Different effects of LDH-A inhibition by oxamate in non-small cell lung cancer cells
Metrics: PDF 2894 views | HTML 1416 views | ?
Yang Yang1,2, Dan Su3, Lin Zhao2, Dan Zhang3, Jiaying Xu2, Jianmei Wan2, Saijun Fan2,4 and Ming Chen1
1 Department of Radiation Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
2 School of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
3 Cancer Research Institute, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
4 Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
Ming Chen, email:
Saijun Fan, email:
Keywords: lactate dehydrogenase A, Warburg effect, G0/G1 arrest, autophagy, apoptosis, Akt/mTOR
Received: September 23, 2014 Accepted: October 22, 2014 Published: October 22, 2014
Higher rate of glycolysis has been long observed in cancer cells, as a vital enzyme in glycolysis, lactate dehydrogenase A (LDH-A) has been shown with great potential as an anti-cancer target. Accumulating evidence indicates that inhibition of LDH-A induces apoptosis mediated by oxidative stress in cancer cells. To date, it’s still unclear that whether autophagy can be induced by LDH-A inhibition. Here, we investigated the effects of oxamate, one classic inhibitor of LDH-A in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells as well as normal lung epithelial cells. The results showed that oxamate significantly suppressed the proliferation of NSCLC cells, while it exerted a much lower toxicity in normal cells. As previous studies reported, LDH-A inhibition resulted in ATP reduction and ROS (reactive oxygen species) burst in cancer cells, which lead to apoptosis and G2/M arrest in H1395 cells. However, when being exposed to oxamate, A549 cells underwent autophagy as a protective mechanism against apoptosis. Furthermore, we found evidence that LDH-A inhibition induced G0/G1 arrest dependent on the activation of GSK-3β in A549 cells. Taken together, our results provide useful clues for targeting LDH-A in NSCLC treatment and shed light on the discovery of molecular predictors for the sensitivity of LDH-A inhibitors.
Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers and causes more than 1.37 million deaths worldwide. The incidence of lung cancer is still on the rise, due to the prevalence of smoking and air pollution, especially in the developing countries. In spite of recent progress in the treatment of lung cancer, including TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) and anti-VEGF, the prognosis of lung cancer remains poor, with 5-year survival rate approximately 18%. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop novel strategies to treat lung cancer.
It is noticed long before that cancer cells have higher uptake of glucose and more dependent on the anerobic glycolysis to produce ATP, the phenomenon is also known as “Warburg effect” . In recent years, targeting energy metabolism has returned to the battlefield of fighting against cancer, more details and molecular mechanisms involved in the “Warburg effect” are increasingly discovered, which not only make us better understand the characteristics of cancer cells, but also provide the Achilles’ heel to kill them.
Among the numerous enzymes participating in the glycolysis, lactate dehydrogenase A (LDH-A), an isoform of lactate dehydrogenase, is undoubtedly an remarkable anti-cancer target with great developable potential[5, 6]. After the year of 2000, many studies found that LDH-A was abnormally expressed in cancer cells and associated with poor prognosis, suggesting that LDH-A played an important role in tumor maintenance[7-12]. Then, Le, et al. reported that inhibition of LDH-A reduced ATP levels and induced apoptosis though the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in lymphoma cells. Subsequently, a number of studies found similar results in other types of tumor cells including renal cancer, breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma[16, 17], nasopharyngeal carcinoma and pancreatic cancer . Besides, the results also indicate that LDH-A inhibition could suppress the migration of cancer cells and enhance their sensitivity to the traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy[18-21]. Especially, the findings are also encouraging in lung cancer cells. Very recently, it was demonstrated that LDH-A was essential for cancer-initiating cell proliferation and could be a feasible therapeutic target for non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) treatment in mouse models.
Since lung cancer, particularly non-small cell carcinoma is one kind of highly heterogeneous tumors with various genetic expressions, and specific treatment is not always effective to all types of lung cancer, we built the hypothesis that different NSCLC cells might exhibit different responses to LDH-A inhibitors. In the present study, we investigated the effect of oxamate, one classic inhibitor of LDH-A[24, 25], in several cell lines of NSCLC, as well as normal lung epithelial HBE cells. The purpose of our study is to examine the effectivity of LDH-A inhibition in NSCLC cells and explore the related mechanism.
Different growth inhibition effects of oxamate in NSCLC cells
Firstly, MTT assays were performed to investigate the effect of LDH-A inhibition by oxamate on the cell proliferation in NCSLC cells and normal lung epithelial cells. As shown in Figure 1A, we found that oxamate obviously inhibited the viability of A549, H1975, H1395 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner, the IC50 (50% inhibitory concentration) at 24h of oxamate sodium were 58.53±4.74, 32.13±2.50 and 19.67±1.53 mmol/L for A549, H1975 and H1395 cells, respectively, while oxamate exerted much lower toxicity in normal lung epithelial cell line HBE cells with its IC50 96.73±7.60 mmol/L.
Then, to further confirm the LDH-A inhibition effect of oxamate as previously reported and understand the alteration of energy metabolism in cells, several intracellular biochemical indicators were detected in both A549 and HBE cells. As a result, after treatment with oxamate for 24h, LDH activity, ATP content and NADPH/NADP ratio were found to be decreased significantly in A549 cells, while ROS content was distinctly increased (Figure 1D-F). In contrast, although the LDH enzyme was also inhibited in HBE cells in a dose-dependent way, however, the glucose metabolism was less influenced (Figure 1G-I).
Figure 1: Different effects of oxamate on the cell viability and energy metabolism in NSCLC cells and normal lung epithelial cells. (A) A549, H1395, H1975 and HBE cells were exposed to varying doses of oxamate for 24 h, and tested by MTT assay. (B)The effect of oxamate on A549 cells was determined at different time points. (C) IC50 of different cells at 24h were calculated by the growth curves. (D-F) A549 cells were treated with 0, 20, 50,100 mM oxamate for 24h, then LDH enzyme activity, ATP and ROS content were determined by commercial kits, respectively. (G-I) The levels of LDH enzyme activity, ATP and ROS content were also assayed in HBE cells. All Data above represented the average of three independent experiments and were shown as means ± SD, * p<0.05 versus control.
Cycle arrest induced by LDH-A inhibition in NSCLC cells
Cell cycle is a reflection of cell growth and division, which is easily disturbed by external stress. Therefore, we next examined the effects of LDH-A inhibition on cycle progression in HBE, H1395 and A549 cells. All the cells were treated with different concentrations of oxamate (0, 20, 50, 100mmol) for 24h, and then were analyzed by flow cytometry after PI staining.
As shown in Figure 2A, no dose-dependent changes were observed in cell cycle progression with the concentrations of oxamate in normal lung epithelial HBE cells, in accordance with the effect on the cell viability. Meanwhile, we found that the numbers of H1395 cells in G2/M phase were increased in a dose-dependent manner after treatment with 0, 20, 50, 100mmol oxamate, the proportions of cells at G2/M were 12.74±1.78%, 16.55±1.20%, 19.09±3.56%, and 26.20±4.57%, respectively (p<0.05), while the percentages of cells in G0/G1 phase were consequently deceased (Figure 2B). Intriguingly, there was another scenario in A549 cells, as shown in Figure 3C, oxamate induced significant G0/G1 arrest in A549 cells, after being exposed to 0, 20, 50, 100 mmol/L oxamate, the proportions of cells at G0/G1 phase were 51.88±0.14%, 58.50±0.28%, 67.79±0.58% and 78.24±2.4%, respectively (p<0.05). In addition, we noticed that the ratios of cells in the sub-G1 phase were not elevated significantly except in H1395 cells.
Figure 2: Different effects of oxamate on the cell cycle arrest in NSCLC cells and normal lung epithelial cells. Cells were treated with 0, 20, 50, 100 mM oxamate for 24h, and then were analyzed by flow cytometry after PI staining. (A) HBE cells; (B) H1395 cells; (C) A549 cells. Each phase of cell cycle (sub-G1, G0/G1, G2/M, S) in oxamate-treated cells was compared with the respective phases in untreated cells, All Data above represented the average of three independent experiments and were shown as means ± SD, * p<0.05 versus control.
G0/G1 arrest in A549 cells was dependent on the activation of GSK-3β
Earlier studies have reported that G2/M arrest was induced by the inhibition of LDH-A or other enzymes involved in glycolysis in cancer cells[18, 19, 27, 28]. However, we found that oxamate induced significant G0/G1 arrest, instead of G2/M arrest in A549 cells in our study. To explore the molecular mechanisms under the G0/G1 arrest in A549 cells, we performed western blotting to detect the changes of cell cycle-related proteins in A549 cells after treatment of oxamate for 24h. As shown in Figure 3A, we found that the expression of cyclin D1 was in a dose-dependent decrease, accompanied by a reduction in the levels of CDK2 and cyclin E, while the expression pattern of cyclin B1 was basically unchanged (Figure 3A). Next, we continued to test other proteins in upstream signal pathways affecting cell cycle, the results showed that the expressions of p53, SIRT1, NF-κB did not alter significantly after treatment of oxamate (Figure 4A). However, the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, which plays an important role in cell proliferation, metabolism and cycle regulation, was obviously inhibited. Notably, the levels of p-Akt and p-c-raf were decreased dramatically in a dose-dependent way. Consistent with this, the phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) at Ser-9, a substrate of p-Akt[30, 31], was also inhibited significantly, accompanied with an enhanced function.
It has been long known that cyclin D1 can be down-regulated by the activation of GSK-3β, which phosphorylated cyclin D1 that triggers its subsequent degradation[32, 33]. To further verify the role of Akt-GSK-3β-cyclin D1 signal pathway in the G0/G1 arrest induced by LDH-A inhibition, we therefore employed lithium chloride (LiCl, 20 mmol/L), an inhibitor of GSK-3β, to treat A549 cells with oxamate together. The results, in accord with our expectations, showed that the G0/G1 arrest induced by oxamate was reversed almost completely by lithium (Figure 3B). Taken together, these data indicated that oxamate-induced G0/G1 arrest was possibly mediated by the changes of G0/G1 cyclins, especially caused by the degradation of cyclin D1, which resulted from the de-phosphorylation and activation of GSK-3β.
Figure 3: G0/G1 arrest in A549 cells is mediated by Akt-GSK-3β-cyclinD1 signal pathway. (A) Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of oxamate for 24h, after treatment, cells were harvested, lysed, and then analyzed by western blotting with the indicated antibodies, β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) A549 cells were pre-treated with 20 mM LiCl followed by combination treatment with 100 mM oxamate for 24 h, then prepared for flow cytometry analysis after PI staining.
Oxamate triggered apoptosis in H1395 while not in A549cells
Apoptosis is one of the major responses to LDH-A inhibition in cancer cells, as previous studies reported[13-15]. To investigate the effect of oxamate on the apoptosis in different NSCLC cells, AnnexinV/PI double staining assays were conducted. As shown in Figure 4A, after treatment with 0, 20, 50, 100 mmol/L oxamate for 24h, the percentages of cells at apoptosis increased significantly in H1395 cells, the apoptosis rates were 2.15±0.16%, 6.24±1.50%, 16.36±3.23% and 29.66±4.34% respectively. By contrast, the apoptosis rates in A549 cells after treatment with oxamate were all at low levels, similar with the control group.
The mechanism under the apoptosis induced by LDH-A inhibition has been well studied in other similar studies, and the results indicate that ROS mediated mitochondrial pathway plays a key role[13, 15, 17]. In the present study, the ROS contents were also enhanced in A549 cells, but relatively lower than the extent in other cells (Figure 1F). To verify that there was no apoptosis induced by oxamate in A549 cells, the expression changes of apoptotic markers, including bcl-2, bax and caspase-3, were explored by western blotting, the results showed that these proteins did not change clearly after treatment with oxamate. Negative results were also obtained with other key regulators in apoptosis, such as p53, SIRT1, NF-κ B (Figure 4C).
Figure 4: LDH-A inhibition by oxamate induces apoptosis in H1395 while not in A549 cells. Cells were treated with 0, 20, 50, 100 mM oxamate for 24h, the apoptosis rates were tested by AnnexinV/PI staining. (A) A549 cells; (B) H1395 cells. (C)The proteins involved in apoptosis as well as their upstream regulators were analyzed by western blotting in A549 cells, after treatment with oxamate, β-actin was used as a loading control.
Oxamate induced protective autophagy in A549 cells
In our previous experiments, LDH-A inhibition by oxamate was found not induce apoptosis in A549 cells, we tried to explore the mechanism of growth suppression in A549 cells using MDC staining. After treating A549 cells with oxamate for 24h, the appearance of acidic vesicles was indeed observed in the cytoplasm of oxamate-treated cells, indicating that autophagy might occur in A549 cells. Next, we detected the expression changes of LC-3, an autophagy marker, to confirm the phenomenon. As shown in Figure 5B, the expression of LC3-II protein was increased in A549 cells following 24 h of oxamate treatment, especially in 50 and 100 mM groups, whereas the expression level of LC3-I was decreased to some extent, which is compatible with an enhanced autophagic flux.
To further investigate the role of autophagy in the anti-proliferation of oxamate in A549 cells and its relationship with apoptosis, we next adopted 3-methylademine (3-MA, 10 mM), an autophagy inhibitor, to treat A549 cells simultaneously with oxamate for 24h, and MDC/PI dual staining showed that there were a large number of PI-positive cells in 3-MA combined with oxamate group. Consist with the results of MDC/PI staining, the quantitative flow cytometry demonstrated that the apoptosis rate was significantly higher in the cells treated with both 3-MA and oxamate, compared to the control cells or the cells treated with oxamate alone. Therefore, the results suggested that LDH-A inhibition by oxamate induced autophagy in A549 cells, which protected the cells against apoptosis.
Figure 5: Oxamate induced protective autophagy in A549 cells. (A) A549 cells were exposed to 100mM oxamate with or without 10mM 3-MA, then were observed under a fluorescence microscope after MDC/PI dual staining, green fluorescence represents autophagic vacuoles whereas red fluorescence represents apoptotic cells. (B) Western blotting was employed to detect the expression levels of LC3 and mTOR, two autophagy-related proteins. β-actin was used as a loading control. (C) The apoptosis rates were analyzed by quantitative flow cytometry. Three independent experiments were repeated and the results were shown as means ± SD, * p<0.05 versus control.
LDH-A has been widely investigated as an anti-tumor target in previous studies, and accumulating evidence indicates that inhibition of LDH-A induces apoptosis though mitochondrial pathway mediated by oxidative stress[13, 15, 17, 18]. To date, it’s still unkown that whether autophagy can be induced by LDH-A inhibition. In the present study, we firstly revealed that oxamate, a classic LDHA inhibitor induced autophagy in A549 cells, and addition of autophagy inhibitor 3-MA with oxamate caused apoptosis again in A549 cells. Another interesting phenomenon found in our study was that LDH-A inhibition induced G0/G1 arrest dependent on the activation of glycogen synthase kinase -3β. Most of all, these findings were based on a multiple context, we employed HBE cells as a normal control, and also observed the apoptosis and G2/M arrest induced by LDH-A inhibition in H1395 cells. The distinct responses to oxamate in different NSCLC cells suggest that the effects of LDH-A inhibition are more complicated than they appeared before.
LDH-A is a key enzyme in anaerobic glycolysis, by catalyzing the conversion of pyruvate into lactate. When the LDH-A is inhibited, more pyruvate will enter into the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and more oxygen is needed. However, since cancer cells tend to overly depend on aerobic glycolysis, which generates ATP faster and provides more precursors to meet the metabolic requirements of rapid proliferation, TCA cycle and subsequent mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) pathway in them are always impaired and dysfunctional. Consequently, increased ROS are produced, which activate apoptosis though caspase-3 pathway. In the present study, we further confirmed the apoptosis induced by LDH-A inhibition in H1395 cells, and also found that LDH-A inhibition induced G2/M arrest, as reported previously[18, 27, 28]. Moreover, the toxicity of oxamate was much lower in normal lung epithelial HBE cells, the results demonstrate that LDH-A is also a potential target for cancer therapy in NSCLC patients.
Autophagy is a self-eating process, in which cellular components are degraded through the lysosomal system to maintain homeostasis. Under metabolic stress, cancer cells can use autophagy as a source of energy and biomolecules to adapt and survive in the unfavorable environment. Here, we firstly reported that LDH-A inhibition induced autophagy in human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells, as evidenced by appearance of autophagic vacuoles and LC-3 degradation, our data also showed that the Akt-mTOR signaling pathway was inhibited significantly after oxamate treatment, and might involve in the regulation of the metabolism and autophagy induced by LDH-A inhibition. Moreover, the autophagy inhibitor 3-MA blocked the autophagy and triggered apoptosis again in human A549 cells, which was similar to the situation in H1395 cells, suggesting that the autophagy was a protective mechanism against apoptosis and contributed to the drug resistance of LDH-A inhibitors. Recent studies have shown that autophagy plays an important role in glucose metabolism and the maintenance of lung tumor’s malignancy. Basing on these above, our study further indicates that combined inhibition of autophagy is a worthy strategy to overcome the drug resistance of LDH-A inhibitor in NSCLC cells.
Another interesting phenomenon is that we observed different cell cycle arrest coupled with apoptosis or autophagy. In H1395 cells, after treatment with oxamate, cells arrested in G2/M cycle were associated with damaged mitochondrial function and susceptive to apoptosis, however, G0/G1 quiescence in A549 cells was related to increased autophagy activity, which allows cells to survive under the metabolic stress. Especially, our study further found that the G0/G1 arrest in A549 cells was dependent on the activation of p-GSK-3β, which is at the down-stream signal transduction of Akt/mTOR pathway. In agreement with our results, An, et al currently reported that autophagy is necessary for G0/G1 arrest under nitrogen starvation in saccharomyces cerevisiae, and concluded that such cycle arrest might permit the cells to adapt the nutrient deprivation . In addition to this, our results also demonstrated that when the oxamate-induced G0/G1 quiescence was disrupted by lithium, the changes in the percentage of apoptotic cells were not significant, the results indicate that G0/G1 arrest might be an accompaniment activity with autophagy, however, the intervention of cycle progression will not determine the final destiny of cells with LDH-A inhibition.
Since lung cancer is one kind of highly heterogenous tumors, biomarkers are vitally important in improving the effectivity of target therapy. As is well-known, EGFR mutation has been proven successfully as a predictor in TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors), which save many patients’ lives as well as money. As the development of more effective LDH-A inhibitors (also including other glycolysis inhibitors), now there is a pressing need to seek for biomarkers to predict sensitivity and screen patients who will benefit most from those inhibitors[19, 44, 45]. For instance, not long ago, Birsoy et,al reported that mtDNA mutations might be useful in determining the sensitivity of cancer cells to glucose limitation. Our results indicated that the biological consequences of LDH-A inhibition are more complex than we thought before in NSCLC cells, and the signal molecules in Akt/mTOR and autophagy pathway might be of potential value to predict the efficacy of LDH-A inhibitors.
In conclusion, we find that NSCLC cells exhibit different responses to LDH-A inhibition in our study, and provide novel insights into the signaling pathways shifting cancer cells towards apoptosis or autophagy, as well as different cell cycle arrests, which are helpful for searching biomarkers to monitor the efficacy of glycolysis inhibitors and contribute to more favorable outcomes in the future clinical trials. The results also suggest that combined autophagy inhibition may be an attractive strategy to enhance the sensitivity of LDH-A inhibitors in drug-resistant cells.
Materials and Methods
Reagents and cell culture
Oxamate sodium was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp (St. Louis, MO, USA). Human non-small cell lung cancer cell lines including A549, H1975 and H1395 were used, normal lung epithelial cell line HBE was employed as a normal control. All the cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, USA), and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco) containing 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C under 5% CO2.
MTT (methye thiazolye telrazlium) assay was used to test the effects of oxamate sodium on cell viability at different concentrations or times. Cells were seeded at 104/well in 96-well plates, and treated with fresh media containing different doses of oxamate (0-100 mmol/L). After 24h, 48h and 72h incubation, respectively, 20 µl of MTT solution (5 mg/L) was added into each well, then the plates were incubated in the dark for 4 h. The supernatant was removed and the precipitates were dissolved in 150 µl dimethyl sulfoxide for 10 min. Optical density was measured using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc.,Winooski, VT, USA) at 570 nm.
LDH activity test
LDH Activity Assay kit (Biovision, Tucson, AZ, USA) was used to determine the intracellular LDH activity. In this test, LDH reduces NAD to NADH, which interacts with a specific probe to produce a color (λmax = 450nm), which is then detected by colorimetric assay. Results were expressed as percentage of LDHA activity normalized to protein concentration, which were measured by BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime, Haimen, China).
Intracellular ATP was detected using a luciferase-based ATP assay kit (Beyotime, Haimen, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells treated with different doses of oxamate were harvested and lysed. Then, optical density was measured using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc.) and normalized to protein concentration.
Reactive Oxygen Species Measurements
Cells were stained with 2’,7’-dichloro-fluoresce in diacetate (DCFH-DA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Beyotime,China), and the fluorescence intensity was measured by a flow cytometry at 530nm.
Analysis of cell cycle distribution
After 24h incubation with different doses of oxamate, cells were collected and fixed with 70% pre-cooled ethanol overnight, after staining with propidium iodide (10 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) in the dark for 30 min. Flow cytometry was performed on the FACS Calibur system (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and cell cycle distribution was analyzed by means of ModFit LT software (Becton Dickinson, CA, USA).
Annexinv-FITC apoptosis kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) was employed to test apoptosis. Cells were harvested after 48h oxamate treatment, then stained with Annexinv/PI for 30 min. The results were analyzed by the FACSCalibur system with ModFit’s LT software.
Protein was extracted using IP lysing buffer (Beyotime, China), and was quantified by a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime, China). 50 ug protein lysates were separated on SDS/PAGE gel, and transferred onto PVDF membrane (Millipore), then immunoblotted with primary antibodies. All primary antibodies were diluted 1:2000 in TBS containing 5% nonfat milk.
MDC/PI dual staining
MDC (monodansylcadaverin) is a fluorescent compound that can detect autophagic vacuoles in cells, and PI (Propidium iodide) is a marker of cell death. To observe the phenomenon of cell autophagy and death at the same time, MDC/PI dual staining was employed in our study. After pretreatment with oxamate for 24h, cells were stained with 0.05mmol/L MDC and 50μg/ml PI at 37°C for 30min, then were observed under a fluorescence microscope at excitation wavelengths of 350nm and 630nm.
All Data were obtained from at least three independent experiments and were shown as means ± SD, two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to assess the difference between two groups, p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All of the statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 17.0.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
This study was supported by the fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81172126), Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation (LZ13H160003) and Youth Foundation of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (QN201405).
1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z and Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014; 64(1):9-29.
2. DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, Alteri R, Robbins AS and Jemal A. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014; 64(4):252-271.
3. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC and Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009; 324(5930):1029-1033.
4. Tennant DA, Duran RV and Gottlieb E. Targeting metabolic transformation for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010; 10(4):267-277.
5. Hirschhaeuser F, Sattler UG and Mueller-Klieser W. Lactate: a metabolic key player in cancer. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(22):6921-6925.
6. Doherty JR and Cleveland JL. Targeting lactate metabolism for cancer therapeutics. J Clin Invest. 2013; 123(9):3685-3692.
7. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Sivridis E, Bougioukas G, Didilis V, Gatter KC and Harris AL. Lactate dehydrogenase-5 (LDH-5) overexpression in non-small-cell lung cancer tissues is linked to tumour hypoxia, angiogenic factor production and poor prognosis. Br J Cancer. 2003; 89(5):877-885.
8. Fantin VR, St-Pierre J and Leder P. Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance. Cancer Cell. 2006; 9(6):425-434.
9. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Sivridis E, Gatter KC, Trarbach T, Folprecht G, Shi MM, Lebwohl D, Jalava T, Laurent D, Meinhardt G and Harris AL. Prognostic and predictive role of lactate dehydrogenase 5 expression in colorectal cancer patients treated with PTK787/ZK 222584 (vatalanib) antiangiogenic therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17(14):4892-4900.
10. Rong Y, Wu W, Ni X, Kuang T, Jin D, Wang D and Lou W. Lactate dehydrogenase A is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and promotes the growth of pancreatic cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 2013; 34(3):1523-1530.
11. Yao F, Zhao T, Zhong C, Zhu J and Zhao H. LDHA is necessary for the tumorigenicity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2013; 34(1):25-31.
12. Shi M, Cui J, Du J, Wei D, Jia Z, Zhang J, Zhu Z, Gao Y and Xie K. A Novel KLF4/LDHA Signaling Pathway Regulates Aerobic Glycolysis in and Progression of Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20(16):4370-4380.
13. Le A, Cooper CR, Gouw AM, Dinavahi R, Maitra A, Deck LM, Royer RE, Vander Jagt DL, Semenza GL and Dang CV. Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase A induces oxidative stress and inhibits tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(5):2037-2042.
14. Xie H, Valera VA, Merino MJ, Amato AM, Signoretti S, Linehan WM, Sukhatme VP and Seth P. LDH-A inhibition, a therapeutic strategy for treatment of hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009; 8(3):626-635.
15. Wang ZY, Loo TY, Shen JG, Wang N, Wang DM, Yang DP, Mo SL, Guan XY and Chen JP. LDH-A silencing suppresses breast cancer tumorigenicity through induction of oxidative stress mediated mitochondrial pathway apoptosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 131(3):791-800.
16. Fiume L, Manerba M, Vettraino M and Di Stefano G. Impairment of aerobic glycolysis by inhibitors of lactic dehydrogenase hinders the growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Pharmacology. 2010; 86(3):157-162.
17. Sheng SL, Liu JJ, Dai YH, Sun XG, Xiong XP and Huang G. Knockdown of lactate dehydrogenase A suppresses tumor growth and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. FEBS J. 2012; 279(20):3898-3910.
18. Zhai X, Yang Y, Wan J, Zhu R and Wu Y. Inhibition of LDH-A by oxamate induces G2/M arrest, apoptosis and increases radiosensitivity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Oncol Rep. 2013; 30(6):2983-2991.
19. Maftouh M, Avan A, Sciarrillo R, Granchi C, Leon LG, Rani R, Funel N, Smid K, Honeywell R, Boggi U, Minutolo F, Peters GJ and Giovannetti E. Synergistic interaction of novel lactate dehydrogenase inhibitors with gemcitabine against pancreatic cancer cells in hypoxia. Br J Cancer. 2014; 110(1):172-182.
20. Zhou M, Zhao Y, Ding Y, Liu H, Liu Z, Fodstad O, Riker AI, Kamarajugadda S, Lu J, Owen LB, Ledoux SP and Tan M. Warburg effect in chemosensitivity: targeting lactate dehydrogenase-A re-sensitizes taxol-resistant cancer cells to taxol. Mol Cancer. 2010; 9:33.
21. Zhao Y, Liu H, Liu Z, Ding Y, Ledoux SP, Wilson GL, Voellmy R, Lin Y, Lin W, Nahta R, Liu B, Fodstad O, Chen J, Wu Y, Price JE and Tan M. Overcoming trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer by targeting dysregulated glucose metabolism. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(13):4585-4597.
22. Xie H, Hanai J, Ren JG, Kats L, Burgess K, Bhargava P, Signoretti S, Billiard J, Duffy KJ, Grant A, Wang X, Lorkiewicz PK, Schatzman S, Bousamra M, 2nd, Lane AN, Higashi RM, et al. Targeting lactate dehydrogenase--a inhibits tumorigenesis and tumor progression in mouse models of lung cancer and impacts tumor-initiating cells. Cell Metab. 2014; 19(5):795-809.
23. Chen Z, Fillmore CM, Hammerman PS, Kim CF and Wong KK. Non-small-cell lung cancers: a heterogeneous set of diseases. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014; 14(8):535-546.
24. Novoa WB, Winer AD, Glaid AJ and Schwert GW. Lactic dehydrogenase. V. Inhibition by oxamate and by oxalate. J Biol Chem. 1959; 234(5):1143-1148.
25. Ramanathan A, Wang C and Schreiber SL. Perturbational profiling of a cell-line model of tumorigenesis by using metabolic measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(17):5992-5997.
26. Shapiro GI and Harper JW. Anticancer drug targets: cell cycle and checkpoint control. J Clin Invest. 1999; 104(12):1645-1653.
27. Isono T, Chano T, Kitamura A and Yuasa T. Glucose deprivation induces G2/M transition-arrest and cell death in N-GlcNAc2-modified protein-producing renal carcinoma cells. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e96168.
28. Madhok BM, Yeluri S, Perry SL, Hughes TA and Jayne DG. Dichloroacetate induces apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest in colorectal cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2010; 102(12):1746-1752.
29. Manning BD and Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007; 129(7):1261-1274.
30. Delcommenne M, Tan C, Gray V, Rue L, Woodgett J and Dedhar S. Phosphoinositide-3-OH kinase-dependent regulation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 and protein kinase B/AKT by the integrin-linked kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(19):11211-11216.
31. Pap M and Cooper GM. Role of glycogen synthase kinase-3 in the phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt cell survival pathway. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273(32):19929-19932.
32. Diehl JA, Cheng M, Roussel MF and Sherr CJ. Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta regulates cyclin D1 proteolysis and subcellular localization. Genes Dev. 1998; 12(22):3499-3511.
33. Hashimoto T, He Z, Ma WY, Schmid PC, Bode AM, Yang CS and Dong Z. Caffeine inhibits cell proliferation by G0/G1 phase arrest in JB6 cells. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(9):3344-3349.
34. Gatenby RA and Gillies RJ. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat Rev Cancer. 2004; 4(11):891-899.
35. Pelicano H, Lu W, Zhou Y, Zhang W, Chen Z, Hu Y and Huang P. Mitochondrial dysfunction and reactive oxygen species imbalance promote breast cancer cell motility through a CXCL14-mediated mechanism. Cancer Res. 2009; 69(6):2375-2383.
36. Lunt SY and Vander Heiden MG. Aerobic glycolysis: meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011; 27:441-464.
37. Maes H, Rubio N, Garg AD and Agostinis P. Autophagy: shaping the tumor microenvironment and therapeutic response. Trends Mol Med. 2013; 19(7):428-446.
38. Cheong H, Lu C, Lindsten T and Thompson CB. Therapeutic targets in cancer cell metabolism and autophagy. Nat Biotechnol. 2012; 30(7):671-678.
39. Karsli-Uzunbas G, Guo JY, Price S, Teng X, Laddha SV, Khor S, Kalaany NY, Jacks T, Chan CS, Rabinowitz JD and White E. Autophagy is required for glucose homeostasis and lung tumor maintenance. Cancer Discov. 2014; 4(8):914-927.
40. Beck JT, Ismail A and Tolomeo C. Targeting the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway: An emerging treatment strategy for squamous cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014; 40(8):980-989.
41. An Z, Tassa A, Thomas C, Zhong R, Xiao G, Fotedar R, Tu BP, Klionsky DJ and Levine B. Autophagy is required for G /G quiescence in response to nitrogen starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Autophagy. 2014; 10(10).
42. Li T, Kung HJ, Mack PC and Gandara DR. Genotyping and genomic profiling of non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for current and future therapies. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(8):1039-1049.
43. Sequist LV, Bell DW, Lynch TJ and Haber DA. Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(5):587-595.
44. Granchi C, Roy S, Giacomelli C, Macchia M, Tuccinardi T, Martinelli A, Lanza M, Betti L, Giannaccini G, Lucacchini A, Funel N, Leon LG, Giovannetti E, Peters GJ, Palchaudhuri R, Calvaresi EC, et al. Discovery of N-hydroxyindole-based inhibitors of human lactate dehydrogenase isoform A (LDH-A) as starvation agents against cancer cells. J Med Chem. 2011; 54(6):1599-1612.
45. Shi Y and Pinto BM. Human lactate dehydrogenase a inhibitors: a molecular dynamics investigation. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e86365.
46. Birsoy K, Possemato R, Lorbeer FK, Bayraktar EC, Thiru P, Yucel B, Wang T, Chen WW, Clish CB and Sabatini DM. Metabolic determinants of cancer cell sensitivity to glucose limitation and biguanides. Nature. 2014; 508(7494):108-112.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.