Oncotarget (a primarily oncology-focused, peer-reviewed, open access journal) aims to maximize research impact through insightful peer-review; eliminate borders between specialties by linking different fields of oncology, cancer research and biomedical sciences; and foster application of basic and clinical science.
Its scope is unique. The term "oncotarget" encompasses all molecules, pathways, cellular functions, cell types, and even tissues that can be viewed as targets relevant to cancer as well as other diseases. The term was introduced in the inaugural Editorial,
Introducing Oncotarget.
As of January 1, 2022, Oncotarget has shifted to a continuous publishing model. Papers will now be published continuously within yearly volumes in their final and complete form and then quickly released to Pubmed.
Publication Alerts
Subscribe to receive alerts once a paper has been published by Oncotarget.
Martin Boegemann1,
Katrin Schlack1,
Lena Früchtenicht1,
Julie Steinestel2,
Andres Jan Schrader1,
Yvonne Wennmann1,
Laura-Maria Krabbe1,3
and Okyaz Eminaga4
1 Department of Urology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, Germany
2 Department of Urology, Augsburg Medical Center, Augburg, Germany
3 Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
4 Department of Urology, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA, USA
Received: March 13, 2019
Accepted: July 21, 2019
Published: August 20, 2019
ABSTRACT
Background: Therapy resistance remains a serious dilemma in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with primary or secondary resistance frequently occurring against any given therapy. Available prognostic models for Abiraterone Acetate (AA) are specifically designed for either pre- or post-chemotherapy settings and mostly based on trial datasets not necessarily reflecting real-life.
Results: A score of 0–2 (low-risk) is associated with an OS-probability of 80.0% (95%CI: 71.3–90.6) and 50.5% (95%CI: 38.7–66.0) after 1 and 2 years while a score of 3–4 (high risk) is associated with an OS-probability of 35.3% (95%CI: 22.3–55.8) and 5.7% (95%CI: 1.5–21.8), respectively. The bootstrapping survival analysis of the scoring-system revealed a median c-index of 0.80 (IQR: 0.79–0.82).
Material and Methods: We developed a scoring-system using four real-life parameters 117 mCRPC patients treated with AA either pre- or post-chemotherapy. These parameters were evaluated using COX regression analysis. The scoring-system consists of binary-categorized parameters; when any of these exceeds the given cut-off, one point is added up to a final score ranging between 0–4 points. The final score was stratified by a median threshold of 2 into low- and high-risk groups. We evaluated the discriminative ability of our scoring-system using concordance probability (C-index) and Kaplan–Meier-analysis and applied a 100-times bootstrap for survival analysis.
Conclusions: Our study introduces a novel prognostic scoring-system for OS of real-life mCRPC patients receiving AA treatment irrespective of the line of therapy. The scoring-system is simple and can be easily utilized based on PSA and LDH values, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and ECOG performance status.
