Research Papers:
A cocktail of p16INK4a and Ki-67, p16INK4a and minichromosome maintenance protein 2 as triage tests for human papillomavirus primary cervical cancer screening
Metrics: PDF 1972 views | HTML 2939 views | ?
Abstract
Hai-Rui Wang1,2,*, Yu-Cong Li3,*, Hui-Qin Guo4, Lu-Lu Yu1, Zeni Wu1, Jian Yin1, Guang-Dong Liao5, Yi-Min Qu2, Yu Jiang2, Dong Wang3 and Wen Chen1
1Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
2School of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
3Department of Gynecological Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Chongqing, PR China
4Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
5Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
*These authors have contributed equally to this work
Correspondence to:
Wen Chen, email: [email protected]
Dong Wang, email: [email protected]
Keywords: HPV, p16/Ki-67 dual staining, p16/mcm2, cervical cancer screening, cytology
Received: October 15, 2016 Accepted: July 11, 2017 Published: August 03, 2017
ABSTRACT
Most human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are transient and additional triage approaches should be built after HPV-based primary cervical cancer screening. We evaluated the accuracy of p16/Ki-67 and p16/mcm2 dual staining as biomarkers for triaging HPV positive women in China. 4070 participants aged 35 to 64 years attending ongoing cervical cancer screening were enrolled in 2015-2016. Cervical exfoliated cells were collected for HPV DNA analysis and the residual positive specimens were tested for liquid-based cytology and biomarkers. Women infected with HPV 16/18 type or other 12 high-risk HPV types with abnormal cytology results received colposcopy. We found the positive rates of both biomarkers increased significantly with histology severity. p16/Ki-67 positivity in HPV16/18 group, other 12 high-risk HPV group and HPV negative group was 50.0%, 33.7% and 8.9%, respectively. The corresponding p16/mcm2 positivity was 70.0%, 56.3% and 6.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of p16/Ki-67 for CIN2+ in all HPV-positive women were 91.7% and 63.5%, with a referral rate of 36.2%, while p16/mcm2 were 87.5% and 42.1%, with a referral rate of 58.4%, respectively. The sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 increased to 95.8% for CIN2+ and 100% for CIN3+ when combined with high-grade cytology, without decrease in specificity. Our studies suggest that p16/Ki-67 is an efficient triaging biomarker for HPV-positive women and could reduce colposcopy workload. p16/mcm2 is more sensitive compared with cytology for identifying cervical lesions.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 19870