Increased platelet-lymphocyte ratio closely relates to inferior clinical features and worse long-term survival in both resected and metastatic colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 studies

Nan Chen, Wanling Li, Kexin Huang, Wenhao Yang, Lin Huang, Tianxin Cong, Qingfang Li and Meng Qiu _

PDF  |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:32356-32369. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16020

Metrics: PDF 2021 views  |   HTML 3027 views  |   ?  


Nan Chen1,*, Wanling Li1,*, Kexin Huang1, Wenhao Yang1, Lin Huang1, Tianxin Cong1, Qingfang Li1 and Meng Qiu1,2

1 West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

2 Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

* These authors have contributed equally to this work

Correspondence to:

Meng Qiu, email:

Keywords: colorectal cancer, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, prognosis, clinical features, meta-analysis

Received: November 14, 2016 Accepted: January 24, 2017 Published: March 08, 2017


Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. However, the prognostic and clinical value of platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in colorectal cancer was still unclear, which attracted more and more researchers’ considerable attention. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between PLR and survival as well as clinical features of CRC update to September 2016. The hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to access the association. We included 24 eligible studies with a total of 13719 patients. Elevated PLR predicted shorter overall survival (OS) (HR=1.47; 95%CI, 1.28-1.68; p<0.001), poorer disease-free survival (DFS) (HR=1.51; 95% CI, 1.2-1.91; p=0.001), and worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR=1.39; 95% CI, 1.03-1.86; p=0.03), but had nothing to do with Cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR=1.14; 95% CI, 0.92-1.42; p=0.223). After trim and fill method, the connection between PLR and DFS disappeared (HR=1.143; 95%CI, 0.903-1.447; p=0.267). By subgroup analyze, we found that increased PLR predicated a worse OS and DFS in patients who underwent surgery, and this prognostic role also shown both in metastatic and nonmetastatic patients. In addition, elevated PLR was associated with poorly differentiated tumor (OR=1.51; 95% CI, 1.26-1.81; p<0.001), higher tumor stage (OR=1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.49; p=0.012), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (OR=1.25; 95% CI, 1.09-1.43; p=0.001), and the recurrence of CRC (OR=2.78; 95% CI, 1.36-5.68; p=0.005). We indicated that pretreatment PLR was a good prognostic marker for CRC patients. High PLR was related to worse OS, RFS and poor clinical characteristics.

Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 16020