Research Papers:

Epidemiology and survival outcome of breast cancer in a nationwide study

PDF |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite  |  Order a Reprint

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:16939-16950. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15207

Metrics: PDF 994 views  |   HTML 1841 views  |   ?  

Fu-Chao Liu, Huan-Tang Lin, Chang-Fu Kuo, Lai-Chu See, Meng-Jiun Chiou and Huang-Ping Yu _


Fu-Chao Liu1,2,*, Huan-Tang Lin1,2,*, Chang-Fu Kuo3,4, Lai-Chu See5,6, Meng-Jiun Chiou7, Huang-Ping Yu1,2

1Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

2College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

3Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

4Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

5Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

6Biostatistics Core Laboratory, Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

7Office for Big Data Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence to:

Huang-Ping Yu, email: yuhp2001@adm.cgmh.org.tw

Keywords: breast cancer, epidemiology, survival outcome, nationwide population study

Received: November 02, 2016     Accepted: January 24, 2017     Published: February 09, 2017


Breast cancer is among the most prevalent cancers in Taiwan. The National Health Insurance database was used to identify patients with breast cancer and estimate the yearly prevalence and incidence of breast cancer between 1997 and 2013. Joinpoint regression analysis was used for the annual percentage change of incidence, prevalence, and survival outcome. Among 12,181,919 female beneficiaries in 2013, the prevalence was 834.37 per 100,000 persons (95% confidence interval, 829.28–839.45) and the incidence was 93.00 per 100,000 person-year (95% confidence interval, 91.27–94.73). The average annual percentage change of the age-standardized breast cancer incidence was 3.5 per 100,000 person-years (3.1–3.8; P < 0.05), suggesting an increase in breast cancer incidence over the study period. The 5-year mortality rate was 4.5% in 1997 and 4.4% in 2008. The 5-year mortality rate among patients with Charlson comorbidity index > 1 was 39.1% (19.2%–59.1%) in 1997 and 21.1% (15.7%-32.0%) in 2008, with an annual percentage change of –0.8 (–1.3 to 2.9), suggesting that the mortality rate was gradually decreasing in patients with comorbidities. In conclusion, 1 in 120 women in Taiwan has breast cancer and the incidence is rising, while the annual percentage change of breast cancer prevalence is decreasing. The mortality rate of breast cancer was essentially stable, but the 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year mortality rates in people with Charlson comorbidity index > 1 were declined.

Epidemiology and survival outcome of breast cancer in a nationwide study | Liu | Oncotarget


According to GLOBOCAN 2012, breast cancer is the second most common cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with an age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) of 43.3 per 100,000 women-years and a worldwide mortality rate of 12.9% in 2012 [1]. The breast cancer incidence rate was considerably lower in Eastern Asia than in Northern America and Europe (ASR: 27.0, 91.6, and 71.1 per 100,000 women-years, respectively). Similarly, the breast cancer mortality rate was also lower (ASR: 6.2%, 14.8%, and 16.1%, respectively). In Asia, reports have indicated that the annual incidence of breast cancer has doubled or tripled over the past two decades. In Asia, the onset of breast cancer tends to occur at a younger age and more estrogen receptor (ER) positive or progesterone receptor (PR) positive subtypes, associated with a more favorable clinical-pathological outcome [2]. The etiology of breast cancer has generally been attributed to genetic, reproductive, and hormonal factors. In a breast cancer risk study conducted in Taiwan by Chuang et al. [3], estrogen-related factors, such as obesity, endometriosis, uterine myoma, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, were identified as important risk factors for patients with breast cancer. The known risk of female breast cancer includes BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, chest radiation exposure < 30 year, dense breast density, abnormal breast biopsy, family history of ovarian or breast cancer, late parity (age > 30 year) or nulliparity, early menarche (age < 12 year) or late menopause (age > 55 year), hormone-replacement therapy, postmenopausal obesity, white race, alcohol consumption and smoking [4]. In order to risk stratification of breast cancer for population-based screening, the Gail model was developed in 1989 to calculate an individual’s combined risks of developing invasive breast cancer [5]. The Gail model was used widely since then but it is known to overestimate breast cancer risk for Asian women [5]. The updated Korean model proposed by Min et al. in 2014 [6], including risk factors of age, body mass index, menopause status, breast feeding, family history, previous breast test and age at first delivery, showed a better performance than the other models for Asian women.

Compared to female breast cancer, male breast cancer accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancers in the United States [7] and Korea [8]. Male breast cancer was diagnosed at early stages and high rate of ER positivity [8], but evidences revealed that aromatase inhibitors are less effective in males than in post-menopausal women [9]. Though most male breast cancer subtypes are invasive ductal carcinomas, the 5-year overall survival rate was comparable between male and female breast cancer patients in Korea [8] while poorer overall survival but better breast cancer-specific survival in Hong Kong [10]. In our NHI database, the incidence of male breast cancer was rare, accounted for 0.4% of all breast cancer (see Supplementary Table 1). Therefore, this study focused on epidemiology of female breast cancer in Taiwan.

Data regarding breast cancer epidemiology in Taiwan are rare, and surveys conducted by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of World Health Organization (WHO) have not included Taiwan [1]. A recent study reported prevalence and incidence trends of multiple categories of cancer in Taiwan using the National Cancer Registry Database [11]. However, stratification of the estimates and mortality trends of breast cancer are lacking. This study aims to estimate the secular trends of the epidemiology of breast cancer, the association between breast cancer and preexisting comorbidities, and breast cancer mortality rates using the National Health Insurance (NHI) database.


Study population and socioeconomic status of patients with breast cancer

The study population comprised 22,080,199 registered NHI beneficiaries in Taiwan between 1997 and 2013. Of these, 125,253 female patients with breast cancer were identified. The average age of subjects was 52.57 ± 12.21 years. Patient baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Women living in rural areas comprised only one-third of breast cancer cases, while women in urban and suburban areas each represented one-third of cases. Furthermore, the prevalence of breast cancer was lower among women with lower income (quintile 1 and 2, total 30.83%) than among women with higher income (quintile 4 and 5, total 39.4%). The socioeconomic analysis indicated that breast cancer was more prevalent in high-income urban areas in Taiwan.

Table 1: Clinical characteristics of patients with breast cancer from 1997 to 2013

Breast cancer cases
(n = 125,253)

Age (years) (mean ± standard deviation)

52.57 ± 12.21

Place of residence, No. (%)













Income levels, No. (%)

 Quintile 1 (lowest)



 Quintile 2



 Quintile 3



 Quintile 4



 Quintile 5 (highest)






Occupation, No. (%)

 Dependents of the insured individuals



 Civil servants, teachers, military personnel and veterans



 Non-manual workers and professionals



 Manual workers









Prevalence and incidence of breast cancer between 1997 and 2013

Table 2 shows the temporal trends in breast cancer prevalence and incidence in Taiwan between 1997 and 2013. Overall, the age-adjusted standardized estimates were slightly higher than the crude estimates, namely due to the aging population effect over time. The standardized prevalence of breast cancer was 186.46 [95% confidence interval (CI): 183.38–189.53] per 100,000 person in 1997 and 834.37 (95% CI: 829.28–839.45) per 100,000 person in 2013 (Figure 1). The standardized incidence was 52.34 (95% CI: 50.70–53.98) per 100,000 person-year in 1997 and 93.00 (95% CI: 91.27–94.73) per 100,000 person-year in 2013 (Figure 2). Overall, the standardized prevalence and incidence of breast cancer were 4.5-fold and 1.8-fold higher, respectively, in 2013 than in 1997. The average APC of breast cancer incidence was 3.5 (95% CI: 3.1 to 3.8, P < 0.05), suggesting an increase in the incidence of breast cancer over the past two decades. Figure 3 shows the age-specific prevalence and incidence of breast cancer in 2013. The age-specific prevalence and incidence increased with age, with a peak at 65–69 years old, followed by a drop after the age of 70.

Table 2: Crude and age-standardized prevalence and incidence of breast cancer from 1997 to 2013

Trends of crude and age-standardized prevalence of breast cancer in Taiwan, 1997-2013.

Figure 1: Trends of crude and age-standardized prevalence of breast cancer in Taiwan, 1997-2013.

Trends of crude and age-standardized incidence of breast cancer in Taiwan, 1997-2013.

Figure 2: Trends of crude and age-standardized incidence of breast cancer in Taiwan, 1997-2013.

Figure 3:

Figure 3: Age-specific prevalence (A) and incidence (B) of breast cancer in Taiwan in 2013.

Joinpoint regression analysis of breast cancer prevalence and incidence

Table 3A and 3B showed the joinpoint regression analysis of breast cancer incidence and prevalence, respectively. The average APC of breast cancer incidence was 3.5 (95% CI: 3.1 to 3.8, P < 0.05) per 100,000 person-years with zero joinpoint. The calculated best-fit joinpoint of breast cancer prevalence was 3, dividing the study period into 4 segments. The average APC of breast cancer prevalence was 17.1 (15.5–18.8) per 100,000 person-years, 1997–2000; 9.8 (9.2–10.5) per 100,000 person-years, 2000–2005; 7.9 (7.1–8.8) per 100,000 person-years, 2005–2009; and 6.3 (5.9–6.7) per 100,000 person-years, 2009–2013. The overall average APC was 9.8 (9.4–10.1) per 100,000 person-years between 1997 and 2013. This indicates gradual decrease in breast cancer prevalence over time.

Table 3A: Joinpoint analysis of breast cancer incidence in Taiwan, 1997-2013

Table 3B: Joinpoint analysis of breast cancer prevalence in Taiwan, 1997-2013

Mortality rate of breast cancer

The 1-year, 2-year and 5-year breast cancer mortality rates in Taiwan were stable (Figure 4), with zero average annual percent change during the study period (Table 4). The calculated mortality rates were as follows: the 1-year mortality rate was 0.9% in 2012, the 2-year mortality rate was 1.5% in 2011, and the 5-year mortality rate was 4.4% in 2008 (Table 4). In view of disease severity and patient comorbidity on survival outcome, we divided our study population into 2 groups, according to the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). The CCI < 1 group included 98.7% of patients with breast cancer (Table 5) with a slightly reduced mortality rate compared to the general population (1-year: 0.8%, 2-year: 1.3%; 5-year: 4.2%). Conversely, the CCI > 1 group included 1.3% of patients with breast cancer with a much higher mortality rate (1-year: 7.1%, 2-year: 13.7%; 5-year: 21.1%). The average APC of 1-year, 2-year, 5-year mortality rates in the CCI > 1 group were -0.6 (–2.1 to 0.8), –0.3 (–0.2 to 0.7), and –0.8 (–1.3 to 2.9), respectively. There was an obvious decline in mortality rate in the CCI > 1 group during the study period (Figure 5).

Trends of 1-, 2-, and 5-year mortality rate of breast cancer in Taiwan, 1997-2012.

Figure 4: Trends of 1-, 2-, and 5-year mortality rate of breast cancer in Taiwan, 1997-2012.

Table 4: Joinpoint analysis of breast cancer mortality rate in Taiwan, 1997-2012

Breast cancer survival rate


Last yeara

Average APC


 1 year mortality rate





0.0 (0.0 to 0.0)

 2 year mortality rate





0.0 (0.0 to 0.0)

 5 year mortality rate





0.0 (–0.1 to 0.0)


 CCI ≤ 1

 1 year mortality rate





0.0 (0.0 to 0.0)

 2 year mortality rate





0.0 (0.0 to 0.0)

 5 year mortality rate





0.0 (–0.1 to 0.1)

 CCI > 1

 1 year mortality rate





–0.6 (–2.1 to 0.8)

 2 year mortality rate





–0.3 (–0.2 to 0.7)

 5 year mortality rate





–0.8 (–1.3 to 2.9)

Abbreviations: APC, annual percent change; *P < 0.05.

aLast year: 1-year mortality rate for 2012; 2-year mortality rate for 2011; 5-year mortality rate for 2008.

Table 5: Number of female patients with breast cancer grouped by the Charlson comorbidity index


Charlson comorbidity index

< 1

> 1












































































































Trends of 1&#x2013;, 2&#x2013;, and 5&#x2013; year mortality rate of breast cancer in Taiwan, 1997&#x2013;2012, according to the Charlson comorbidity index.

Figure 5: Trends of 1–, 2–, and 5– year mortality rate of breast cancer in Taiwan, 1997–2012, according to the Charlson comorbidity index. (A): Charlson index ≤ 1; (B): Charlson index > 1 (yellow: 1-year mortality rate; green: 2-year mortality rate; purple: 5-year mortality rate).


Four main intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer have been identified based on the expression of ER, PR, human epidermal receptor-2 (HER2) [12, 13]. The loss of hormone receptor positivity and the switch to the triple negative phenotype after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with a worse patient outcome [14, 15]. The heritability of breast cancer has been estimated to be about 31% [16]. Known genetic factors contributing to a higher lifetime risk of breast cancer comprise rare variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM and CHEK2 [17]. Taken together, these genetic variants explain about 37% of the excess familial breast cancer risk [17]. Recent advances in sequencing technology have made panel multigene testing practical for risk stratification of invasive breast cancer according to genetic variants [18]. The clinical utility of several genomic tests such as 21-gene expression assay [19] or 70-gene signature [20] have been proved in prospective long-term clinical trials to better predict clinical outcomes.

The prevalence and incidence of breast cancer have been rising globally [21]. However, breast cancer mortality rates have been stable, or have slightly declined. In the USA, breast cancer mortality rates decreased by 36% between 1989 and 2012 [22]. Sung et al. [23] found comparable longitudinal breast cancer age-specific incidence rates (ASR) among Asian and Western populations. Taiwan implemented a stratified breast cancer screening program in 1995 [24]. Since 2002, the Taiwan government has provided a national biennial mammography screening program for women aged between 40 and 69 years [24]. According to the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan, 690,000 women underwent screening mammography in 2013, with a screening rate of 36% [11]. Amy Ming-Fang Yen et al. [25] investigated screening efficiency in Taiwan and found that population-based screening mammography was associated with a 41% reduction in breast cancer mortality rates.

Our study indicated that there was a rising trend in the prevalence and incidence of breast cancer in Taiwan, while mortality rates were essentially stable. These findings were consistent with epidemiological studies conducted in other countries [21, 26]. A study involving adult cancer patients, based on the Taiwan cancer registries database [11], found that between 2002 and 2012 the breast cancer incidence APCs in men and women were 4.9%, and -2.4% respectively, and the 5-year age-standardized relative survival rate was 82.8% in 2008. These findings are consistent with our results.

In countries with a universal health care system, higher socioeconomic status is associated with better overall survival, while lower socioeconomic status is correlated with increased cancer mortality [2729]. Our socioeconomic status analysis showed a similar pattern, with a reduced prevalence of breast cancer cases in low-income rural areas. Furthermore, emerging treatment modalities have contributed to a reduction in breast cancer mortality rates, particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities. These advances may explain the significant improvement in the survival rate of the CCI > 1 group in our study.

Standardized clinical approaches to breast cancer include breast imaging, surgery, pathological analysis and subtyping, radiotherapy, and near universal application of adjuvant systemic therapy [30]. Systemic treatments have proved to be effective at reducing distant metastasis and local recurrence rate to less than 5% during 10 years of follow-up after breast surgery [31, 32]. For example, adjuvant therapy with pan-HER2 tyrosine-kinase inhibitor neratinib significantly improved invasive disease-free survival in women after chemotherapy and trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer [33]. Recent large-scale cohort studies revealed that screening mammography resulted in reduction of breast cancer-specific mortality [34, 35].

There are several limitations to our study. The NHI released de-identified and encrypted data for public research, so there are no clues of clinical information on cancer staging or treatment modalities, which could only be obtained by the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database. However, we validated breast cancer diagnosis against the National Cancer Registry, a highly accurate source for the diagnosis of cancer. The agreement between the NHI database and the National Cancer Registry breast cancer diagnoses is excellent. Furthermore, NHI database has a 99.9% coverage of the population in Taiwan while the Cancer Registry Database had a 98.4% coverage of the population in 2012. These data are inherently complementary and are supported by consistent epidemiologic statistics between previous studies [11] and our results. Finally, the prevalence reported in this study was defined within a 10-year period, rather than a lifetime prevalence, which could be higher theoretically. Overall, we may have underestimated breast cancer prevalence rates but overestimated incidence rates.

In conclusion, this epidemiological study of breast cancer in Taiwan found a rising trend in breast cancer prevalence and incidence. However, the AAPC of breast cancer prevalence by joinpoint regression analysis showed a gradual deceleration of the increasing trend. The breast cancer mortality rate was essentially stable during the study period, but we observed a reduction in the 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year mortality rates in patients with CCI > 1. By improving patient awareness, and providing efficient screening and innovative treatments, we may be able to control the rising incidence of breast cancer and reduce mortality rates in Taiwan in the near future.


This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (approval number 104-6697B) and the National Health Research Institute, the data holder of the National Health Insurance (NHI) research database.

Data sources and study population

Our primary data source was the NHI research database. This database routinely collected health data for all individuals eligible for NHI. By law, all citizens are required to enroll in the program, resulting in an exceptionally high population coverage rate of over 99%. Our study database comprised approximately 28 million (living and deceased) beneficiaries, registered between 1 Jan 1997 and 31 Dec 2013. The NHI diagnostic coding system follows the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). The reliability, representativeness, and clinical consistency of this database have been reported previously. In Taiwan, patients with major illnesses, such as cancer, are entitled to a medical copayment waiver. A diagnosis from a specialist and a review by a commissioned expert panel are required for approval of the waiver. The registry of patients with catastrophic illness records the clinical and administrative information of patients receiving this waiver. We identified patients with breast cancer through the registry using an ICD-9 CM code of 174.9. Denominator data were based on the Registry of Beneficiaries, containing the demographics, insurance status, residence, and socioeconomic data.

To ascertain the validity of breast cancer diagnosis in the NHI database, we used the National Cancer Registry as a standard to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) of breast cancer diagnosis. We also compared the databases for the estimated mortality rates. The PPV, NPV, sensitivity, and specificity of breast cancer diagnosis were 0.92, 1.00, 0.97, and 1.00, respectively.

Estimation of prevalence and incidence

Prevalent cases of breast cancer were defined as individuals with at least one primary diagnosis of breast cancer within the 10-year period before 1 January of each calendar year. Prevalence was calculated by dividing the number of prevalent cases of breast cancer by the eligible population in a specified calendar year. Incident breast cancer cases were defined as beneficiaries with a registration period of at least 1 year prior to 1 January of each calendar year. For the incidence of breast cancer, we constructed at-risk cohorts for each calendar year, comprising all beneficiaries registered during the given calendar year without a history of breast cancer before 1 January of that year. The incidence was calculated using the number of incident breast cancer cases during a calendar year as the numerator and the total person-years in the at-risk population accumulating during that same year as the denominator.

Trends of prevalence, incidence of breast cancer

To determine the trends in prevalence and incidence of breast cancer, we calculated age standardized prevalence and incidence of breast cancer in each calendar year between 1997 and 2013, with the population structure in 2013 as the reference. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to compare the average annual percent change (APC) of breast cancer prevalence and incidence during the study period.

Trends of mortality rate of breast cancer

To determine the mortality rate of breast cancer, we constructed cohorts for each calendar year. The 1-, 2- and 5- year mortality rates of breast cancer were calculated during the specified calendar year using deceased breast cancer beneficiaries diagnosed after 1, 2 or 5 years of that year. We then divided our study population according to the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) into 2 groups, CCI > 1 and CCI < 1, in order to compare the trend of 1–, 2–, 5– year mortality rate between 1997 and 2013.

Statistical analysis

The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of prevalence and incidence were based on the assumption of Poisson distribution for the observed prevalent and incident cases. We used the Joinpoint Regression Program (version 4.0.4; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA) to estimate trends in the prevalence and incidence of breast cancer. The Bayesian information criterion was used to generate different ‘joinpoints’ when the linear trend of prevalence and incidence of breast cancer changed significantly and to determine the best-fit situations. Average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) for each segment were calculated. The significance level was set at 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted on SAS statistical software, version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).


National Health Insurance (NHI), confidence interval (CI), annual percentage change (APC), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), age-standardized incidence rate (ASR), estrogen receptor positive (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization (WHO), International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), human epidermal receptor (HER), the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results(SEER).


This study was partially based on data from the NHIRD provided by the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health, and managed by the National Health Research Institutes. Interpretation and conclusions reported herein do not represent the views of the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health or National Health Research Institutes. This work was partially supported by grants from the National Science Council of Taiwan (project 103-2314-B-182A-070-MY2 and 103-2314-B-182-043-MY2) and the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (project CMRPG3F1011, CMRPG3D1671 and CORPG3E0131). The University of Nottingham provided methodology and infrastructure support.


The authors declare no conflicts of interests.


1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136:E359–E386.

2. Lin CH, Chuang PY, Chiang CJ, Lu YS, Cheng AL, Kuo WH, Huang CS, Lai MS, You SL, Tang CH. Distinct clinicopathological features and prognosis of emerging young-female breast cancer in an East Asian country: A nationwide cancer registry-based study. Oncologist. 2014; 19:583–591.

3. Chuang SC, Wu GJ, Lu YS, Lin CH, Hsiung CA. Associations between medical conditions and breast cancer risk in Asians: A nationwide population-based study in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0143410.

4. Warner E. Breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:1025–1032.

5. Chay WY, Ong WS, Tan PH, Jie Leo NQ, Ho GH, Wong CS, Chia KS, Chow KY, Tan M Sr, Ang P Sr. Validation of the Gail model for predicting individual breast cancer risk in a prospective nationwide study of 28,104 Singapore women. Breast Cancer Res. 2012; 14:R19.

6. Min JW, Chang MC, Lee HK, Hur MH, Noh DY, Yoon JH, Jung Y, Yang JH. Validation of risk assessment models for predicting the incidence of breast cancer in Korean women. J Breast Cancer. 2014; 17:226.

7. Leone JP, Zwenger AO, Iturbe J, Leone J, Leone BA, Vallejo CT, Bhargava R. Prognostic factors in male breast cancer: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 156:539–548.

8. Choi MY, Lee SK, Lee JE, Park HS, Lim ST, Jung Y, Ko BK, Nam SJ. Characterization of Korean male breast cancer using an online nationwide breast-cancer database. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95:e3299.

9. Fentiman IS. Male breast cancer is not congruent with the female disease. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016; 101:119–124.

10. Kwong A, Chau WW, Mang OW, Wong CH, Suen DT, Leung R, Wong K, Lee A, Shea C, Morse E, Hong Kong Breast Cancer Research Group, Law SC. Male breast cancer: a population-based comparison with female breast cancer in Hong Kong, Southern China: 1997–2006. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21:1246–1253.

11. Chiang CJ, Lo WC, Yang YW, You SL, Chen CJ, Lai MS. Incidence and survival of adult cancer patients in Taiwan, 2002–2012. J Formos Med Assoc. 2016.

12. Prat A, Pineda E, Adamo B, Galvan P, Fernandez A, Gaba L, Diez M, Viladot M, Arance A, Munoz M. Clinical implications of the intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast. 2015; 24:S26-S35.

13. Sun W, Jiang YZ, Liu YR, Ma D, Shao ZM. Nomograms to estimate long-term overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival of patients with luminal breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:20496–20506. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7975.

14. Jin X, Jiang YZ, Chen S, Yu KD, Shao ZM, Di GH. Prognostic value of receptor conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a prospective observational study. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:9600–9611. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3292.

15. Kimbung S, Kovács A, Danielsson A, Bendahl PO, Lövgren K, Stolt MF, Tobin NP, Lindström L, Bergh J, Einbeigi Z, Fernö M, Hatschek T, Hedenfalk I. Contrasting breast cancer molecular subtypes across serial tumor progression stages: biological and prognostic implications. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:33306–33318. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5089.

16. Mucci LA, Hjelmborg JB, Harris JR, Czene K, Havelick DJ, Scheike T, Graff RE, Holst K, Moller S, Unger RH, McIntosh C, Nuttall E, Brandt I, et al, Nordic Twin Study of Cancer (NorTwinCan) Collaboration. Familial Risk and Heritability of Cancer Among Twins in Nordic Countries. JAMA. 2016; 315:68–76.

17. Michailidou K, Beesley J, Lindstrom S, Canisius S, Dennis J, Lush MJ, Maranian MJ, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Shah M, Perkins BJ, Czene K, Eriksson M, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of more than 120,000 individuals identifies 15 new susceptibility loci for breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2015; 47:373–380.

18. Harris LN, Ismaila N, McShane LM, Andre F, Collyar DE, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hammond EH, Kuderer NM, Liu MC, Mennel RG, Van Poznak C, Bast RC, Hayes DF, American Society of Clinical Oncology. Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016, 34:1134–1150.

19. Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer CE, Dees EC, Perez EA, Olson JA, Zujewski J, Lively T, Badve SS, et al. Prospective validatin of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 2005–2014.

20. Cardoso F, van’t Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, Slaets L, Viale G, Delaloge S, Pierga JY, Brain E, Causeret S, DeLorenzi M, Glas AM, Golfinopoulos V, Goulioti T, et al. 70-Gene Signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375:717–729.

21. Banas T, Juszczyk G, Pitynski K, Nieweglowska D, Ludwin A, Czerw A. Incidence and mortality rates in breast, corpus uteri, and ovarian cancers in Poland (1980–2013): An analysis of population-based data in relation to socioeconomic changes. Onco Targets Ther. 2016; 9:5521–5530.

22. DeSantis CE, Fedewa SA, Goding Sauer A, Kramer JL, Smith RA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2015: Convergence of incidence rates between black and white women. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66:31–42.

23. Sung H, Rosenberg PS, Chen WQ, Hartman M, Lim WY, Chia KS, Wai-Kong Mang O, Chiang CJ, Kang D, Ngan RK, Tse LA, Anderson WF, Yang XR. Female breast cancer incidence among Asian and western populations: more similar than expected. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107.

24. Chiang CJ, Chen YC, Chen CJ, You SL, Lai MS. Taiwan Cancer Registry Task F. Cancer trends in Taiwan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010; 40:897–904.

25. Yen AM, Tsau HS, Fann JC, Chen SL, Chiu SY, Lee YC, Pan SL, Chiu HM, Kuo WH, Chang KJ, Wu YY, Chuang SL, Hsu CY, et al. Population-based breast cancer screening with risk-based and universal mammography screening compared with clinical breast examination: A propensity score analysis of 1429890 Taiwanese women. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2:915–921.

26. Shin HR, Boniol M, Joubert C, Hery C, Haukka J, Autier P, Nishino Y, Sobue T, Chen CJ, You SL, Ahn SH, Jung KW, Law SC, et al. Cancer Sci. 2010; 101:1241–1246.

27. Kumachev A, Trudeau ME, Chan KK. Associations among socioeconomic status, patterns of care and outcomes in breast cancer patients in a universal health care system: Ontario’s experience. Cancer. 2016; 122:893–898.

28. Corbex M, Bouzbid S, Boffetta P. Features of breast cancer in developing countries, examples from North-Africa. Eur J Cancer. 2014; 50:1808–1818.

29. Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ, St Louis J, Finkelstein DM, Yu KD, Chen WQ, Shao ZM, Goss PE. Breast cancer in China. The Lancet Oncology. 2014; 15:e279-e289.

30. Figueroa-Magalhães MJ, Jelovac D, Connolly R, Wolff AC. Treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast. 2014; 23:128–136.

31. Lowery AJ, Kell MR, Glynn RW, Kerin MJ, Sweeney KJ. Locoregional recurrence after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review by receptor phenotype. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 133: 831–841.

32. Arvold ND, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, Abi Raad RF, Sreedhara M, Nguyen PL, Bellon JR, Wong JS, Smith BL, Harris JR. Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:3885–3891.

33. Chan A, Delaloge S, Holmes FA, Moy B, Iwata H, Harvey VJ, Robert NJ, Silovski T, Gokmen E, von Minckwitz G, Ejlertsen B, Chia SKL, Mansi J, et al. Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17:367–377.

34. Kalager M, Zelen M, Langmark F, Adami HO. Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:1203–1210.

35. Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367:1998–2005.

Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 15207