Patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells respond differentially to targeted therapies
Metrics: PDF 2024 views | HTML 3143 views | ?
Pratik Kanabur1,3,*, Sujuan Guo1,*, Cara M. Rodgers7,*, Gary R. Simonds7, Deborah F. Kelly1,3,4,8, Robert G. Gourdie1,4,5,6, Scott S. Verbridge5, Zhi Sheng1,2,3,4
1Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA 24016, United States
2Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, United States
3Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA 24016, United States
4Faculty of Health Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, United States
5Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Blacksburg, VA 24061, United States
6Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA 24016, United States
7Department of Neurosurgery, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA 24016, United States
8Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, United States
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Zhi Sheng, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Keywords: glioblastoma, glioblastoma stem cells, patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells, targeted therapies
Received: October 11, 2016 Accepted: November 07, 2016 Published: November 16, 2016
The dismal prognosis of glioblastoma is, at least in part, attributable to the difficulty in eradicating glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). However, whether this difficulty is caused by the differential responses of GSCs to drugs remains to be determined. To address this, we isolated and characterized ten GSC lines from established cell lines, xenografts, or patient specimens. Six lines formed spheres in a regular culture condition, whereas the remaining four lines grew as monolayer. These adherent lines formed spheres only in plates coated with poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. The self-renewal capabilities of GSCs varied, with the cell density needed for sphere formation ranging from 4 to 23.8 cells/well. Moreover, a single non-adherent GSC either remained quiescent or divided into two cells in four-seven days. The stem cell identity of GSCs was further verified by the expression of nestin or glial fibrillary acidic protein. Of the two GSC lines that were injected in immunodeficient mice, only one line formed a tumor in two months. The protein levels of NOTCH1 and platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha positively correlated with the responsiveness of GSCs to γ-secretase inhibitor IX or imatinib, two compounds that inhibit these two proteins, respectively. Furthermore, a combination of temozolomide and a connexin 43 inhibitor robustly inhibited the growth of GSCs. Collectively, our results demonstrate that patient-derived GSCs exhibit different growth rates in culture, possess differential capabilities to form a tumor, and have varied responses to targeted therapies. Our findings underscore the importance of patient-derived GSCs in glioblastoma research and therapeutic development.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.