Research Papers: Gerotarget (Focus on Aging):
Epigallocatechin gallate affects glucose metabolism and increases fitness and lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster
Metrics: HTML 1735 views | ?
Anika E. Wagner1, Stefanie Piegholdt1, Doerte Rabe1, Nieves Baenas1,2, Anke Schloesser1, Manfred Eggersdorfer3, Achim Stocker4, Gerald Rimbach1
1Institute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
2Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Campus Universitario de Espinardo, Murcia, Spain
3DSM Nutritional Products, Basel, Switzerland
4Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Anika E. Wagner, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Gerald Rimbach, e-mail: email@example.com
Keywords: Gerotarget, epigallocathechin-3-gallate, green tea, life span, Drosophila melanogaster
Received: July 07, 2015 Accepted: August 28, 2015 Published: September 08, 2015
In this study, we tested whether a standardized epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) rich green tea extract (comprising > 90% EGCG) affects fitness and lifespan as well as parameters of glucose metabolism and energy homeostasis in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Following the application of the green tea extract a significant increase in the mean lifespan (+ 3.3 days) and the 50% survival (+ 4.3 days) as well as improved fitness was detected. These effects went along an increased expression of Spargel, the homolog of mammalian PGC1α, which has been reported to affect lifespan in flies. Intriguingly, in flies, treatment with the green tea extract decreased glucose concentrations, which were accompanied by an inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase activity. Computational docking analysis proved the potential of EGCG to dock into the substrate binding pocket of α-amylase and to a greater extent into α-glucosidase. Furthermore, we demonstrate that EGCG downregulates insulin-like peptide 5 and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, major regulators of glucose metabolism, as well as the Drosophila homolog of leptin, unpaired 2. We propose that a decrease in glucose metabolism in connection with an upregulated expression of Spargel contribute to the better fitness and the extended lifespan in EGCG-treated flies.
The consumption of green tea (Camellia sinensis) has been associated with various health benefits [1–4]. The leaves of green tea offer a wide spectrum of different phytochemicals that may vary according to environmental conditions and processing procedures. Approximately 30% of the green tea dry weight comes from polyphenols of which 60–80% are catechins . Catechins and in particular epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), which accounts for up to 80% of the catechins, are suggested to mediate the health-promoting effects of green tea [6–8].
In fact, studies in various model organisms indicate a lifespan extension by green tea and EGCG treatment. This has been shown in both invertebrates and in mammalian species [9–13]. However, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms are not clear. Bartholome and colleagues observed higher levels of the FoxO ortholog DAF-16, which increased the expression of its target gene Sod-3, and extended lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans . In Drosophila melanogaster, EGCG extended lifespan via an induction of endogenous antioxidant enzymes . Additionally, in mice receiving tea polyphenols from the 13th month of life onward, lifespan was significantly longer than in the corresponding control animals . Furthermore, rats treated with EGCG also exhibited a significantly longer lifespan that was accompanied by a decrease in inflammation and oxidative stress as well as an increase of FOXO3a and SIRT1, both centrally involved in the regulation of longevity . It has been demonstrated that aging is associated with a decrease in mitochondrial biogenesis and in consequence with a loss in the expression of PPARγ co-activator α (PGC1α), the master switch of energy metabolism [15, 16]. Interestingly, green tea polyphenols have been shown to induce both PGC1α mRNA and protein expression in male Sprague-Dawley rats .
The aim of the present study was to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the lifespan extending effect of a caffeine-free green tea extract containing more than 90% EGCG in Drosophila melanogaster. We analyzed the regulatory effects of EGCG on parameters involved in energy homeostasis and glucose metabolism. In addition, fitness, as marker for an improved health span, was assessed.
EGCG extends lifespan and improves fitness in Drosophila melanogaster
The application of 10 mg/ml EGCG increased the mean lifespan (+ 3.3 days) and the 50% survival (+ 4.3 days) compared to control flies (Figure 1a). Flies reared on EGCG-supplemented medium for 30 days exhibited a significantly higher fitness level in the climbing assay than the control flies (Figure 1b).
Figure 1: Effect of EGCG (10 mg/ml) supplementation on lifespan in male W1118 Drosophila melanogaster. a. One representative experiment out of two is shown. n = 120 flies per group, p < 0.05 log-rank test. b. Relative fitness levels of male W1118 Drosophila melanogaster reared on an EGCG (10 mg/ml)-supplemented diet for 30 days. The data are expressed as the mean + SEM (n = 100). * indicates significant differences compared to the control group (p < 0.05, Student's t-test).
EGCG inhibits α-amylase and α-glucosidase in vitro and in vivo and decreases glucose levels in Drosophila melanogaster
EGCG dose-dependently inhibited both α-amylase and α-glucosidase in vitro (Figure 2a, 2b). Accordingly, flies reared for 10 days on the EGCG-supplemented diet showed significantly lower levels of both amylase (Figure 2c) and α-glucosidase activity (Figure 2d). As shown in Figure 2e, glucose levels were lowered by 25% following EGCG-treatment.
Figure 2: EGCG-dependent inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase activity in vitro (a, b) and in vivo (c, d) and decrease of glucose levels in vivo (e). Dose-dependent inhibition of a. α-amylase and b. α-glucosidase by EGCG in vitro. The data are expressed as the mean + SEM (n = 3). c. α-amylase activity, d. α-glucosidase activity, and e. glucose levels of male W1118 Drosophila melanogaster relative to fly weights. Flies were reared on an EGCG (10 mg/ml)-supplemented or control diet for 10 days. The data are expressed as the mean + SEM (n = 5–6, indicating extraction from 5–6 × 5 flies). * indicates significant differences in EGCG-treated flies compared to flies fed control medium for 10 days (p < 0.05, Student's t-test).
Molecular docking of EGCG on human salivary α-amylase
In order to gain insight into the putative binding mode of EGCG with human salivary α-amylase blind docking for EGCG with the crystallographic model of apo-amylase was carried out . Figure 3a illustrates a predicted binding mode of EGCG snugly fitting into the left arm of the polysaccharide-binding cleft of human salivary amylase. The binding free energies of a cluster of eight binding poses were averaged (−7.29 kcal/mol ± SEM = 0.056 kcal/mol) to estimate the affinity from the predicted binding intensities of the docking interaction of EGCG at the active site of human salivary α-amylase. The 3D-superposition of the pig amylase:acarbose inhibitor-complex with the in silico model of human salivary α-amylase:EGCG complex produced steric clashes of the inhibitor with EGCG in close proximity to the active site.
Figure 3: Predicted binding modes of EGCG docked with the X-ray structure of human salivary α-amylase and with the homology model of α-glucosidase from baker's yeast. a. The interaction between EGCG and human salivary α-amylase. Illustration of the surface of the substrate binding cleft with bound EGCG (green sticks) and the 3D-superposed acarbose (yellow sticks) from pancreatic α-amylase to visualize pseudo-substrate position (yellow) within the ligand binding cleft relative to docked EGCG inhibitor (green). b. The interaction between EGCG and α-glucosidase from baker's yeast. Illustration of the surface of the substrate binding cavity bound to its competitive inhibitor maltose (grey sticks) relative to docked EGCG (green sticks). Images were depicted using the Pymol software.
α-Glucosidase homology model preparation and molecular docking of EGCG
Using the web-based SWISS-MODEL service dedicated to protein structure homology modeling  a α-glucosidase homology model was built. Blind docking for EGCG with the homology model of α-glucosidase was carried out using the web-based SwissDock service . Figure 3b illustrates the predicted binding mode of EGCG plugging the entry of the substrate-binding cavity of the α-glucosidase. The binding free energies of a cluster of eight binding poses were averaged (−7.44 kcal/mol ± SEM = 0.001 kcal/mol) to estimate the affinity from the predicted binding intensities of the docking interaction of EGCG at the entry of the binding pocket of α-glucosidase.
EGCG affects the expression of biomarkers related to energy homeostasis and energy metabolism
Flies treated with EGCG for 10 days exhibited higher levels of p-AMPK protein as depicted in Figure 4a. Furthermore, flies housed on an EGCG-supplemented diet showed significantly higher levels of spargel (srl) mRNA expression than the corresponding control flies (Figure 4b). Srl is the fly homolog of human PPARγ-co-activator 1α (PGC1α), the master regulator of energy homeostasis. The mRNA expression of unpaired 2 (upd2), the homolog of human leptin, was significantly lowered in flies that had received EGCG for 10 days compared to control animals (Figure 4c). In addition, the key enzyme of gluconeogenesis, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (Pepck; Figure 4d), and insulin-like peptide 5 (Ilp5; Figure 4e) were significantly downregulated following EGCG-treatment for 10 days in comparison to flies receiving CM. Furthermore, the expression of Ilp2, Ilp3, and Ilp6 as well as the expression of the glucose transporters Glut1, Glut3 and Glut4EF was not affected by EGCG treatment (data not shown).
Figure 4: Protein (a) and mRNA (b-e) levels of genes involved in energy homeostasis in Drosophila melanogaster. a. p-AMPK protein levels analyzed in whole fly homogenates following a 10 day treatment of male W1118 Drosophila melanogaster with 10 mg/ml EGCG. b. spargel (srl), c. unpaired 2 (upd2), d. phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (Pepck), and e. insulin-like peptide 5 (Ilp5) mRNA levels of genes involved in energy homeostasis measured in whole fly homogenates after a 10 day supplementation period of male W1118 Drosophila melanogaster with 10 mg/ml EGCG. The data are expressed as the mean + SEM (n = 3, indicating extraction from 3 × 5 flies). * indicates significant differences in EGCG-treated flies compared to flies fed control medium for 10 days (p < 0.05, Student's t-test).
In the present study we used Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism in order to elucidate the effect of EGCG on glucose metabolism, fitness and lifespan. Drosophila melanogaster offers a wide variety of advantages. This includes a short generation time, a reasonable number of offspring and a relatively short lifespan. Furthermore, it possesses defined organs including gut, brain and fat body. Drosophila melanogaster holds a complex and dynamic gut exhibiting a similar structure and organization like the mammalian gut predestining it as a feasible model organism in nutrition research [32–35]. The application of the EGCG-rich green tea extract significantly extended lifespan in male flies. Similarly to our results indicating that EGCG only extended the lifespan in male but not in female flies (data not shown), Lopez and co-workers found that lifespan is only extended in male but not in female Drosophila melanogaster following EGCG application . It has also been shown that in male flies a lifelong intake of 10 mg/ml green tea catechin extract extended the mean lifespan (59 ± 2.8 days) compared to the corresponding control flies (51 ± 2.0 days) .
We identified EGCG as an inhibitor of α-amylase and α-glucosidase, which may cause the attenuated glucose levels in our flies as the expression levels of the glucose transporters were not affected. We could also show via computational docking studies that EGCG fits into binding boxes of both α-amylase and α-glucosidase. In the case of α-amylase the docking results indicate competitive inhibition by EGCG through a single high-affinity binding site located close to the active center. In contrary docking with α-glucosidase rather suggests a noncompetitive inhibition mode with EGCG blocking the entry of the deeply buried substrate-binding site. Our results also demonstrate that the blocking effect of EGCG is stronger with regard to α-glucosidase than α-amylase. Interestingly, a recent study conducted by Harrison and co-workers identified the α-amylase inhibitor acarbose as a compound that extends lifespan in mice .
Tinkerhess and colleagues showed that, as in mammals, endurance exercise caused an upregulation of the PGC1α homolog srl in Drosophila melanogaster. Interestingly, in mutant srl flies, the positive effect of exercise is abolished whereas an overexpression of srl in the muscle and the heart of the mutant flies improved some exercise-related physiological parameters . A 30 day application of the EGCG-rich tea extract to our flies resulted in improved climbing activity that may be related to the significant increase of the srl expression and consequently to a potential increase in mitochondrial biogenesis. These characteristics may also contribute to the extension in lifespan. The weakness of the current study is a missing experiment with srl mutant flies. Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of EGCG on srl mutants.
We were able to detect changes in the expression of parameters involved in energy metabolism. With regard to the insulin-like peptides (Ilps), Ilp5 was found to be significantly downregulated by EGCG in our Drosophila melanogaster. Min and co-workers also observed a downregulation of Ilp5 mRNA levels following dietary restriction [38, 39], and another group demonstrated that yeast dietary restriction (DR) (in the fly medium the percentage of yeast was decreased although the percentage of carbohydrate remained constant) caused a downregulation of both Ilp5 mRNA and protein levels [38, 40]. At the same time, the glucose levels in our EGCG-treated flies were significantly lower than in the corresponding control flies, which may explain the extension in lifespan by EGCG. Glucose has been described as a pro-aging factor that interferes with all relevant regulators of the aging process [41, 42]. This has also been reported by Schulz and co-workers who observed a decrease in lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans due to high glucose availability while glucose restriction resulted in an extended lifespan through an induction of the mitochondrial respiration . The downregulation of the rate-controlling enzyme in gluconeogenesis, Pepck, may have also contributed to the lower glucose levels in our EGCG-treated flies. This result is in contrast to the fact that an increase in PGC1α is related to an upregulation of gluconeogenesis including an induction of Pepck . Indeed, our results are supported by two recent studies. Aatsinki and co-workers  showed an upregulation of hepatic PGC1α and a simultaneous impairment of hepatic Pepck by metformin treatment in both human primary hepatocytes and mice. Metformin is an anti-diabetic drug used clinically for decades and known for its AMPK-inducing and lifespan extending effects [46–49]. Doan et al.  treated mice with gallic acid (GA), a natural polyphenol, and observed a significant induction of AMPK activation accompanied by an increase in PGC1α and a decrease in Pepck expression. In Caenorhabditis elegans it has been shown that aak-2, a homolog of the mammalian AMPK, is essentially required to extend lifespan due to glucose restriction. Schulz and colleagues suggest that the glucose restriction increases the levels of reactive oxygen species resulting in an induction of the endogenous antioxidant machinery consequently leading to an improved stress resistance which the authors refer to as “mitohormesis” . The inhibition of gluconeogenesis in the present study may be at least partly mediated through an induction of AMPK by EGCG . These results may imply that an EGCG treatment mimics the effects of caloric restriction (CR). To date, CR is the only established method to extend health and lifespan in primates [52–54].
Our results indicate that EGCG significantly extended lifespan in male flies, which was accompanied by improved fitness. For the first time, we confirmed the inhibitory effect of EGCG on α-amylase and α-glucosidase activity in vitro and in vivo in Drosophila melanogaster. Computational docking analysis proved the potential of EGCG to dock into the substrate binding pocket of α-amylase and to a greater extent into α-glucosidase. By lowering the activity of these enzymes, EGCG causes a decrease in calorie uptake resulting in lower levels of glucose and Ilp5. The lowered energy intake also causes a significant downregulation of the leptin homolog upd2. The inhibition of the rate-limiting enzyme of gluconeogenesis, Pepck, is potentially mediated through an activation of AMPK by EGCG, which also causes the significant upregulation of PGC1α srl, the master switch of mitochondrial biogenesis. The postulated mechanism is summarized in Figure 5.
Figure 5: Schematic summary of the postulated mechanism how EGCG mediates lifespan extension and improved fitness in Drosophila melanogaster (for detailed description see text).
Energy excess is the main cause of accelerated aging . Limiting calorie intake may counteract the deleterious effects of aging . We propose that EGCG may function as a potential caloric restriction mimetic, thereby affecting health and lifespan, which needs to be confirmed in future in vivo studies in mammalian species.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Drosophila melanogaster stocks
In the present study W1118 wild-type Drosophila melanogaster were used for all experiments. Flies were maintained under conventional conditions on 10% Caltech (CT) medium (5.5% dextrose, 3.0% sucrose [both Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany], 6.0% corn meal, 2.5% inactive dry yeast, 1.0% agar, 0.3% nipagin [all Dominique Dutscher SAS, Brumath, France] and 0.3% propionic acid [Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany]) in a constant climate chamber (HPP 1018, Memmert, Schwabach, Germany) with a temperature of 25°C, 60% relative humidity and a 12-h day/night cycle. For all experiments, age-matched flies from synchronized eggs were used.
In order to exclude differences in food intake as reason for differing results between control flies and tea polyphenol treated flies, the gustatory assay was performed using the method of Bahadorani et al. . Fifteen flies were either kept on control medium (CM; 5% sucrose, 8.6% corn meal, 5% inactive dry yeast, 0.5% agar) or isocaloric CM supplemented with 10 mg/ml tea polyphenols (EGCG; Teavigo, DSM, Basel, Switzerland). They were reared under standard conditions (25°C, 60% relative humidity, 12-h day/night cycle), and the medium was changed at least 2 times during this period. After 5 days, flies were transferred onto CM or EGCG stained with 0.2% sulforhodamine B sodium salt (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and kept under standard conditions for 15 h. Flies were anesthetized and sorted to an arbitrary redness index of their abdomens (colorless = 0, partly colored = 0.5, fully red colored = 1.0). The food intake did not differ between control flies and EGCG-treated flies.
Twelve vials containing 20 male flies each were divided into two groups. One group (n = 120) received CM; the other group (n = 120) received the EGCG-supplemented diet. Flies were reared under standard conditions (25°C, 60% relative humidity, 12-h day/night cycle), and the medium was changed every 2–3 days. This procedure was adopted for all experiments of the study if not otherwise noted. Dead flies were counted every 2–3 days and analyzed for survivorship using dLife .
Climbing ability was assayed as an indicator of overall fitness of the flies. Flies were maintained under standard conditions and received either CM (n = 100) or EGCG (n = 100) for 30 days. On day 30, the flies were transferred into empty vials and the RING-assay described by Gargano et al.  was performed. In brief, vials with 10 flies each were placed in a box containing a metering rule. The vial-containing box was rapidly tapped three times on the table, and a photo was taken after 4 s of climbing time. This procedure was repeated ten times with a 30 second break between trials. Data analysis was performed using the method of Bazzell et al.  with modifications.
Flies were maintained either on CM (n = 15) or EGCG (n = 15) under standard conditions for 10 days. Five flies were homogenized in 250 μl PBS plus 0.01% Triton™ X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) using a Qiagen TissueLyser II (Hilden, Germany) at 4°C and 5000 × g for 10 min. Fly lysates were centrifuged at 5000 × g at 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant was removed and stored at −80°C until use. Glucose levels were detected by Fluitest®GLU (Analyticon Biotechnologies, Lichtenfels, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sample concentrations were calculated via the standard curve and related to the corresponding fly weights per fly.
In vitro α-amylase and α-glucosidase assay
The α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition assay was performed using the method of Phan et al.  with modifications. To test α-glucosidase inhibition, 50 μl of test sample/H2O were mixed with 100 mmol/l KH2PO4 (pH = 6.8) and 50 μl α-glucosidase (0.5 U/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and incubated at 37°C for 5 min. One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that is needed for the liberation of 1 μmol of p-nitrophenol from p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG). Subsequently, 50 μl of 10 mmol/l pNPG was added, mixed and incubated at 37°C for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 2 mol/l Na2CO3. The absorbance of the liberated p-nitrophenol was measured at 405 nm in a plate reader (Tecan, Crailsheim, Germany). To test for α-amylase inhibition, 50 μl of test sample/H2O were mixed with 50 μl 1% starch solution and 50 μl α-amylase (10 U/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and incubated at 20°C for 3 min. Subsequently, 50 μl of color reagent (44 mM 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic Acid Solution (DNS) with 1.1 M Sodium Potassium Tartrate Solution) and 50 μl α-amylase (as a control) were added, mixed, spun down and incubated at 99°C for 15 min. After cooling, 450 μl H2O was added, and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm in a plate reader (Tecan, Crailsheim, Germany). The % inhibition of enzyme activity was calculated by the following formula ((Δ H2O - Δ sample)/Δ H2O)*100; Δ = absorbance test group (including enzyme) - absorbance control group (without enzyme). Acarbose was used as positive control. Acarbose and EGCG were dissolved in H2O.
In vivo α-glucosidase and amylase activity assay
Flies were maintained either on CM (n = 39) or EGCG (n = 39) under standard conditions for 10 days. Per group, 13 male flies were homogenized in 250 μl Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS (Gibco, Darmstadt, Germany) using a Qiagen TissueLyser II (Hilden, Germany). Homogenates were centrifuged at 13,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min. Supernatants were removed and used for enzyme activity measurements.
The α-glucosidase activity assay (MAK123, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The amylase activity assay (MAK009, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) was conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions. Enzyme activities were related to the corresponding fly weights per fly.
X-ray structural models of human salivary α-amylase (PDB ID: 1SMD ), isomaltase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (PDB ID: 3A4A ) and pig pancreatic α-amylase (PDB ID: 1PPI ) were obtained from the Protein Data Bank at Brookhaven. The EGCG 3D-structure was obtained from the Zinc database (EGCG: Zinc ID 3870412) . The human salivary α-amylase structure was prepared for docking by removing from the crystallographic structure ions and water molecules. Since the salivary R-amylase X-ray structure does not contain hydrogen atoms, H-atoms were added to the enzyme prior to docking by the SwissDock web-service . (The web service SwissDock is based on fast docking using the CHARMM force field with the docking software EADock DSS ). For structure homology modeling the sequence of α-glucosidase (gi|411229) from baker's yeast and the high resolution X-ray structure of isomaltase (PDB ID: 3A4A ) were submitted to the web-based service of SwissModel  along previously reported methods . The obtained target-template sequence similarity (SID = 72.3) and the global model quality estimation (GMQE = 0.92) were judged to be suitable for docking experiments. Molecular analyses were performed with the UCSF Chimera package. Chimera is developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco (supported by NIGMS P41-GM103311) .
RNA isolation and real time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from 5 flies per sample using peqGOLD TriFast™ (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance with a NanoDrop® spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Langenselbold, Germany), and the RNA purity was assessed by calculating the 260/280-nm and 260/230-nm ratios. RNA aliquots were stored at −80°C until the PCR was performed. The primers for Drosophila melanogaster genes were designed using Primer3 software and were synthesized and purchased from MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany (see Table 1). The real time PCR was performed using the SensiFast™ SYBR® No-ROX One-Step kit (Quantace, Berlin, Germany) on a Rotor-Gene 6000 cycler (Corbett Life Science, Sydney, Australia). The relative mRNA levels of the target genes were calculated relative to the expression of the housekeeping gene ribosomal protein l32 (rpl32).
Table 1: Primer sequences (Drosophila melanogaster) used for real time PCR
forward primer (5′ → ‘3)
reverse primer (3′ → ‘5)
annealing temperature (°C)
Abbreviations: Ilp5 = insulin-like peptide 5; Pepck = phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; rpl32 = ribosomal protein l32; upd2 = unpaired 2; bp = base pairs
Per group, 5 flies were homogenized in RIPA buffer (50 mmol/l Tris, 150 mmol/l NaCl, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate (v/v), 0.1% SDS (w/v) and 1% NP-40 (v/v), at pH 7.4) supplemented with phosphatase and proteinase inhibitors in a Qiagen TissueLyser II (Hilden, Germany). Samples were incubated on ice for 30 min and centrifuged at 13,000 × g at 4°C for 20 min. The supernatant was aliquoted and stored at −80°C until analysis. Protein concentrations were detected using the Pierce™ BCA protein assay kit (Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A quantity of 50 μg of each sample was heated with loading buffer and separated on a 4–20% ready-to-use gel (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany). Then, samples were transferred onto a polyvinylidenedifluoride membrane (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) and blocked with 5% (w/v) skim milk dissolved in Tris-buffered saline + 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 for 2 h. Membranes were probed overnight with p-AMPK (#2535, 1:1000, Cell Signaling, Frankfurt, Germany), AMPK (#ab80039, 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and α-tubulin (#2125, 1:1000 Cell Signaling, Frankfurt, Germany) primary antibodies followed by incubation with the corresponding secondary antibodies, anti-rabbit (1:4000, Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) for p-AMPK and α-tubulin and anti-mouse (1:4000, Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) for AMPK, at room temperature for 1 h. Bands were visualized with ECL substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany) in a ChemiDoc XRS System (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) using Quantity One Software (version 4.6.3; Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany).
Analysis of lifespan and stress test experiments was performed with dLife (freeware, available from the laboratory of Scott Pletcher, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Survival was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier approach, and significant differences were calculated applying the log-rank test with the dLife program based on R. Mean and median survival times were calculated with SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). All other data were analyzed for significant differences using a one-way ANOVA followed by a Student's t-test. All data were tested for normality of distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk) and homogeneity of variances (Levene's test). P < 0.05 was considered significant. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Manfred Eggersdorfer is an employee of DSM Nutritional Products, Basel, Switzerland and provided funding for this study.
1. Chacko SM, Thambi PT, Kuttan R, Nishigaki I. Beneficial effects of green tea: a literature review. Chin Med. 2010; 5:13–21.
2. Boon N. Health potential for functional green teas? Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2008; 78:275–281.
3. Wu D, Guo Z, Ren Z, Guo W, Meydani SN. Green tea EGCG suppresses T cell proliferation through impairment of IL-2/IL-2 receptor signaling. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009; 47:636–643.
4. Yan J, Zhao Y, Suo S, Liu Y, Zhao B. Green tea catechins ameliorate adipose insulin resistance by improving oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012; 52:1648–1657.
5. Rains TM, Agarwal S, Maki KC. Antiobesity effects of green tea catechins: a mechanistic review. J Nutr Biochem. 2011; 22:1–7.
6. Cabrera C, Artacho R, Gimenez R. Beneficial effects of green tea—a review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2006; 25:79–99.
7. Reygaert WC. The antimicrobial possibilities of green tea. Front Microbiol. 2014; 5:434(1–8).
8. Kim HS, Quon MJ, Kim JA. New insights into the mechanisms of polyphenols beyond antioxidant properties; lessons from the green tea polyphenol, epigallocatechin 3-gallate. Redox Biol. 2014; 2:187–195.
9. Kitani K, Osawa T, Yokozawa T. The effects of tetrahydrocurcumin and green tea polyphenol on the survival of male C57BL/6 mice. Biogerontology. 2007; 8:567–573.
10. Niu Y, Na L, Feng R, Gong L, Zhao Y, Li Q, Li Y, Sun C. The phytochemical, EGCG, extends lifespan by reducing liver and kidney function damage and improving age-associated inflammation and oxidative stress in healthy rats. Aging Cell. 2013; 12:1041–1049.
11. Bonilla-Ramirez L, Jimenez-Del-Rio M, Velez-Pardo C. Low doses of paraquat and polyphenols prolong life span and locomotor activity in knock-down parkin Drosophila melanogaster exposed to oxidative stress stimuli: implication in autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism. Gene. 2013; 512:355–363.
12. Li YM, Chan HY, Huang Y, Chen ZY. Green tea catechins upregulate superoxide dismutase and catalase in fruit flies. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007; 51:546–554.
13. Lopez T, Schriner SE, Okoro M, Lu D, Chiang BT, Huey J, Jafari M. Green tea polyphenols extend the lifespan of male drosophila melanogaster while impairing reproductive fitness. J Med Food. 2014; 17:1314–1321.
14. Bartholome A, Kampkotter A, Tanner S, Sies H, Klotz LO. Epigallocatechin gallate-induced modulation of FoxO signaling in mammalian cells and C. elegans: FoxO stimulation is masked via PI3K/Akt activation by hydrogen peroxide formed in cell culture. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010; 501:58–64.
15. Anderson R, Prolla T. PGC-1alpha in aging and anti-aging interventions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009; 1790:1059–1066.
16. Wagner AE, Ernst IMA, Birringer M, Sancak Ö, Barella L, Rimbach G. A combination of lipoic acid Plus coenzyme Q10 induces PGC1α, a master switch of energy metabolism, improves stress response, and increases cellular glutathione levels in cultured C2C12 skeletal muscle cells. Oxid Med and Cell Longev. 2012; 835970(1–9).
17. Rehman H, Krishnasamy Y, Haque K, Thurman RG, Lemasters JJ, Schnellmann RG, Zhong Z. Green tea polyphenols stimulate mitochondrial biogenesis and improve renal function after chronic cyclosporin a treatment in rats. PLoS One. 2014; 8:e65029.
18. Bahadorani S, Bahadorani P, Phillips JP, Hilliker AJ. The effects of vitamin supplementation on Drosophila life span under normoxia and under oxidative stress. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008; 35–42.
19. Linford NJ, Bilgir C, Ro J, Pletcher SD. Measurement of lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster. J Vis Exp. 2013; 71:e50068(1–9).
20. Gargano JW, Martin I, Bhandari P, Grotewiel MS. Rapid iterative negative geotaxis (RING): a new method for assessing age-related locomotor decline in Drosophila. Exp Gerontol. 2005; 40:386–395.
21. Bazzell B, Ginzberg S, Healy L, Wessells RJ. Dietary composition regulates Drosophila mobility and cardiac physiology. J Exp Biol. 2013; 216:859–868.
22. Phan MAT, Wang J, Tang JY, Lee YZ, Ng K. Evaluation of alpha-glucosidase inhibition potential of some flavonoids from Epimedium brevicornum. Lwt-Food Science and Technology. 2013; 53:492–498.
23. Ramasubbu N, Paloth V, Luo Y, Brayer GD, Levine MJ. Structure of human salivary alpha-amylase at 1.6 A resolution: implications for its role in the oral cavity. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1996; 52:435–446.
24. Yamamoto K, Miyake H, Kusunoki M, Osaki S. Crystal structures of isomaltase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in complex with its competitive inhibitor maltose. FEBS J. 2010; 277:4205–4214.
25. Qian M, Haser R, Buisson G, Duee E, Payan F. The active center of a mammalian alpha-amylase. Structure of the complex of a pancreatic alpha-amylase with a carbohydrate inhibitor refined to 2.2-A resolution. Biochemistry. 1994; 33:6284–6294.
26. Irwin JJ, Sterling T, Mysinger MM, Bolstad ES, Coleman RG. ZINC: a free tool to discover chemistry for biology. J Chem Inf Model. 2012; 52:1757–1768.
27. Grosdidier A, Zoete V, Michielin O. SwissDock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock, DSS. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39:W270–277.
28. Grosdidier A, Zoete V, Michielin O. Fast docking using the CHARMM force field with EADock, DSS. J Comput Chem. 2011; 32:2149–2159.
29. Biasini M, Bienert S, Waterhouse A, Arnold K, Studer G, Schmidt T, Kiefer F, Cassarino TG, Bertoni M, Bordoli L, Schwede T. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:W252–258.
30. Yan J, Zhang G, Pan J, Wang Y. alpha-Glucosidase inhibition by luteolin: kinetics, interaction and molecular docking. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014; 64:213–223.
31. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004; 25:1605–1612.
32. Apidianakis Y, Rahme LG. Drosophila melanogaster as a model for human intestinal infection and pathology. Dis Model Mech. 2011; 4:21–30.
33. Buchon N, Broderick NA, Lemaitre B. Gut homeostasis in a microbial world: insights from Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013; 11:615–626.
34. Lushchak OV, Gospodaryov DV, Rovenko BM, Yurkevych IS, Perkhulyn NV, Lushchak VI. Specific dietary carbohydrates differentially influence the life span and fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014; 69:3–12.
35. Ruden DM, Lu X. Evolutionary conservation of metabolism explains howDrosophila nutrigenomics can help us understand human nutrigenomics. Genes Nutr. 2006; 1:75–83.
36. Harrison DE, Strong R, Allison DB, Ames BN, Astle CM, Atamna H, Fernandez E, Flurkey K, Javors MA, Nadon NL, Nelson JF, Pletcher S, et al. Acarbose, 17-alpha-estradiol, and nordihydroguaiaretic acid extend mouse lifespan preferentially in males. Aging Cell. 2014; 13:273–282.
37. Tinkerhess MJ, Healy L, Morgan M, Sujkowski A, Matthys E, Zheng L, Wessells RJ. The Drosophila PGC-1alpha homolog spargel modulates the physiological effects of endurance exercise. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e31633.
38. Kannan K, Fridell YW. Functional implications of Drosophila insulin-like peptides in metabolism, aging, and dietary restriction. Front Physiol. 2013; 4:288(1–8).
39. Min KJ, Yamamoto R, Buch S, Pankratz M, Tatar M. Drosophila lifespan control by dietary restriction independent of insulin-like signaling. Aging Cell. 2008; 7:199–206.
40. Broughton SJ, Slack C, Alic N, Metaxakis A, Bass TM, Driege Y, Partridge L. DILP-producing median neurosecretory cells in the Drosophila brain mediate the response of lifespan to nutrition. Aging Cell. 2010; 9:336–346.
41. Kassi E, Papavassiliou AG. Could glucose be a proaging factor? J Cell Mol Med. 2008; 12:1194–1198.
42. Leontieva OV, Demidenko ZN, Blagosklonny MV. Rapamycin reverses insulin resistance (IR) in high-glucose medium without causing IR in normoglycemic medium. Cell Death Dis. 2014; 5:e1214.
43. Schulz TJ, Zarse K, Voigt A, Urban N, Birringer M, Ristow M. Glucose restriction extends Caenorhabditis elegans life span by inducing mitochondrial respiration and increasing oxidative stress. Cell Metab. 2007; 6:280–293.
44. Yoon JC, Puigserver P, Chen G, Donovan J, Wu Z, Rhee J, Adelmant G, Stafford J, Kahn CR, Granner DK, Newgard CB, Spiegelman BM. Control of hepatic gluconeogenesis through the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1. Nature. 2001; 413:131–138.
45. Aatsinki SM, Buler M, Salomaki H, Koulu M, Pavek P, Hakkola J. Metformin induces PGC-1alpha expression and selectively affects hepatic PGC-1alpha functions. Br J Pharmacol. 2014; 171:2351–2363.
46. Anisimov VN, Berstein LM, Egormin PA, Piskunova TS, Popovich IG, Zabezhinski MA, Tyndyk ML, Yurova MV, Kovalenko IG, Poroshina TE, Semenchenko AV. Metformin slows down aging and extends life span of female SHR mice. Cell Cycle. 2008; 7:2769–2773.
47. De Haes W, Frooninckx L, Van Assche R, Smolders A, Depuydt G, Billen J, Braeckman BP, Schoofs L, Temmerman L. Metformin promotes lifespan through mitohormesis via the peroxiredoxin PRDX-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111:E2501–2509.
48. Martin-Montalvo A, Mercken EM, Mitchell SJ, Palacios HH, Mote PL, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Gomes AP, Ward TM, Minor RK, Blouin MJ, Schwab M, Pollak M, et al. Metformin improves healthspan and lifespan in mice. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:2192(1–9).
49. Blagosklonny MV. Koschei the immortal and anti-aging drugs. Cell Death Dis. 2014; 5:e1552.
50. Doan KV, Ko CM, Kinyua AW, Yang DJ, Choi YH, Oh IY, Nguyen NM, Ko A, Choi JW, Jeong Y, Jung MH, Cho WG, et al. Gallic acid regulates body weight and glucose homeostasis through AMPK activation. Endocrinology. 2015; 156:157–168.
51. Collins QF, Liu HY, Pi J, Liu Z, Quon MJ, Cao W. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a green tea polyphenol, suppresses hepatic gluconeogenesis through 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282:30143–30149.
52. Colman RJ, Anderson RM, Johnson SC, Kastman EK, Kosmatka KJ, Beasley TM, Allison DB, Cruzen C, Simmons HA, Kemnitz JW, Weindruch R. Caloric restriction delays disease onset and mortality in rhesus monkeys. Science. 2009; 325:201–204.
53. Colman RJ, Beasley TM, Kemnitz JW, Johnson SC, Weindruch R, Anderson RM. Caloric restriction reduces age-related and all-cause mortality in rhesus monkeys. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:3557(1–5).
54. Weindruch R. The retardation of aging by caloric restriction: studies in rodents and primates. Toxicol Pathol. 1996; 24:742–745.
55. Bilinski T, Paszkiewicz T, Zadrag-Tecza R. Energy excess is the main cause of accelerated aging of mammals. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:12909–12919.
56. Mitchell SE, Delville C, Konstantopedos P, Hurst J, Derous D, Green C, Chen L, Han JJ, Wang Y, Promislow DE, Lusseau D, Douglas A, et al. The effects of graded levels of calorie restriction: II. Impact of short term calorie and protein restriction on circulating hormone levels, glucose homeostasis and oxidative stress in male C57BL/6 mice. Oncotarget. 2015; DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4003, Advance Online Publications:2.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.