Oncotarget

Editorial:

Notching up a new therapeutic strategy for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC)

PDF |  HTML  |  How to cite  |  Order a Reprint

Oncotarget. 2012; 3:917-918. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.671

Metrics: PDF 1139 views  |   HTML 1212 views  |   ?  

Antonio Maraver _ and Manuel Serrano

671.html

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death in the world. Current therapies are only partially successful and relapse is frequent in a large number of patients. Hence, new therapeutic strategies are needed to improve the quality of life and survival of NSCLC patients.

The Notch pathway is a key pathway involved in cell fate determination during development and also in tissue homeostasis during adulthood [1]. Deregulation of the Notch pathway has been implicated in many human diseases including cancer. Interestingly, the Notch pathway can be oncogenic or tumor suppressive depending on the cellular type. For example, gain-of-function mutations that hyperactivate the pathway are a common cause of acute T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), while head and neck squamous cancers present loss-of-function mutations of the Notch pathway [1]. In the case of NSCLC, gain-of-function mutations have been found in a small percentage of patients [2, 3] and high Notch pathway activity correlates with poor prognosis [3, 4].

In our recent work [4], we have used a mouse model with a latent genetically-engineered oncogenic Kras that can be experimentally induced on adult mice resulting in NSCLC [5]. Importantly, loss-of-function of the Notch pathway completely prevented the generation of NSCLCs [4]. This indicates that oncogenic Kras-driven lung carcinogenesis is strictly dependent on the presence of a functional Notch pathway.

The Notch pathway cooperates with the KRAS pathway in the hyperactivation of ERK in NSCLC.

Figure 1: The Notch pathway cooperates with the KRAS pathway in the hyperactivation of ERK in NSCLC.

Previous studies have demonstrated that phosphorylated ERK is a critical mediator of oncogenic Kras-driven NSCLC [6-8]. Interestingly, our mechanistic studies in murine and human cells revealed that an important, unsuspected, function of the Notch pathway is to contribute to the hyperactivation of ERK [4]. This is accomplished, at least in part, through the transcriptional repression of DUSP1, an inhibitory phosphatase of ERK (Figure 1). Moreover, in primary human NSCLC there is an inverse correlation between Notch pathway activity and DUSP1 levels [4].

Gamma-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) have been used during the last years to inhibit the Notch pathway [9]. Importantly, we found that authochtonous murine Kras-driven NSCLC, detected by positron emission tomography (PET), arrested their growth after 15 days of GSI treatment (with Eli Lilly´s GSI LSN-411575). This therapeutic response was associated to biomarkers of Notch pathway inhibition and ERK dephosphorylation [4].

Our results open a new therapeutic opportunity to treat NSCLC using GSIs. Interestingly, GSIs have been used in long-term treatments in Alzheimer´s patients without major side effects (although without improving the course of the disease). The accumulated knowledge on the pharmacology of GSIs should pave the way to test these compounds in NSCLC patients. MEK inhibitors (MEKi) have shown some therapeutic activity in murine Kras-driven NSCLC [10]. In this context, combined MEKi and GSIs constitute a very attractive dual agent therapy for NSCLC.

Antonio Maraver: Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, Spain

Manuel Serrano: Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, Spain

Correspondence:

Antonio Maraver, email:

Manuel Serrano, email:

Received: September 20, 2012;

Published: September 20, 2012;

References

1. C. Lobry, P. Oh, I. Aifantis J Exp Med. 208 (2011) 1931.

2. T.P. Dang, A.F. Gazdar, A.K. Virmani et al J Natl Cancer Inst. 92 (2000) 1355.

3. B. Westhoff, I.N. Colaluca, G. D’Ario et al Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106 (2009) 22293.

4. A. Maraver, P.J. Fernandez-Marcos, D. Herranz et al Cancer Cell. 22 (2012) 222.

5. C. Guerra, N. Mijimolle, A. Dhawahir et al Cancer Cell. 4 (2003) 111.

6. M.R. Junttila, A.N. Karnezis, D. Garcia et al Nature. 468 (2010) 567.

7. D.M. Feldser, K.K. Kostova, M.M. Winslow et al Nature. 468 (2010) 572.

8. R.B. Blasco, S. Francoz, D. Santamaria et al Cancer Cell. 19 (2011) 652.

9. M.S. Wolfe Semin Cell Dev Biol. 20 (2009) 219.

10. J.A. Engelman, L. Chen, X. Tan et al Nat Med. 14 (2008) 1351.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 671