Oxygenation/non-invasive ventilation strategy and risk for intubation in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure

Abstract

We investigated how the initial ventilation/oxygenation management may influence the need for intubation on the coming day in a cohort of immunocompromised patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF).

Data from 847 immunocompromised patients with ARF were used to estimate the probability of intubation at day+1 within the first 3 days of ICU admission, according to oxygenation management. First, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) was compared to oxygen therapy whatever the administration device; then standard oxygen was compared to High Flow Nasal Cannula therapy alone (HFNC), NIV alone or NIV+HFNC. To take into account the oxygenation regimens over time and to handle confounders, propensity score weighting models were used.

In the original sample, the probability of intubation at day+1 was higher in the NIV group vs oxygenation therapy (OR = 1.64, 95CI, 1.09–2.48) or vs the standard oxygen group (OR = 2.05, 95CI: 1.29–3.29); it was also increased in the HFNC group compared to standard oxygen (OR = 2.85, 95CI: 1.37–5.67). However, all these differences disappeared by handling confounding-by-indication in the weighted samples, as well as in the pooled model. Note that adjusted OR for day-28 mortality increased with the day of intubation.

In this large cohort of immunocompromised patients, ventilation/oxygenation management had no impact on the probability of intubation on the coming day.