Oncotarget

Research Papers:

Dramatic reduction of sequence artefacts from DNA isolated from formalin-fixed cancer biopsies by treatment with uracil-DNA glycosylase.

Hongdo Do and Alexander Dobrovic _

PDF  |  HTML  |  How to cite  |  Order a Reprint

Oncotarget. 2012; 3:546-558. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.503

Metrics: PDF 2971 views  |   HTML 4239 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Hongdo Do1,§, and Alexander Dobrovic1,2,§

1 Molecular Pathology Research and Development Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

2 Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

3 Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

§ Joint corresponding authors

Correspondence:

Hongdo Do, email:

Alexander Dobrovic, email:

Keywords: FFPE, cancer biopsies, sequencing artefacts, EGFR mutation, BRAF mutation, closed-tube analysis

Received: May 20, 2012, Accepted: May 21, 2012, Published: May 24, 2012

Abstract

Non-reproducible sequence artefacts are frequently detected in DNA from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. However, no rational strategy has been developed for reduction of sequence artefacts from FFPE DNA as the underlying causes of the artefacts are poorly understood. As cytosine deamination to uracil is a common form of DNA damage in ancient DNA, we set out to examine whether treatment of FFPE DNA with uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) would lead to the reduction of C>T (and G>A) sequence artefacts. Heteroduplex formation in high resolution melting (HRM)-based assays was used for the detection of sequence variants in FFPE DNA samples. A set of samples that gave false positive HRM results for screening of the E17K mutation in exon 4 of the AKT1 gene were chosen for analysis. Sequencing of these samples showed multiple non-reproducible C:G>T:A artefacts. Treatment of the FFPE DNA with UDG prior to PCR amplification led to a very marked reduction of the sequence artefacts as indicated by both HRM and sequencing analysis. Similar results were shown for the BRAFV600 region in the same sample set and EGFR exon 19 in another sample set. UDG treatment specifically suppressed the formation of artefacts in FFPE DNA as it did not affect the detection of true KRAS codon 12 and true EGFR exon 19 and 20 mutations. We conclude that uracil in FFPE DNA leads to a significant proportion of sequence artefacts. These can be minimised by a simple UDG pre-treatment, which can be readily carried out in the same tube as the PCR, immediately prior to commencing thermal cycling. HRM is a convenient way of monitoring both the degree of damage and the effectiveness of the UDG treatment. These findings have immediate and important implications for cancer diagnostics where FFPE DNA is used as the primary genetic material for mutational studies guiding personalised medicine strategies and where simple effective strategies to detect mutations are required.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 503