Oncotarget

Meta-Analysis:

Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor sensitizing mutations on outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive thoracic radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yu Yang Soon _, Balamurugan Vellayappan, Jeremy Chee Seong Tey, Cheng Nang Leong, Wee Yao Koh and Ivan Weng Keong Tham

PDF  |  HTML  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:109712-109722. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21019

Metrics: PDF 1381 views  |   HTML 1685 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Yu Yang Soon1,2,3, Balamurugan Vellayappan1,2,3, Jeremy Chee Seong Tey1,2,3, Cheng Nang Leong1,2,3, Wee Yao Koh1,2,3 and Ivan Weng Keong Tham1,2,3

1Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore

2National University Hospital, Singapore

3National University of Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence to:

Yu Yang Soon, email: [email protected]

Keywords: non-small cell lung cancer, epidermal growth factor receptor, radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy, prognosis

Received: July 04, 2017     Accepted: August 29, 2017     Published: September 18, 2017

ABSTRACT

Background: To determine if the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitizing mutations improves tumor control and survival outcomes in patients with non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received definitive thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) with or without chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods: We searched MEDLINE for eligible comparative studies which compared the outcomes of patients treated with definitive TRT according to EGFR mutation status. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model. Outcomes of interest were tumor overall response rate (ORR), loco-regional (LRR), distant recurrence rates (DRR), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AE).

Results: We found seven studies including 537 patients with stage III NSCLC. Up to 45% of patients in the studies had mutations in exon 19 and 21. Patients harbouring EGFR sensitizing mutations had a trend towards improvement in ORR (risk ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.99–1.37, P = 0.06) compared to EGFR wild type status. There were no significant differences in LRR, DRR, RFS, OS and AE outcomes between the EGFR mutant and EGFR wild type groups.

Conclusions: The presence of EGFR sensitizing mutations may improve tumour response rate but not survival in patients with localized NSCLC treated with definitive thoracic radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 21019