Clinical application of angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yating Li _, Hong Xu, Wenrui Wu, Jianzhong Ye, Daiqiong Fang, Ding Shi and Lanjuan Li

PDF  |  HTML  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2018; 9:24155-24167. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23816

Metrics: PDF 1680 views  |   HTML 2468 views  |   ?  


Yating Li1, Hong Xu2, Wenrui Wu1, Jianzhong Ye1, Daiqiong Fang1, Ding Shi1 and Lanjuan Li1

1State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 31003, People’s Republic of China

2Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Heping District, Tianjin 300052, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence to:

Lanjuan Li, email: [email protected]

Keywords: NAFLD (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease); ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers); liver fibrosis; liver inflammation; meta-analysis

Received: September 19, 2017     Accepted: October 27, 2017     Epub: January 02, 2018     Published: May 08, 2018


Objective: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common chronic liver diseases, ranging from simple steatosis to progressive steatohepatitis and cirrhosis. Because of their anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are potential therapeutic agents for NAFLD. The present systematic review assessed the effectiveness of ARBs in NAFLD management.

Results: Accounting for data overlap and exclusion criteria, randomized controlled trial -based and single-arm meta-analyses were conducted for four studies with 362 patients and eight studies with 525 patients, respectively. Although alanine aminotransferase levels were not significantly affected by ARB treatment (standardized mean difference 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) [−0.04, 0.44]; P = 0.10), a fixed-effect model revealed a decreasing trend in alanine transaminase levels. Low-density lipoprotein levels were reduced by ARB treatment (MD 5.21; 95% CI [3.01, 7.40]; P < 0.00001), and total cholesterol also decreased in response to ARBs (MD 2.10; 95% CI [−0.37, 4.57]; P = 0.10). However, the fibrosis score and NAFLD activity score were not significantly improved by ARB treatment (MD 0.10; 95% CI [−0.58, 0.78]; P = 0.77) (MD −0.25; 95% CI [−1.05, 0.55]; P = 0.53).

Materials and Methods: Keywords were used to identify studies in PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science and CNKI published up to July 31, 2017. Single-arm and RCT-based meta-analyses of the available data were performed using RevMan (version 5.3).

Conclusions: Although ARBs significantly decreased plasma low-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol levels, the current evidence is insufficient to support the efficacy of ARBs in managing fibrosis in NAFLD patients.

Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 23816