Research Papers:

c-myc copy number gain is a powerful prognosticator of disease outcome in cervical dysplasia

PDF |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite  |  Order a Reprint

Oncotarget. 2015; 6:825-835. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2706

Metrics: PDF 2267 views  |   HTML 2255 views  |   ?  

Kirsten Kübler _, Sally Heinenberg, Christian Rudlowski, Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik, Alina Abramian, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, Reinhard Büttner, Walther Kuhn and Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus


Kirsten Kübler1,*, Sally Heinenberg1,*, Christian Rudlowski1,2, Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik1, Alina Abramian1, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse3,4, Reinhard Büttner3,4, Walther Kuhn1, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus3,4,5

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany

2Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Teaching Hospital of the University of Bonn, 51465 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany

3Institute of Pathology, Center for Integrated Oncology, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany

4Institute of Pathology, Center for Integrated Oncology, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany

5Institute of Pathology, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany

* These authors have contributed equally to this work

Correspondence to:

Kirsten Kübler, e-mail: Kirsten.Kuebler@ukb.uni-bonn.de

Keywords: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, FISH analysis, copy number gain, prognostic signature, c-myc

Received: November 05, 2014     Accepted: November 08, 2014     Published: December 16, 2014


Cervical carcinoma develops from preneoplasia by a multistep process. Although most low-grade dysplastic lesions will regress without intervention and even high-grade changes exhibit a substantial rate of regression, a small percentage of dysplasia will progress over time. Thus, indicators are needed to estimate the biological risk and to help avoid overtreatment in women who desire to preserve fertility. In addition to the classical biomarkers, PCR-ELISA-determined HPV genotype and immunohistochemically assessed p16INK4a and Ki-67 expression, cells with integrated HPV and copy number gain of TERC and c-myc were quantified in a panel of 104 benign, intraepithelial neoplastic (CIN I, II, III) and cancerous lesions using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Optimal cut-off values were calculated; Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox proportional hazard regression model were used to evaluate prognostic signatures. The assay reliably identified HPV integration, TERC and c-myc copy number gain as determined by comparisons with established biomarkers. All biomarker levels increased with the progression of the disease. However, only c-myc copy number gain independently prognosticated a low probability of dysplastic regression. Our results suggest that c-myc plays a key role in the process of dysplastic transformation and might thus be exploited for treatment and follow-up decision-making of cervical dysplasia.


Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix continues to be the fourth most common malignancy in women worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death, even though the tumor is nowadays virtually preventable through the combination of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and screening programs. The early detection system of SCC is based on the fact that the tumor develops through a well-defined continuum of premalignant lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN) that can be identified and treated before malignant transformation. However, detailed insights into the natural history of SCC point out that not all untreated premalignant abnormalities would develop into cancer [1]. Even for advanced CIN the amount of non-progressing lesions appears to be considerable [2]. Yet, regardless of biological diversity standard management consists of colposcopy-directed biopsies to determine the severity of the lesion and cervical conization in the case of advanced CIN. This approach has led to a substantial rate of overtreatment that persists to be a problem in young women in which cervical excision is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome [3]. Thus, there is a need for biomarkers that more precisely prognosticate the natural course of the disease.

Several candidate prognostic indicators have been evaluated in the last years [4]. Most of them are conceptually based on molecular key events of HPV-associated carcinogenesis. The virus is attributed to be the cause of virtually all SCC cases [5] and promotes malignant transformation through the integration of the viral oncogenes E6/E7 into the host genome subsequently inactivating p53 and retinoblastoma (RB1) tumor suppressor [6]. As a consequence, genes required for S-phase entry get continuously activated. Two of the most thoroughly studied molecular biomarkers, the tumor suppressor gene p16INK4a and the proliferation-associated gene Ki-67, reflect this deregulation of the cell cycle [7]. Uncontrolled cell growth may then lead to genomic instability. Accordingly, recurrent patterns of genetic aberrations have been observed in SCC. The most commonly identified amplifications include the chromosomal regions 3q and 8q, which coincide with the mapping positions of the telomerase RNA component (TERC) gene at 3q26.3 and the protooncogene c-myc at 8q24.2 [8]. Upregulation of both suggested candidate genes have been shown to be critical events in the progression of cervical precursor lesions to a malignant phenotype [913]. Consequently, TERC and c-myc copy number gains have been proposed as two of the most promising biomarkers [14].

Due to ethical limitations of follow-up research in preneoplastic changes the disease behavior according to the status of a specific biomarker is only poorly documented in the literature. We established a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay that simultaneously tested for HPV integration, TERC and c-myc copy numbers in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens. Correlation with HPV genotypes and expression of the classical biomarkers p16INK4a and Ki-67 validated the FISH assay. Signatures were then tested for their potential to prognosticate the cumulative risk of persistent and progressive disease over time in a cohort of women that were followed-up and treated according to guidelines.


Performance of the FISH assay

Integrated HPV, TERC and c-myc FISH spots were of comparable intensity in HeLa cells prepared by liquid-based cytospin and tissue processing (Supplementary Fig. S1). We then applied the method to FFPE specimens of cervical changes. Fluorescent signals of integrated HPV, TERC and c-myc showed similar intensities across all tissue specimens (Fig. 1A). Successful hybridization of HPV was achieved in 98 (94%), of TERC in 66 (64%) and of c-myc in 81 (78%) cases.

HPV genotype and integration status in relation to histopathology

Oncogenic HPV genotypes were more commonly found in SCC and higher- than lower-grade dysplastic changes (Table 1). However, ten malignant and high-grade dysplastic cases showed no evidence of high-risk HPV. Eight of these exhibited signs of integrated HPV DNA as well as TERC and c-myc copy number gain suggesting a false-negative PCR result due to HPV integration that may have disrupted PCR primer target sequences. According to HPV genotype data also the prevalence of HPV integration was more frequent in cancerous and high- than low-grade dysplastic lesions (p < 0.01; Fig. 1B). Benign tissue did not show increased HPV FISH signals and only four CIN I cases harbored HPV integration events.

TERC and c-myc copy numbers in relation to histopathology

We evaluated average TERC and c-myc copy numbers per cell to determine the level of chromosomal instability. Moreover, this analysis allowed us to choose appropriate cut-off values for the discrimination of normal and abnormal cells. The average amount of both TERC (p < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. S2A) and c-myc (p < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. S2B) copy numbers per cell was found to be positively associated with the progression of the disease. However, only low-level copy number gain was observed in dysplastic specimens. Therefore, we used a threshold of > 2 FISH spots per cell to differentiate between healthy and unhealthy cells. In accordance to our observations above, the quantity of cells with a chromosomal gain of TERC (p < 0.01; Fig. 1C) and c-myc (p < 0.01; Fig. 1D) increased with the severity of cervical lesions. However, also four CIN I cases were defined by high TERC and c-myc copy number gain. Interestingly, further analysis showed that none of these women exhibited regression of dysplasia.

Expression of p16INK4a and Ki-67 in relation to histopathology

All cervical changes were stained for p16INK4a and Ki-67 (Fig. 2A). We found a significant association between the expression of p16INK4a and an increasing severeness of the disease (p < 0.01; Fig. 2B). The upregulation of p16INK4A was particularly pronounced in advanced dysplasia and SCC. Only six non-dysplastic cases displayed p16INK4A expression due to squamous metaplasia. Also, the increase of Ki-67 paralleled the progression of the disease ( p < 0.01; Fig. 2C). However, the induction of Ki-67 appeared to be a late event during carcinogenesis and thus exhibited the most pronounced expression in SCC.

HPV integration, TERC and c-myc copy number gain increase with progressing severity of cervical lesions.

Figure 1: HPV integration, TERC and c-myc copy number gain increase with progressing severity of cervical lesions. (A) FISH-visualization of integrated HPV DNA (green), TERC (gold) and c-myc (red) signals in a FFPE specimen of CIN III; nuclei of the cells are shown in blue (representative fluorescence images, 100x magnification). (B) HPV FISH positive cells accumulate along the increasing severity of cervical lesions. FISH spots were counted up to a maximum of 50 signals and grouped according to histopathology. (C, D) The quantity of cells with TERC (C) and c-myc (D) copy number gain is higher in SCC and CIN II / III compared to CIN 0 / I cohorts. Cells with > 2 FISH signals were counted up to a maximum of 50 and classified according to histopathology. Box plots summarize the median, the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers and the outliers (*p < 0.05, after Bonferroni correction).

Table 1: Correlation of HPV genotypes with histopathology and the course of the disease


No, low-risk HPV

High-risk HPV

















Persistence / Progression



n.s., not significant.

*, after Bonferroni correction.

HPV integration status, TERC and c-myc copy numbers in relation to HPV genotypes, p16INK4A and Ki-67 levels

The FISH assay was further validated by analyzing for correlation between FISH results and results obtained using HPV genotypes and classical biomarkers. First, cut-off scores were determined using ROC curve analyses (Supplementary Fig. S3). Areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) for cells with TERC and c-myc copy number gain, p16INK4A and Ki-67 expression obtained from the training set equaled 1.0 and thus provided a perfect separation of CIN 0 and SCC. The analysis of HPV FISH signals resulted in a lower but acceptable AUC value. In the next step, cervical changes were evaluated for concordance of HPV integration and genotype. We found that cases with carcinogenic HPV infection harbored a higher amount of HPV integration sites (p < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. S4A). The accuracy of the HPV FISH analysis was further supported by the fact that HPV integration correlated with p16INK4a (p < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. S4B) and Ki-67 staining (p < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. S4C). In accordance to these data, TERC copy number gain was also positively related to the presence of high-risk HPV (p < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. S4D), p16INK4a (p < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. S4E) and Ki-67 overexpression ( p < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. S4F). Moreover, increased c-myc copy numbers were more frequent in cases defined by the presence of oncogenic HPV (p < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. S4G), high p16INK4a (p < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. S4H) and Ki-67 levels ( p < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. S4I).

Overexpression of p16INK4A and Ki-67 increases with progressing severity of cervical lesions.

Figure 2: Overexpression of p16INK4A and Ki-67 increases with progressing severity of cervical lesions. (A) Cells immunohistochemically positive for p16INK4A show a strong nuclear and cytoplasmic expression; cells positive for Ki-67 exhibit an intense nuclear labeling with a limited diffuse background staining (representative bright field images, 20x magnification). (B, C) The extent of staining for p16INK4A (B) and Ki-67 (C) is higher in in SCC and CIN II / III compared to CIN 0 / I cohorts. p16INK4a and Ki-67 expression was recorded as the percentage of positive cells among the total number of epithelial cells in representative areas and stratified by histopathology. Box plots summarize the median, the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers and the outliers (*p < 0.05, after Bonferroni correction).

Table 2: Follow-up status, period and procedure according to the grade of dysplasia


Follow-up status

Follow-up time (months)

Follow-up procedure









n (%)

median (95% CI)

n (%)


11 (55)

6 (30)

1 (5)

2 (10)

8.19 (2.42 – 14)

4 (20)

4 (20)

10 (50)

2 (10)


9 (47)

6 (32)

2 (10.5)

2 (10.5)

9.01 (0 – 19.45)

11 (58)*

2 (10.5)

4 (21)

2 (10.5)


5 (23)

15 (68)

1 (4.5)

1 (4.5)

2.17 (1.33 – 3.01)

20 (91)

0 (0)

1 (4.5)

1 (4.5)

ND, not determined; CI, confidence interval.

*, includes one case of hysterectomy.

Biomarker status in relation to the clinical course of cervical dysplasia

Rates of regression, persistence and progression after a 5-year follow-up period are summarized in (Table 2). Risks of persistence and progression were found to increase with rising severity of dysplasia. CIN I samples had a substantial tendency to regress. In contrast, CIN III cases showed a low rate of regression. Only one case of high-grade dysplasia progressed to early SCC within a short interval and was treated with radical hysterectomy. According to guidelines, conization was a common treatment in CIN III cases. Consequently, the median follow-up time for CIN III was shorter than for CIN II and CIN I specimens.

Oncogenic HPV genotypes were not associated with an increased risk of persistent and progressive dysplasia (Table 1). Likewise, the degree of integrated HPV DNA (Fig. 3A) as well as TERC copy numbers (Fig. 3B) did not prognosticate the clinical outcome. Also p16INK4A (Fig. 3D) and Ki-67 (Fig. 3E) overexpression did not identify cervical changes with a high likelihood of persistence and progression. Only lesions that showed a particularly pronounced gain of c-myc copy numbers were more likely to persist and progress ( p < 0.01; Fig. 3C).

c-myc copy number gain correlates with persistent and progressing dysplasia.

Figure 3: c-myc copy number gain correlates with persistent and progressing dysplasia. (A) HPV integration has no value in prognosticating the course of the disease. HPV FISH signals were analyzed as in Fig. 1B and grouped according to the clinical outcome. (B, C) Copy numbers of TERC (B) have limited prognostic accuracy but those of c-myc (C) strongly prognosticate the course of the disease. FISH-analysis for copy number gain was performed as in Fig. 1C, D and classified according to the clinical outcome. (D, E) Strong expression of p16INK4A and Ki-67 does not identify lesions with a high probability of persistence and progression. Analysis of p16INK4A (D) and Ki-67 (E) was performed as in Fig. 2B,C and stratified according to the clinical outcome. Box plots summarize the median, the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers and the outliers (*p < 0.05, after Bonferroni correction; n.s., not significant).

Cumulative risk of persistence and progression of cervical dysplasia over time

In the next step, we analyzed the cumulative hazard of persistence and progression over time in low- and high-risk groups. The risk of persistent and progressive disease was significantly elevated in patients with high c-myc copy numbers (p < 0.01; Fig. 4). Of note, the cumulative hazard value was more than one-fold larger in lesions with high c-myc copy numbers. The analysis of the HPV genotype and integration status, TERC copy number gain, p16INK4a and Ki-67 overexpression did not define high-risk entities with a hazard different from that of the low-risk group (data not shown).

According to our results above, univariate analysis identified only c-myc copy number gain as a risk factor for the persistence and progression of dysplasia (Table 3). Also in the multivariate model c-myc copy number gain remained significant. Thus, the level of c-myc copy numbers appeared to be a strong independent risk factor.


Similar to classical biomarkers FISH-based HPV integration status as well as TERC and c-myc copy numbers showed a progressive upregulation with increasing severity of cervical dysplastic lesions thereby confirming the consistency of our data set and verifying the reliability of the FISH assay. Moreover, the present study identified c-myc as a biomarker with a high clinical potential since it independently stratified persistent and progressive from regressing alterations.

Copy numbers of c-myc are useful for risk prognostication in dysplastic lesions.

Figure 4: Copy numbers of c-myc are useful for risk prognostication in dysplastic lesions. FISH-analysis of c-myc copy number gain was performed as in Fig. 1D; ROC curve analysis-based cut-off values defined low-risk and high-risk groups; Kaplan Meier curves according to risk tier are shown.

Table 3: Risk factors affecting persistence and progression of dysplasia


Persistence / Progression

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Hazard ratio (95% CI)


Hazard ratio (95% CI)


HPV oncogenic genotype

1.93 (0.88 – 4.22)


0.52 (0.13 – 2.07)


High number of cells with HPV FISH signals / slide

1.01 (0.99 – 1.03)


1.02 (0.99 – 1.06)


High number of cells with > 2 TERC signals / slide

2.20 (0.77 – 6.26)


0.94 (0.19 – 4.71)


High number of cells with > 2 c-myc signals / slide

1.03 (1.01 – 1.06)


1.04 (1.00 – 1.08)


p16INK4a overexpression (% positive cells)

1.01 (1.00 – 1.03)


1.01 (0.99 – 1.03)


Ki-67 overexpression (% positive cells)

1.02 (0.99 – 1.04)


1.03 (1.00 – 1.07)


CI, confidence interval; n.s., not significant.

*, after Bonferroni correction.

Although we have optimized the protocol for FFPE tissue a remaining limitation of the FISH-procedure was the inability to achieve successful hybridization for TERC and c-myc in all cases. The reduced hybridization efficiency might be due to tissue preparation procedures especially long-term fixations with formalin known to be responsible for cross-linking and thus reduced probe penetration. Probe lengths might have also influenced the efficacy of DNA detection. Indeed, hybridization with the large-sized c-myc probe (821 kb) led to the identification of a higher number of positive cells than did the hybridization with the small-sized TERC probe (495 kb). However, not only in FFPE tissue but also in cytological specimens a rate of unsuccessful hybridization for TERC of 16–47% has been reported [10, 15].

In agreement with previous data, our FISH analysis revealed low-level copy number changes in dysplastic transformations [11, 12]. Also in SCC 3q26.3 and 8q24.2 copy numbers have been shown to increase only 3–7 fold [16]. The role of limited chromosomal gain in tumorigenesis is still poorly understood but accumulating evidence suggests that even the increase of one single gene copy may influence the tumor phenotype [17].

Classical biomarkers are widely used for squamous differentiation including p16INK4a and Ki-67. According to previous studies, staining values of both proteins increased stepwise with rising grades of malignant transformation [18, 19]. In line with previous findings a reliable classification of cervical changes in our cohort was also possible on the basis of HPV genotypes und integration status [11, 13]. Our results of increasing TERC copy numbers with rising grades of cervical lesions are similarly in agreement with previous work [10, 11, 13]. The upregulation of TERC, which is the RNA matrix for telomere synthesis, has been identified in several cancer entities and its effects on tumor growth include both telomerase activity-dependent and -independent pathways [20]. However, it should be noted that the 3q26.3 region also contains PIK3CA that has been additionally proposed as an oncogene in SCC potentially leading to 3q amplification [21]. Additionally, our data of c-myc copy number gain are in line with previous findings showing an upregulation of c-myc parallel to increasing dysplastic transformation [9, 12, 14].

Our analysis focused on the capacity of biomarkers to provide information on the malignant potential of dysplastic changes. To date, only little information is available on rates of persistence and progression of dysplasia according to risk factors [22, 23]. We used the combination of persistent and progressing changes as a solid end point because the small number of progressing lesions in our study may have hampered any meaningful testing. This approach is also clinically reasonable because precursor changes that will persist or progress are characterized by continual HPV infection and thus need medical treatment in contrast to those lesions that are likely to have spontaneous regression [24]. The mean time for progression of CIN III to SCC has been shown to be 8.1 to 12.6 years [25]. Thus, to correctly assess the risk of progression adequately long follow-up periods are needed. In our study an extended observation interval would have been unethical since we included CIN III, which is an immediate precursor of SCC and requires medical treatment. However, the estimatation of progression in our cohort was comparable to that in other short-term follow-up reports [2628]. Equally important for clinical practice are proportions of regression, which were found to be adequately high in our sample [1].

We found that lesions with high c-myc copy numbers are prone to persist and progress. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report providing evidence that c-myc copy number changes have the potential to identify precursor lesions at risk. It is well documented, that c-myc overexpression drives malignant transformation by controlling cellular proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis [29]. Accordingly, c-myc has been shown to contribute to the development of several tumor types [30]. In SCC, the c-myc region is a hotspot of HPV integration suggesting that the virus might alter gene copy numbers at this locus thereby harnessing c-myc for the course of the disease [31]. Further support for this hypothesis comes from the observation that SCC cases with a more aggressive biologic behavior harbor amplifications of the c-myc gene [32, 33]. Moreover, the association of low-level copy number gain with aberrant protein expression underlines the functional relevance of c-myc amplification in SCC [16].

In contrast to recent reports we were unable to identify TERC as a prognostic factor [15, 3436]. Such discrepancy may be due to the use of different material since prior studies were entirely based on cytological specimens. Additionally, in contrast to our cohort, three studies [3436] were based on the analysis of low-grade dysplasia solely and only one study [15] used CIN I and II lesions. Also, all authors used cut-off criteria different from our values. In order to more closely reflect tumor biology we first enumerated FISH signals per cell in hotspot areas similar to HER2 analysis in routine diagnostics [37]. Based on these data the cut-off between normal and abnormal was established. Additional ROC curve analysis was used to set stringent threshold scores for further comparative analyses.

The strength of our investigation lies in the histological verification of all cervical lesions. It is well known that studies using cytology cannot provide precise estimates of disease trends over time and that tissue specimens better reflect the course of the disease [38]. However, there is debate whether biopsies may influence the natural course by completely eradicating small lesions or initiating inflammatory healing processes [39, 40]. As of the retrospective design of our study with a relatively small number of patients further prospective research is needed to confirm the prognostic role of c-myc.

In conclusion, FISH-based detection of HPV integration, TERC and c-myc copy number changes as well as the analysis of HPV genotypes and p16INK4a and Ki-67 overexpression is suitable for a reliable differentiation of cervical changes. However, only c-myc copy numbers independently identified high-risk groups for disease persistence and progression making it a potential future ancillary tool in risk determination and a valuable help in the clinical decision-making process.


Patients and specimens

After approval by the Institutional Review Board of the Medical faculty FFPE tissue specimens were retrospectively collected from 104 patients treated between 2004 and 2008 at the University of Bonn. Clinical parameters were assessed using medical records; follow-up data were updated until June 2013. Samples obtained by colposcopy-directed biopsy were classified according to their histopathologic diagnosis based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria: benign squamous lesions (CIN 0, metaplasia, hyperplasia, inflammation), squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN I, mild dysplasia; CIN II, moderate dysplasia; CIN III, severe dysplasia / carcinoma in situ), SCC. CIN I lesions were referred to as low-grade and CIN II and III as high-grade changes [41]. Due to the small sample size individual histopathological groups were pooled for comparison as reported earlier [42]. CIN changes were followed up with surgical excision or colposcopy-directed biopsy; Pap smears were only allowed in cases being colposcopically and cytologically negative for dysplasia. The median number of biopsies obtained per woman was 2 (range, 1–3). The outcome was defined as progression (CIN I to CIN II, CIN III or SCC; CIN II to CIN III or SCC; CIN III to SCC), persistence or regression (CIN I to benign; CIN II to CIN I or benign; CIN III to CIN II, CIN I or benign). Prolonged follow-up in high-grade dysplasia was made possible only because patients delayed their treatment. Detailed patient baseline characteristics are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Cell line

The FISH protocol was established using the human cervical cancer cell line HeLa (ATCC® CCL-2™), maintained in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS, 200 IU/ml Penicillin, 200 μg/ml Streptomycin and 1% L-Glutamine. The identity of the cell line was verified by DNA profiling (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). Using a cytospin centrifuge (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts USA) 2.5 x 104 HeLa cells were transferred to microscope slides, fixed with methanol / glacial acetic acid, air dried and stained. Alternatively, HeLa cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, suspended in 2% agar and paraffin-embedded.

HPV typing by PCR-ELISA

Genomic and viral DNA was extracted from microdissected samples applying the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and screened for the presence of HPV-6/-11/-16/-18/-31/-33/-35/-45/-52/-56/-58 DNA according to a published protocol [43].

Immunohistochemical staining

Immunostaining was performed on an automated staining system (TechMate 500, Dako, Hamburg, Germany) using the streptavidin-biotin complex method. Antibodies included the mouse anti-human Ki-67 IgG1 monoclonal antibody (clone MIB-1, dilution 1:1000, Dako) and the CINtec® Histology kit for the evaluation of p16INK4a (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).

Evaluation of immunohistochemical staining

Immunostained cells were analyzed at 20x magnification with a Leica DM LB2 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Continuous variables were generated for p16INK4a and Ki-67 expression. Labeling indices were computed as the percentage of positive cells among the total number of epithelial cells scored in representative areas. For Ki-67 a nuclear staining was interpreted as positive. For p16INK4a a moderate or strong nuclear and cytoplasmic labeling was regarded as positive. We favored this simple method over a semiquantitative scoring system since both protocols gave similar results for the determination of p16INK4a expression [44].

FISH analysis

A FISH assay was developed for the analysis of HPV integration, TERC and c-myc copy numbers in FFPE tissue samples by modifying a previously reported method [45]. HeLa cells served as positive controls to guarantee probe specificity, sensitivity and interpretation accuracy as they show integration of HPV-18 and gene enrichment for 3q26 and 8q24 [4648]. Cytospinned cells were pretreated for hybridization by pepsin digestion and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde. The probe mixture was applied and hybridization was performed at 37°C overnight. Slides were then washed in 75°C 0.4xSCC / 0.3% NP-40 for 2 min followed by an ascending series of ethanol for dehydration. In FFPE specimens, the hybridization conditions were optimized by applying a harsh pretreatment, decreasing the number of post-hybridization washing steps and performing long-term proteloytic digestion. In detail, tissue sections of 2 μm were pretreated using a VP 2000 automated tissue-processing station (Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany). Specimens were rinsed with xylene to remove paraffin, dehydrated in a descending ethanol series and incubated in 0.2 M HCl for 20 min. To increase DNA accessibility protease digestion was performed at 37°C for 90 min. After application of the probe mixture samples were denatured at 73°C for 5 min and hybridized at 37°C overnight. Subsequently, samples were washed in 45°C 2xSCC / 0.3% NP-40 for 2 min. For FISH analysis the following probes were used: a SpectrumGoldTM-labeled 3q26 (TERC) probe, a SpectrumRedTM-labeled 8q24 (c-myc) probe and a biotinylated probe for HPV-16/-18/-26/-31/-33/-35/-39/-45/-51/-52/-53/-56/-58/-59/-66/-68/-82 (kindly provided by Abbott). The green fluorescent Alexa Fluor 488 tyramide (TSATM Kit #22, Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) allowed visualizing the biotin-labeled DNA. Sections were further counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). To account for potential problems of FISH in FFPE, especially with regard to the absence of probe signals and nonspecific hybridization, HeLa cells were used to confirm proper tissue treatment. In detail, the number of FISH signals in HeLa controls were counted and compared with the number of spots expected from the literature. Thus, we were able to identify the loss of target genes due to non-optimal assay conditions and to consequently repeat the assay when the correct pattern was not obtained.

Evaluation of FISH analysis

Slides were analyzed at 100x magnification using a Leica DM5500 fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems) with a triple bandpass filter for simultaneous detection. The entire surface of each slide was evaluated for FISH analysis; in cases with a high amount of FISH signals only the first 50 spots or abnormal cells were recorded. For the determination of HPV integration cells with ≥ 1 punctate HPV FISH signal localized to the nucleus indicative of HPV integration were quantified; a diffuse nuclear pattern that constitutes episomal HPV was excluded from quantification. For the determination of TERC and c-myc copy number gain two consecutive analyses were performed. First, we enumerated TERC and c-myc FISH signals in 20 cells of hotspot areas defined as the region where the most atypical cells were found. In the next step, the average number of TERC and c-myc signals per cell was assessed. From these data, the cut-off between normal and abnormal was achieved (> 2 FISH spots / cell). Using this threshold cells with TERC and c-myc copy number gain were enumerated in the whole slide.

Statistical analysis

Comparisons between continuous data were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test; comparisons between categorical variables were carried out using the Fisher’s exact test; p-values for tests with only a small number of counts were computed based on Monte Carlo simulations using 1.000.000 replicates. The cumulative risk of persistence or progression was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method as a function of the length of the follow-up; the log-rank test was used to determine a statistical significance of differences. To define cut-off values samples were divided into two subsets, the training and the validation set. The former consisted of benign and SCC samples and was used to detect optimal thresholds by receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The precancerous samples were used separately to validate the cut-off points identified by the training set. To study the simultaneous effect of prognostic factors multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. The median follow-up time was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier estimator [49]. Results with a two-sided p-value of <0.05 were considered to be significant. Conservative Bonferroni correction for p-values was used to account for multiple testing. Analysis was performed using the statistical softwares SPSS version 21 (IBM, Ehningen, Germany) and ‘R’ version 2.15.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).


We thank Susanne Steiner for excellent technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

H.-U.S. has received honoraria from Abbott.

Editorial note

This paper has been accepted based in part on peer-review conducted by another journal and the authors’ response and revisions as well as expedited peer-review in Oncotarget.


1. Östör AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1993; 12:186–192.

2. McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, Baranyai J, Medley G, Jones RW, Skegg DC. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9:425–434.

3. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1284.

4. Tornesello ML, Buonaguro L, Giorgi-Rossi P, Buonaguro FM. Viral and cellular biomarkers in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 15:1–10.

5. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Peto J, Meijer CJ, Munoz N. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999; 189:12–19.

6. Park TW, Fujiwara H, Wright TC. Molecular biology of cervical cancer and its precursors. Cancer. 1995; 76:1902–1913.

7. von Knebel Doeberitz M, Reuschenbach M, Schmidt D, Bergeron C. Biomarkers for cervical cancer screening: the role of p16INK4a to highlight transforming HPV infections. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2012; 9:149–163.

8. Rao PH, Arias-Pulido H, Lu XY, Harris CP, Vargas H, Zhang FF, Narayan G, Schneider A, Terry MB, Murty VV. Chromosomal amplifications, 3q gain and deletions of 2q33–q37 are the frequent genetic changes in cervical carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2004; 4:5.

9. Golijow CD, Abba MC, Mouron SA, Gomez MA, Dulout FN. c-myc gene amplification detected in preinvasive intraepithelial cervical lesions. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001; 11:462–465.

10. Heselmeyer-Haddad K, Janz V, Castle PE, Chaudhri N, White N, Wilber K, Morrison LE, Auer G, Burroughs FH, Sherman ME, Ried T. Detection of genomic amplification of the human telomerase gene (TERC) in cytologic specimens as a genetic test for the diagnosis of cervical dysplasia. Am J Pathol. 2003; 163:1405–1416.

11. Hopman AH, Theelen W, Hommelberg PP, Kamps MA, Herrington CS, Morrison LE, Speel EJ, Smedts F, Ramaekers FC. Genomic integration of oncogenic HPV and gain of the human telomerase gene TERC at 3q26 are strongly associated events in the progression of uterine cervical dysplasia to invasive cancer. J Pathol. 2006; 210:412–419.

12. Sokolova I, Algeciras-Schimnich A, Song M, Sitailo S, Policht F, Kipp BR, Voss JS, Halling KC, Ruth A, King W, Underwood D, Brainard J, Morrison L. Chromosomal biomarkers for detection of human papillomavirus associated genomic instability in epithelial cells of cervical cytology specimens. J Mol Diagn. 2007; 9:604–611.

13. Andersson S, Sowjanya P, Wangsa D, Hjerpe A, Johansson B, Auer G, Gravitt PE, Larsson C, Wallin KL, Ried T, Heselmeyer-Haddad K. Detection of genomic amplification of the human telomerase gene TERC, a potential marker for triage of women with HPV-positive, abnormal Pap smears. Am J Pathol. 2009; 175:1831–1847.

14. Policht FA, Song M, Sitailo S, O’Hare A, Ashfaq R, Muller CY, Morrison LE, King W, Sokolova IA. Analysis of genetic copy number changes in cervical disease progression. BMC Cancer. 2010; 10:432.

15. Heselmeyer-Haddad K, Sommerfeld K, White NM, Chaudhri N, Morrison LE, Palanisamy N, Wang ZY, Auer G, Steinberg W, Ried T. Genomic amplification of the human telomerase gene (TERC) in Pap smears predicts the development of cervical cancer. Am J Pathol. 2005; 166:1229–1238.

16. Zhang A, Maner S, Betz R, Angstrom T, Stendahl U, Bergman F, Zetterberg A, Wallin KL. Genetic alterations in cervical carcinomas: frequent low-level amplifications of oncogenes are associated with human papillomavirus infection. Int J Cancer. 2002; 101:427–433.

17. Lahortiga I, De Keersmaecker K, Van Vlierberghe P, Graux C, Cauwelier B, Lambert F, Mentens N, Beverloo HB, Pieters R, Speleman F, Odero MD, Bauters M, Froyen G, Marynen P, Vandenberghe P, Wlodarska I, et al. Duplication of the MYB oncogene in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2007; 39:593–595.

18. Kruse AJ, Baak JP, de Bruin PC, Jiwa M, Snijders WP, Boodt PJ, Fons G, Houben PW, The HS. Ki-67 immunoquantitation in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): a sensitive marker for grading. J Pathol. 2001; 193:48–54.

19. Tsoumpou I, Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Wentzensen N, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Malamou-Mitsi V, Paraskevaidis E. p16(INK4a) immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009; 35:210–220.

20. Cao Y, Bryan TM, Reddel RR. Increased copy number of the TERT and TERC telomerase subunit genes in cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2008; 99:1092–1099.

21. Ma YY, Wei SJ, Lin YC, Lung JC, Chang TC, Whang-Peng J, Liu JM, Yang DM, Yang WK, Shen CY. PIK3CA as an oncogene in cervical cancer. Oncogene. 2000; 19:2739–2744.

22. Razmpoosh M, Sansregret A, Oligny LL, Patey N, Dormoy-Raclet V, Ducruet T, Bouron-Dal Soglio D. Assessment of correlation between p16INK4a staining, specific subtype of human papillomavirus, and progression of LSIL/CIN1 lesions: first comparative study. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014; 142:104–110.

23. Pacchiarotti A, Ferrari F, Bellardini P, Chini F, Collina G, Dalla Palma P, Ghiringhello B, Maccallini V, Musolino F, Negri G, Pisa R, Sabatucci I, Rossi PG. Prognostic value of p16-INK4A protein in women with negative or CIN1 histology result: A follow-up study. Int J Cancer. 2014; 134:897–904.

24. Ho GY, Burk RD, Klein S, Kadish AS, Chang CJ, Palan P, Basu J, Tachezy R, Lewis R, Romney S. Persistent genital human papillomavirus infection as a risk factor for persistent cervical dysplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995; 87:1365–1371.

25. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin number 66, September, 2005. Management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106:645.

26. Kadish AS, Timmins P, Wang Y, Ho GYF, Burk RD, Ketz J, He W, Romney SL, Johnson A, Angeletti R, Abadi M, Consortium AECDC. Regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and loss of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is associated with cell-mediated immune responses to an HPV type 16 E7 peptide. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11:483–488.

27. Goldie SJ, Kohli M, Grima D, Weinstein MC, Wright TC, Bosch FX, Franco E. Projected clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of a human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96:604–615.

28. Moscicki A-B Ma, Y Wibbelsman, C Darragh, TM Powers A, Farhat S, Shiboski S. Rate of and risks for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescents and young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116:1373–1380.

29. Meyer N, Penn LZ. Reflecting on 25 years with MYC. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008; 8:976–990.

30. Pelengaris S, Khan M, Evan G. c-myc: more than just a matter of life and death. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002; 2:764–776.

31. Ferber MJ, Thorland EC, Brink AATP, Rapp AK, Phillips LA, McGovern R, Gostout BS, Cheung TH, Chung TKH, Fu WY, Smith DI. Preferential integration of human papillomavirus type 18 near the c-myc locus in cervical carcinoma. Oncogene. 2003; 22:7233–7242.

32. Riou G, Barrois M, Le MG, George M, Le Doussal V, Haie C. c-myc proto-oncogene expression and prognosis in early carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Lancet. 1987; 1:761–763.

33. Bourhis J, Le MG, Barrois M, Gerbaulet A, Jeannel D, Duvillard P, Le Doussal V, Chassagne D, Riou G. Prognostic value of c-myc proto-oncogene overexpression in early invasive carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 1990; 8:1789–1796.

34. Jalali GR, Herzog TJ, Dziura B, Walat R, Kilpatrick MW. Amplification of the chromosome 3q26 region shows high negative predictive value for nonmalignant transformation of LSIL cytologic finding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 202:581.e1–581.e5.

35. Rodolakis A, Biliatis I, Symiakaki H, Kershnar E, Kilpatrick MW, Haidopoulos D, Thomakos N, Antsaklis A. Role of chromosome 3q26 gain in predicting progression of cervical dysplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012; 22:742–747.

36. Obermann EC, Savic Prince S, Barascud A, Grilli B, Herzog M, Kaup D, Cathomas G, Frey Tirri B, Zlobec I, Wight E, Bubendorf L. Prediction of outcome in patients with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of human papillomavirus, TERC, and MYC. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013; 121:423–431.

37. Allison KH, Dintzis SM, Schmidt RA. Frequency of HER2 heterogeneity by fluorescence in situ hybridization according to CAP expert panel recommendations: time for a new look at how to report heterogeneity. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011; 136:864–871.

38. Heatley MK, Bury JP. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix. Cytopathology. 1998; 9:93–99.

39. Richart RM, Barron BA. A follow-up study of patients with cervical dysplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969; 105:386–393.

40. Chenoy R, Billingham L, Irani S, Rollason TP, Luesley DM, Jordan JA. The effect of directed biopsy on the atypical cervical transformation zone: assessed by digital imaging colposcopy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 103:457–462.

41. Richart RM. A modified terminology for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 75:131–133.

42. Steinau M, Lee DR, Rajeevan MS, Vernon SD, Ruffin MT, Unger ER. Gene expression profile of cervical tissue compared to exfoliated cells: impact on biomarker discovery. BMC Genomics. 2005; 6:64.

43. Merkelbach-Bruse S, Jakob C, Tietze L, Schroder W, Rath W, Fuzesi L. Consensus polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for human papillomavirus detection and typing in cervical specimens. Diagn Mol Pathol. 1999; 8:32–38.

44. Lesnikova I, Lidang M, Hamilton-Dutoit S, Koch J. p16 as a diagnostic marker of cervical neoplasia: a tissue microarray study of 796 archival specimens. Diagn Pathol. 2009; 4:22.

45. Hopman AHN, Kamps MA, Smedts F, Speel E-JM, Herrington CS, Ramaekers FCS. HPV in situ hybridization: impact of different protocols on the detection of integrated HPV. Int J Cancer. 2005; 115:419–428.

46. Macville M, Schrock E, Padilla-Nash H, Keck C, Ghadimi BM, Zimonjic D, Popescu N, Ried T. Comprehensive and definitive molecular cytogenetic characterization of HeLa cells by spectral karyotyping. Cancer Res. 1999; 59:141–150.

47. Meissner JD. Nucleotide sequences and further characterization of human papillomavirus DNA present in the CaSki, SiHa and HeLa cervical carcinoma cell lines. J Gen Virol. 1999; 80:1725–1733.

48. Vazquez-Mena O, Medina-Martinez I, Juárez-Torres E, Barrón V, Espinosa A, Villegas-Sepulveda N, Gómez-Laguna L, Nieto-Martínez K, Orozco L, Roman-Basaure E. Amplified genes may be overexpressed, unchanged, or downregulated in cervical cancer cell lines. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7:e32667.

49. Schemper M, Smith TL. A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials. 1996; 343–346.

Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 2706