Oncotarget

Research Papers:

Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Feng Cao, Jia Li, Ang Li and Fei Li _

PDF  |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:15004-15013. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14745

Metrics: PDF 1877 views  |   HTML 2360 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Feng Cao1,*, Jia Li1,*, Ang Li1, Fei Li1

1Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, PR China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence to:

Fei Li, email: [email protected]

Keywords: pancreatic cancer, surgery, cytology, overall survival, meta-analysis

Received: September 20, 2016     Accepted: January 10, 2017     Published: January 19, 2017

ABSTRACT

Although peritoneal cytology has been used to determine pancreatic cancer staging for more than three decades, its prognostic significance in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer is inconclusive. We therefore conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the impact of peritoneal cytology status on the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Ten studies were identified for this meta-analysis after searching the PubMed, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) electronic databases. Our results showed that positive peritoneal cytology was associated with tumor size (OR 11.65, P = 0.001), tumor location (OR 0.37, P = 0.000), serosal invasion (OR 3.89, P = 0.000), portal vein invasion (OR 1.82, P = 0.016), lymph vessel invasion (OR 2.71, P = 0.026), T stage (OR 2.65, P = 0.037) and N stage (OR 2.34, P = 0.001) in resectable pancreatic cancer. Patients with positive peritoneal cytology demonstrated poor overall survival (OS; HR 3.18, P = 0.000) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR 2.88, P = 0.000) times. Based on our meta-analysis, we conclude that positive peritoneal cytology is an indicator of advanced stage pancreatic cancer with a poor prognosis; hence, radical resection should not be performed on these patients.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 14745