partially known in some tumors while the function of this miRNA in desmoid-type fibromatosis is still unknown. Therefore, in order to investigate the effects of miR-133b in DT, we referred to bioinformatic websites miRTarBase 6 and DIANA-TarBase v7.0 which showed 80 and 66 experimentally validated genes, respectively, subjected to miR-133b action. Among these mRNAs, ELAVL1 and SIRT1 were selected.

Several reports suggested ELAVL1 relationship with β-catenin at the posttranscriptional level therefore, considering that Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway plays a crucial role in DT pathogenesis, ELAV 1 expression was evaluated [29].

The second selected mRNA, SIRT1, is a member of sirtuin family belonging to class III histone deacetylases (HDACs). The role of SIRT1 in tumors is still under debate since it could act as tumor suppressor or tumor promoter depending on the cellular environment and specific signaling pathways [30].

The qPCR analysis showed that SIRT1 mRNA levels were significantly up-regulated in FAP-associated DT than in sporadic DT, whereas no differences in ELAVL1 expression were observed between these two DT types. In addition, a negative correlation was demonstrated between miR-133b and SIRT1 in FAP-associated DTs, but not in sporadic DTs. These data are supported by other authors who suggested that the up- or down-regulation of miR-133b is often associated to an inverse expression of SIRT1 [3134].

Increased levels of SIRT1 control fibroblast activation and tissue fibrosis [34], while, SIRT1 inactivation, reduces the growth and number of intestinal polyps in the APC+/min mice model [35]. Both mechanisms could be involved in patients affected by Gardner’s disease.

Tumor microenvironment usually host less-differentiated subpopulations retaining self-renewal capability with the highest tumorigenic potential [36] such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) present in most adult tissues including DTs [37].

Recent studies in mouse and in human tumor cell cultures describe that SIRT1 is over-expressed in MSCs [38, 39] and the miR-133b knockdown induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition and renal fibrosis by up-regulation of SIRT1 [27].

In addition, SIRT1 promotes nuclear accumulation of β-catenin protein [39, 40] while MSC-derived exosomes carrying miR-133b attenuate glioma cell development via disrupting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [41].

In conclusion, the dialog between MSCs and tumor cells in FAP-associated DT tissue microenvironment could lead to β-catenin deacetylation driven by SIRT1, promoting Wnt/β-catenin signaling cascade in this tumor. Although the number of specimens of FAP-associated DTs used in the present study was limited, it could be speculated that the β-catenin deacetylation process in FAP-associated DTs mimics the stabilization of that protein induced by CTNNB1 gene mutations occurring in sporadic DTs [39].

Therefore, in addition to APC gene mutations, the miR-133b-SIRT1-β-catenin axis may represent a novel mechanism underlying progression of FAP-associated DT.

However, further studies are needed to fully understand the influence of miR-133b-SIRT1 in the genesis or progression of FAP-associated DT.

Materials and Methods

Patients and samples

This study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Independent Ethics Committee of the Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico of Bari (code n.5038/16).

All patients enrolled in the study gave written informed consent.

By retrieving clinical data of our previous study [17], 27 consecutive patients with histologically proved DT (20 with sporadic DT and 7 with FAP-associated DT), undergone surgery in our surgical unit between 1999 and 2015, were evaluated. Patients with previous history of cancer, pretreatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, chemotherapy, hormonotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded.

Clinical and pathologic characteristics of the patients are described in Table 3.

Table 3: Clinical and pathologic characteristics of the patients (data expressed as median and range)

VariablesSporadic DT (n = 20)FAP derived DT (n = 7)
Age (years)*42 (29–71)32 (16–41)
Female/male15/53/4
Tumor size (cm)*5 (2–30)17 (7–22)
Abdominal/ Extrabdominal location16/47/0

The analysis was carried out on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens obtained by the Pathology Department after immunohistochemical analysis as explained elsewhere [17]. Consecutive FFPE tissue sections (4-μm thick) obtained from the same block of each patient, were cut and processed for miRNAs and mRNAs identification.

Microarray and quantitative real time PCR (RT-qPCR)

We identified the differentially expressed miRNAs in two DT forms by microarray (2,080 mature miRNAs) considering 7 FAP-associated and 20 sporadic DT patients. The microarray analysis has been described previously [17].

In brief, total RNA was isolated from FFPE tissue samples by miRNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Milan, Italy). RNA quality was analyzed with the Agilent Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). One hundred nanograms of total RNA from each sample were labeled and hybridized on human Agilent miRNA v2 microarrays. Data were extracted and summarized using Agilent Feature Extraction Software. Then they were imported into GeneSpring GX12.2 software (Agilent Technologies) and differentially expressed probes between two DT subtypes was performed applying an unpaired t-test, with a p-value cut-off of 0.05 and a fold change (FC) cut-off of 2.

Nineteen miRNAs showing different levels between the two forms of DT were analyzed by reverse transcription (RT) and by quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods to validate the microarray data [17]. For RT-qPCR were used miRCURY LNAUniversal RT microRNA PCR and miRCURY LNA SYBR Green PCR Kits (Exiqon-Qiagen, Vedbaek, Denmark), respectively. The primers were purchased from Exiqon-Qiagen and the apparatus was CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad Laboratories, Segrate MI, Italy).

All samples were run in triplicate and miRNA expression was calculated by ΔCt method with U6 for normalization [42].

mRNA analysis

To further investigate the role of the miRNA-133b, we referred to two miRNA databases, miRTarBase 6.0 (http://mirtarbase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/php/index.php) and DIANA-TarBase v7.0 (http://miRTarBase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/) reporting a miRNA/mRNA interaction experimentally validated.

The bioinformatics data showed 146 mRNA targets of miR-133b. Two mRNAs, ELAV1, also known as HuR, and SIRT1 were selected. The mRNA levels were evaluated by RT-qPCR using the ΔCt method with β-actin for normalization as described previously [43].

In brief, for cDNA synthesis and qPCR analysis iScript cDNA Synthesis kit and PCR SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix (BioRad Laboratories) were used, respectively, according to manufacturer’s instructions. The primers were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Assay ID: qHsaCID0017218, qHsaCID0006484 and qHsaCED0036269 for ELAVL1, SIRT1 and ?β-actin, respectively). All samples were run in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

The differences of the miR-133b expression was evaluated by non-parametric Mann-Whitney test and presented as mean ± SEM.

The relationship between miR-133b and mRNA levels, as well as correlation between microarray and RT-qPCR data, was evaluated by Spearman’s rank correlation test.

All statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Software 5, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.R., M.G.R. and A.C. Methodology, M.T.R. and C.L. Software, A.C. Validation, M.T.R., C.L. and A.C. AP Formal analysis, A.C. M.T.R. Investigation, C.L. M.T.R. Resources, M.T.R. and C.L. Data Curation, M.T.R. and M.G.R. Writing – Original Draft Preparation, M.T.R., A.C. and D.F.A. Writing – Review, D.F.A., AP Visualization, A.C. Supervision, M.T.R., A.C. D.F.A. and AP Project Administration, D.F.A.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None.

References

1. Wu C, Amini-Nik S, Nadesan P, Stanford WL, Alman BA. Aggressive fibromatosis (desmoid tumor) is derived from mesenchymal progenitor cells. Cancer Res. 2010; 70:7690–98. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1656. [PubMed].

2. Lewis JJ, Boland PJ, Leung DH, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. The enigma of desmoid tumors. Ann Surg. 1999; 229:866–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199906000-00014. [PubMed].

3. Penel N, Coindre JM, Bonvalot S, Italiano A, Neuville A, Le Cesne A, Terrier P, Ray-Coquard I, Ranchere-Vince D, Robin YM, Isambert N, Ferron G, Duffaud F, et al. Management of desmoid tumours: a nationwide survey of labelled reference centre networks in France. Eur J Cancer. 2016; 58:90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.008. [PubMed].

4. Desmoid Tumor Working Group. The management of desmoid tumours: a joint global consensus-based guideline approach for adult and paediatric patients. Eur J Cancer. 2020; 127:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.11.013. [PubMed].

5. Gronchi A, Jones RL. Treatment of desmoid tumors in 2019. JAMA Oncol. 2019; 5:567–68. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6449. [PubMed].

6. Kasper B, Baumgarten C, Garcia J, Bonvalot S, Haas R, Haller F, Hohenberger P, Penel N, Messiou C, van der Graaf WT, Gronchi A, and Desmoid Working Group. An update on the management of sporadic desmoid-type fibromatosis: a european consensus initiative between sarcoma PAtients EuroNet (SPAEN) and european organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC)/soft tissue and bone sarcoma group (STBSG). Ann Oncol. 2017; 28:2399–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx323. [PubMed].

7. Lazar AJ, Tuvin D, Hajibashi S, Habeeb S, Bolshakov S, Mayordomo-Aranda E, Warneke CL, Lopez-Terrada D, Pollock RE, Lev D. Specific mutations in the beta-catenin gene (CTNNB1) correlate with local recurrence in sporadic desmoid tumors. Am J Pathol. 2008; 173:1518–27. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2008.080475. [PubMed].

8. Aitken SJ, Presneau N, Kalimuthu S, Dileo P, Berisha F, Tirabosco R, Amary MF, Flanagan AM. Next-generation sequencing is highly sensitive for the detection of beta-catenin mutations in desmoid-type fibromatoses. Virchows Arch. 2015; 467:203–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1765-0. [PubMed].

9. DE Marchis ML, Tonelli F, Quaresmini D, Lovero D, Della-Morte D, Silvestris F, Guadagni F, Palmirotta R. Desmoid tumors in familial adenomatous polyposis. Anticancer Res. 2017; 37:3357–66. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres. 11702. [PubMed].

10. Lips DJ, Barker N, Clevers H, Hennipman A. The role of APC and beta-catenin in the aetiology of aggressive fibromatosis (desmoid tumors). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009; 35:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2008.07.003. [PubMed].

11. Nieuwenhuis MH, Casparie M, Mathus-Vliegen LM, Dekkers OM, Hogendoorn PC, Vasen HF. A nation-wide study comparing sporadic and familial adenomatous polyposis-related desmoid-type fibromatoses. Int J Cancer. 2011; 129:256–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25664. [PubMed].

12. Koskenvuo L, Ristimäki A, Lepistö A. Comparison of sporadic and FAP-associated desmoid-type fibromatoses. J Surg Oncol. 2017; 116:716–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24699. [PubMed].

13. Crago AM, Chmielecki J, Rosenberg M, O’Connor R, Byrne C, Wilder FG, Thorn K, Agius P, Kuk D, Socci ND, Qin LX, Meyerson M, Hameed M, Singer S. Near universal detection of alterations in CTNNB1 and Wnt pathway regulators in desmoid-type fibromatosis by whole-exome sequencing and genomic analysis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2015; 54:606–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc. 22272. [PubMed].

14. Dufresne A, Paturel M, Alberti L, Philippon H, Duc A, Decouvelaere AV, Cassier P, Blay JY. Prediction of desmoid tumor progression using miRNA expression profiling. Cancer Sci. 2015; 106:650–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12640. [PubMed].

15. Nijhuis A, Biancheri P, Lewis A, Bishop CL, Giuffrida P, Chan C, Feakins R, Poulsom R, Di Sabatino A, Corazza GR, MacDonald TT, Lindsay JO, Silver AR. In Crohn’s disease fibrosis-reduced expression of the miR-29 family enhances collagen expression in intestinal fibroblasts. Clin Sci (Lond). 2014; 127:341–50. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20140048. [PubMed].

16. Walton SJ, Lewis A, Jeffery R, Thompson H, Feakins R, Giannoulatou E, Yau C, Lindsay JO, Clark SK, Silver A. Familial adenomatous patients with desmoid tumours show increased expression of miR-34a in serum and high levels in tumours. Oncoscience. 2016; 3:173–85. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncoscience.312. [PubMed].

17. Cavallini A, Rotelli MT, Lippolis C, Piscitelli D, Digennaro R, Covelli C, Carella N, Accetturo M, Altomare DF. Human microRNA expression in sporadic and FAP-associated desmoid tumors and correlation with beta-catenin mutations. Oncotarget. 2017; 8:41866–75. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16383. [PubMed].

18. Li D, Xia L, Chen M, Lin C, Wu H, Zhang Y, Pan S, Li X. miR-133b, a particular member of myomiRs, coming into playing its unique pathological role in human cancer. Oncotarget. 2017; 8:50193–208. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16745. [PubMed].

19. Chen X, Wu B, Xu Z, Li S, Tan S, Liu X, Wang K. Downregulation of miR-133b predict progression and poor prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinoma of bladder. Cancer Med. 2016; 5:1856–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.777. [PubMed].

20. Li X, Wan X, Chen H, Yang S, Liu Y, Mo W, Meng D, Du W, Huang Y, Wu H, Wang J, Li T, Li Y. Identification of miR-133b and RB1CC1 as independent predictors for biochemical recurrence and potential therapeutic targets for prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20:2312–25. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1588. [PubMed].

21. Yang D, Zhao D, Chen X. MiR-133b inhibits proliferation and invasion of gastric cancer cells by up-regulating FBN1 expression. Cancer Biomark. 2017; 19:425–36. https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-160421. [PubMed].

22. Wang X, Bu J, Liu X, Wang W, Mai W, Lv B, Zou J, Mo X, Li X, Wang J, Niu B, Fan Y, Hou B. miR-133b suppresses metastasis by targeting HOXA9 in human colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2017; 8:63935–48. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19212. [PubMed].

23. Yamamoto H, Kohashi K, Fujita A, Oda Y. Fascin-1 overexpression and miR-133b downregulation in the progression of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Mod Pathol. 2013; 26:563–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol. 2012.198. [PubMed].

24. Zhuang Q, Zhou T, He C, Zhang S, Qiu Y, Luo B, Zhao R, Liu H, Lin Y, Lin Z. Protein phosphatase 2A-B55δ enhances chemotherapy sensitivity of human hepatocellular carcinoma under the regulation of microRNA-133b. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 35:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-016-0341-z. [PubMed].

25. Servín-González LS, Granados-López AJ, López JA. Families of microRNAs expressed in clusters regulate cell signaling in cervical cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16:12773–90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160612773. [PubMed].

26. Fasseu M, Tréton X, Guichard C, Pedruzzi E, Cazals-Hatem D, Richard C, Aparicio T, Daniel F, Soulé JC, Moreau R, Bouhnik Y, Laburthe M, Groyer A, Ogier-Denis E. Identification of restricted subsets of mature microRNA abnormally expressed in inactive colonic mucosa of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS One. 2010; 5:e13160. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013160. [PubMed].

27. Sun Z, Ma Y, Chen F, Wang S, Chen B, Shi J. miR-133b and miR-199b knockdown attenuate TGF-β1-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition and renal fibrosis by targeting SIRT1 in diabetic nephropathy. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018; 837:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.08.022. [PubMed].

28. Zerr P, Palumbo-Zerr K, Huang J, Tomcik M, Sumova B, Distler O, Schett G, Distler JH. Sirt1 regulates canonical TGF-β signalling to control fibroblast activation and tissue fibrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016; 75:226–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205740. [PubMed].

29. Kim I, Hur J, Jeong S. HuR represses Wnt/β-catenin-mediated transcriptional activity by promoting cytoplasmic localization of β-catenin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015; 457:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.12.052. [PubMed].

30. Carafa V, Altucci L, Nebbioso A. Dual tumor suppressor and tumor promoter action of sirtuins in determining malignant phenotype. Front Pharmacol. 2019; 10:38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00038. [PubMed].

31. Farcas M, Gavrea AA, Gulei D, Ionescu C, Irimie A, Catana CS, Berindan-Neagoe I. SIRT1 in the development and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Nutr. 2019; 6:148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00148. [PubMed].

32. Ying S, Jianjun H, Xue Y, Shuwei Y, Liyuan Z, Jie W, Lixian C. MicroRNA-133b inhibits cell proliferation and invasion in osteosarcoma by targeting Sirt1. Oncol Res. 2017; 25:1421–30. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504016X14826089198805. [PubMed].

33. Li C, Liu Z, Yang K, Chen X, Zeng Y, Liu J, Li Z, Liu Y. miR-133b inhibits glioma cell proliferation and invasion by targeting Sirt1. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:36247–54. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9198. [PubMed].

34. Tian Z, Jiang H, Liu Y, Huang Y, Xiong X, Wu H, Dai X. MicroRNA-133b inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell progression by targeting Sirt1. Exp Cell Res. 2016; 343:135–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.03.027. [PubMed].

35. Leko V, Park GJ, Lao U, Simon JA, Bedalov A. Enterocyte-specific inactivation of SIRT1 reduces tumor load in the APC(+/min) mouse model. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e66283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066283. [PubMed].

36. Papaccio F, Paino F, Regad T, Papaccio G, Desiderio V, Tirino V. Concise review: cancer cells, cancer stem cells, and mesenchymal stem cells: influence in cancer development. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017; 6:2115–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.17-0138. [PubMed].

37. Carothers AM, Rizvi H, Hasson RM, Heit YI, Davids JS, Bertagnolli MM, Cho NL. Mesenchymal stromal cell mutations and wound healing contribute to the etiology of desmoid tumors. Cancer Res. 2012; 72:346–55. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2819. [PubMed].

38. Wang H, Hu Z, Wu J, Mei Y, Zhang Q, Zhang H, Miao D, Sun W. Sirt1 promotes osteogenic differentiation and increases alveolar bone mass via Bmi1 activation in mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2019; 34:1169–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3677. [PubMed].

39. Chen X, Huan H, Liu C, Luo Y, Shen J, Zhuo Y, Zhang Z, Qian C. Deacetylation of β-catenin by SIRT1 regulates self-renewal and oncogenesis of liver cancer stem cells. Cancer Lett. 2019; 463:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.07.021. [PubMed].

40. Simic P, Zainabadi K, Bell E, Sykes DB, Saez B, Lotinun S, Baron R, Scadden D, Schipani E, Guarente L. SIRT1 regulates differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by deacetylating β-catenin. EMBO Mol Med. 2013; 5:430–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/emmm.201201606. [PubMed].

41. Xu H, Zhao G, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Wang W, Zhao D, Hong J, Yu H, Qi L. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal microRNA-133b suppresses glioma progression via Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway by targeting EZH2. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019; 10:381. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1446-z. [PubMed].

42. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29:e45. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. [PubMed].

43. Carr BI, D’Alessandro R, Refolo MG, Iacovazzi PA, Lippolis C, Messa C, Cavallini A, Correale M, Di Carlo A. Effects of low concentrations of regorafenib and sorafenib on human HCC cell AFP, migration, invasion, and growth in vitro. J Cell Physiol. 2013; 228:1344–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.24291. [PubMed].


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 27622