Oncotarget

Research Papers:

Decision aid on breast cancer screening reduces attendance rate: results of a large-scale, randomized, controlled study by the DECIDEO group

Aurelie Bourmaud _, Patricia Soler-Michel, Mathieu Oriol, Véronique Regnier, Fabien Tinquaut, Alice Nourissat, Alain Bremond, Nora Moumjid and Franck Chauvin

PDF  |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2016; 7:12885-12892. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7332

Metrics: PDF 1564 views  |   HTML 2802 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Aurelie Bourmaud1,2, Patricia Soler-Michel3, Mathieu Oriol1,4 , Véronique Regnier1, Fabien Tinquaut1, Alice Nourissat 1, Alain Bremond4, Nora Moumjid5,6,7 and Franck Chauvin1,2,4

1 Hygée Centre, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institut, CIC-EC Inserm 1408, Saint Priest en Jarez, France

2 EMR3738, Therapeutic Targeting in Oncology, Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France

3 Adémas-69, association pour le dépistage organisé des cancers dans le Rhône, Lyon, France

4 Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France

5 Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France

6 GATE-LSE UMR 5824 CNRS, Lyon, France

7 Léon Bérard Cancer Centre, Lyon, France

Correspondence to:

Aurélie Bourmaud, email:

Keywords: breast cancer screening, decision aid, informed decision, decision making patient education, randomized control trial

Received: October 30, 2015 Accepted: January 27, 2016 Published: February 11, 2016

Abstract

Controversies regarding the benefits of breast cancer screening programs have led to the promotion of new strategies taking into account individual preferences, such as decision aid. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a decision aid leaflet on the participation of women invited to participate in a national breast cancer screening program. This Randomized, multicentre, controlled trial. Women aged 50 to 74 years, were randomly assigned to receive either a decision aid or the usual invitation letter. Primary outcome was the participation rate 12 months after the invitation. 16 000 women were randomized and 15 844 included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The participation rate in the intervention group was 40.25% (3174/7885 women) compared with 42.13% (3353/7959) in the control group (p = 0.02). Previous attendance for screening (RR = 6.24; [95%IC: 5.75-6.77]; p < 0.0001) and medium household income (RR = 1.05; [95%IC: 1.01-1.09]; p = 0.0074) were independently associated with attendance for screening. This large-scale study demonstrates that the decision aid reduced the participation rate. The decision aid activate the decision making process of women toward non-attendance to screening. These results show the importance of promoting informed patient choices, especially when those choices cannot be anticipated.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 7332