Oncotarget

Research Papers:

Limited impact of intratumour heterogeneity on molecular risk assignment in endometrial cancer

Manouk van Esterik, Inge C. Van Gool, Cor D. de Kroon, Remi A. Nout, Carien L. Creutzberg, Vincent T.H.B.M. Smit, Tjalling Bosse _ and Ellen Stelloo

PDF  |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:25542-25551. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16067

Metrics: PDF 1979 views  |   HTML 1968 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Manouk van Esterik1, Inge C. Van Gool1, Cor D. de Kroon2, Remi A. Nout3, Carien L. Creutzberg3, Vincent T.H.B.M. Smit1, Tjalling Bosse1, Ellen Stelloo1

1Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

2Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

3Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:

Tjalling Bosse, email: [email protected]

Keywords: endometrial cancer, intratumour heterogeneity, molecular markers, prognostic, risk stratification

Received: December 16, 2016     Accepted: February 07, 2017     Published: March 10, 2017

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Individual prediction of tumour behaviour based on molecular markers may refine adjuvant treatment strategies in endometrial cancer (EC). As these molecular alterations are determined in a small tumour fraction, high intratumour heterogeneity may interfere with correct risk prediction. This study aimed to investigate to which extent intratumour heterogeneity exists for molecular markers and whether it affects the molecular risk assignment in EC.

Methods: Forty-nine ECs (three tumour blocks/case) were selected with alterations in POLE (n=10), CTNNB1 (n=8), p53 (n=10), mismatch repair (n=11), L1CAM (n=10), and ECs without any of these markers (n=9). Nine ECs carried more than one molecular marker. All 147 blocks were analysed for POLE exonuclease domain and CTNNB1 exon 3 mutations, and for p53, mismatch repair and L1CAM protein expression. All blocks were assigned to a favourable, intermediate or unfavourable risk group, based on a molecular risk assignment.

Results: Concordance between the three tumour blocks for POLE and CTNNB1 mutational status, and p53, mismatch repair and L1CAM protein expression was found in 100% (48/48), 95.9% (47/49), 93.9% (46/49), 98.0% (48/49), and 91.8% (45/49) of tumours, respectively. These discordances were found in a total of nine cases (18.4%). The intratumour heterogeneity impacted the risk assignment in five cases (10.2%).

Conclusion: Intratumour heterogeneity of prognostic molecular markers in EC without morphologic heterogeneity is uncommon among three tumour fractions, affecting the molecular risk allocation in a limited number of cases. This low intratumour heterogeneity facilitates the implementation of the molecular risk assignment, advocating its use in clinical decision making.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 16067