Oncotarget

Clinical Research Papers:

Differentiation of pancreatic carcinoma and mass-forming focal pancreatitis: qualitative and quantitative assessment by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI combined with diffusion-weighted imaging

Ting-Ting Zhang, Li Wang, Huan-huan Liu, Cai-yuan Zhang, Xiao-ming Li, Jian-ping Lu and Deng-bin Wang _

PDF  |  HTML  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:1744-1759. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12120

Metrics: PDF 4148 views  |   HTML 3016 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Ting-Ting Zhang1, Li Wang2, Huan-huan Liu1, Cai-yuan Zhang1, Xiao-ming Li1, Jian-ping Lu2 and Deng-bin Wang1

1 Department of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

2 Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China

Correspondence to:

Deng-bin Wang, email:

Li Wang, email:

Keywords: pancreatic carcinoma, mass-forming focal pancreatitis, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging

Received: March 10, 2016 Accepted: September 13, 2016 Published: September 19, 2016

Abstract

Differentiation between pancreatic carcinoma (PC) and mass-forming focal pancreatitis (FP) is invariably difficult. For the differential diagnosis, we qualitatively and quantitatively assessed the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in PC and FP in the present study. This study included 32 PC and 18 FP patients with histological confirmation who underwent DCE-MRI and DWI. The time-signal intensity curve (TIC) of PC and FP were classified into 5 types according to the time of reaching the peak, namely, type I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively, and two subtypes, namely, subtype-a (washout type) and subtype-b (plateau type) according to the part of the TIC profile after the peak. Moreover, the mean and relative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value between PC and FP on DWI were compared. The type V TIC was only recognized in PC group (P < 0.01). Type IV b were more frequently observed in PC (P = 0.036), while type- IIa (P < 0.01), type- Ia (P = 0.037) in FP. We also found a significant difference in the mean and relative ADC value between PC and FP. The combined image set of DCE-MRI and DWI yielded an excellent sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy (96.9%, 94.4%, and 96.0%). The TIC of DCE-MRI and ADC value of DWI for pancreatic mass were found to provide reliable information in differentiating PC from FP, and the combination of DCE-MRI and DWI can achieve a higher sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 12120