Oncotarget

Reviews:

Engineered nanoparticles induce cell apoptosis: potential for cancer therapy

PDF |  HTML  |  Order a Reprint

Oncotarget. 2016; 7:40882-40903. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8553

Metrics: PDF 1131 views  |   HTML 1815 views  |   ?  

Dan-Dan Ma and Wan-Xi Yang _

Abstract

Dan-Dan Ma1 and Wan-Xi Yang1

1 The Sperm Laboratory, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Correspondence to:

Wan-Xi Yang, email:

Keywords: engineered nanoparticles, cytotoxicity, apoptosis, cancer cells, ENP characteristics

Received: February 02, 2016 Accepted: March 28, 2016 Published: April 02, 2016

Abstract

Engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) have been widely applied in industry, commodities, biology and medicine recently. The potential for many related threats to human health has been highlighted. ENPs with their sizes no larger than 100 nm are able to enter the human body and accumulate in organs such as brain, liver, lung, testes, etc, and cause toxic effects. Many references have studied ENP effects on the cells of different organs with related cell apoptosis noted. Understanding such pathways towards ENP induced apoptosis may aid in the design of effective cancer targeting ENP drugs. Such ENPs can either have a direct effect towards cancer cell apoptosis or can be used as drug delivery agents. Characteristics of ENPs, such as sizes, shape, forms, charges and surface modifications are all seen to play a role in determining their toxicity in target cells. Specific modifications of such characteristics can be applied to reduce ENP bioactivity and thus alleviate unwanted cytotoxicity, without affecting the intended function. This provides an opportunity to design ENPs with minimum toxicity to non-targeted cells.


012348R1.html

INTRODUCTION

Nanoparticles (NPs) exist in the natural world as a result of biogenic, geogenic, atmospheric and pyrogenic processes. Examples of natural NPs include geogenic or pyrogenic fullerenes and CNT, biogenic magnetite, atmospheric aerosol, whilst the engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) were either produced inadvertently as by-product of combustion, or were intentionally synthesized to meet the demanding needs of industry, daily life and medicine [1]. With many emerging applications of ENPs, such as those utilized in sporting goods, tires, clothes, sunscreens, cosmetics, foods, diagnostic medicine, imaging and drug delivery [2], the fields related to nanotechnology and nanoscience seem to lead us to the brink of a new industrial revolution. Vastly increasing levels of human exposure to ENP’s became already evident and this trend is likely to continue. ENPs are defined as anthropogenic materials with an order of less than 100 nm at one or more dimension. They include those of various shapes and structures ranging from spherical to tubular to irregular and to those that exist as fused, aggregated, or agglomerated forms of organic, inorganic, crystalline or amorphous materials [3]. As the size of the particle decreases, its relative surface area increases and this higher mass-specific surface area renders it more biologically active than larger particles of the same material [4], this brings with it the potential to exert unintentional harmful interactions within biological systems and to the environment. Many new products containing such particles are supplied to the market every year. Common examples include carbon-containing particles, such as carbon nanotubes, functionalized nanotubes, fullerenes, as well as metal containing particles such as TiO2, SiO2, silver, copper, iron, and gold [3].

ENPs dispersed into air, water, food, clothes or pharmaceuticals may enter the human body through inhalation, uptake via skin, ingestion, or injection and readily travel through the body in the blood vessels to be deposited in target organs such as liver, heart, kidney, spleen, bone marrow and other sites where they may trigger injurious responses [5]. Travelling through the respiratory tract is the primary entrance of nanomaterial exposure. Some inhaled ENPs can be deposited at the nasal cavity and bronchus and then be excreted by the body. However, some others, those of a size ranging from 5-50 nm, are more likely to be deposited at the alveoli. When they exceed the phagocytic capacity, this can lead to their travel across the alveolar epithelium, and even the alveolar-capillary barrier, with the potential to cause adverse effects on extrapulmonary tissues such as the heart, liver, and brain. Such exposure may eventually trigger cardiovascular diseases as well as other central nervous system effects [6]. Skin uptake is another primary pathway of ENP exposure, particularly where nano-level particles have been used in cosmetics or clothes. Opinions differ in the potential of solid NPs to overcome the skin barrier, to penetrate the stratum corneum and to diffuse into underlying structures. ZnO nanoparticles, which are widely used in sunscreen products, are reported to possess the ability to penetrate into the viable epidermis in vivo. When this occurs they mainly localize at the furrow-cellular border or even penetrate into the skin strata [7]. Although in vivo toxicity studies have failed to reveal any readily apparent cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, photo-genotoxicity, general toxicity or carcinogenicity associated with insoluble TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles, as found in personal care products [8], one should not neglect the possibility of long-term effects. Related to ingestion, NPs contained in food or water or were used in cosmetics or drugs can be directly ingested via the gastrointestinal tract and thus enter into the blood stream. While many of these NPs can be excreted through urine, others may lead to significant complications.

Potential health risks of ENPs next to their accumulation in the body arise with their capacity to pass through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This is the reason why ENPs have been considered as drug carriers for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Their efficacy has been demonstrated in models such as those related to neurodegenerative diseases, neuroregeneration, and brain tumors [9]. The adverse effects of ENPs on the functioning of the CNS have also been reported. Studies by Campbell et al. (2005) using ovalbumin-sensitized BALB/c mice exposed to airborne fine and ultrafine ambient particles showed increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1a) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a) as well as the immune-related transcription factor NF-kB in the brain [10]. This indicates the occurrence of ENP induced pathological changes with the potential to induce neurodegenerative disease. Similarly, a series of NPs have been reviewed as being able to penetrate the blood-testis barrier and affect spermatogenesis [11]. This probably is the mechanism of NPs inducing damage of the tight junction of the Sertoli cells, as reported by Zhang et al. (2015). In the latter study exposure to silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) of 10 and 20 nm resulted in a decrease in mRNA levels of tight-junction related genes in the mice Sertoli cells [12]. Significantly, some nanoparticles have also been reported to be able to cross through the blood-fetus barrier resulting in malformed fetuses among mice offspring [13].

There are many kinds of manufactured nanomaterial products including TiO2, ZnO, CeO2, Fe2O3, and CuO (as metal oxide nanoparticles) as well as gold, silver, platinum and palladium (as metal nanoparticles), and other carbon based ENP’s such as carbon nanotubules (CNTs) and quantum dots [14]. These have been widely and increasingly used by the industry as catalysts, fuel, cosmetics and food. They have also been applied in nanomedicine and bio-imaging. Although such an increase in use has aroused people’s awareness of toxic effects of some ENPs, the mechanism of ENP toxicity is, as yet, not well understood. As apoptosis has been reported in a variety of cell types via contacting with various ENPs, this paper will discuss in detail the mechanisms by which ENPs exert apoptosis. This will include the way they enter cells, their distributions in subcellular regions, and the way they change cellular morphology. We also highlight the specific molecules involved in such processes towards a better understanding of ENP cytotoxicity. We hope this may provide a more comprehensive perspective to evaluate the safety of nanoparticles. This review provides a new possibility in cancer treatment. In recent years, the number of cancer patients is increasing substantially. Almost each cancer treatment has its own side effects, and its curative ratio is very low. ENPs, when modified or loaded with signal molecules, can selectively target the cancer cells and induce cell apoptosis there, especially in organs that have special barriers, such as brain and testes. Therefore, the ENPs induced cancer therapy may become a trend in the future.

UPTAKE OF ENPS AND THEIR INTRACELLULAR LOCALIZATIONS

Cell membranes consist of different receptors that function in cell-cell signaling, cell adhesion, interaction and the immune recognition of foreign substances. Several ENPs have been reported to bind directly to surface receptors and occupy specific residence times in those locations. Oligonucleotide-conjugated gold nanoparticles (AuNP-ssO), for example, were found attached as single nanoparticles to the plasma membrane of bovine sperm [15]. This resulted in decreased amount of free thiol groups on the surface of the membrane, affecting sperm functionality and causing detrimental effects such as loss in motility by interfering directly with membrane bound ion transporters. According to Hirano et al. (2008), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs, 67 nm) triggered cytotoxic effects in mouse macrophages by reacting with the macrophage receptor collagenous structure (MARCO) and rupturing the plasma membrane [16]. Some other ENPs are also retained in the membrane fraction due to its relatively large primary particle size. Compared to nano-titanium dioxide (TiO2, 24.0±7.2 nm), a large fraction of nano-hydroxyapatite (Nano-HA, 51.1±12.1 nm) were found at the cellular membrane of the human oral epithelium where it was seen to cause elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and apoptotic profiles [17].

A number of techniques have been applied to study the biodistribution of ENPs in cells. Immunogold labeling, FITC-tagging, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are the most frequently used techniques. Results showed that ENPs were taken up by animal cells through a variety of ways, including direct penetration, caveolae dependent endocytosis, lipid raft composition, clathrin-dependent endocytosis or phagocytosis [18]. The direct ENP penetration refers to either entering the membrane by passive diffusion, or by non-specific permeation as a result of ENPs-inflicted membrane damage [19]. The active energy-taking uptake of ENPs include different endocytosis vesicles with different sizes: macropinosomes 1-5 µm in diameter, clathrin mediated endosomes up to 120 nm, caveolae 50-80 nm [20]. Upon uptake, the intracellular localization and exocytosis depend on ENPs sizes, surface characteristics and the ability to form aggregates, etc. [18]. ENPs internalized into mammalian cells have been frequently found to be co-localized in the endosomes or lysosomes, either for degradation or recycling. Some others were observed to be randomly dispersed in the cytoplasm or interact with the nuclear membrane or organelles and were often seen to be causing various adverse effects to cells.

Among all the reports of ENP associated organelle damages, mitochondria seem to be the most sensitive target. Uptake of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) by normal human lung fibroblasts (IMR-90) and human glioblastoma cells (U251) occurs mainly via endocytosis with a uniform intracellular distribution of AgNPs in the cytoplasm, nucleus, and nucleoli. AgNPs treated cells showed autophagic vacuoles filled with mitochondria-like structures as well as other unknown contents and also exhibited chromosome instability and mitotic arrest [21]. Damaged mitochondria were also found in mouse TM3 Leydig cells and the TM4 Sertoli cells when treated by 10 nm and 20 nm AgNPs for 24 hours. Such observations were accompanied by cell autophagy and apoptosis [22]. Bressan et al. (2013) studied the interaction of AgNPs with human dermal fibroblast cells and found that the internalized AgNPs were closed to the outer membrane of the mitochondria. This caused direct mitochondrial damage and the disturbance of respiratory chain function with a result of increased ROS level and oxidative stress [23]. Cerium dioxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs), with diversified industrial uses and novel therapeutic applications, were also studied in human peripheral blood monocytes. TEM analysis showed that human peripheral blood monocytes, upon treatment with 10 µg/mL CeO2 NPs for 40 h, resulted in enlarged or swollen mitochondria and included the induction of apoptosis and autophagy accompanied by the accumulation of aggregated CeO2 NPs in vesicles and free CeO2 in cytoplasm [24]. Mitochondrial swelling, nuclear shrinkage, chromatin condensation and the evacuation of lamellar bodies were also found in mice pneumonocytes when they had been engulfed in nanosized titanium dioxide (nano-TiO2), where the classical morphology characteristics of cell apoptosis also appeared [25].

Along with mitochondria, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the nucleus also appear to be targeted by ENPs. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (Nano-ZnO), which are widely used in daily commodities, have been reported to induce hepatotoxicity through ER stress. ER swelling and ribosomal degranulation were also observed by TEM in the liver tissues treated with Nano-ZnO [26]. Obvious ER aggregation and the associated swelling were also observed in nano-ZnO treatment of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) [27]. The human hepatic cell line L-02 also showed cellular swelling, microvilli disappearance, mitochondrial vacuolization and ER ectasis after incubation with 0.6 mg/mL of 21 nm SiO2 colloids for 24 h [28]. In addition to the ER, nano-SiO2 was also reported to be deposited in the nuclear membrane and cause its deterioration in human embryonic kidney cells HEK-293 when treated with 100 or 200 mg/L nano-SiO2 for 48 h. This induced cell apoptosis through oxidative-stress-mediated DNA damage and p53 activation [29].

To summarize, the function and action of ENPs on cells depend on a variety of factors including whether the particles are aggregated or in free form, particle size, target cell type, length of ENP treatment, as well as the inner subcellular distribution of the ENPs and organelles affected. Some ENPs deposited on the cell membrane while others were engulfed into cells (Figure 1). For those entering cells, some were uniformly dispersed inside the cells, others were deposited in endosomes or lysosomes and some induced cell apoptosis through damaging the mitochondria. Others caused similar damage by targeting the ER, nuclear membrane or chromatin.

Uptake of ENPs and their intracellular localizations.

Figure 1: Uptake of ENPs and their intracellular localizations. ENPs are taken up by animal cells through pinocytosis, caveolae dependent endocytosis, lipid raft composition, clathrin-dependent endocytosis or phagocytosis. ENPs are distributed on the cell membrane, in the endosomes or lysosomes, randomly dispersed in the cytoplasm, interacting with the nuclear membrane, in mitochondria or in the endoplasmic reticulum.

ENP INDUCED CELL APOPTOSIS AND THE PATHWAYS INVOLVED

The nano-sizes of these particles make them easy to be transported into biological systems, thus having the potential to have many effects on susceptible organisms. Changes in gene expression, abnormal apoptosis, enhanced oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory effects involving ENPs exposure have been reviewed by Magaye et al. (2012) [30]. The in vitro responses that ENPs elicit on different cells also differ considerably which may correspond to similar factors of size, shapes or agglomeration aspects of the ENPs, and ENP types, surface modifications, surface charges, doses, etc. All such factors can influence ENP pathways in treated cells. Here we introduce several mechanisms involved in ENP actions in inducing abnormal cell apoptosis (Table 1).

Table 1: ENPs induced cell apoptosis in different cell lines

ENPs type

ENPs size

Induced cell apoptosis

Mechanism

Reference

Nano-TiO2

5-6 nm

mice lung tissue

Oxidative stress

[31]

AgNP

25-70 nm

human lung fibroblast (HLF) cell

mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS

[32]

NiONP

≤50 nm

human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B)

SIRT1, caspase3

[33]

PAMAM

45 nm

human lung cells WI-26 VA4

Intrinsic mitochondrial pathway

[34]

MWCNOs and MWCNTs

human skin fibroblasts cell (HSF42)

Altered gene expressions

[35]

Nano-SiO2

15 nm, 30 nm

human keratinocyte HaCaT cells

oxidative stress

[36]

Nano-TiO2

21 nm

HaCaT cells

oxidative damage, intrinsic mitochondrial pathway

[37]

Cr2O3 NPs

26.5 nm

HaCaT cells

oxidative DNA damage, caspase 3

[38]

NiNPs

92.32 nm

mouse epidermal JB6 cells

Casepase8/AIF

[40]

Nano-SiO2

15 nm

PC12 cells

oxidative stress

[42]

Nano-SiO2

20 and 50 nm

PC12 cells

oxidative stress

[45]

Nano-TiO2

21 nm

PC12 cells

oxidative stress

[46]

AgNP

14 nm

PC12 cells

Caspase8/9

[47]

CeO2 NPs

10-30 nm

monocytes

mitochondria/AIF

[51]

Nano-TiO2

5-6 nm

mice spleen

Oxidative stress, ER stress

[52]

Nano-TiO2

25 nm

human lymphocytes

JNK/p38-caspase 8-Bid pathway

[53]

CoO-NPs

62±4 nm

human lymphocytes

TNF-α-caspase 8-P38-caspase 3

[54]

PS-NPs

20 nm,

40 nm

Caco-2 cells

Oxidative stress

[56]

AgNPs

20±2 nm

Caco-2 cells

Oxidative stress, ER stress

[57]

Nano-ZnO

80 nm

Mice liver

Oxidative stress, ER stress

[58]

Nano- SiO2

21 nm

hepatic cells L-02 cells

Oxidative stress, p53, Bax

[28]

Nano-TiO2

13-35 nm

human embryonic kidney cell line HEK-293

Oxidative stress, p53, Bax, caspase 3

[29]

Nano-Cu

15 nm

podocytes

Oxidative stress

[60]

Nano-Cu

25-40 nm

Mice kidney

Oxidative stress, intrinsic/extrinsic pathway

[61]

ZnO NPs

42 nm

human umbilical vein

endothelial cells (HUVECs)

ROS, ER stress

[27]

MWCNOs

31.2 nm

HUVECs

ROS, DNA damage

[63]

SWCNTs

Rat aorta endothelial cells(RAECs)

ROS, mitochondrial pathway

[64]

Nano-TiO2

50-100 nm

Mice testes

FasL, p38, caspase-3

[65]

AgNPs

10 nm,

20 nm

Male leydig cell (TM3)

the Stertoli cell (TM4)

Caspase 3/8/9

[12]

ENP induced pulmonary injury

As mentioned, ENPs that are taken in mainly through inhalation tend to lead to increasing concerns about effects on pulmonary health in particular. Nasal administration of nano-TiO2 (5-6 nm by TEM) to mice for 90 consecutive days at 10 mg/kg BW, for example, resulted in the deposition of nano-TiO2 in the lungs. This was accompanied by significant pyknosis of the nucleus, mitochondrial swelling and evacuation of the lamellar bodies, all of these being classical morphological aspects of apoptosis [31]. Microarray analysis revealed significant alterations of the 847 genes in the nano-TiO2 treated mouse lung tissues. Such alterations resulted in examples of apoptosis, oxidative stress, changes to the cell cycle and alterations in cell proliferation. In such cases, lung apoptosis may be caused by the elevated production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), as demonstrated by peroxidation of lipids, proteins and DNA in mouse lung tissue. Monodispersed AgNPs with a range of 25 to 70 nm were able to cause human lung fibroblast (HLF) cell apoptosis at concentrations of 250 μg/mL for 72 h, with 25 nm AgNPs causing the highest apoptosis rate (80%). This implies that nano-AgNP cytotoxicity is increased with the decrease of particle size [32]. The nano-AgNPs taken up by cells may release Ag ions, the elevated Ag ions then caused mitochondrial dysfunction and the generation of excessive ROS. This leaves the cells under oxidative stress which subsequently results in cell apoptosis. The wide application of nano-sized nickel (Nano-Ni) compounds offers another occupational hazard that is associated with pulmonary injury. NiO nanoparticles (NiONPs), of sizes smaller than 50 nm, were able to enter human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) and release Ni2+ inside the cells. This resulted in inhibited cell viability through an apoptotic process as indicated by activated caspase-3 and the increased numbers of Annexin V positive cells [33]. It was also found that sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), an NAD-dependent deacetylase the substrates of which include p53, Foxo and Ku70, was suppressed by the intracellularly released Ni2+. This rendered the cells more sensitive to apoptosis. SIRT1 displays essential inhibitory effects by directly deacetylating the C-terminal lysine residue of p53, thus inhibiting the p53-dependent apoptosis pathway. The dendrimer nanosized polyamidoamine (PAMAM), widely used in clinical settings, has been also reported to exert cytotoxicity on human lung cells (WI-26 VA4) [34]. The 45 nm PAMAM was found co-localized with mitochondria. This disrupted mitochondrial membrane potential and caused a release of cytochrome c, activating caspases 3 and 9. Cell apoptosis, as demonstrated by annexin V/propidium iodide staining and DNA fragmentation, then occurred. Also, such examples highlight the strong requirement that nanomaterials should be carefully tested and cautiously used from a safety perspective.

ENPs induced skin injury

In addition to the pulmonary system, which is often directly exposed to airborne ENPs, human skin is another potential target for ENPs, particularly those used in consumer products such as clothes and cosmetics, both of which are designed to have direct contact with skin. A human skin fibroblast cell (HSF42) population, for example, was used to test the cytotoxicity of multiwall carbon nano-onions (MWCNOs) and multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) [35]. HSF42 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis/necrosis were seen to be induced by MWCNOs (6 and 0.6μg/mL) and MWCNTs (0.6 and 0.06μg/mL), the effects of which included the activation of genes involved in cellular transport, metabolism, cell cycle regulation and stress response. Nanometer silicon dioxide (nano-SiO2) of 15 nm and 30 nm was similarly observed to induce human keratinocyte HaCaT cell apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. Again, in cases of identical doses, it was observed that the smaller the particle size, the severer was the cell apoptosis [36]. Two dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) and mass spectrometry (MS) were used to detect the differences in protein expression. Sixteen proteins in 5 categories were found to display significant changes. The changes in the proteins were associated with oxidative stress. In this study, though apoptosis was thought to be involved in the toxic mechanisms related to nano-SiO2, the specific apoptosis signals and how nano-SiO2 induces cytotoxicity exactly, remain unclear. In another case, HaCaT apoptosis was induced by 21 nm nano-TiO2 where oxidative damage was caused by the generation of ROS and proved to result in mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) pore opening. This led to the release of cytochrome c and other factors that activated caspase-3 and initiated the pathway of cell apoptosis [37].

Released of soluble metal ions are considered responsible for some of the aspects of cytotoxicity of metal nanoparticles. The HaCaT cellular uptake of Chromium (III) oxide nanoparticles (Cr2O3 NPs) with a size of 26.5 nm was observed by TEM [38]. The internalized Cr2O3 NPs formed aggregates and were dispersed in the cytosol. This released soluble Cr (VI) or Cr (III) to the cell interior which increased the intracellular ROS level and reduced the GSH level. Results included oxidative DNA damage and the triggering of the caspase 3-dependent cell apoptosis pathway. Nickel is also widely used in many industries. Workers exposed to a variety of nickel compounds have been reported to exhibit various pathological effects including skin allergies, lung fibrosis and lung cancer [39]. Mouse epidermal JB6 cells exposed to metallic nickel nanoparticles (NiNPs) (92.32 nm) displayed cell apoptosis after a 24 h treatment to a dose range of 0.1-20μg/cm [40]. It was found that NiNPs activated the proapoptotic factors including Fas (CD95). Here, Fas-associated proteins with death domain (FADD), death receptor 3 (DR3) as well as pro-caspase 8, are bound together to form a death including signaling complex (DISC) which has been implicated as an extrinsic apoptotic pathway. In addition, apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) was also up-regulated by NiNPs and released from the mitochondria to the cytoplasm, entered the nucleus, and caused DNA breakage. This implied a caspase 8/AIF mediated apoptosis pathway [40].

ENPs induced CNS injury

ENPs have been increasingly used in diagnosis, imaging and drug delivery to the central nervous system. The main reason for this lies in their ease of transport through the blood brain barrier (BBB). Whilst the mechanism of ENPs transport cross BBB has not been fully elucidated, the most probable transport pathway seems to be the lipid-mediated endocytosis of small molecules, together with other blood plasma components. The ENPs may interact with the Low Density Lipoproteins (LDL) on the endothelial cells and then get internalized. The ENPs can also get into the CNS by completely bypassing the BBB at the median eminence, lamina terminalis, or the area postrema [41]. However, this factor becomes very limited if using particles of larger sizes. Little is known about the potentially adverse effects of the ENPs on the brain. In rats, intranasal instillation of SiO2-NPs (15 nm by TEM) for 1 day and 7 days result in a significant accumulation in the striatum and the hippocampus [42]. Such a deposition resulted in oxidative stress, inflammation and depleted dopamine in the striatum and in a down-regulation of the tyrosine hydroxylase protein. All such factors increase the risk towards the development of neurodegenerative disorders. In order to study the SiO2-NPs induced pathway and mechanism of in vivo damage, in vitro studies were also carried out through co-incubation model of dopaminergic neuron PC12 cells and SiO2-NPs. The PC12 cell is a cell line derived from the rat adrenal medulla pheochromocytoma that includes the typical characteristics of dopaminergic neurons in both form and function. It has therefore been widely used as a paradigm for neurobiological studies [43]. The exposure of PC12 cells to SiO2-NPs for 24 h resulted in cell apoptosis accompanied by increased intracellular ROS levels and oxidative damage measured by glutathione (GSH) depletion, methane dicarboxylic aldehyde (MDA) production and superoxide dismutase (SOD) inhibition. Oxidative stress may be the main route of SiO2-NPs induced P12 cell apoptosis as brain cells have been reported to be particularly vulnerable to oxidative damage due to their high metabolic rates, high content of cellular lipids and proteins and low level of endogenous scavengers [44]. Oxidative mechanisms also contribute to nano-SiO2 (20 and 50 nm) and nano-TiO2 (21 nm) induced P12 cell apoptosis, for both NPs this happened in a dose-dependent manner [45-46]. Such brain cell vulnerability was further shown in a previous study using the pretreatment of N-(mercaptopropinyl)-glycine (N-MPG), a ROS scavenger, which inhibited the nano-TiO2 induced P12 cell apoptosis to some degree [46].

14 nm AgNP was also shown to have potential neurotoxicological effects [47]. Female rats treated with 4.5 and 9 mg AgNP/kg bw/day for only 14 days showed a decreased level of dopamine concentration, conversely, after 28 days the levels increased, which suggests exposure/time-dependent effects. As disturbances of dopamine levels have been linked to Parkinson’s disease [48], an in vitro exposure model was conducted to look for the underlying toxicity mechanism. P12 cell apoptosis, as induced by AgNP exposure, was assumed to be caused by the release of Ag ions as no AgNPs were found by TEM within cells. Co-incubation of AgNPs with caspase 8 or 9 inhibitors abolished this AgNP-induced cell apoptosis. This suggests that both the mitochondrial and the death receptor pathways play a role in this cytotoxic mechanism.

It should be noted that pregnant mice exposed to ENPs also gave birth to fetuses with retarded brain development [49]. This indicates the ability of such ENPs to cross the blood-fetus barrier. In one case where pregnant mice were injected 100 μg nano-TiO2 (2570 nm) on gestational days, the brains of newborn pups showed altered expression in apoptosis genes at early ages and changed the expression of genes responding to oxidative stress as analyzed by cDNA microarray and Gene Ontology (GO). The expression of genes relating to the function of the CNS was also affected. This could pose a threat to the normal development of the CNS in the young generation [49].

ENP induced immune system injury

Monocytes work as integral components of the immune system. They play roles in producing antibodies, resisting pathogen invasion and antagonizing diseases. They also act as links between innate and adaptive immune components and are precursors of important antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells [50]. The increased cytotoxicity of monocytes can lead to impaired early immune responses to foreign agents or infections. This poses concerns in terms of human health. Cerium dioxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs), with their diverse industrial uses and actively pursued therapeutic applications, were toxic to primary human monocytes at relatively low doses [24]. Monocytes exposed to 5 and 10μg/mL CeO2 NPs (range from 10 to 30 nm) for 40 h showed significant apoptosis and DNA fragmentation. An increase in mitochondrial depolarization and the number of cells with activated forms of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax were observed after CeO2 NPs exposure. Here, it was not the damaged mitochondria that initiated the caspase pathway, but the apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) that induced DNA fragmentation and subsequent cell apoptosis. In addition, p53 modulated autophagy was also assumed to be part of the CeO2 NP toxicity to monocytes.

The spleen is not only an organ working as the body’s largest blood filter, it also plays an important role in the immune system and shares responsibility for a number of other areas including the protection of the body from invading pathogens, the recognition and removal of unwanted, damaged, or aberrant cells, the avoidance of tumor formation and the mitigation of various other kinds of diseases [51]. Nano-TiO2 (2.5, 5, 10 mg/kg BW), ranging from 5 to 6 nm, as intragastrically administrated to mice for 90 consecutive days, resulted in spleen injury. Increase in spleen indices, immune dysfunction, and severe macrophage infiltration was noted as well as apoptosis in the mouse spleen after Nano-TiO2 exposure. Microarray assay results showed that, in addition to the clear expression of indicators of abnormal spleen functions, genes involved in oxidative stress (Cyp2e1, Mt1, Mt2, Sod3) were also up-regulated. This resulted in the up-regulation of Atf4 and Chac1 as well as in the down-regulation of Dnajb2, Hspa8, Hsp90B1 and Asns. Such factors further triggered the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress load and apoptosis in the splenocytes. Such results call for caution when applying Nano-TiO2 in food industry, cosmetic, sunscreens, and in medicine [52].

Nano-TiO2 (25 nm) also causes apoptosis in human lymphocytes, as demonstrated by the increase in the sub-G1 cell fractions [53]. The collapse of mitochondrial membrane integrity and the activated caspase 3/9, followed by Poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage, indicated that the nano-TiO2 induced apoptosis in lymphocytes occurred through an intrinsic mitochondria-dependent pathway. This same pathway is also regulated by caspase 8. When activated, caspase 8 cleaves its substrate Bid. Truncated-Bid (t-Bid) then translocates from the cytosol to the mitochondria and induces a mitochondrial collapse. In this study, it was found that two members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family, p38 and cJun N-terminal kinase (JNK), play a role in the regulation of nano-TiO2 induced lymphocyte survival by activating caspase 8. The metal CoO-NPs exert toxicity to human lymphocytes via either direct uptake into the cells or through the release of Co++ into the cytoplasm. In such a study, an elevated ROS was attributed to the CoO-NPs (62±4 nm by SEM) induced lymphocyte apoptosis. ROS acts as a critical signaling molecule in the induction of apoptosis through different pathways. On one hand, the ROS induces cellular toxicity like damage to the cell membrane, as reflected by increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. On the other hand, excessive ROS induces the activation of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α, which is followed by the phosphorylation of p38 and the activation of caspase 8 and caspase 3, thus initiating the signaling pathway of apoptosis. In vivo studies in mice show that CoO-NPs possesses significant toxicity to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and platelets as shown after 30 days of exposure starting from 200μg/kg BW. In this, an increase in the level of pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-αand a decrease in anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was noted as indicators of inflammation [54]. CoO-NPs were, therefore, proven to be toxic to the human primary immune system.

ENPs induced intestine, liver and kidney injury

Various ENPs are used in the food sector for improving food packaging materials, efficient nutrient delivery and for formulations with improved bioavailability. This makes consumer exposure to ENPs inevitable. Upon ingestion, ENPs reach the gastrointestinal tract and remain there for 4-8 h [55]. Differentiated human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells, Caco-2, were applied to test the toxicity of commonly used polystyrene (PS) nanoparticles (of 20 and 40 nm diameters) in the intestinal membrane. Phosphatidylserine externalization, reduced mitochondrial transmembrane potential and increased caspase activity were all observed along with PS-induced Caco-2 cell apoptosis. The addition of catalase (CAT), an enzyme that selectively decomposes hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), resulted in significant decrease in apoptosis. This indicated an oxidative stress-induced apoptosis pathway was in operation in such cases. Ingested non-biodegradable nanoparticles represent a particular potential health risk to the intestinal membrane [56]. AgNPs are frequently used in the food sector. One study applied whole-genome mRNA expression to study the effects of four sizes of AgNPs (20±2 nm, 34±3 nm; 61±5 nm; 113±8 nm) exposure on Caco-2 and M-cells. After exposure for 4 h in vitro, the AgNPs induced clear changes in the expression of stress responding genes including those associated with oxidative stress, endoplasmatic stress responses, and apoptosis, with cell viability being significantly reduced by 37.5μg/mL AgNPs (20±2 nm) exposure [57].

The oral intake of ENPs may also cause liver injury in organisms. For example, in an in vitro study in which mice were gavaged with 200 mg/kg or 400 mg/kg of Nano-ZnO (80 nm) once a day for consecutive 90 days [58], liver injury was observed with focal hepatocellular necrosis and congestive dilation of central veins as well as increased levels of the liver function enzymes alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST). TEM results also showed ER swelling and ribosomal degranulation in the liver tissue. Oral administration of nano-ZnO resulted in the production of MDA and the depletion of GSH. This suggested an imbalance in oxidative status. Apoptosis-related genes (bax and chop) and proteins (caspase 3/9/12 and JNK) were seen to be highly expressed. This was consistent with the conclusion of oxidative stress promoted by nano-ZnO administration. Whilst C/EBF-homologue protein (CHOP), cJun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and caspase 12 appeared as ER-stress mediated proteins, the liver injury caused by long term oral exposure to nano-ZnO was attributed to oxidative stress and ER stress induced apoptosis. In vitro experiments using normal human hepatic cells (L-02) to test the cytotoxicity of nano-SiO2 were also conducted. Here the L-02 cells were treated with 0.2, 0.4 or 0.6 mg/ml of 21, 48 or 86 nm SiO2 colloids for 24 h. Cell apoptosis was then evidenced using annexin V-FITC/PI double-staining which revealed apoptosis occurring in a dose and time dependent manner. The 21 nm SiO2 caused a dose-dependent increase in ROS and lipid peroxidation and a decrease in GSH levels, all of which were indicative of oxidative stress. The oxidative stress induced DNA damage (as shown by the DNA ladder in current study) triggered cell apoptosis by up-regulating p53 and Bax. This explains the mechanism of its toxicity in liver cells [28].

ENP-induced renal injury has also occurred, as noted in recent literature. Just as in the case of nano-SiO2, ROS mediated oxidative stress, activated p53, Bax and caspase 3 also all played a role in nano-TiO2 (13-35 nm) induced cell apoptosis in the human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK-293) [29]. In addition to nano-TiO2, nano-copper of different sizes was proven to induce oxidative stress and apoptosis in kidney cells in both in vivo and in vitro experiments. Podocytes act as a glomerular filtration barrier whose injury correlates to renal dysfunction [59]. Adult mouse podocytes having been exposed to 1, 10 or 30 g/mL nano-Cu (15 nm) for 3 h displayed cell shrinkage, nuclear condensation and fragmentation indicative of apoptosis [60]. Pretreatment with N-MPG (a ROS scavenger) inhibited the podocyte apoptosis induced by nano-Cu. This suggests that apoptosis occurs via an oxidative stress-induced apoptosis pathway. In another in vivo study where mice were orally gavaged with 200, 413 or 600 mg/kg BW nano-Cu (25-40 nm) for 3 days, they also investigated the specific apoptosis pathways. It was found that, in addition to intracellular ROS and NO generation, changes in Bcl2/Bax, disruption of the mitochondrial membrane integrity, release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria to the cytosol and the activation of caspase 3 and 9 were all involved in the intrinsic mitochondrial-induced apoptosis pathway. The activation of Fas, caspase 8 and tBid were also suggestive of an extrinsic apoptotic pathway [61].

ENPs-induced cardiovascular injury

Certain environmental epidemiological studies have correlated atmospheric particles to cardiovascular diseases [62]. In addition to the liver injury mentioned previously, nano-ZnO exposure is also correlated with cardiovascular abnormalities. The in vitro exposure of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) to non-cytotoxic concentrations of ZnO NPs (42 nm) resulted in caspase-12 mediated ER stress. This could be used as a sensitive and early biomarker of cell apoptosis. Where ER stress may be caused by ROS induced oxidative stress, the pretreatment of HUVECs with N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC, another ROS scavenger) could act to utterly abolish such ER-stress [27]. The HUVECs also underwent apoptosis after 1 and 5μg/mL MWCNOs (31.2 nm) exposure for 24 h where ROS generation and DNA damage were assumed to have caused the apoptosis [63]. While SWCNTs under concentrations of 100μg/mL were suggested to be safe for drug delivery or other use, exposure to 200μg/mL SWCNTs after 48 or 72 hours was found to induce apoptosis in rat aorta endothelia cells (RAECs) and was accompanied by chromatin condensation, internucleosomal DNA fragmentation and caspase 3 activation [64]. The increase of ROS levels and the reduction of GSH in SWCNT-treated RACEs resulted in DNA-protein crosslinks, a kind of DNA damage not easy to repair, which activated p53, TNF-αand Bax and caused cell apoptosis via a mitochondrial-dependent pathway.

ENP-induced reproductive injury

As reviewed by Lan and Yang (2012) [11], some ENPs have the ability to penetrate the blood-testis barrier (BTB). The authors suggested that NP exposure may result in a generalized inflammation in the host and effect Leydig cells, causing reduced testosterone serum levels which then weaken the integrity of the BTB. In this regard the scale of the BTB gap became larger and allowed the NPs penetrating BTB easily. Both in vivo and in vitro studies have indicated that some ENPs exert toxic actions on male germ cells. ENP induced cell apoptosis was among one of the mechanisms of ENP’s reproductive toxicity. According to Orazizadeh (2015) [65], mice receiving 300 mg/kg nano-TiO2 (ranging from 50 to 100 nm) for 35 days showed a significant decrease in testis weight, epidydimal sperm parameters, maturity of spermatogenesis and testosterone levels, with the apoptosis being demonstrated at each stage using the TUNEL method. Consistent with this was the increased expression of apoptotic related genes including Bid, FasL, caspase-3 and p38 MAPK, implying an nano-TiO2 induced extrinsic pathway. Similarly, an in vitro study showed that male Leydig cells (TM3) and the Sertoli cells (TM4) exposed to 10 nm and 20 nm AgNP for 6 hours showed apoptosis, as evidenced by flow cytometry, and that this apoptosis could be partially mitigated by pretreatment of NAC, in accordance with the increased ROS levels in AgNP-treated cells [12]. The expressions of caspases 3, 8, 9 were all increased after AgNPs treatment, indicating that the apoptosis was induced both by intrinsic and extrinsic pathways. It should be noted that in the 10 nm AgNPs-treated groups, the phosphorylation of p38 and pErk1/2 was significantly higher than was that of control groups. However, in the 20 nm AgNPs treatment groups, the phosphorylation of Erk1/2, Bax, Bcl2 and RAD51 was increased. This suggests that the two different sizes of AgNPs induced cell apoptosis via two distinct signaling pathways.

Sperm are more sensitive to external environmental pollutants as they lack an effective enzyme defense system due to loss of cytoplasm during spermatogenesis [66]. Internalization of AgNPs (34-46 nm) into mouse spermatozoa resulted in decreased numbers of live cells, increased loss of mitochondrial copy numbers and other morphological abnormalities, as caused by AgNPs inducing ROS generation. The authors studied further and found that the AgNP-treated spermatozoa also resulted in poor fertilization and compromised embryo development. The ENP induced detrimental effects in sperm functionality was also observed in AuAPs-treated human sperm [15]. What surprises us is that neither sperm membrane nor sperm morphology was affected by the administration of 10.8 nm AuNPs or 7.8 nm AuNPs-oligonucleotide conjunction. Nevertheless, sperm motility and fertilization ability were significantly affected by the combination of AgNPs on the sperm membrane where toxic doses started at 10μg/mL.

APOPTOSIS PATHWAYS INVOLVED IN ENP CYTOTOXICITY

Cells undergoing apoptosis may display blebbing, cell shrinkage, nuclear fragmentation and the appearance of apoptotic bodies along with protein denaturation, proteolysis and DNA fragmentation [67]. Apoptosis is a natural process that is important in embryogenesis, aging and in maintaining homeostasis of multicellular organisms. Deregulation of apoptosis can result in a variety of diseases; in the case of degenerative diseases apoptosis is overabundant, whilst in cases of malignancy it is over-suppressed. From the many studies listed above we can draw the conclusion that environmental ENPs are potential threats to human health via their ability to cause increased cell apoptosis in various normal organs. Apoptosis is also a well regulated aspect of cell death involving a complex interplay of organelles, molecules and signal transductions. The understanding of the specific mechanisms underlying ENP toxicity enables us to ensure their safe use or make specific modifications to either antagonize or mitigate the ENP-induced injury. According to previous studies, ENPs exposure results in cell apoptosis through a variety of pathways. These include ROS induced oxidative stresses, intrinsic mitochondrial pathways. ER-stress pathways and extrinsic Fas-FasL involved pathways (Figure 2).

Whilst the generation of ROS seems to be a common mechanism of ENPs, in some cases apoptosis is found, independent from oxidative stress, as induced by direct damage of organelles cause by ENP deposition [68]. For metal NPs, ROS generation may be caused by the release of metal ions. This has been proved in the case of AgNPs, nano-ZnO, CoO-NPs, etc. Other ENPs may be able to bind to proteins and affect their normal function as seen in the decrease of activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, GSH, CAT and others. This results in an imbalance in oxidative status. Excessive ROS has been seen to result in a series of oxidative damages. These include protein and lipid peroxidation, the formation of DNA-protein crosslinks and DNA breakage. Protein oxidation is considered to be one of the main causes of cell death, resulting in accumulation of aberrant proteins and the loss of their function [69]. As cells are part of a huge membrane system, lipid peroxidation also results in a loss of membrane permeability and integrity. This is reflected by the increase in LDH level and disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψ) [64]. Oxidative DNA damage, if not repaired in time, is able to trigger the p53 induced cell G1- and S-phase arrest. P53 is also seen to be responsible for Bax upregulation and the release of cytochrome c following cell apoptosis.

ENP induced ROS triggers two apoptosis pathways, the intrinsic mitochondria and ER pathways. Under administration of ENPs, most cells show increased mitochondrial permeability and release of pro-apoptotic molecules such as cytochrome c and apoptotic inducing factor (AIF) into the cytoplasm. Cytochrome c release is regulated by various molecules such as t-Bid, Bax, and anti-apoptotic proteins like Bcl2. Cytochrome c, when released from mitochondria into the cytoplasm, is bound to caspase 9 and apoptotic protease activating factor 1 (Apaf1), forming a complex known as apoptosome which activates caspase 3 and initiates apoptosis [70]. AIF is translocated into the nucleus and causes DNA breakage into 5Х104 fragments, inducing cell apoptosis in a caspase-independent pathway. Another ENP induced pathway, the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway, is less common but also plays a role. In the UPR pathway, it is the alteration of intracellular Ca2+ concentration, accumulation of per-oxidative proteins and unfolded proteins triggers this ER pathway. Under normal conditions, the ER stress sensors are maintained in inactive state through association with a chaperone protein called glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78 or Bip), which dissociates when the aggregation of misfolded proteins as well as other stress events take place resulting in the initiation of UPR [71]. The UPR is considered to be a mitochondrial-independent and caspase 12-dependent pathway, which was activated along with the ER stress [72]. The activated caspase 12, together with other molecules, act as executors in the UPR-ER stress induced cell apoptosis. Although the specific mechanisms involved in UPR remain unclear, the p38 MAPK, JNK, Chop are all believed to be essential factors in this pathway.

ENPs were also able to activate Fas and FasL and trigger the extrinsic death receptor pathway. The combination of Fas and FasL recruits the adaptor protein FADD and pro-caspase 8, which together form the death inducing signaling complex (DISC) and activates caspase 8. Caspase 8, as an initiator caspase, cleaves and activates the executioner (caspase 3), leading to cell apoptosis and ultimately cell death. Caspase 8 is also able to cleave Bid into truncated Bid (tBid). This is then translocated into the mitochondria and favors cytochrome c release, initiating apoptosis in a mitochondrial-dependent pathway.

The ENP induced apoptosis pathways The ENPs induce two intrinsic pathways and one extrinsic death receptor pathway.

Figure 2: The ENP induced apoptosis pathways The ENPs induce two intrinsic pathways and one extrinsic death receptor pathway. The ENPs generate excessive ROS, resulting in the peroxidation of lipids, protein and DNA. The oxidative stress then triggers mitochondria or ER induced apoptotic pathways. (1) Intrinsic mitochondria pathway. The oxidative DNA damage activates p53 and causes an increase in Bax levels. With the disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential the cytc and AIF is released to the cytoplasm. The cyt c together with caspase 9 and other factors form apoptosome and activate caspase 3, initiating cell apoptosis. The AIF is then translocated to the nucleus and induces DNA breakage. (2) Intrinsic ER pathway. The unfolded protein accumulation induces caspase 12 activation, and p38 MAPK, Chop and JNK are involved in this pathway. (3) Extrinsic pathway. The Fas association with FasL recruits FADD and pro-caspase8 forming DISC and activated caspase 8. Caspase 8 then activates caspase 3, or truncates Bid to tBid. tBid translocates into mitochondria and favors the release of Cyt C. MT: mitochondria. ER: endoplasmic reticulum. Cyt C: cytochrome c. DISC: death inducing signaling complex. tBid: truncated Bid.

ENP INDUCED APOPTOSIS IN CANCER CELLS

Direct induction of cell apoptosis by ENPs provides an opportunity for cancer treatment [66]. Among a variety of apoptotic stimuli, nanomaterials have been proven in numerous studies to be able to cause cancer cell apoptosis (Table 2).

Table 2: ENPs induced cancer cell apoptosis

ENPs type

ENPs size

Apoptosis in cancer cell

phenotype

Reference

AgNP

22 nm

human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7)

Cell shrinkage, nuclear condensation and fragmentation, DNA break up, apoptotic bodies

[73]

AgNP

Not mentioned

human lung carcinoma cell line A549

Increased Caspase 3/7/9 activities and mitochondrial depolarization, high levels of Bax, Smac/BIABLO,

[74]

AgNP

5 to 25 nm

human colon cancer cell (COLO 205)

chromatin condensation and nuclear fragmentation, MMP loss, increased ROS levels

[76]

AgNP

25 to 39 nm

human colon cancer cell(HCT-15, HT-29)

cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase

[75]

AgNP

7.5±2.5 nm

ovarian carcinoma cell line

DNA damage

[77]

,

nano-Cr2O3

60 nm

Human lung cancer cell line

A549

Increased ROS levels and antioxidant activities,

caspase 3 activation

[38]

Au-Fe2O3 NPs

44.8±11.8 nm

human lung cancer HepG2 cells

shrinkage, budding and apoptotic body formation, increased ·OH and caspase 3 levels

[79]

Nano-TiO2

20-50 nm

A549

Increased ROS, decreased ATP

[78]

nano-HAP

<50 nm

human gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells

chromatin condensation and margination, cell blebbing and vacuoles, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, release of Cyt C, increased caspase 3/9

[80]

nano-HAP

20 nm, 80 nm

human osteosarcoma MG-63 cells

nuclear fragmentation , formation of dense rounded apoptotic bodies, increased caspase 9

[81]

nano-HAP

<20 nm

mice leukemia P388 cells

irregular nucleus, ER expansion, mitochondrial swelling and collapse, cell arrest in G1 phase

[82]

MoO3 nanoplate

Width of 100-200 nm, length of 400 nm

human invasive breast cancer iMCF-7 cells

activated caspase 8 and caspase 9, increased ROS levels and declined mitochondrial membrane potential, condensed and fragmented chromatins

[84]

Nano-Se

59 nm

A357 melanoma cells

DNA fragmentation, phosphatidylserine translocation,

oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction

[85]

Realgar nanoparticles

80 nm

rat glioma C6 cells

Cell arrest in G0/G1 phases, increased Bax/Bcl2 ratio

[86]

AgNPs induced cancer cell apoptosis

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), alongside some other metal nanoparticles, have been reported in a series of studies to have induced cancer cell apoptosis. Design, synthesis and manipulation of the AgNPs effective in this area has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years for potential applications in biology and medicine. The synthesis of AgNPs using plant extracts, for example, appears to be a simple, safe, effective as well as eco-friendly way to create an anticancer agent [73]. In one study, spherical shaped AgNPs with a size of 22 nm in a slightly agglomerated form were achieved by employing Sesbanta grandiflora leaf extract as reducing agent. When such kind of AgNPs were applied to human breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7) with concentrations of 20μg/mL for 48 hours, the treated cells displayed shrinkage, nuclear condensation and fragmentation as well as DNA break up characteristic of apoptosis. Apoptosis was then confirmed by the observance of apoptotic bodies. It was assumed by the authors that the AgNPs-induced ROS and the activation of caspase cascades were responsible for the DNA damage and the following apoptotic processes. However, more direct evidence is needed to confirm this. In another case, where AgNP was synthesized from aqueous leaf extract of Albizia adianthifolia (AA AgNP), the apoptosis pathways were investigated in detail using the human lung carcinoma cell line A549 [74]. It was found that caspase-3/-7 and casepase-9 activities were up-regulated in AAAgNP -treated A549 cells as compared to controls. This was responsible for the cleavage of specific substrates leading to cell apoptosis or cell death. In addition, increased mitochondria depolarization, decreased ATP concentration and high levels of Bax expression were detected after AA AgNP treatment, as accompanied by the release of the apoptotic regulator molecule Smac/BIABLO. This indicated an intrinsic apoptotic pathway induced by AA AgNP in human cancerous lung cells. AgNPs synthesized by the crystal compound of sodium para-hydroxybenzoate tetrahydrate (SPHT), as isolated from Vitex negundo.L leaves, displayed a spherical shape and was arranged from 25 to 39 nm [75]. The SPHT-AgNPs were found able to exert an apoptotic effect on human colon cancer cell lines by IC50 inducing cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase. Other biogenic-AgNPs from Abutilon indicum (AIAgNPs) were also presented in a spherical shape and had sizes ranging from 5 to 25 nm, as identified from the TEM imaging [76]. AIAgNP treated human colon cancer cell (COLO 205) at IC50 for 24 and 48 hours showed an orange-colored apoptosis body detected by AO/EB staining which was considered to be as a result of chromatin condensation and nuclear fragmentation. The apoptosis mechanism in AIAgNPs treated COLO 205 was attributed to the increased ROS levels and the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP). This, in turn, caused DNA fragmentation and cell cycle arrest.

Cancer cell apoptosis, as induced by AgNPs, has also involved other molecules. AgNPs with a size of 7.5±2.5 nm were reported to have induced ovarian carcinoma cell line apoptosis, as showed by increased DNA damage and increased apoptosis rate after AgNPs-treatment [77]. In this case, nuclear factor erythroid 2 (NF-E2)-related factor 2 (Nrf2) was proved to play a role in AgNPs-induced cell apoptosis where cells were more sensitive to AgNP-induced DNA damage and apoptosis in the Nrf2-RNAi treatment group as compared to the control. HO-1, one of the down-regulators of Nrf2, which engages the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) as well as P38-MAPK pathways, was further proved to be active in cytoprotection against AgNP-mediated toxicity. In addition, elevated ROS levels and subsequent oxidative stress and the mitochondria mediated intrinsic pathways were shown to have been involved in most of the cases of ENP-induced cancer cell apoptosis.

Other ENP induced cancer cell apoptosis

Some cancer cells can be induced cell death via different ENPs. The human lung cancer cell line A549, for example, displayed induced cell apoptosis via nano-Cr2O3 and nano-TiO2 exposure. The nano-Cr2O3 (60 nm) exposure to A549 cells resulted in a dose-dependent increase in ROS level and the activation of antioxidant defense systems. With caspase 3 activation, the decline in nano-Cr2O3 exposed A549 cell viability was assumed to be caused by apoptosis [38]. A549 cell viability was also significantly decreased after exposure to 50-300μg/mL nano-TiO2 for 4 hours. The nano-TiO2 was observed to be endocytosed by A549, causing a dose-dependent decrease of intracellular ATP levels which was related to the increased ROS level. This leads to cell apoptosis and cellular energy deficits [78]. In some cases the combination of two ENPs may provide, from the two differing components, special properties and excellent catalytic activities when used in combination. Gao et al. (2012) combined the 8 nm Au and 20 nmγ-Fe2O3 together with peptide conjunction and produced the 44.8±11.8 nm RGD/FITC-DEVD-Au-Fe2O3 NPs (DEVD as caspase 3 substrate) [79], which allowed the real-time imaging of caspase 3 induced apoptosis. The Au-Fe2O3 NPs of 30μg/mL were administrated to human lung cancer HepG2 cells, which initiated catalytic formation of hydroxyl radicals (·OH). After 6 hours, the HepG2 cells showed shrinkage, budding and apoptotic body formation with the maximum fluorescence intensity occurring at the highest caspase 3 level. The heterostructured NPs prove promising for future therapeutic applications in cancer.

Some ENPs have been reported to exhibit anti-cancer effects on several human cancers. Nanoscale hydroxyapatite (nano-HAP) was shown to have induced cell apoptosis in human gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells, osteosarcoma MG-63 cells, leukemia P388 cells, and others. Characteristic features of apoptosis such as chromatin condensation and margination, cell blebbing and vacuoles in SGC-7901 cells [80], nuclear fragmentation and formation of dense rounded apoptotic bodies in MG-63 cells [81], irregular nuclei, ER expansion, and mitochondrial swelling and collapse in P388 cells, were all observed beyond nano-HAP treatment [82]. Overall, mitochondria seem to be a main target of nano-HAP. The exposure of human gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells to 100μg/mL nano-HAP (smaller than 50 nm) for 12 hours caused decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, release of cytochrome c and activation of caspase 3 and 9. The caspase 9-dependent intrinsic mitochondrial apoptotic pathway also played a role in nano-HAP (20 and 80 nm) treated MG-63 cells. The cell arrest in the G1 phase of P388 cells caused by nano-HAP exposure (of less than 20 nm particle size) may be the result of disrupted mitochondrial morphology and function.

Nano structures of some essential elements were also explored as anti-cancer candidates. Molybdenum (Mo) is an essential trace metal in organisms and acts as a cofactor for various enzymes including aldehyde oxidase, xanthine oxidase, and sulfite oxidase [83]. MoO3 nanoplates with a width of 100-200 nm and a length of 400 nm were applied towards human invasive breast cancer iMCF-7 cells [84]. The MoO3 nanoplate exposure at 200 and 400μg/mL for 48 hours has resulted in elevated ROS levels and a declined mitochondrial membrane potential in iMCF-7 cells as well as condensed and fragmented chromatins, all of which suggest the presence of apoptotic bodies. With increases of activated caspase 8 and caspase 9, the MoO3 nanoplates might exert anti-cancer activities via both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways. Another essential element, the selenium nanoparticle (Nano-Se), is known for its novel biological activity and low toxicity. The use of Nano-Se, with an average size of 59 nm, resulted in a broad spectrum of growth inhibition against A357 melanoma cells, Hep G2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells, MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cells and CNE2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma with IC50 values ranging from 3.0 to 14.1μM [85]. Further investigation on the mechanism suggested that the nano-Se treatment resulted in DNA fragmentation and phosphatidylserine translocation in A357 cells. In this, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction is thought to be involved in the nano-Se induced apoptosis pathway. Such results may render nano-Se as a candidate chemotherapeutic agent for human cancers.

High grade gliomas are among the deadest human tumors. ENPs, with their small sizes and ability to cross the BBB, have been used in an attempt by scientists to treat brain cancers. One example, realgar, has been used in China for thousands of years as a traditional Chinese medicine. According to An et al. (2011) [86], realgar nanoparticles with an average diameter of 80 nm have inhibited rat glioma C6 cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in a dose and time-dependent manner. Here, cell arrest in G0/G1 phases can be observed and the associated apoptosis may be caused by an increase in Bax/Bcl2 ratio. Realgar nanoparticles may therefore also provide a promising anti-cancer strategy and hopes towards utilization for human brain cancer therapy.

ENP as a drug-delivery system for treatment of cancer

ENPs, with their unique properties such as surface charge, particle size, composition and surface modification with tissue recognition ligands or antibodies, has been increasingly explored as a tool to carry small molecular weight drugs as well as macromolecules for cancer therapy, thus generating the new concept “nanocarrier” [87]. Taking the brain as an example, the ENP nanocarriers applied to brain cancer include polymeric nanoparticles, liposomes, dendrimers, nanoshells, carbon nanotubes, superparamagnetic nanoparticles, nucleic acid based nanoparticles and antisense oligonucleotides [88]. There are several strategies that DNA, protein and drug molecules are constructed with ENPs, such as ionic interactions, covalent or non-covalent binding, absorption to surfaces, or via polymers like PEG and PEGylated phospholipids [89]. Here we review several nanocarrier examples targeting cancer cells and enhancing their apoptosis. Such a strategy includes various innovative opportunities for cancer therapy (Figure 3).

ENPs can be used as nano-carriers in cancer therapy.

Figure 3: ENPs can be used as nano-carriers in cancer therapy. A. ENPs were constructed with nucleus-targets and caused its deformation and induced apoptotic bodies. B. ENPs were constructed with MT-targets and caused ROS-dependent oxidative damages, cyt C-dependent apoptosis, and AIF induced nucleus breakage. C. ENPs were constructed with cyt C which were able to induce caspase 3/8/9-dependent apoptosis. D. ENPs were constructed with ER targets and induced caspase 12-dependent apoptosis. E. ENPs were constructed with cancer drugs that were not able to be taken into cancer cells. MT: mitochondria. ER: endoplasmic reticulum. cyt C: cytochrome c.

As nucleus damage, mitochondrial disruption and cytochrome c release all play a key role in regulating cell fates, each of these can be targeted to induce apoptosis in cancer cells. The nucleus, as the most important organelle in a cell, controls the growth, proliferation and apoptosis of a cell. Nuclear-targeted apoptosis, therefore, has been a clear goal for cancer therapy [90]. In one study nanoconstructs composed of nucleolin-specific aptamers and gold nanostars (Apt-AuNS, 25 nm) were selectively targeted to nucleus of Hela cells. This leads to the deformation of the nuclear envelop in over 60% of Hela cells with nanoconstructs after 7 h exposure [91]. Such a nuclear deformation may be caused by the release of aptamers from the surface of gold nanostars upon delivery. Beyond administration the nuclear phenotype and the biological activity of caspase 3 and 7 were found to be correlated, with more nuclear deformation and increased caspase 3 and 7 as well as less cell viability. Mitochondria are also an attractive target for the design of effective and specific cancer therapeutics. Mkandawire et al. (2015) had AuNPs (20 nm) conjugated to a variant of turbo green fluorescent protein (mito TGFP) that harbored an amino-terminal mitochondrial localization signal. He then transfected the AuNPs conjugates into the human breast cancer cell line Jimt-1 [92]. The mitoTGFP-AuNPs conjugates were directed to mitochondria upon transfection, causing the rupture of the mitochondrial outer membrane, enabling the conjugates to make their way to the inner membrane. This, in turn, released cytochrome c led to mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis as evidenced by cell shrinkage and condensed chromatin in mitoTGFP-AuNPs including in the Jimt-1 cells. In the study of Morales-Cruz et al. (2014), a cytochrome c drug delivery system was constructed to induce apoptosis in Hela cells. Cytochrome c was made nanosized into 100 to 300 nm using a solvent-displacement method, the particle surface of which was decorated with poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid-SH via a linker to prevent premature dissolution during delivery. When incubated with 25 to 100 μg/mL cytochrome c NPs for 6 hours, the Hela cells showed significant decrease in viability where more than 70% of cells were dead in the 100 μg/mL group and apoptosis was confirmed by co-localization of DAPI and PI [93].

It is well known that tumor cells can be resistant to chemotherapeutics. With the assistance of nanoparticles, medical treatment can advance more smoothly. Polysaccharides, as major bioactive compounds, are reported to have anti-cancer properties. They have been able to induce cell death in a hepatoma cell lines (Hep G2) [94]. Here, Nano-encapsulated in chitosan-silica or just silica, the nano-conjunction caused a more significant decrease in Hep G2 cell viability than mere polysaccharides alone and induced apoptosis like ROS generation, DNA fragmentation, caspase activation and cell sub-G1 phase arrest. In another case, daunomycin, one of the most important antitumor drugs clinically applied in acute leukemia, was loaded with magnetic nanoparticle Fe3O4 or Au to facilitate anti-cancer activity in K562/A02 cells [95]. Breast cancer remains a threat to women’s health worldwide. Anti-metadherin (anti-MTDH) antibodies which are specific to breast cancer cells, were bound to AuNPs via [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) [96]. The 18FDG-AuNPs-Anti-MTDH conjunction was co-incubated with breast cancer MCF7 cells and an apoptosis rate of 20% was observed, compared with the 2% in the control. In the study of Li et al. (2014), a brain metastatic breast cancer model was established in mice where doxorubicin (Dox) was loaded to PMAA-PS 80-g-St nanoparticulates. The Dox-loaded nanoparticles (10 mg/kg Dox) were injected into the breast cancer brain metastasis models for 2 weeks, during which the Dox NPs managed to cross the BBB and accumulated in the intracranial breast cancer brain metastases. There it significantly inhibited the growth of tumors as compared to free Dox treatment. It may be that the released Dox induced cancer cell apoptosis through interference with DNA repair and replication by DNA intercalation in highly proliferating cells. In such a process normal cells may be spared [97]. ENPs are also explored as small interfering RNA (siRNA) carriers in the treatment of breast cancer [98], ovarian cancer [99], hepatocellular carcinoma [100], and B-cell malignancies [101] etc., as methods in gene silencing therapy. The above examples show that ENP-dependent drug delivery systems prove to be a promising therapeutic system for the treatment of cancer.

Despite the promising drug delivery system provided by ENPs in cancer therapy, one has to consider the safety and efficiency of the delivery and targeting. To achieve selective treatment and to reduce toxicity, ENPs are usually endowed with tumor targeting abilities by binding to antibodies directed against highly expressed cancer cell surface receptors. The drugs may be encapsulated within ENPs and then conjugate to targeting antibodies (Antibody-Nanoparticle Conjugates, ANPs) [102]. For example, α-Hed, which induced cell death mainly via apoptosis, was conjugated with chitosan nanoparticles (CS-NP) to form α-Hed-CS-NPs in one study [103]. The α-Hed-CS-NP surface was then modified with monoclonal antibody CD147 and formedα-Hed-CS-CD147-NPs with sizes ranging from 50 to 300 nm, which showed a higher cellular uptake and intracellular accumulation in human liver cancer cell lines HepG2 and SMMC-7721 than free α-Hed and α-Hed-CS-NPs, and also had higher targeting antitumor efficacy at the tumor sites in nude mice. In another case the melanotransferrin antibody (MA) was conjugated with solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) to carry anticancer etoposide (ETP) across the BBB for managing glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) [104]. MA was crosslinked on the surface of etoposide-loaded SLNs (ETP-SLNs) to form MA-ETP-SLNs, which were shown to be appropriate for the transport of etoposide across the BBB and be able to inhibit the growth of GBM, indicating a potential application in the colloidal delivery system for malignant GBM pharmacotherapy. In the newly published literature of Palanca-Wessels et al. [105], the authors introduced the usage of linking an internalizing streptavidin-conjugated HER2 antibody to an endosome-disruptive biotinylated polymeric nanocarrier for the functional cytoplasmic delivery of siRNA in breast and ovarian cells, resulting in an 80% reduction of target mRNA and protein levels with sustained repression for no less than 96 hours. Plus, the effective targeting can be realized by designing smart nano-carriers that respond to certain changes in the bio-environment and release the encapsulated contents on demanded sites. Gurka et al. [106] designed a dual targeting system in mesoporous silica nanoparticle (MSN) in the adventure of pancreatic cancer treatment, taking advantage of the overexpressed tumor receptor urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (UPAR) as well as the acid tumor microenvironment. It was found that the tumor specificity of MSN was improved with the addition of chitosan (targeting acid PH) and urokinase plasminogen activator (UPA, targeting UPAR), ensuring drug release and accumulation preferentially at the pancreatic tumors compared to liver or kidney. Targeted as well as controlled drug delivery and release can also be realized with magnetoelectric nanoparticles (MEN), which, with its load, can be controlled and placed at the intended site via application of an external magnetic field [107].

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVE

ENPs, having great potential for application in cancer treatment, also arouse concerns about potential risks for human exposure. How to use ENPs wisely at minimum side effects is becoming an increasingly important focal area. Several particle features, such as type, size, shape, zeta potentials, dispersion/agglomeration status and surface modification should be taken into account in evaluating ENP safety. Here we introduce several examples concerning ENP type, size and shape as well as surface modification.

ENPs type-dependent cytotoxicity

Before application, the comparable cytotoxicities between many differing particles must be established by comparing their effects in different cell lines. In one case six different fine- or nano- particles were investigated on the macrophage-like murine cell line RAW 264.7. The particles were crystalline silica (DQ12, 960 nm), amorphous silica (a-SiO2, 14 nm), TiO2 ultrafine (uf TiO2, 20-80 nm), TiO2 fine (f TiO2, 40-300 nm), ZnO (10 nm) and MgO (8 nm). It was demonstrated that ZnO, DQ12 quartz and a-SiO2 were cytotoxic whilst toxicity was not in evidence for MgO, or fine and ultrafine TiO2, as referred to apoptotic effects for hypodiploid DNA in caspase 3/7 activation and effects upon cell live/death rates [108]. In another report, silver particles of nano-(20 nm) and submicron- (200 nm) were compared with TiO2-NPs (21 nm) in the human testicular embryonic carcinoma cell line Ntera2 and primary testicular cells from C57BL6 mice. The results showed that the silver particles exerted more of a cytotoxic effect than did the TiO2-NPs, causing apoptosis, necrosis and decreased proliferation in dose and time dependent manner [109]. TiO2 NPs seemed to be less toxic than other particles, though case by case analyses remain necessary.

ENPs size and shape-dependent cytotoxicity

ENP size has been generally considered the most dominant factor for ENP cytotoxicity. In general, the smaller the ENPs size, the more concerns there is for human exposure. This may be due to the effect of mass-specific surface area, leading to the smaller sized ENPs exerting a more toxic effect. The bioavailability of nano- and microscale CuO (CuO NP and CuO MP) were explored in A549 and Hela S3 cells, as compared with CuCl2 [110]. A high cytotoxicity of CuO NP (55 nm) and CuCl2 were found, while the CuO MP (1289 nm) cytotoxicity was not in evidence up to 50μg/mL. In this, CuO NPs were seen to exert the strongest effects. However, small particles do not necessarily lead to better uptake or enhanced toxicity. In a NT2 study, for example, primary testicular cells were treated with nano-(20 nm) and submicron-(200 nm) Ag particles. Here it was the 200 nm AgNPs that caused more DNA damage (20%) than 20 nm AgNPs (15%) under same conditions [109]. Another study by Park (2007) reconfirmed that by investigating different cell fates induced by different sizes of TiO2 nanotubes, in which cellular activities were enhanced by particles less than 30 nm while reduced by particles larger than 50 nm with a high extent of apoptosis [111].

In addition to size, the shapes of ENPs are also directly correlated to their induced cytotoxicity. Two graphitic nanomaterials, graphene layers (G) and single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT), having similar chemical composition and crystalline structures, were presented with different shapes. Here, G occurs in flat atomic sheets and nanotubes are tubular. In the concentration-dependent toxicity testing of these two ENPs on PC12 cells, results were dissimilar. G had a higher toxic effect at lower concentrations and SWCNT a more intense toxic effect at higher concentrations. This indicates different toxic mechanisms related to shape [112]. These different effects were assumed to be that the needle-like CNTs were more mobile and more easily able to penetrate the cell membrane and thereby caused strong interactions with various protein systems. G cytotoxicity may instead be correlated with the aggregation/agglomeration forms found on cell membranes. The indication is that these two ENPs have different cellular target sites. In another case four types of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (nano-HAP) with different nanocrystal morphologies (short rod-like, long rod like, spherical and needle-shaped crystals) and sizes (10-20, 10-30, 20-40 and 20-40 nm) were compared for their effects upon primary cultured rat osteoblasts [113]. These nano-HAPs induced mitochondrial and caspase dependent apoptosis in the osteoblasts, with needle-shaped and the spherical particles inducing the greater cellular injury than short rod-like and long rod-like particles. It has been recognized that the specific surface area of ENPs can determine the activities of the materials. Particles with higher specific surface area tend to have greater activity and more easily attach to the cells and lead to toxicity. This is in accordance with the above study in which the needle-shaped (148.140 m2/g) and the spherical (122.479 m2/g) particles had larger specific surface areas than the short rod-like (45.002 m2/g) and long rod-like (68.452 m2/g) particles.

ENPs surface-dependent cytotoxicity

ENPs of different surface modifications have numerous technological and biomedical applications. They interact with biological structures and display distinct and specific impacts to the cell systems. Graphite nanoparticles (GO) with a lateral width of 200-500 nm and a thickness of 1 nm were modified in different ways including the modification of their thickness, LA-PEG-GO (2 nm), PEG-GO (1.9 nm) and PEI-GO (2.5 nm). The modified and unmodified GOs were then co-incubated with human lung fibroblast cells (HLF). It was found that exposure to GOs led to mitochondrial dysfunction and increased the amount of HLF apoptotic cells, while values of the cell viability rates and DNA damage differed among the various modifications. This may be a result of different electronic charges on the surface of GOs after modification (-65.1mV for GO, +18.4mV for LA-PEG-GO, -8.86mV for PEG-GO and +60.5mV for PEI-GO) [114]. The electronic charge on the surface of the ENPs may play important roles in determining their toxicity to targeted cells. Similarly, Arvizo et al. (2010) investigated the different surface charge of AuNPs on various cell lines including malignant cells of ovarian cancer CP70 and A2780, nonmalignant cells of human bronchial epithelial cell BECs and human airway smooth muscle ASM cells, (24.4 mV for +AuNP, -1.09 mV for 0AuNP, -37.9 mV for -AuNP, and -1.94 mV for ±AuNP) [115]. The results showed that the uptake of +AuNP was significantly higher than other charges of AuNPs across different cell lines and that such an uptake induced membrane depolarization and altered intracellular Ca2+ concentrations leading to the inhibition of the cell proliferation of BECs and cell apoptosis of both CP70s and BECs.

Some modifications might be able to lighten the cytotoxic effects of ENPs. These modifications were supposed to improve their solubility and biocompatibility and alter their cellular interaction pathways, resulting in an enhanced ability to penetrate biological membranes with relatively low cytotoxicity [89]. Polystyrene nanoparticles of about 110 nm diameter were surface functionalized with carbonxyl (PS-COOH) or amino (PS-NH2) groups and were applied to macrophages of THP-1 leukemia cells [116]. Whilst the PS-COOH did not affect TP1 cell proliferation or exhibit any toxic effects on the macrophages, PS-NH2 particles not only inhibited THP-1 proliferation but also induced cell apoptosis in THP-1 cells. Carbon-based substances were considered to be less bio-reactive in biological systems and thus be critical for reducing the inherent reactivity of ENPs with biomolecules. In another case, nano-TiO2 was coated with polyacrylate and the cytotoxicity on Chinese hamster lung fibroblast (V79) cells was compared with nano-TiO2 and micro-TiO2. Here, the cell viability decreased and induction of apoptosis was observed for the administration of all types of TiO2 particles, but for polyacrylate-coated nano-TiO2, it was only detected in higher concentrations with no DNA damage detected [117].

SUMMARY

Nanoparticles offer a numerous application possibilities in the industrial sector. These include their use as fuel additives for catalysis, as sunscreen additives for UV protection, various applications in the textile industry and their use in biomedicine as drug targeting agents or drug carriers [100]. In recent years directs ENP applications towards cancer therapy for inducing cancer cell apoptosis has been an increasing focus. Unfortunately such widely usage may also pose unwanted threat to human health. This calls for the necessity of a precise analysis of ENP cytotoxicity in living cells and the understanding of how their exact properties (size, shapes, surface charges, dispersion/agglomeration status) all play a deciding ENP safety and suitability for such roles. In addition, some aspects of surface modification may be able to reduce the bio-reactivity of ENPs, thus alleviating their toxicities in certain circumstances. This may provide a way to design even more effective particles of minimum undesired toxicity.

Abbreviations

Full name

NPs

nanoparticles

ENPs

engineered nanoparticles

BBB

blood-brain barrier

BTB

blood-testis barrier

CNS

central nervous system

AgNPs

silver nanoparticles

CNTs

carbon nanotubes

ROS

reactive oxygen species

TEM

transmission electron microscopy

SEM

scanning electron microscopy

ER

the endoplasmic reticulum

SIRT1

sirtuin 1

HaCaT

human keratinocyte cells

FADD

Fas-associated proteins with death domain

DISC

death including signaling complex

AIF

apoptosis-inducing factor

PC12

dopaminergic neuron cells

GSH

glutathione

MDA

methane dicarboxylic aldehyde

SOD

superoxide dismutase

N-MPG

N-(mercaptopropinyl)-glycine

t-Bid

Truncated-Bid

MAPK

mitogen-activated protein kinase

JNK

cJun N-terminal kinase

LDH

lactate dehydrogenase

CAT

catalase

H2O2

hydrogen peroxide

CHOP

C/EBF-homologue protein

UPR

unfolded protein response

DISC

death inducing signaling complex

Nrf2

nuclear factor erythroid 2 (NF-E2)-related factor 2

cyt C

cytochrome c

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to all members of the Sperm Laboratory in Zhejiang University for their valuable perspectives as to this topic and suggestion in the writing. This project was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31572603 and 41276151). The authors thank Chris Wood for his effort in linguistic polishing of this manuscript.

Author contribution

D.-D. Ma and W.-X. Yang conceived of and authored the manuscript.

CONFLICTs OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of this review.

REFERENCES

1. Nowack B, Bucheli TD. Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut. 2007; 150: 5-22.

2. Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science. 2006; 311: 622-627.

3. Weinberg H, Galyean A, Leopold M. Evaluating engineered nanoparticles in natural waters. Trend Anal Chem. 2011; 30: 72-83.

4. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Persp. 2005; 113: 823-839.

5. Oberdörster G, Maynard A, Donaldson K, Castranova V, Fitzpatrick J, Ausman K, Carter J, Karn B, Kreyling W, Lai D, Olin S, Monteiro-Riviere N, Warheit D, Yang H; ILSI Research Foundation/Risk Science Institute Nanomaterial Toxicity Screening Working Group. Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2005; 2: 8-43.

6. Kreyling WG, Semmler-Behnke M, Möller W. Ultrafine particle-ling interactions: Does size matter? J Aerosol Med. 2006; 19: 74-83.

7. Leite-Silva VR, Lamer ML, Sanchez WY, Liu DC, Sanchez WH, Morrow I, Martin D, Silva HDT, Prow TW, Grice JE, Roberts MS. The effect of formulation on the penetration of coated and uncoated zinc oxide nanoparticles into the viable epidermis of human skin in vivo. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013; 84: 297-308.

8. Nohynek GJ, Dufour EK. Nano-sized cosmetic formulations or solid nanoparticles in sunscreens: a risk to human health? Arch Toxicol. 2012; 86: 1063-1075.

9. Srikanth M, Kessler JA. Nanotechnology-novel therapeutics for CNS disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012; 8: 307-318.

10. Campbell A, Oldham M, Becaria A, Bondy SC, Meacher D, Sioutas C, Misra C, Mendez LB, Kleinman M. Particulate matter in polluted air may increase biomarkers of inflammation in mouse brain. Neurotoxicology. 2005; 26: 133-140.

11. Lan Z, Yang WX. Nanoparticles and spermatogenesis: how do nanoparticles affect spermatogenesis and penetrate the blood-testis barrier. Nanomedicine. 2012; 7: 579-596.

12. Zhang XF, Choi YJ, Han JW, Kim E, Park JH, Gurunathan S, Kim JH. Differential nanoreprotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in male somatic cells and spermatogonial stem cells. Int J Nanomed. 2015; 10:1335-1357.

13. Xu S, Zhang Z, Chu M. Long-term toxicity of reduced graphene oxide nanosheets: Effects on female mouse reproductive ability and offspring development. Biomaterials. 2015; 54: 188-200.

14. Horie M, Koto H, Fujita K, Endoh S, Iwahashi H. In vitro evaluation of cellular response induced by manufactured nanoparticles. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012; 25: 605-619.

15. Taylor U, Barchanski A, Petersen S, Kjes WA, Baulain U, Gamrad L, Sajti L, Barcikowski S, Rath D. Gold nanoparticles interfere with sperm functionality by membrane adsorption without penetration. Nanotoxicology. 2014; 8: 118-127.

16. Hirano S, Kanno S, Furuyama A. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes injure the plasma membrane of macrophages. Toxicol Appl Pharm. 2008; 244-251.

17. Tay CY, Fang W, Setyawati MI, Chia SL, Tan KS, Hong CHL, Leong DT. Nano-hydroxyapatite and nano-titanium dioxide exhibit different subcellular distribution and apoptotic profile in human oral epithelium. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014; 6: 6248-6256.

18. Bartlomiejczyk T, Lankoff A, Kruszewski M, Szumiel I. Silver nanoparticles-allies or adversaries? Ann Agr Env.Med 2013; 20: 48-54.

19. Vakurov A, Brydson R, Nelsont A. Electrochemical modeling of the silica nanoparticle-biomembrane interaction. Langmuir. 2012; 28:1246-1255.

20. Patel L, Zaro J, Shen WC. Cell penetrating peptides: intracellular pathways and pharmaceutical perspectives. Pharma Res. 2007; 24:1977-1992.

21. AshaRani PV, Hande MP, Valiyaveettil S. Anti-proliferative activity of silver nanoparticles. BMC Cell biology. 2009; 10: 65.

22. Zhang XF, Choi YJ, Han JW, Kim E, Park JH, Gurunathan S, Kim JH. Differential nanoreprotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in male somatic cells and spermatogonial stem cells. Int J Nanomed. 2015; 10: 1335-1357.

23. Bressan E, Ferroni L, Gardin C, Rigo C, Srocchero M, Vindigni V, Cairns W, Zavan B. Silver nanoparticles and mitochondrial interaction. Int J Dentistry. 2013; 2013: 1-8.

24. Hussain S, Al-Nsour F, Rice AB, Marshburn J, Yingling B, Ji Z, Zink JI, Walk NJ, Garantziotis S. Gerium dioxide nanoparticles induce apoptosis and autophagy in human peripheral blood monocytes. Acs Nano. 2012; 6: 5820-5829.

25. Li B, Ze Y, Sun Q, Zhang T, Sang X, Cui Y, Wang X, Gui S, Tan D, Zhu M, Zhao X, Sheng L, Wang L, Hong F. Molecular mechanisms of nanosized titanium dioxide-induced pulmonary injury in mice. PloS ONE. 2013; 8: e55563.

26. Yang X, Shao H, Liu W, Gu W, Shu X, Mo Y, Chen X, Zhang Q, Jiang M. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress are involved in ZnO nanoparticles-induced hepatotoxicity. Toxicol Lett. 2015; 234: 40-49.

27. Chen R, Huo L, Shi X, Bai R, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Chang Y, Chen C. Endoplasmic reticulum stress induced by zinc oxide nanoparticles is an earlier biomarker for nanotoxicological evaluation. Acs Nano. 2014; 8: 2562-2574.

28. Ye Y, Liu J, Xu J, Sun L, Chen M, Lan M. Nano-SiO2 induces apoptosis via activation of p53 and Bax mediated by oxidative stress in human hepatic cell line. Toxicol in Vitro. 2010; 24: 751-758.

29. Meena R, Rani M, Pal R, Rajamani P. Nano-TiO2-induced apoptosis by oxidative stress-mediated DNA damage and activation of p53 in human embryonic kidney cells. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012; 167: 791-808.

30. Magaye R, Zhao J, Bowman L, Ding M. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of cobalt-, nickel- and copper-based nanoparticles (Review). Exp Ther Med 2012; 4: 551-561.

31. Li B, Ze Y, Sun Q, Zhang T, Sang X, Cui Y, Wang X, Gui S, Tan D, Zhu M, Zhao X, Sheng L, Wang L, Hong F. Molecular mechanisms of nanosized titanium dioxide-induced pulmonary injury in mice. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e55563.

32. Li L, Sun J, Li X, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Wang C, Dai J, Wang Q. Controllable synthesis of monodispersed silver nanoparticles as standards for quantitative assessment of their cytotoxicity. Biomaterials. 2012; 33: 1714-1721.

33. Duan WX, He MD, Mao L, Qian FH, Li YM, Pi HF, Liu C, Chen CH, Lu YH, Cao ZW, Zhang L, Yu ZP, Zhou Z. NiO nanoparticles induce apoptosis through repressing SIRT1 in human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicol Appl Pharm. 2015; 286: 80-91.

34. Lee JH, Cha KE, Kim MS, Hong HW, Chung DJ, Ryu G, Myung H. Nanosized polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer-induced apoptosis mediated by mitochondrial dysfunction. Toxicol Lett. 2009; 190: 202-227.

35. Ding L, Stiwell J, Zhang T, Elboudwarej O, Jiang H, Selegue JP, Cooke PA, Gray JW, Chen FF. Molecular characterization of the cytotoxic mechanism of multiwall carbon nanotubes and nano-onions on human skin fibroblast. Nano lett. 2005; 5: 2448-2464.

36. Yang X, Liu J, He H, Zhou L, Gong C, Wang X, Yang L, Yuan J, Huang H, He L, Zhang B, Zhuang Z. SiO2 nanoparticles induce cytotoxicity and protein expression alteration in HaCaT cells. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2010; 7:1.

37. Xue C, Luo W, Yang X. A mechanism for nano-titanium dioxide-induced cytotoxicity in HaCaT cells under UVA irradiation. Biosci Biotech Bioch. 2015; DOI:10.1080/09168451.2015.1023248.

38. Horie M, Nishio K, Endoh S, Kato H, Fujita K, Miyauchi A, Nakamura A, Kinugasa S, Yamamoto K, Niki E, Yoshida Y, Iwahashi H. Chromium(III) oxide nanoparticles induced remarkable oxidative stress and apoptosis on culture cells. Environ Toxicol. 2013; 28: 61.

39. Kasprzak KS, Sunderman FW, Sainkow K. Nickel carcinogenesis. Mutat Res. 2003; 533:67-97.

40. Zhao J, Bowman L, Zhang X, Shi X, Jiang B, Castranova V, Ding M. Metallic nickel nano- and fine particles induce JB6 cell apoptosis through a caspase-8/AIF mediated cytochrome c-independent pathway. J Nanobiotecg. 2009; 7: 2.

41. Misra A, Ganesh S, Shahiwala A, Shah SP. Drug delivery to the central nervous system: a review. J Pharm Sci. 2003; 6: 252-273.

42. Wu J, Wang C, Sun J, Xue Y. Neurotoxicity of silica nanoparticles: brain localization and dopaminergic neurons damage pathways. Acs Nano. 2011; 5: 4476-4489.

43. Ishima T, NishimuraT. Iyo M, Hashimoto K. Potentiation of nerve growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth in PC12 Cells by donepezil: Role of sigma-1 receptors and IP3 receptors. Prog Neuro-Psychoph. 2008; 7: 1656-1659.

44. Cui K, Luo XL, Xu KY, Murthy MRV. Role of oxidative stress in neurodegeneration: recent developments in assay methods for oxidative stress and nutraceutical Antioxidants. Prog Neuro-Psychoph. 2004; 5: 771- 799.

45. Wang F, Jiao C, Liu J, Yuan H, Lan M, Gao F. Oxidative mechanisms contribute to nanosized silican dioxide-induced development neurotoxicity in PC12 cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2011; 25: 1548-1556.

46. Liu S, Xu L, Zhang T, Ren G, Yang Z. Oxidative stress and apoptosis induced by nanosized titanium dioxide in PC12 cells. Toxicology. 2010; 267: 172-177.

47. Hardup N, Loeschner K, Mortensen A, Sharma AK, Qvortrup K, Larsen EH, Lam HR. The similar neurotoxic effects of nanoparticulate and ionic silver in vivo and in vitro. NeuroToxicology. 2012; 33: 416-423.

48. Ehringer H, Hornykiewicz O. Distribution of noradrenaline and dopamine (3-hydroxytyramine) in the human brain and their behavior in diseases of the extrapyramidal system. Klin Wochenschr. 2012; 38:1236-1239.

49. Shimizu M, Tainaka H, Oba T, Mizuo K, Umezawa M, Takeda K. Maternal exposure to nanoparticulate titanium dioxide during the prenatal period alters gene expression related to brain development in the mouse. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2009; 6:20.

50. Hussain S, Garantziotis S. Interplay between apoptotic and autophagy pathways after exposure to cerium dioxide nanoparticles in human monocytes. Autophagy 2013; 9:1.

51. Wluka A, Olszewski WL. Innate and adaptive processes in the spleen. Ann Transplant. 2006; 11 : 22-29.

52. Sheng L, Wang L, Sang X, Zhao X, Hong J, Cheng S, Yu X, Liu D, Xu B, Hu R, Sun Q, Cheng J, Cheng Z, Gui S, Hong F. Nano-sized titanium dioxide-induced splenic toxicity: A biological pathway explored using microarray technology. J Hazard Mater. 2014; 278: 180-188.

53. Kang SJ, Kim BM, Lee YJ, Hong SH, Chung HW. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce apoptosis through the JNK/p38-casapase 8-Bid pathway in phytothemagglutinin-stimulated human lymphocytes. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2009; 386: 682-687.

54. Chattopadhyay S, Dash SK, Tripathy S, Das B, Mandal D, Pramanik P, Roy S. Toxicity of cobalt oxide nanoparticles to normal cells: an in vitro and in vivo study. Chem-Biol Interact. 2015; 226: 58-71.

55. Degen, LP, Phillips SF. Variability of Gastrointestinal Transit in Healthy Women and Men. Gut. 1996; 39: 299-305.

56. Thubagere A, Reinhard BM. Nanoparticle-induced apoptosis propagates through hydrogen-peroxide-mediated bystander killing: insights from a human intestinal epithelium in vitro model. Acs Nano. 2010; 4: 3611-3622.

57. Bouwmeester H, Poortman J, Peters RJ, Wijma E, Kramer E, Makama S, Puspitaninganindita K, Marvin HJP, Peijnenburg AACM, Hendriksen PJM. Characterization of translocation of silver nanoparticles and effects on whole-genome gene expression using an in vitro intestinal epithelium coculture model. Acs Nano. 2011; 5: 4091-4103.

58. Yang X, Shao H, Liu W, Gu W, Shu X, Mo Y, Chen X, Zhang Q, Jiang M. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress are involved in ZnO nanoparticle-induced hepatotoxicity. Toxicol Lett. 2015; 234: 40-49.

59. Pavenstadt H, Kriz W, Kretzler M. Cell biology of the glomerular podocyte. Physiol Rev. 2003; 83: 253-307.

60. Xu J, Li Z, Xu P, Xiao L, Yang Z. Nanosized copper oxide induces apoptosis through oxidative stress in podocytes. Arch Toxicol. 2013; 87: 1067-1073.

61. Sarkar A, Das J, Manna PC, Sil P. Nano-copper induces oxidative stress and apoptosis in kidney via both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. Toxicology. 2011; 290: 208-217.

62. Suwa T, Hogg JC, Quinlan KB. Particulate air pollution induces progression of atherosclerosis. Am Coil Cardiol. 2002; 39: 935-942.

63. Xu Y, Wang SY, Yang J, Gu X, Zhang J, Zheng YF, Yang J, Xu L, Zhu XQ. Multiwall carbon nano-onions induce DNA damage and apoptosis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Environ Toxicol. 2013; 28: 442-450.

64. Cheng WW, Lin ZQ, Wei BF, Zeng Q, Han B, Wei CX, Fan XJ, Hu CL, Huang JH, Yang X, Xi ZG. Single-walled carbon nanotube induction of rat aortic endothelial cell apoptosis: reactive oxygen species are involved in the mitochondrial pathway. Int J Biochem Cell B. 2011, 43:564-572.

65. Orazizadeh M, Daneshi E, Hashemitmar M, Absalan F, Khorsandi L. Protective effect of beta-carotene against titanium dioxide nanoparticles induced apoptosis in mouse testicular tissue. Andrologia. 2015; 47: 816-825.

66. Ma D, Hou Y, Du L, Li N, Xuan R, Wang F, Jing W, Wang L. Oxidative damages and ultrastructral changes in the sperm of freshwater crab Sinopotamon henanense exposed to cadmium. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2013; 98: 244-249.

67. Kang B, Austin LA, El-Sayed MA. Observing real-time molecular event dynamics of apoptosis in living cancer cells using nuclear-targeted plasmonically enhanced raman nanoprobes. Acs Nano. 2014; 8: 4883-4892.

68. Fröhlich E, Samberger C, Kueznik T, Absenger M, Roblegg E, Zimmer A, Pieber TR. Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles is independent from oxidative stress. J Toxicol Sci. 2009; 34: 363-375.

69. Feng PH, Huang YL, Chuang KJ, Chen KY, Lee KY, Ho SC, Bien MY, Yang YL, Chuang HC. Dysfunction of methionine sulfoxide reductases to repair damaged proteins by nickel nanoparticles. Chem-Biol Interact. 2015; 236: 82-89.

70. Wong RSY. Apoptosis in cancer: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Exp Clin Canc Res. 2011; 30: 88.

71. Bertolotti A, Zhang Y, Hendershot, LM, Harding HP, Ron D. Dynamic interaction of BIP and ER stress transducers in the unfolded-protein response. Nat Cell Biol. 2000; 2: 326-332.

72. Rao RV, Poksay KS, Castro-Obregon S, Schilling B, Row RH, Rio F, Gibson BW, Ellerby HM, Bredesen DE. Molecular components of a cell death pathway activated by endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Biol Chem. 2004; 177-187.

73. Jeyaraj M, Sathishkumara G, Sivanandhana G, MubarakAlid D, Rajesha M, Arunc R, Kapildeva G, Manickavasagama M, Thajuddinb N, Premkumarc K, Ganapathia A. Biogenic silver nanoparticles for cancer treatment: An experimental report. Colloid Surface B. 2013; 106: 86-92.

74. Govender R, Phulukdaree A, Gengan RM, Anand K, Chuturgoon AA. Silver nanoparticles of Albizia adianthifolia: the induction of apoptosis in human lung carcinoma cell line. J Nanobiotecg. 2013; 11:5.

75. Durai P, Chinnasamy A, Gajendran B, Ramar M, Pappu S, Kasivelu G, Thirunavukkarasu A. Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using crystal compound of sodium para-hydroxybenzoate tetrahydrate isolated from Vitex negundo. L leaves and its apoptotic effect on human colon cancer cell lines. Eur J Med Chem. 2014; 84: 90-99.

76. Mata R, Nakkala JR, Sadras SR. Biogenic silver nanoparticles from Abulilon indicum: Their antioxidant, antibacterial and cytotoxic effects in vitro. Colloid Surface B. 2015; 128: 276-286.

77. Kang SJ, Ryoo IG, LeeYJ, Kwak MK. Role of the Nrf-heme oxygenase-1 pathway in silver nanoparticle-mediated cytotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharm. 2012; 258: 89-98.

78. Tang Y, Wang F, Jin C, Liang H, Zhong X, Yang Y. Mitochondrial injury induced by nanosized titanium dioxide in A549 cells and rats. Environ Toxicol Phar. 2013; 36, 66-72.

79. Gao W, Ji L, Li L, Gui G, Xu K, Li P, Tang B. Bifunctional combined Au-Fe2O3 nanoparticles for induction of cancer cell-specific apoptosis and real-time imaging. Biomaterials. 2012; 33: 3710-3718.

80. Chen X, Deng C, Tang S, Zhang M. Mitochondria-dependent apoptosis induced by nanoscale hydroxyapatite in human gastric cancer SGX-7901 cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007; 30: 128-132.

81. Shi Z, Huang X, Liu B, Tao H. Biological response of osteosarcoma cells to size-controlled nanostructured hydroxyapatite. J Biomater Appl. 2010; 25: 19-37.

82. Li G, Huang J, Zhang R, Deng B, Zhang J, Aoki H. In vitro study on influence of a discrete nano-hydroxyapatite on leukemia P388 cell behavior. Bio-Med Mater Eng. 2007; 17: 321-327.

83. Yoshida M, Hattoria H, Otaa S, Yoshihara K, Kodama N. Molybdenum balance in healthy young Japanese women. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2006; 20, 245252.

84. Tran TA, Krishnamoorthy K, Song YW, Cho SK, Kim SJ. Toxicity of nano molybdenum trioxide towards invasive breast cancer cells. Acs Appl Mater Inter. 2014; 6: 2980-2986.

85. Chen T, Wong YS, Zheng W, Bai Y, Huang L. Selenium nanoparticles fabricated in Undaria pinnatifida polysaccharide solutions induce mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in A375 human melanoma cells. Colloid Surface B. 2008; 67: 26-31.

86. An Y, Nie F, Wang Z, Zhang D. Preparation and characterization of realgar nanoparticles and their inhibitory effect on rat glioma cells. Int J Nanomed. 2011; 6: 3187-3194.

87. Charron DM, Chen J, Zheng G. Theranostic lipid nanoparticles for cancer medicine. Cancer Treat Res 2015; 166: 103-127.

88. Krpa P, ehák S, Diaz-Garcia D, Filip S. Nanotechnology - new trends in the treatment of brain tumours. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2014; 57: 142-150.

89. Vardharajula S, Ali SZ, Tiwari PM, Erolu E, Vig K, Dennis VA, Singh SR. Functionalized carbon nanotubes: biomedical applications. Int J Nanomed. 2012; 7: 5361-5537.

90. Schwartz GK, Shah MA. Targeting the Cell Cycle: A New Approach to Cancer Therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 9408-9421.

91. Dam DHM, Lee JH, Sisco PN, To DT, Zhang M, Wasielewski MR, Odom TW. Direct observation of nanoparticle-cancer cell nucleus interactions. Acs Nano. 2012; 6: 3318-3326.

92. Mkandawire MM, Lakatos M, Springer A, Clemens A, Appelhans D, Krause-Buchholz U, Pompe W, Rdel G, Mkandawire M. Induction of apoptosis in human cancer cells by targeting mitochondria with gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2015; 7, 10634-10640.

93. Morales-Cruz M, Figueroa CM, González-Robles T, Delgado Y, Molina A, Méndez J, Morales M, Griebenow K. Activation of caspase-dependent apoptosis by intracellular delivery of cytochrome c-based nanoparticles. J Nanobiotecg. 2014; 12: 33.

94. Chang JS, Kuo HP, Chang KLB, Kong ZL. Apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells induced by nanoencapsulated polysaccharides extracted from Antrodia camphorata. PLoS One. 2015; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0136782.

95. Chen BA, Dai YY, Wang XM, Zhang RY, Xu EL, Shen HL, Gao F, Sun Q, Deng XJ, Ding J, Gao C, Sun YY, Cheng J, Wang J, Zhao G, Chen NN. Synergistic effect of the combination of nanoparticulate Fe2O3 and Au with daunomycin on K562/A02 cells. Int J Nanomed. 2008; 3: 343-350.

96. Unak G, Ozkaya F, Medine EI, Kozgus O, Sakarya S, Bekis R, Unak P, Timur S. Gold nanoparticle probes: design and in vitro application in cancer culture. Colloid Surface B. 2012; 90: 217-226.

97. Li J, Cai P, Shalviri A, Henderson JT, He C, Foltz WD, Prasad P, Brodersen PM, Chen Y, DaCosta R, Rauth AM, Wu XY. A multifunctional polymeric nanotheranostic system delivers doxorubicin and imaging agents across the blood-brain barrier targeting brain metastases of breast cancer. Acs Nano. 2014; 8: 9925-9940.

98. Jadidi-Niaragh F, Atyabi F, Rastegari A, Mollarazi E, Kiani M, Razavi A, Yousefi M, Kheshtchin N, Hassannia H, Hadjati J, Shokri F. Downregulation of CD73 in 4T1 breast cancer cells through siRNA-loaded chitosan-lactate nanoparticles. Tumor Biol. 2016; doi. 10.1007/s13277-015-4732-0.

99. Fathabadi EG, Shelling AN, Al-Kassas†. Nanocarrier systems for delivery of siRNA to ovarian cancer tissues. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012; 9: 743-754.

100. Varshosaz J, Farzan M. Nanoparticles for targeted delivery of therapeutics and small interfering RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroentero. 2015; 21: 12022-12041.

101. Weinstein S, Toker IA, Emmanuel R, Ramishetti S, Hazan-Halevy I, Rosenblum D, Goldsmith M, Abrahamd A, Benjaminid O, Baireye O, Raananie P, Naglerd A, Lieberman J, Peer D. Harnessing RNAi-based nanomedicines for therapeutic gene silencing in B-cell malignancies. PNAS. 2015; E16-E22.

102. Raja SM, Desale SS, Mohapatra B, Luan H, Soni K, Zhang J, Storck MA, Feng D, Bielecki TA, Band V, Cohen SM, Bronich TK, Band H. Marked enhancement of lysosomal targeting and efficacy of ErbB2-targeted drug delivery by HSP90 inhibition. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:10522-35. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7231.

103. Zhu R, Zhang C, Liu Y, Yuan Z, Chen W, Yang S, Li J, Zhu W, Zhou X, You B, Zhang X. CD147 monoclonal antibody mediated by chitosan nanoparticles loaded with-hederin enhances antineoplastic activity and cellular uptake in liver cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:17904.

104. Kuo YC, Chao IW. Conjugation of melanotransferrin antibody on solid lipid nanoparticles for mediating brain cancer malignancy. Biotechnol Prog. 2015; doi. 10.1002/btpr.2214.

105. Palanca-Wessels MC, Booth GC, Convertine AJ, Lundy BB, Berguig GY, Press MF, Stayton PS, Press OW. Antibody targeting facilitates effective intratumoral siRNA nanoparticle delivery to HER2-overexpressing cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:9561-75. doi 10. 18632/oncotarget.7076.

106. Gurka MK, Pender D, Chuong P, Fouts BL, Sobelov A, McNally MW, Mezera M, Woo SY, McNally LR. Identification of pancreatic tumors in vivo with ligand-targeted, pH responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles by multispectral optoacoustic tomography. J Control Release. 2015; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.055.

107. Rodzinski A, Guduru R, Liang P, Hadjikhani A, Stewart T, Stimphil E, Runowicz C, Cote R, Altman N, Datar R, Khizroev S. Targeted and controlled anticancer drug delivery and release with magnetoelectric nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:20867.

108. Wilhelmi V, Fischer U, Berlo D, Schulze-Osthoff K, Schins RPF, Albrecht C. Evaluation of apoptosis induced by nanoparticles and fine particles in RAW 264.7 macrophages: Facts and artifacts. Toxicol in Vitro. 2012; 26: 323-334.

109. Asare N, Instanes C, Sandberg WJ, Refsnes M, Schwarze P, Kruszewski M, Brunborg G. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles in testicular cells. Toxicology. 2012; 291: 65-72.

110. Semisch A, Ohle J, Witt B, Hartwig A. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of nano- and microparticulate copper oxide: role of solubility and intracellular bioavailability. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014; 11:10.

111. Park J, Bauer S, Mark K, Schmuki P. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 2007; 7: 1686-1691.

112. Zhang Y, Ali SF, Bervishi E, Xu Y, Li Z, Casciano D, Biris AS. Cytotoxicity effects of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes in neural phaeochromocytoma-derived PC12. 2010, Asc Nano, 4: 3181-3186.

113. Xu Z, Liu C, Wei J, Sun J. Effects of four types of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles with different nanocrystal morphologies and sizes on apoptosis in rat osteoblasts. 2011, J Appl Toxicol, 32: 429-435.

114. Wang A, Pu K, Dong B, Liu Y, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Duan W, Zhu Y. Role of surface charge and oxidative in cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of graphene oxide towards human lung fibroblast cells. J Appl Toxicol. 2013; 33: 1156-1164.

115. Arvizo RR, Miranda OR, Thompson MA, Pabelick CM, Bhattacharya R, Robertson JD, Rotello VM, Prakash YS, Mukherjee P. Effect of nanoparticle surface charge at the plasma membrane and beyond. Nano Lett. 2010; 10: 2543-2548.

116. Loos Cornelia, Syrovets T, Musyanovych A, Mailänder V, Landfester K, Nienhaus GU, Simmet T. Functionalized polystyrene nanoparticles as a platform for studying bio-nano interactions. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2014; 2403-2412.

117. Hamzeh M, Sunahara GI. In vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity studies of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells. Toxicol in Vitro. 2013; 27: 864-873.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 8553