Research Papers:

Identifying characteristic miRNAs-genes and risk pathways of multiple sclerosis based on bioinformatics analysis

PDF |  HTML  |  How to cite  |  Order a Reprint

Oncotarget. 2018; 9:5287-5300. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23866

Metrics: PDF 1076 views  |   HTML 2032 views  |   ?  

Deling Luo and Jin Fu _


Deling Luo1 and Jin Fu1

1Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Nangang District, Harbin 150086, China

Correspondence to:

Jin Fu, email: fujindoctor@163.com

Keywords: miRNAs; multiple sclerosis; peripheral blood mono-nuclear cells; susceptibility gene; therapy

Received: February 18, 2017    Accepted: December 18, 2017    Published: January 02, 2018


Multiple sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system. In MS, the genetic susceptibility is high and currently there is no effective treatment. MicroRNA, a small non-coding RNA, plays a vital role in immune responses. Aberrant or dysfunctional miRNAs may cause several diseases, including MS, thus miRNAs and miRNA related genes may be therapeutic weapons against MS. Here, we identified 21 miRNAs in peripheral blood mono-nuclear cells from over 600 persons, including healthy controls. By using informatics databases, 1637 susceptibility genes were evaluated and Cytoscape was used to integrate and visualize the relation between the miRNA identified and susceptibility genes. By using the cluster Profile package, a total of 10 risk pathways were discovered. Top pathways included: hsa05200 (pathway in cancer), hsa04010 (MAPK signaling pathway), and hsa04060 (cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction). By using the STRING database, a protein-protein interaction network was conducted to identify highly susceptibility genes. Moreover, the GSE21942 dataset was used to indicate the gene expression profiles and to correct prediction results, thereby identifying the most pivotal genes. The MiRSystem database provided information on both pivotal miRNAs and genes. In conclusion, miR-199a and miR-142-3p may be crucial for MS by targeting pivotal susceptibility genes, in particular KRAS and IL7R.


Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory neurological disorder in which auto-reactive immune cells attack the myelin sheath of nerve cell axons [1]. MS has higher incidence in females compared to males and affects young females between 20-40 years. Worldwide, nearly 2.5 million people suffer from MS [2]. A growing body of evidence shows that MS is associated with genetic susceptibility, environmental factors, virus infection, and autoimmune responses in which genes play a role that are closely related to MS [3, 4]. However, neither the underlying mechanism action nor the etiology of MS is clear and there is still no effective cure for the disease.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous short, highly conserved and single-stranded non-coding RNA molecules, containing about 19-25 nucleotides, that regulates gene expression at the post-transcriptional level through binding to the 3’or 5’-untranslated region of target mRNA, leading to translational repression or mRNA degradation [5]. MiRNAs play essential roles in multiple biological processes, including cell maintenance, development, and immune responses. In addition, miRNAs participate in immune homeostasis, such as immune cell development, central and peripheral tolerance, and T helper cell differentiation [4, 6]. Dysregulated miRNA expression has been reported to be associated with diseases such as cancer, inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases (including MS), systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis [79]. For example, in in vivo studies, miR-30a down-regulated the expression of the interleukin-21 receptor, resulting in fewer Th17 cells, and alleviated experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) [10]. Wan et al reported that miR-30a directly targeted Traf3ip2 mRNA (coding Act1) and inhibited IL-17-mediated NF-κB and MAPK activation, leading to a decrease of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [11]. O’Connell et al. demonstrated a role for miR-155 in regulating inflammatory responses, and miR155(-/-) mice were highly EAE-resistant [12]. Mandolesi et al. used miR-142-3p(-/-) mice to demonstrate that synaptic irregulars, which are modulated by IL-1β, and clinical and neuropathological manifestation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) disappeared [13]. Recent evidence suggested that miRNAs are highly stable in blood and are resistant to circulating ribonucleases. Therefore combined with its important roles in multiple biological processes, miRNAs in peripheral blood, are promising biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of MS. Moreover, miRNA mimics, inhibitors, and antisense oligonucleotides may become effective weapons in the treatment against MS [14, 15].

Numerous studies have focused on identifying MS-specific miRNAs through reliable methods such as “next-generation” sequencing, microarray analysis, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which resulted in generation of a myriad of data. However, a major issue with these achievements was that each experiment varied in the source and amount of sample and tissue of origin, leading to large differences in miRNA results, the correlation was low and some data rather controversial. The question remains, which miRNAs are MS-specific markers.

In this study, we isolated peripheral blood mono-nuclear cells (PBMC) from MS patients and healthy controls, and evaluated and compared their miRNA expression profiles, specific locations on human chromosomes. Using biological information methods, we constructed a network of these miRNAs and their susceptibility genes (including risk genes and miRNA target genes), and identified MS-related miRNAs. Furthermore, biological functions and pathways of MS susceptibility genes were thoroughly analyzed. The MS-related pathways included important pathways in which key protein kinases were encoded by susceptibility genes. Finally, our study focuses on miRNAs, susceptibility genes, expression profiles and their roles in MS. The results of our study may provide significant insight in the therapeutic treatment of MS.


Expression profile of MS-related miRNAs and locations on human chromosomes

Representative miRNAs were validated in a total of 321 MS patients and 333 healthy controls. A total of 21 differentially expressed miRNAs identified in PBMC of MS patients were validated in literature studies. Of the 21genes, 12 miRNAs were up-regulated, 7 miRNAs were down-regulated, and 2 miRNAs were controversial. In order to identify the specific location of the miRNA on chromosomes, miRNAs were mapped into the Gene Database (last Update: October 19, 2016). Interestingly, the miRNA cluster, miR-15a and miR-16-1, were both down-regulated and located at the same position on human chromosome 13 with different regions of 13q14.2. The roles of the two miRNAs in MS were similar, they both inhibited the apoptotic processes through modulating BCL2 gene expression which is highly expressed in CD4+T cells from relapsing-remitting (RR)-MS patients. Similarly, miR-140-5p and miR-328 were both down-regulated and located in close proximity on human chromosome 16 with different regions of 16q22.1. Guan et al. demonstrated that has-miR-140-5p may suppress encephalitogenic T helper type 1 (Th1) cell differentiation and that the expression level of this miRNA was inversely correlated with MS severity [16]. However, the role of miR-328 in MS remains unclear. We hypothesized that miR-328 and miR-140-5p may be part of a new miRNA cluster. Additionally, miR-125a (up-regulated) and miR-150 (expression controversial) were located on human chromosome 19q13.41, 19q13.33, respectively, however the roles of the two miRNAs in MS are not clear. Detailed information is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Overview of target miRNAs with expression and location on human chromosomes




Location on human chromosomes
























20/20; 36/32
















13q14.2 (50,049,119..50,049,201)83bp





13q14.2 (50,048,973..50,049,061)89bp





16q22.1 (69,933,081..69,933,180)100bp





21q21.3 (25,573,980..25,574,044) 65bp






























16q22.1 (67,202,321..67,202,395) 75bp






















Relationship between miRNAs and susceptibility genes

In this study, 1637 susceptibility genes were obtained including miRNA 710 target genes and 927 risk genes. Target genes from the miRTarBase Database were identified by experimental methods, such as luciferase reporter assay or green fluorescent protein reporter assay, ELISA, qRT-PCR, and Western blot analysis. Risk genes were taken from the OMIM database, GAD, and GWAS Central database. Target genes partially overlapped with risk genes, therefore Cytoscape [17] software was used to visualize the relationship between the genes. By matching target genes and risk genes, we observed that 69 of 710 target genes were repeated in risk genes. In the mapped 69 target genes, VEGFA was closely related with has-miR-145, miR-200c, miR-199a, and miR-21 compared to miR-140-5p, miR-15a, miR-125a, miR-93. MYB was more closely related with miR-155 compared to miR-150, miR-15a, and miR-200c. There was also a close relationship between MYC, miR-145, and miR-155. Of the 641 target genes, SAMD4 was more significantly related with miR-155 compared to miR199a, miR-125a, miR-26a, and miR-146a. PTEN, which was confirmed as a target by most of the experiments, was more tightly related with miR-21 compared to miR-26a, miR-155 and miR-93. ETS1 was more closely associated with miR-155 than with miR-200c and miR-145. RHOA was more related with miR-155 than miR-125a and miR-200c. KRas was significantly associated with miR-200c, miR-155, and miR152. NOTCH1 was tightly associated with miR-200c and miR-326(detailed information is presented in Figure 1). All miRNAs and genes were closely correlated (Figure 2A and 2B). Among all 710 target genes, the maximum number of genes was derived from miR-155. The number of target genes decreased, for example from miR-145, miR-21, miR146a, miR-200c, miR199a, and miR-26a (Figure 2C).

Relationship between miRNAs and susceptibility genes.

Figure 1: Relationship between miRNAs and susceptibility genes. Red nodes represent miRNAs, dark blue nodes represent target genes that repeat the risk gene, and light blue nodes represent target genes. The larger map edge size represents target genes that were verified by an increased number of experiments, and the map edge of an increased red color highlights a close relationship between the nodes.

MiRNAs and their target genes biological function and topological properties.

Figure 2: MiRNAs and their target genes biological function and topological properties. (A) node degree distribution of miRNAs, susceptibility genes and curve fitting. (B) the node with more neighbors indicated the higher betweenness centrality, suggesting such nodes were more essential in MS. (C) the top 6 miRNAs with highest number of susceptibility genes respectively. (D) the significant function catalog of susceptibility genes through gene oncology (GO) analysis, and the p-value were log-processed. (E) The main pathways through susceptibility genes enrichment analysis, and the p-value were log-processed.

Identifying genes functional catalogues and MS risk pathways in MS

699 susceptibility genes were successfully converted in gene Entrez ID by Abosolute Gend ID Conversion Tools [18]. Then we used the cluster Profiler [19] package (statistical analysis and visualization of functional profiles for genes and gene clusters) in the R/Bioconducter to identify risk pathways in MS with a background of Homo sapiens. The cutoff criteria was P-value<0.01, minimal size of genes annotated by Ontology term for testing>10. The significant enrichment of biological processes contained GO:0042127:regulation of cell proliferation, GO:0006955:immune response, GO:0043067:regulation of programmed cell death, GO:0010941:regulation of cell death, GO:0042981:regulation of apoptosis, GO:0033554:cellular response to stress, which was in line with the current theories on MS pathology. Among the susceptibility genes, VEGFA, ETS1,NOTCH1 were all involved in immune responses (Figure 2D).

“MS risk pathways” are associated with immune diseases or the immune system and highlight fundamental characteristics of autoimmune diseases. By using the cluster Profiler package, we identified 116 MS related pathways from Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database (KEGG) database. The filter conditions: P-value<0.01, minimal size of genes annotated by Ontology term for testing>10. Based on the catalog of GO terms, the significant enrichment analysis of pathways included hsa05200(pathways in cancer), hsa04010(MAPK signaling pathway), hsa04060(Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction), hsa04657(IL-17 signaling pathway), hsa04115(p53 signaling pathway), hsa04630 (Jak-STAT signaling pathway), hsa04660(T cell receptor signaling pathway), hsa04659(Th17 cell differentiation), hsa04152(AMPK signaling pathway), hsa04370(VEGF signaling pathway). These top 10 pathways are MS risk pathways (Table 2).

Table 2: Pathways associated with MS

KEGG Pathway




hsa05200 Pathways in cancer




hsa04010 MAPK signaling pathway




hsa04060 Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction




hsa04630 Jak-STAT signaling pathway




hsa04657 IL-17 signaling pathway




hsa04660 T cell receptor signaling pathway




hsa04115 p53 signaling pathway




hsa04659 Th17 cell differentiation




hsa04152 AMPK signaling pathway




hsa04370 VEGF signaling pathway




Hsa05200: potential hot pathway of MS

In our study, Hsa05200 (pathway in cancer) was identified to be a most significant pathway of MS pathogenesis. Many genes in this pathway encoded cell surface receptors or important message signals such as risk genes: ERK (MAPK1, MAPK3), MYC, VEGFA, MMP, IL8, and target genes: KRAS, RHOA, PTEN, SAMD4, IGF1R, and ETS1. The specific locations of these genes have been marked in the pathway map (Figure 3). Proteins encoded by these genes regulate activation of sub-pathways including cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, Jak-STAT signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathway, and the TGF-β signaling pathway. For example, the MAPK signal transduction pathway, plays key roles in cell proliferation and differentiation, cell growth and survival, neuronal function and the immune response [20]. Thus, promising roles of hsa05200 have been observed.

Schematic of the pathways in cancer from the KEGG database.

Figure 3: Schematic of the pathways in cancer from the KEGG database. Proteins or complexes encoded by susceptibility genes are marked in white. A red background color represents target genes that relates with risk genes. A green background color represents target genes that do not relate with risk genes, and a yellow background color represents risk genes and their locations within the pathway.

KRAS, p38, and MKK3/6 in MAPK signaling

Hsa04010 (MAPK signaling pathway) consisted of follow pathways: JNK(c-Jun N-terminal kinase) MAPK pathway, p38 MAPK pathway, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway. Each cascade was comprised by three core kinases (MAP3K, MAPKK, and MAPK) and additional upstream (MAP4K) and downstream (MAPKAPK) components. The signal was spread through sequential phosphorylation or activations of the sequential kinases, and ultimately resulted in phosphorylation of MAPK and MAPKAPK components to target regulatory proteins [21]. In the ERK cascade, Ras (known as MAPKKKs) was activated by extracellular growth factors, insulin and G-proteins by binding directly to the N-terminus of the Ras protein which modified its structure by phosphorylation. The active signal was transmitted to ERK(a member of MAPK), after phosphorylation of MEK1/2, which are members of MAPKK [22]. Finally, this signal activated ETS1, which delayed activation in inflammatory cells may promote demyelination in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis (a mouse model of multiple sclerosis) [23]. Activation of the ERK cascade positively participated in cellular activities, such as cell differentiation, proliferation, neuronal flexibility, and apoptosis [21]. ERK was considered a risk gene, whereas KRAS was a target gene, not a risk gene.

The p38 cascade can be activated by environmental factors, inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, insulin, transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α), ischemic stimulus. Activation of p38-related kinases required phosphorylation of two key MAPKKs namely, MKK3 (MAP2K3) and MKK6(MAP2K6) [20]. In this study, we discovered that MAP2K3, MAP2K6, and P38(MAPK14) were all target genes, and after activation of p38, several genes in the downstream pathway would be affected. This included P53, ELK-1, MSK1/2, and MEF2C. Among them, P53 was a risk gene. Moreover, miR-199a negatively regulated the expression of the following genes: JUN (MAPK9/10), p38 (MAPK14), ERK (MAPK1), NFKB1, and NIK (MAP3K14), therefore miR-199 primarily participated in the p38 signaling transmission process. Target genes of both miR-142-3p, and miR-21 encoded proteins that were mostly inflammatory factors, cell surface receptors or proteins located in signaling pathways upstream such as IL-1, TGFBR, TAB2, CD14, and MKK3 (MAP2K3). Therefore, miR-142-3p and miR-21 primarily regulated the activation process of the p38 the cascade (Figure 4).

Relationship between miRNAs and susceptibility genes in the MAPK signaling pathway.

Figure 4: Relationship between miRNAs and susceptibility genes in the MAPK signaling pathway. Proteins or complexes encoded by susceptibility genes are marked in a white background color. A red background color represents target genes that repeat with risk genes. A green background color represents target genes that do not repeat with risk genes, and a yellow background represents risk genes. MiRNAs with red frames negatively regulated their targets.

The roles of cytokine receptors in MS

Hsa04060 (cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction) is another pathway that has been reported to be associated with MS. This pathway contains chemokines, inflammatory cytokines, PDGF family, interferon family, IL-10 family, TNF family, IL-17 family, IL-1 family, and the TGF-β family. In our study, numerous genes encoded message signals or their receptors that referred to inflammatory cytokines. It is worth noting that several genes have been validated as risk genes, such as IL2/IL2R, IL3/IL3R, IL4/IL4R, IL7/IL7R, and IL17/IL17R. A large and growing body of evidence has investigated interleukins and found that their pathways played key roles in the development of MS. Especially, a strong relation has been shown between gene IL7RA (rs6897932), IL2RA (rs2104286), and the susceptibility, disability and development of MS [24, 25], indicating its importance in MS.

Expression profile of pivotal susceptibility genes and relation with miRNAs

To accurately and thoroughly identify pivotal susceptibility genes, we constructed a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network that was based on data from the STRING database. Seven nodes were exposed as hub genes (degree≥8, combined score≥0.9), including ETS1, KRAS, MYC, MAPK1, MAPK14, NOTCH1, and STAT3 (Figure 5). Although IL7R was not properly matched it was demonstrated that IL7R was enriched on Th17 cells and could serve as marker of Th17 cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (a common animal model of MS) [26]. Therefore, IL7R was considered another hub gene. Next, we evaluated the expression profiles of these genes exposed as hub genes in an independent genome-wide study of PBMC, GSE21942 [27] dataset from 15 healthy controls (Samples: GSM545818-GMS545832) and 14 MS patients (Samples: GSM545833-GSM545846), using the Gene Expression Omnibus Database. Five out of seven genes were differentially expressed between MS patients and healthy controls. The up-regulated genes included IL7R(log Fold Change=0.82, p<0.001) and KRAS (log Fold Change=1.31, p<0.001), while the down-regulated genes were MAPK14 (log Fold Change= -0.70, p<0.001), STAT3 (log Fold Change=-0.89, p<0.001) and ETS1 (log Fold Change= -0.73, p<0.001) (Table 3, Figure 6). The expression of MAPK1 and NOTCH1 was not statistically significant. Interestingly, the interaction between pivotal susceptibility genes and characteristic miRNAs was determined using the miRSystem database. Hsa-miR-142-3p was a common target for IL7R and KRAS. In addition, KRAS was also the target of hsa-miR-155, hsa-miR-145, and hsa-miR-199a.

Relationship between highly susceptibility genes.

Figure 5: Relationship between highly susceptibility genes. Nodes represent highly susceptibility genes and edges represent interaction between proteins. Nodes sizes are based on the number of degree: bigger nodes indicate larger degree. Size of edges represent combined scores: the more bold the edge, the higher the scores.

Table 3: Different expression level of highly susceptibility genes in healthy individuals versus MS patients

Gene Symbol

GSE21942 (14 MS patients vs.15 healthy controls)


log FC






































Shown are characteristic genes with a significant P.value and adjusted P-value (adj.p.value). Log FC (Log Fold Change) was logarithm2 of fold change; ns, not significant P.value.

Hierarchical clustering analysis between 14 MS patients and 15 healthy controls based on differentially expressed genes.

Figure 6: Hierarchical clustering analysis between 14 MS patients and 15 healthy controls based on differentially expressed genes. Horizontal rows represent 5 genes, and columns represent 29 samples, including 15 samples derived from healthy controls (GSM545818-GSM545832) and 14 derived from MS patients (GSM545833-GSM545846). Red color represents over-expression, whereas blue represents under-expression.


Although extensive research has been performed, effective therapy for the treatment of MS is still lacking. Prior studies have highlighted the importance of genetic susceptibility that highly correlated with the etiology of MS. Therefore, further studies are required to identify more effective therapies based on target genes. In this study, we focused on miRNAs from human PBMC and validated their expression levels. Through systemically and manually review of the literature, we identified 21 miRNAs that were experimentally validated. Despite the fact that expression levels of hsa-miR-150 and hsa-miR-155 were not consistent, previous studies have demonstrated a clear role for hsa-miR-155 in the pathological process of EAE, namely Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation. Hsa-miR-150 is involved in B cells, T cells, NK cell differentiation, and regulates the immune responses, however information on its roles in MS is limited [2833]. Therefore, future studies on the role of hsa-miR-155 and hsa-miR-150 in MS are clearly warranted.

Hsa-miR-15a and hsa-miR-16-1 are both located on human chromosome 13q14.2 but in a different region. Their roles in MS were similar and both miRNAs regulated apoptotic processes of CD4+T cells by targeting the BCL2 gene [34]. Previous studies have demonstrated that compared with relapse patients, expression of the BCL2 gene was lower in MS remission patients, and was accompanied with lower levels of inflammation [35]. Hsa-miR-140-5p and hsa-miR-328 were both down-regulated and located at chromosome16q22.1 at different regions. In human PBMC of MS patients, a low expression level of hsa-miR-140-5p enhances disease severity and development of Th1 cells. During MS, hsa-miR-140-5p expression showed a greater reduction in the relapsing phase compared to the remitting phase, and inversely impacted the expression of IFN-γand STAT1 [16]. Although, the role of has-miR-328 in MS was not clear, in cervical cancer a low expression of hsa-miR-328 as well as hsa-miR-140-5p may be potential therapeutic targets by binding different functional target genes [36, 37]. Thus, we hypothesized that the mechanism of has-miR-328 in MS may be similar to that of has-miR-140-5p. On human chromosomes, the location of hsa-miR-125a and has-miR-150 was 19q13 with a different sub band. Both miRNAs played crucial roles in autoimmune diseases, such as lupus nephritis (LN) and myasthenia gravis (MG). Although the roles of the two miRNAs in MS were unclear, we suggested that the effects may be analogous, therefore future studies are essential.

Recent evidence suggested that MS may be related to abnormalities in apoptosis/cell death, microglia activation, blood-brain barrier functioning, immune responses, cytokine production, and oxidative stress. In MS, several cytokine-related signaling pathways as well as immune receptors have been discovered that were deregulated, including downstream molecules, such as JAK /STAT, NF-Kb, ERK1/3, P38 or JUN/FOS [38]. In our study, we used biological information to obtain 710 target genes (no duplicates), which covered 69 risk genes (approximately 10%). GO term and pathway enrichment analysis results were highly consistent with current theories of MS pathology described above.

It is well-known that T(H)17 lymphocytes, as a third subset of effector CD4 +T cells, were different from the classic lineages of Th1 and Th2 cells and played essential roles in the pathogenesis of MS [39]. STAT3, as a pivotal susceptibility gene, has been demonstrated a role in generating Th17 cell responses through CD4 in STAT3-/- mice, therefore this gene was considered a marker of Th17 cells [40]. ETS1 negatively regulated Th17 cell differentiation and negatively correlated with the severity of MS [41]. Lill et al. analyzed 21589 individuals (10796 MS cases and 10793 controls from Europe) through logistic regression and fixed-effect meta-analysis. ETS1 (rs3809006, p=7.74×10(-9)) has a significant association with MS susceptibility [42]. MAPK14 (p38) was found to positively regulate transcription of the IL-17 gene and participated in the development of EAE through the induction of IL-17. Oral administration of a p38α (encoded by MAPK14) inhibitor obviously prohibited the progression of EAE and lowered the severity of neurological signs [43].

Based on the data described above, miRNA-based screening of MS-related genes seemed reliable. Such results provided the theoretical basis and guidance for the verification of future risk genes. In our study, the expression profile of STAT3 in GSE21942 [27] was down-regulated in MS patients, whereas IL7R was up-regulated. The trend of two gene expression values was inconsistent because the gene expression data of GSE21942 were obtained from human PBMC in which Th17 cells were represented by only a small proportion. Therefore, we predicted that, as a MS biomarker, IL7R might be more reliable compared to STAT3. Previous studies have shown that KRAS, which encodes protein of the small GTPase superfamily, is involved in various malignancies, such as non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer [44]. It could be used as a therapeutic approach for peritoneal mucinous malignancies by targeting the MEK- and PI3K-mediated pathway [45]. The role of KRAS in MS remains unclear, however through array analysis, KRAS expression levels were significantly up-regulated in MS patients. We concluded that KRAS may be a promising pivotal susceptibility gene.

Based on pathway enrichment analysis, hsa05200 was identified as a significant player in MS pathogenesis with a highest number of genes, which showed its promising role in MS. In hsa05200 pathway, MS-associated and risk genes were members of many vital sub-pathways, such as the MAPK signaling pathway, JAK-STAT signaling pathway, and cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions. For example, GWA studies demonstrated that the gene expression in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway significantly changed during MS [46]. The JAK-STAT pathway regulated immune responses through biological activities of interferon-gamma and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factors [47]. Dysregulation of the JAK-STAT pathway resulted in autoimmune diseases, such as MS/EAE. Currently, many studies focus on the therapeutic targets of this pathway [47, 48].

The MAPK signaling pathway was a key signaling pathway that regulated a wide range of cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, neuron function, and the immune response. During evolution, the pathway was one of the earliest signaling pathways to emerge and is highly evolutionarily conserved. This signaling pathway was possessed by all eukaryotic cells and is activated by environmental factors, inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, hormones, tumor necrosis factor, and ischemic injury [20]. If this pathway is dysregulated or functionally abnormal, it would lead to conditions, such as cancer, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, and developmental abnormalities [21]. P38 MAPK is a stress-induced kinase that plays an important role in inflammation. It is activated by a myriad of cellular stress and inflammatory responses. Activation of this sub-pathway released pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL10, IL-17 which are known to be involved in MS [49]. Di Mitri et al. demonstrated that the p38 MAPK pathway regulated Th17 cell differentiation, immune responses and participated in the pathogenesis of MS [50]. P38 inhibitors might be a new therapeutic tool to treat Th17-mediated autoimmune diseases [50], thus, our results were in line with previous studies.

MiRNAs, as crucial genetic negative regulators of gene expression, regulate various biological pathways [11]. Recent studies have shown that miRNAs in peripheral blood or the central nervous were potential biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic use, therefore miRNA mimics/inhibitors may be potential therapeutic weapons to fight MS [15]. Target genes of miR-199a which were experimentally validated, encoded several vital proteins that are located at key positions in the MAPK signaling pathway, such as MAPK14 (p38), and JUN. In our study, we found that KRAS, a vital susceptibility gene, is a predictive target of miR-199a. During the initial phase of the study, miR-142-3p was considered a significant miRNA of MS. Mandolesi et al. found that in miR-142 knock-out mice IL1β-dependent synaptopathy as well as the clinical and neuropathological manifestations of EAE disappeared [13]. In vivo experiments indicated that miR-142-3p inhibition might delete IL1β-dependent synaptopathy in EAE animal model. Thus, Mandolesi et al. proposed that miR-142-3p was a key negative regulator of IL-1β-dependent synaptopathy in neuroinflammation [13]. By using the miRSystem, miR-142-3p was found a common predictive target of IL7R and KRAS. According to the relation between pivotal susceptibility genes and characteristic miRNAs, we hypothesized that miR-199a, miR-142-3p and their target genes (IL7R, KRAS) might act as MS therapeutic targets in the MAPK /JAK-STAT signaling transduction pathway.

In summary, through systemically scientific analysis, we identified that miR-155, miR-145, miR-21, miR146a, miR-200c, miR199a, and miR-26a are MS significant miRNAs, whereas miR-199a and miR-142-3p were characteristic miRNAs. We should deeply explore the clinical use of characteristic miRNAs and their potential target genes in MS. In addition, future studies are required to identify and validate MS-pivotal susceptibility genes (KRAS, IL7R) and their therapeutic roles in MS.


Representative miRNA expression, location on human chromosomes

Characteristic target miRNAs were defined as those, which expression levels were significantly different between MS patient samples and healthy controls. In order to collect comprehensive information, “(“micrornas”[MeSH Terms] OR “micrornas”[All Fields] OR “mirna”[All Fields]) AND “multiple sclerosis”[All Fields] AND “humans”[MeSH Terms]” were used as key-words to search and review articles in the PubMed database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed). We read the literature of human species, which was published prior to October 30, 2016. Target miRNAs were obtained by following criteria: (1) each experiment contained at least 10 MS patients without any treatment and 10 controls. (2) experimental sample tissue must be from human PBMC. (3) target miRNAs were detected in an independent experiment both by microarray analysis and real-time –PCR (rt-PCR) with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. MiRNAs that met one of following criteria were also scored as targets:(i) miRNA emerged in an experiment in which only microarray was used, but was validated in an independent test of in which rt-PCR was used, p< 0.05. (ii) several special miRNA(s) from human PBMC have been confirmed in MS process in patients who were not treated. All target miRNAs were found at specific locations in the human chromosome with Gene Database (last Update: October 19, 2016) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene).

Susceptibility genes: target genes of miRNAs and risk genes

Throughout this study, risk genes referred to genes that contained single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with MS or genes that were experimentally validated to be involved in pathological process. The Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database (Updated 21 October 2016) (http://omim.org/), Genetic Association Database (GAD) and GWAS Central database (release January 2016) (http://www.gwascentral.org/) were reviewed to obtain specific information on MS-related genes. Risk genes must be conform the following criteria: (1) the total number of patients or healthy participants enrolled in each study must be over 20. (2) biological methods of genes detected or validated should be reliable. (3) significant MS-associated SNP variants are identified by p<0.01. We obtained the related genes of these target miRNAs by reviewing the mirTarBase (Release 6.0: Sept. 15, 2015), a database storing experimentally confirmed microRNA-target interactions (http://miRTarBase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/) [5153]. The target genes must be conform the following criteria: (1) Luciferase reporter assay or green fluorescent protein reporter assay was used to validate the relation between miRNA target genes. (2) if experimental technology of reporter assay was not included, any two of ELISA, qRT-PCR or Western blot analysis must be used at the same time. (3) if ELISA, qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis was used, it must combined with biological method of the Luciferase reporter assay or green fluorescent protein reporter assay.

Pathway, GO data and enrichment analysis

MS-related risk pathways were identified using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (updated October 1, 2016) and pathways were in line with the entries of the ‘immune system diseases of Human Diseases’ and ‘immune system of Organismal systems’. To identify MS risk, and which target and risk genes are involved in the MS pathway, we applied the cluster Profiler [19] package (statistical analysis and visualization of functional profiles for genes and gene clusters) in the R/Bioconducter. The cluster Profiler packages was used to enrich genes to GO functional categories and KEGG metabolic processes to discover biological function and a gene catalog. The cut-off criterion of the GO term was a Homo sapiens background, and p<0.01, minimal size of genes annotated by Ontology term for testing>10. The pathway criteria was a Homo sapiens background and p<0.01.

Gene expression profile analysis and target miRNAs of pivotal genes

PPI networks were constructed based on important susceptibility genes. The network was evaluated based on two topological parameters, combined scores and degree. Degree≥8 and a combined score≥0.9 were cut-off criteria. Furthermore, Cytoscape [17] was used to construct and visualize the PPI network. Next, the expression profiling of GSE21942 [27] was downloaded from Gene Expression Omnbius (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), which was based on the platform of GPL570: [HG-U133_Plus_2] Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array. A total of 29 samples were enrolled in the database, including 14 MS patients (10 samples of PBMCs and 4 samples as a technical replicate) and 15 healthy controls. The differently expressed genes were identified by the limma [54] package (linear model for microarray data) in the R/Bioconducter. The cut-off criteria was p<0.05 and the log2FC (fold change)>0.6 or <-0.6 (fold change>1.5 or <0.6). Then, Heml [55] (Heatmap Illustrator, version 1.0) was used to create the heatmap and visualize the specific expression data of these important and pivotal genes. Moreover, the MiRSystem database, a integration of seven well-known miRNA target gene prediction programs: DIANA, miRanda, miRBridge, PicTar, PITA, rna22, and TargetScan (http://mirsystem.cgm.ntu.edu.tw/) [56] were used. According to the MiRSystem database, the interactions of characteristic miRNAs and pivotal genes were identified.


EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FC, fold change; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; LN, lupus nephritis; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MG, myasthenia gravis; miRNA, microRNA; MS, multiple sclerosis; PBMC, peripheral blood mono-nuclear cells; qRT-PCR, quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction; SNP, significant Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms; TGF-α, transforming growth factor-α; 3’UTR, 3’-untranslated region; 5’UTR, 5’-untranslated region.

Author contributions

The experiment was designed by Jin Fu and Deling Luo; the literature was screened and the data were analyzed by Deling Luo; the draft was written by Deling Luo.


All the authors declared no conflict of interest.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant nos. 81171120. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Stadelmann C. Multiple sclerosis as a neurodegenerative disease: pathology, mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011; 24:224–229.

2. Pastuszak Z, Stepien A, Tomczykiewicz K, Piusinska-Macoch R, Durka-Kesy M. [Mitoxantrone role in treatment of primary progressive multiple sclerosis]. [Article in Polish]. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2016; 40:66–69.

3. Sawcer S, Hellenthal G, Pirinen M, Spencer CC, Patsopoulos NA, Moutsianas L, Dilthey A, Su Z, Freeman C, Hunt SE, Edkins S, Gray E, Booth DR, et al; International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2011; 476:214–219.

4. Lill CM, Zipp F. [The genetic profile of multiple sclerosis: risk genes and the “dark matter”]. [Article in German]. Nervenarzt. 2012; 83:705–713.

5. Zhou X, Duan X, Qian J, Li F. Abundant conserved microRNA target sites in the 5’-untranslated region and coding sequence. Genetica. 2009; 137:159–164.

6. Bergman P, Piket E, Khademi M, James T, Brundin L, Olsson T, Piehl F, Jagodic M. Circulating miR-150 in CSF is a novel candidate biomarker for multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016; 3:e219.

7. Ebert MS, Sharp PA. Roles for microRNAs in conferring robustness to biological processes. Cell. 2012; 149:515–524.

8. Perez-Sanchez C, Aguirre MA, Ruiz-Limon P, Barbarroja N, Jimenez-Gomez Y, de la Rosa IA, Rodriguez-Ariza A, Collantes-Estevez E, Segui P, Velasco F, Cuadrado MJ, Teruel R, Gonzalez-Conejero R, et al. Atherothrombosis-associated microRNAs in antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:31375.

9. Wu T, Chen G. miRNAs participate in MS pathological processes and its therapeutic response. Mediators Inflamm. 2016; 2016:4578230.

10. Qu X, Zhou J, Wang T, Han J, Ma L, Yu H, Geng D, Fan H, Zhang Q, Hua F, Yao R. MiR-30a inhibits Th17 differentiation and demyelination of EAE mice by targeting the IL-21R. Brain Behav Immun. 2016; 57:193–199.

11. Wan Q, Zhou Z, Ding S, He J. The miR-30a negatively regulates IL-17-mediated signal transduction by targeting Traf3ip2. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2015; 35:917–923.

12. O’Connell RM, Kahn D, Gibson WS, Round JL, Scholz RL, Chaudhuri AA, Kahn ME, Rao DS, Baltimore D. MicroRNA-155 promotes autoimmune inflammation by enhancing inflammatory T cell development. Immunity. 2010; 33:607–619.

13. Mandolesi G, De Vito F, Musella A, Gentile A, Bullitta S, Fresegna D, Sepman H, Di Sanza C, Haji N, Mori F, Buttari F, Perlas E, Teresa Ciotti M, et al. miR-142-3p is a key regulator of IL-1beta-dependent synaptopathy in neuroinflammation. J Neurosci. 2016; 37:546–561.

14. Gandhi R. miRNA in multiple sclerosis: search for novel biomarkers. Mult Scler. 2015; 21:1095–1103.

15. Zare-Shahabadi A, Renaudineau Y, Rezaei N. MicroRNAs and multiple sclerosis: from physiopathology toward therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013; 17:1497–1507.

16. Guan H, Singh UP, Rao R, Mrelashvili D, Sen S, Hao H, Zumbrun EE, Singh NP, Nagarkatti PS, Nagarkatti M. Inverse correlation of expression of microRNA-140-5p with progression of multiple sclerosis and differentiation of encephalitogenic T helper type 1 cells. Immunology. 2016; 147:488–498.

17. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27:431–432.

18. Mohammad F, Flight RM, Harrison BJ, Petruska JC, Rouchka EC. AbsIDconvert: an absolute approach for converting genetic identifiers at different granularities. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012; 13:229.

19. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012; 16:284–287.

20. Krishna M, Narang H. The complexity of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) made simple. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008; 65:3525–3544.

21. Plotnikov A, Zehorai E, Procaccia S, Seger R. The MAPK cascades: signaling components, nuclear roles and mechanisms of nuclear translocation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011; 1813:1619–1633.

22. Rapp UR, Gotz R, Albert S. BuCy RAFs drive cells into MEK addiction. Cancer Cell. 2006; 9:9–12.

23. Gerhauser I, Alldinger S, Baumgartner W. Ets-1 represents a pivotal transcription factor for viral clearance, inflammation, and demyelination in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2007; 188:86–94.

24. Cierny D, Hanysova S, Michalik J, Kantorova E, Kurca E, Skerenova M, Lehotsky J. Genetic variants in interleukin 7 receptor alpha chain (IL-7Ra) are associated with multiple sclerosis risk and disability progression in Central European Slovak population. J Neuroimmunol. 2015; 282:80–84.

25. Traboulsee AL, Bernales CQ, Ross JP, Lee JD, Sadovnick AD, Vilarino-Guell C. Genetic variants in IL2RA and IL7R affect multiple sclerosis disease risk and progression. Neurogenetics. 2014; 15:165–169.

26. Arbelaez CA, Glatigny S, Duhen R, Eberl G, Oukka M, Bettelli E. IL-7/IL-7 receptor signaling differentially affects effector CD4+ T cell subsets involved in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2015; 195:1974–1983.

27. Kemppinen AK, Kaprio J, Palotie A, Saarela J. Systematic review of genome-wide expression studies in multiple sclerosis. BMJ Open. 2011; 1:e000053.

28. Fenoglio C, Cantoni C, De Riz M, Ridolfi E, Cortini F, Serpente M, Villa C, Comi C, Monaco F, Mellesi L, Valzelli S, Bresolin N, Galimberti D, et al. Expression and genetic analysis of miRNAs involved in CD4+ cell activation in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Lett. 2011; 504:9–12.

29. Martinelli-Boneschi F, Fenoglio C, Brambilla P, Sorosina M, Giacalone G, Esposito F, Serpente M, Cantoni C, Ridolfi E, Rodegher M, Moiola L, Colombo B, De Riz M, et al. MicroRNA and mRNA expression profile screening in multiple sclerosis patients to unravel novel pathogenic steps and identify potential biomarkers. Neurosci Lett. 2012; 508:4–8.

30. Paraboschi EM, Solda G, Gemmati D, Orioli E, Zeri G, Benedetti MD, Salviati A, Barizzone N, Leone M, Duga S, Asselta R. Genetic association and altered gene expression of mir-155 in multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2011; 12:8695–8712.

31. Zhang J, Cheng Y, Cui W, Li M, Li B, Guo L. MicroRNA-155 modulates Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation and is associated with multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2014; 266:56–63.

32. Moore CS, Rao VT, Durafourt BA, Bedell BJ, Ludwin SK, Bar-Or A, Antel JP. miR-155 as a multiple sclerosis-relevant regulator of myeloid cell polarization. Ann Neurol. 2013; 74:709–720.

33. Punga AR, Andersson M, Alimohammadi M, Punga T. Disease specific signature of circulating miR-150-5p and miR-21-5p in myasthenia gravis patients. J Neurol Sci. 2015; 356:90–96.

34. Lorenzi JC, Brum DG, Zanette DL, de Paula Alves Souza A, Barbuzano FG, Dos Santos AC, Barreira AA, da Silva WA. miR-15a and 16-1 are downregulated in CD4+ T cells of multiple sclerosis relapsing patients. Int J Neurosci. 2012; 122:466–471.

35. Arthur AT, Armati PJ, Bye C, Heard RN, Stewart GJ, Pollard JD, Booth DR; Southern MS Genetics Consortium. Genes implicated in multiple sclerosis pathogenesis from consilience of genotyping and expression profiles in relapse and remission. BMC Med Genet. 2008; 9:17.

36. Su Y, Xiong J, Hu J, Wei X, Zhang X, Rao L. MicroRNA-140-5p targets insulin like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1) to suppress cervical cancer growth and metastasis. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:68397–68411. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11722.

37. Wang X, Xia Y. microRNA-328 inhibits cervical cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis by targeting TCF7L2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016; 475:169–175.

38. Kotelnikova E, Bernardo-Faura M, Silberberg G, Kiani NA, Messinis D, Melas IN, Artigas L, Schwartz E, Mazo I, Masso M, Alexopoulos LG, Mas JM, Olsson T, et al. Signaling networks in MS: a systems-based approach to developing new pharmacological therapies. Mult Scler. 2015; 21:138–146.

39. Kebir H, Kreymborg K, Ifergan I, Dodelet-Devillers A, Cayrol R, Bernard M, Giuliani F, Arbour N, Becher B, Prat A. Human TH17 lymphocytes promote blood-brain barrier disruption and central nervous system inflammation. Nat Med. 2007; 13:1173–1175.

40. Harris TJ, Grosso JF, Yen HR, Xin H, Kortylewski M, Albesiano E, Hipkiss EL, Getnet D, Goldberg MV, Maris CH, Housseau F, Yu H, Pardoll DM, et al. Cutting edge: An in vivo requirement for STAT3 signaling in TH17 development and TH17-dependent autoimmunity. J Immunol. 2007; 179:4313–4317.

41. Du C, Liu C, Kang J, Zhao G, Ye Z, Huang S, Li Z, Wu Z, Pei G. MicroRNA miR-326 regulates TH-17 differentiation and is associated with the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Nat Immunol. 2009; 10:1252–1259.

42. Lill CM, Luessi F, Alcina A, Sokolova EA, Ugidos N, de la Hera B, Guillot-Noel L, Malhotra S, Reinthaler E, Schjeide BM, Mescheriakova JY, Mashychev A, Wohlers I, et al. Genome-wide significant association with seven novel multiple sclerosis risk loci. J Med Genet. 2015; 52:848–855.

43. Namiki K, Matsunaga H, Yoshioka K, Tanaka K, Murata K, Ishida J, Sakairi A, Kim J, Tokuhara N, Shibakawa N, Shimizu M, Wada Y, Tokunaga Y, et al. Mechanism for p38alpha-mediated experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287:24228–24238.

44. Kawada K, Toda K, Sakai Y. Targeting metabolic reprogramming in KRAS-driven cancers. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017; 22:651–659.

45. Kuracha MR, Thomas P, Loggie BW, Govindarajan V. Bilateral blockade of MEK- and PI3K-mediated pathways downstream of mutant KRAS as a treatment approach for peritoneal mucinous malignancies. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0179510.

46. International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. Network-based multiple sclerosis pathway analysis with GWAS data from 15,000 cases and 30,000 controls. Am J Hum Genet. 2013; 92:854–865.

47. Benveniste EN, Liu Y, McFarland BC, Qin H. Involvement of the janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling pathway in multiple sclerosis and the animal model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2014; 34:577–588.

48. Liu Y, Gibson SA, Benveniste EN, Qin H. Opportunities for translation from the bench: therapeutic intervention of the JAK/STAT pathway in neuroinflammatory diseases. Crit Rev Immunol. 2015; 35:505–527.

49. Yasuda S, Sugiura H, Tanaka H, Takigami S, Yamagata K. p38 MAP kinase inhibitors as potential therapeutic drugs for neural diseases. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2011; 11:45–59.

50. Di Mitri D, Sambucci M, Loiarro M, De Bardi M, Volpe E, Cencioni MT, Gasperini C, Centonze D, Sette C, Akbar AN, Borsellino G, Battistini L. The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade modulates T helper type 17 differentiation and functionality in multiple sclerosis. Immunology. 2015; 146:251–263.

51. Hsu SD, Lin FM, Wu WY, Liang C, Huang WC, Chan WL, Tsai WT, Chen GZ, Lee CJ, Chiu CM, Chien CH, Wu MC, Huang CY, et al. miRTarBase: a database curates experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39:D163–169.

52. Hsu SD, Tseng YT, Shrestha S, Lin YL, Khaleel A, Chou CH, Chu CF, Huang HY, Lin CM, Ho SY, Jian TY, Lin FM, Chang TH, et al. miRTarBase update 2014: an information resource for experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D78–85.

53. Chou CH, Chang NW, Shrestha S, Hsu SD, Lin YL, Lee WH, Yang CD, Hong HC, Wei TY, Tu SJ, Tsai TR, Ho SY, Jian TY, et al. miRTarBase 2016: updates to the experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44:D239–247.

54. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004; 3:Article3.

55. Deng W, Wang Y, Liu Z, Cheng H, Xue Y. HemI: a toolkit for illustrating heatmaps. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e111988.

56. Lu TP, Lee CY, Tsai MH, Chiu YC, Hsiao CK, Lai LC, Chuang EY. miRSystem: an integrated system for characterizing enriched functions and pathways of microRNA targets. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e42390.

Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 23866