Oncotarget

Research Papers:

A randomized phase II study of aromatase inhibitors plus metformin in pre-treated postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer

Yannan Zhao, Chengcheng Gong, Zhonghua Wang, Jian Zhang, Leiping Wang, Sheng Zhang, Jun Cao, Zhonghua Tao, Ting Li, Biyun Wang _ and Xichun Hu

PDF  |  HTML  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:84224-84236. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20478

Metrics: PDF 1672 views  |   HTML 2618 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Yannan Zhao1,*, Chengcheng Gong1,*, Zhonghua Wang1, Jian Zhang1, Leiping Wang1, Sheng Zhang1, Jun Cao1, Zhonghua Tao1, Ting Li1, Biyun Wang1 and Xichun Hu1

1Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China

*These authors have contributed equally to this work

Correspondence to:

Biyun Wang, email: [email protected]

Xichun Hu, email: [email protected]

Keywords: metastatic breast cancer, hormone receptor positive, endocrine therapy, metformin, pre-treated

Received: April 18, 2017     Accepted: July 19, 2017     Published: August 24, 2017

ABSTRACT

Background: Everolimus significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) and has been approved to use in aromatase inhibitor pretreated patients with hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer. Metformin has been shown to inhibit mTOR pathway, with more favorable safety profile, leading to this hypothesis-generating trial to assess whether metformin enhances the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors.

Methods: 60 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to aromatase inhibitor (exemestane 25mg/d or letrozole 2.5mg/d depending on the most recent treatment) plus metformin (0.5g bid, orally) or placebo. The primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints were objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, overall survival and safety.

Results: Median PFS was 4.7 months in the combination group and 6.0 months in the control group (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 2.1; P =0.48). ORR was 6.7% in the combination group and 0% in the control group (odds ratio for ORR not available; P =0.99), and CBR was 33.3% and 50.0%, respectively (OR for CBR 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.4; P=0.15). No significant difference in overall survival was observed between the combination and control groups (median OS, 30.9 vs. 32.4 months; P = 0.81). Subgroup analyses didn’t find any specific population favoring the combination treatment. No substantial difference in incidence or severity of adverse events was seen between the two treatment groups.

Conclusion: This randomized phase II clinical trial failed to show an improved efficacy with the addition of metformin to endocrine therapy, although with excellent tolerability.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 20478