CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer

This retrospective study was to evaluate the local control and survival of 125I brachytherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer. 52 125I brachytherapy procedures were performed in 47 patients with 51 recurrent ovarian cancer lesions. The follow-up period was 1-55 months (median 12 months). The local control rate (LC) of 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months was 93.3%, 77.7%, 58.9%, 38.7% and 19.3%, respectively. Patients with tumor size ≤ 4cm (85.7% vs 40.0%, P = 0.037) and actual D90 between 110 to 130Gy (47.4% vs 66.7% vs 62.5%, P = 0.029) had better LC. The 1, 2 and 3 years of overall survival (OS) was 79.3%, 63.0% and 52.5%, respectively. The poor performance status (HR 3.821, 95% CI 1.383-10.555; P = 0.010), concurrent distant metastasis (HR 9.222, 95% CI 1.710-49.737; P = 0.010) and large postoperative residual tumor size (HR 6.157, 95% CI 1.438-26.367; P = 0.014) were closely correlated with a poor OS. Our data indicate thatCT-guided 125I brachytherapy is an effective and safe modality for the local treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.


INTRODUCTION
Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the fifth most common cause of cancer death in women [1]. Despite the intense therapeutic regimen include adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and optimal cytoreduction, 60%-70% patients will eventually relapse [2]. Due to this high recurrence rate, different types of adjuvant treatment have been tested. Conventional treatment for recurrent OC is chemotherapy and/or cytoreduction. However, the therapy eventually relevant to chemoresistance and it is unclear whether all patients benefit from a comprehensive surgical intervention in the same way [3,4]. Therefore, the treatment of recurrent OC is usually challenging. 125 I brachytherapy has been accepted as a useful and minimally invasive treatment for different tumors with significant efficacy. The most common application of 125 I interstitial irradiation has been in the treatment of prostatic malignancies [5,6], although therapy for other sites of disease, such as central nervous system, headand-neck tumors, lung, hepatic and pancreatic cancer has also been described [7][8][9][10][11][12]. 125 I brachytherapy combines the advantages of delivering a high dose of irradiation to the tumor with a very sharp fall-off outside the implanted volume; thus, sparing nearby normal tissues [13]. This is of great value especially to the recurrent OC because most patients had experienced more than one times of surgery and the anatomical structure had changed a lot. Furthermore, most of the recurrent tumors were near or adhered by momentum, vessels, ureter and urethra, vagina, cyst or rectum et al. Thus, most of the tumors could not be removed because of local extension, or inaccessibility because of the distorted geometry, or their removal would cause severe functional disability. 125

I brachytherapy with
Clinical Research Paper its unique characters may address this clinical problem.
In our institution, 125 I brachytherapy has been employed for salvage or supportive treatment of gynecological cancer in dedicated brachytherapy suits since 2010. The purpose of this study was to review and update our experience and to evaluate the significance of local treatment with 125 I interstitial brachytherapy among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

I brachytherapy
A total of 52 125 I brachytherapy procedures were performed in 47 patients with 51 recurrent ovarian cancer lesions. Of 47 patients, 42 (89.4%) met the treatment planning system criteria after the first procedure. Five patients did not reach the treatment planning system criteria, followed by additional implantations. The final 125 I brachytherapy achieved rate was 100%. The actuarial D90 (dose delivered to 90% of the target volume) ranged from 95-162 (mean 126Gy). The V100 (the percentage of the target volume receiving at least 100% of the prescription dose) of each patient was more than 95%, and the V150 (the percentage of the target volume receiving at least 150% of the prescription dose) for all cases was less than 50%. The D2cc for organs at risk was less than 70-75Gy. The total number of implanted seeds was 1775, with an average of 35.6±12.9 seeds per lesion (range, 12-63).

Overall survival
The mean OS of this study group was 14.6 months ( Figure 3). In 12 patients who died, 5 cases died as a result of heart and lung function failure, 2 patients died of renal failure, and 5 cases died of extensive metastases. Better OS was found in patients who didn't have distant metastasis when received the 125 I brachytherapy (P = 0.016), good performance status (P = 0.006) and small postoperative residual tumor size (P = 0.049) ( Table 2). Age, ovarian cancer pathology, primary tumor stage, interval from the last chemotherapy, CA125 levels, the number of previous chemotherapy or operation, recurrence site, and 125 I dosage had no association with OS. Based on the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, no distant metastasis before the procedure (HR 9.222, 95% CI 1.710-49.737; P = 0.010), good performance status (HR 3.821, 95% CI 1.383-10.555; P = 0.010) and small postoperative residual tumor size (HR 6.157, 95% CI 1.438-26.367; P = 0.014) were still the independent predictors of better OS. The results are shown in Table 3.

Distant metastases
Distant metastases were present in eighteen patients prior to 125 I brachytherapy, including liver metastasis in 12 patients, spleen metastasis in 2 patients, liver and spleen metastasis in 1 patient, bone metastasis in 1 patient, and the other 2 patients with inguinal lymph node metastasis. In this study, the patients who had distant metastasis when received the 125 I brachytherapy were correlated with poor OS (P = 0.010). Besides that, three patients developed distant metastases after the procedure. There had two liver metastasis (8 months and 14 months) and one lung metastasis (16 months) from the time of brachytherapy. The afterward metastasis had no association with OS (P = 0.894).

DISCUSSION
In this study, we demonstrated that 125 I brachytherapy is an effective method to treat recurrent OC, especially for people with clinical symptoms caused by local tumor infiltration. This is important because it might be an alternative treatment for recurrent OC through this minimally invasive procedure. Despite the strong evidence for primary cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer, the evidence for surgery after disease relapse is less well defined. Second debulking surgery is not curative and it may confers a high risk of perioperative morbidity in some cases [16]. Chemotherapy is the usual treatment of recurrent OC, but its impact on quality of life remains uncertain [17]. Repeated administration of chemotherapy causes numerous intolerable cumulative toxicities, which worsen until continuation of chemotherapy finally becomes impossible. 125 I brachytherapy provided an    opportunity to achieve remission. As a low-dose rate brachytherapy, 125 I seed emits continuous gamma rays, which can inhibit tumor cell mitosis and decrease the resistance effect of hypoxic cells to radiation [18,19]. Brady et al [20] proved that 125 I radiation could efficiently inhibit the proliferation and promote the apoptosis of tumor cells. Due to its long half-life (59.4 days) and low photon energy (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35), 125 I brachytherapy has increasingly been used for gynecological malignant tumors [21][22][23]. However, few institutions have reported slightly larger experiences with 125 I brachytherapy for (recurrent) ovarian cancer. With the recurrent rates of 70% or more, many OC patients will require further salvage therapies. For recurrent pelvic malignancies without evidence of systemic disease, the decision to add radiation to the salvage regimen should be considered [24][25][26]. As one kind of the radiotherapy, 125 I brachytherapy has several dosimetric advantages when compared to the other kind of radiotherapy [18,19,22,23]. Furthermore, the therapeutic benefit is theoretically boosted by natural increases in local dose after radiation-induced tumor shrinkage brings the 125 I seeds closer together [27]. Despite these particular advantages, there are very limited reports about the important role of 125 I brachytherapy in the treatment of OC. In our series, the local control rate of 3, 6, 12 and 24 months was 93.3%, 77.7%, 58.9%, 38.7%, respectively, and the patients released the symptom very quickly. Besides that, we found that patients with tumor size > 4 cm had significantly lower LC (P = 0.037). This is consistent with the other kind of radiotherapy [28]. However, FIGO-stage was not an independent prognostic factor in this study. It can be explained that the radiation technique used and enrolled indication criteria were different from this report. Some studies also indicated that special histopathology type such as clear cell carcinoma had a favorable prognosis of radiotherapy but we didn't find the relationship [29]. In our study, some patients were failed to respond to one or more drugs and the recurrence frequency was more than two times, which led to more complicated chemotherapy regimens and chemotherapy cycles. Of course, this was also an important reason for the patients in poor general condition, so that they could not accept other treatments. 125 I brachytherapy is a local treatment and we have shown that performance status can not influence the LC. That indicates that the patient's condition does not affect the efficacy of 125 I brachytherapy, and the symptoms associated with tumor infiltration are resolved significantly after 125 I seed implantation.
Another important finding in our study is the dose-effect relationship in recurrent OC. With an actual D90 of 110-130Gy, a better LC rate was obtained. This is corresponding to the AAPM (American Association of Physicists in Medicine) recommendation that clinics reduce the prescribed dose for 125 I implantation monotherapy from 160 to144Gy [30]. This recommendation dose is mainly for prostate carcinoma. When the prescribed dose reached up to this limit, serious side effects may occur. Although in this study group, we didn't had any serious side effects observed, we recommend the prescribed dose less than 130Gy with TPS plan. Physicians should be cautious when using a dose higher than 130Gy since no better LC was observed and severe complications may occur at this dose level. A treatment planning system can help peripheral tumor doses reach the matched peripheral dose [31]. It can make more than 95% of the tumor get 100% of the prescription dose without increasing radiation to surrounding healthy tissues. This satisfies the American Brachytherapy Society's so-called dual 90, which is a cancer cure requires that 90% of the tumor volume acquire 90% prescription dose [32]. With this in mind, a careful TPS should be done before the 125 I brachytherapy for each patient and repeat DVH with close observation should be applied during the  procedure. 125 I seed local treatment can reduce the tumor burden, relieve local symptoms and improve quality of life of patients. But some patients had distant metastases before 125 I seed implantation. Although distant metastases had been treated with other therapies, it still had an important influence on prognosis. The mean OS in this study was14.6 months. The overall survival rates of patients with distant metastases before the procedure were significantly lower 55.6% (10/18) than those with no distant metastasis 89.3% (25/28) (P = 0.010). By the time of writing this paper, the two patients who had longest OS were 55 and 48 months, respectively. All of them didn't have distant metastasis before the procedure. For the 12 death, 66.7% (8/12) patients had distant metastases prior to 125 I brachytherapy. Furthermore, good performance status (P = 0.010) and small postoperative residual tumor size (P = 0.014) were closely correlated with a better OS. So, this reminds us that postoperative residual tumor size is an important predictor for the prognosis of patients with 125 I brachytherapy.
The success of 125 I brachytherapy for recurrent OC is dependent on the accurate placement of radioactive seeds [33]. The biggest concern in terms of dosimetric success is the elimination of pelvic seeds migration. In this study, 9.8% (5/51) patients were observed to have seeds migration at 3 months after the procedures. This phenomenon may contribute to the natural mixed cystic and solid structure of the ovarian cancer. Abhirup Sarkar et al. [34] found that although Day 0 implants (radiographs and CT scans obtained after implant) appeared quite conformal with no migration, by Day 30, thirty percent (3/10) had demonstrated significant pelvic shift in prostate brachytherapy. In another study, seeds migration also resulted in a higher dose to the urethra and rectal wall with a trend toward more acute rectal toxicity in prostate cancer brachytherapy [35]. Although it didn't induce any side effect in our study group, physicians should aware this phenomenon and a CT scan should be done not only at the end of the procedure but also thereafter to monitor the seeds migration and possible side effects.
Although it is difficult to compare differences in treatment techniques and subsequent outcomes, the patients received limited whole-pelvis [28]or electronbeam radiation [36]had more subsequent morbidity and mortality. Chronic bowel toxicity, particularly small bowel obstruction, is a potential problem in all patients receiving radiation therapy to the abdomen or pelvis. Compared with the complications related to other kind of radiotherapy, 125 I brachytherapy appears more tolerable. Adverse events of adjuvant 125 I implantation are generally related to puncture process, but are generally mild and manageable, such as pain of the puncture site and small amount of vaginal bleeding. Moreover, some patients will feel intestinal uncomfortable when we need to pass through the bowel during 125 I implantation. But, the recovery of bowel function is quickly, and no serious damage to the intestinal. No procedure-related deaths or major complications occurred. Based on these results, 125 I brachytherapy is an effective and safe modality for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.
However, there are some limitations concerning the present study. This study was limited by its retrospective nature, and relatively small sample size from a single institution. More than 60% of the patients were within the recent two years and the follow up period were relatively short. Given the propensity of ovarian cancer to recur in the abdomen, 125 I brachytherapy may be suitable for patients with isolated recurrences after resection and resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Fortunately, in this study, we found a good local control rate and patients tolerance of 125 I brachytherapy. However, large-scale multicentre studies with long-term follow-up will be designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of 125 I seeds for recurrent ovarian cancer in the future.
In conclusion, 125 I brachytherapy is an effective and safe salvage therapy for patients in poor general condition with a previous history of various types of therapy, and may be the most appropriate treatment for recurrent tumors of small size (tumor volume of < 4cm) located within the pelvic. In a word, 125 I brachytherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer is a promising area of investigation to improve local disease control and quality of life.

Patients
This study was approved by institutional review board and was performed in compliance with hospital ethics and clinical practice guidelines. The study included patients who with recurrent ovarian cancer. In addition, all patients were medically inoperable or patients and their families refused surgery and failed to respond to one or more chemotherapeutic regimens. Patients were excluded from the study if they had (1) uncorrectable coagulopathy (international normalized ratio > 1.5), (2) thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000/L), (3) severe history of mental disease, (4) severe renal or hepatic function impairment.

I brachytherapy treatment planning
The brachytherapy treatment planning system (TPS, Beijing Aerospace and Aviation University, Beijing, China) was used to create implant plans based on patients' CT images (Figure 1a). The prescribed dose target volume (PTV) was outlined by oncologists to cover the lesion with a 0.5-1.0 cm margin. The prescribed dose (PD) of the 125 I implant was 90-150Gy, which was adjusted according to the adjacent structures. PTV edge was covered by isodose curve from 80% to 90% (Figure 1b). Dose-volume histogram (DVH), isodose curves of different percentages, position of brachytherapy applicator and number of implanted seeds were generated (Figure 1c). Implantation of 125 I seeds ( model 6711, 4.5 mm long and 0.8 mm in diameter; radioactivity, 0.6-0.8 mCi; average energy, 27-35 keV; half-life of 59.6 days; antitumor activity, 1.7 cm; initial dose rate, 7 cGy/h; China Institute of Atomic High Tech) was performed under CT guidance according to the plan (Figure 1d, 1e).

I brachytherapy procedure
All the 125 I seeds implantation was performed in a standard CT room under local anesthesia and CT imaging was taken at intervals of 5 mm. With CT fluoroscopic guidance, 18 G implantation needles were inserted into target lesions avoiding puncture of large blood vessels and nearby important organs, a turntable gun was then used to place 125 I seeds into recurrent tumors and seeds were released 0.5-1cm apart upon withdrawing the needles. However, those close to critical structures such as vital blood vessels, intestine and bladder, 125 I seeds must be kept at least one centimeter away. The evaluation of post plan was routinely obtained for each patient. For tumors showing insufficient radioactivity, more 125 I seeds were implanted.

Follow-up
Follow-up consisted of record of symptoms improvement, routine physical examinations and appropriate imaging examination. A CT scan was undertaken 1 and 3 months after the procedure, and then at 3-month intervals after implantation, or as necessary. The objective response rate of 125 I brachytherapy was calculated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) [14]. Local control rate (LC) was defined as the proportion of patients who received complete response and partial response according to RECIST. The overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of implantation to the final follow-up assessment or the date of death. In our research, the definition of distant metastasis refers to metastasis outside the abdomen, for example, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, spleen metastasis, and so on. The presence of distant metastases was checked using X-rays, ultrasound, CT or PET-CT. Complications were evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORCT) grading system [15].

Statistical analysis
Data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The probabilities of LC and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier productlimit method. Possible predictive factors were analyzed for impact on LC and on OS with univariate analyses using the classical log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis. A two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistical significant.