Oncotarget

Research Papers:

Landscape of activating cancer mutations in FGFR kinases and their differential responses to inhibitors in clinical use

Harshnira Patani, Tom D. Bunney, Nethaji Thiyagarajan, Richard A. Norman, Derek Ogg, Jason Breed, Paul Ashford, Andrew Potterton, Mina Edwards, Sarah V. Williams, Gary S. Thomson, Camilla S.M. Pang, Margaret A. Knowles, Alexander L. Breeze, Christine Orengo, Chris Phillips _ and Matilda Katan

PDF  |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2016; 7:24252-24268. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8132

Metrics: PDF 3394 views  |   HTML 5870 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Harshnira Patani1,*, Tom D. Bunney1,*, Nethaji Thiyagarajan1, Richard A. Norman2, Derek Ogg2, Jason Breed2, Paul Ashford1, Andrew Potterton1, Mina Edwards1, Sarah V. Williams3, Gary S. Thomson4, Camilla S.M. Pang1, Margaret A. Knowles3, Alexander L. Breeze4, Christine Orengo1, Chris Phillips2, Matilda Katan1

1Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, UK

2Discovery Sciences, AstraZeneca, Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG, UK

3Section of Experimental Oncology, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK

4Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

*These authors have contributed equally to this work

Correspondence to:

Tom D. Bunney, e-mail: [email protected]

Matilda Katan, e-mail: [email protected]

Keywords: precision medicine, cancer mutations, receptor tyrosine kinases, small molecule inhibitors, resistance

Received: December 15, 2015    Accepted: February 28, 2016    Published: March 16, 2016

ABSTRACT

Frequent genetic alterations discovered in FGFRs and evidence implicating some as drivers in diverse tumors has been accompanied by rapid progress in targeting FGFRs for anticancer treatments. Wider assessment of the impact of genetic changes on the activation state and drug responses is needed to better link the genomic data and treatment options. We here apply a direct comparative and comprehensive analysis of FGFR3 kinase domain variants representing the diversity of point-mutations reported in this domain. We reinforce the importance of N540K and K650E and establish that not all highly activating mutations (for example R669G) occur at high-frequency and conversely, that some “hotspots” may not be linked to activation. Further structural characterization consolidates a mechanistic view of FGFR kinase activation and extends insights into drug binding. Importantly, using several inhibitors of particular clinical interest (AZD4547, BGJ-398, TKI258, JNJ42756493 and AP24534), we find that some activating mutations (including different replacements of the same residue) result in distinct changes in their efficacy. Considering that there is no approved inhibitor for anticancer treatments based on FGFR-targeting, this information will be immediately translatable to ongoing clinical trials.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 8132