Interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) is a trigger for tumorigenesis and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma
Metrics: PDF 1400 views | HTML 1432 views | ?
Chong Li1,2, Ji Wang3, Hong Zhang3, Mingao Zhu3, Feifei Chen3, Yufeng Hu4, Hudan Liu4 and Hong Zhu1
1 Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
2 CAS Key Laboratory of Infection and Immunity, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China
3 Department of Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
4 School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Hong Zhu, email:
Keywords: ISG15, HCC, Metastasis, Tumorigenesis
Received: June 04, 2014 Accepted: August 05, 2014 Published: August 06, 2014
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide with poor prognosis. IFN-stimulated genes 15 (ISG15) is an ubiquitin-like molecule that is strongly upregulated by type I interferons as a primary response to diverse microbial and cellular stress stimuli. However, the role of ISG15 in HCC remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the function of ISG15 during HCC progression and related mechanism using clinicopathological data, cell line and xenograft model. Our results indicated that ISG15 is highly expressed in HCC tissues and multiple HCC cell lines. ISG15 expression is significantly associated with the differentiation grade, metastatic of tumor and survival of HCC patients. However, the expression of ISG15 is not affected by HBV infection. ISG15 promotes the proliferation and migration of hepatocarcinoma cells through maintaining Survivin protein stabilization via sequestering XIAP from interacting with Survivin. Knowing down ISG15 with SiRNA inhibited the xenografted tumor growth and prolonged the lifespan of tumor-bearing mice. All these results support that ISG15 high expression is an intrinsic feature for HCC and a trigger for tumorigenesis and metastasis. ISG15 may be a prognostic biomarker and the inhibition of ISG15 could provide a therapeutic advantage for HCC patients over-expressing ISG15.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common solid neoplasm and the leading cause of cancer-related death in the world with 55% occurring in China [1-3]. According to a recent report from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, HCC has become the second most common cause of cancer-related death and accounts for 9.1% (0.8 million) of the global cancer-related deaths in 2012 . Despite advance in the treatment of HCC, there is currently no curative option for this life-threatening disease and the overall 5-year survival is about 40% for patients treated with major hepatectomy . Although not satisfactory, molecularly targeted drugs, e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib, have brought promising outcomes to HCC, which encourages the scientists to shift their interests towards the development of novel biotherapeutic agents. Furthermore, advances in molecular target are likely to derive from a better recognition and understanding of the biological behavior and pathogenesis. Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection accounts for 52% of the causes of HCC, followed by chronic infection with hepatitis C virus and alcoholic liver disease . HBV is a well-known predominant etiologic risk factor and its carriers have a 100-fold relative risk for developing HCC with an annual incidence rate of 2–6% in cirrhotic patients . Sustained inflammation caused by chronic HBV infection is not only involved in hepatocarcinogenesis, but also plays critical roles in the recurrence and metastasis of HCC after surgical treatment .
To survive from viral infection, cells can produce and secrete interferons (IFNs), proinflammatory cytokines which can block viral infection and replication, cellular proliferation, and inhibit important immunomodulatory activities. One important mechanism by which IFNs mediate their antiviral effects is through the transcriptional regulation of relevant genes, such as IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) [9, 10]. Among them, ISG15 is an ubiquitin-like protein that conjugates to cellular substrates to form ISGylated proteins and shows antivirus activities . The expression of ISG15 also can be regulated by IFN regulated factor (IRFs) and it was one of the first reported targets of IRF3, a 55 kDa protein that is constitutively expressed in all tissues. Viral infection induces phosphorylation and activation of IRF. Phosphorylated IRF3 translocates into the nucleus and activates the expression of ISG15 by binding to the ISRE/IRFE elements [12-15]. The structure of ISG15 and ubiquitin are highly homologous with the similar region, known as ubiquitin cross-reactive protein (UCRP) . ISG15 is covalently conjugated with cellular proteins in an enzymatic pathway comprised of the activating E1, conjugating E2 and ligating E3 enzymes, which is similar to ubiquitylation. The conjugation of ISG15 with protein substrates provides a tag that either marks the labeled protein for degradation or modulates its function [16-18].
Mounting studies have identified specific alterations of ISG15 pathway in human tumors, such as bladder cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and acute multiple sclerosis lesions [12, 19-23]. Like other innate immune/stress response mediators, appropriately regulated ISG15 expression is associated with a tumor suppressor function, whereas the perturbation of ISG15 regulation is correlated with enhanced tumor progression and leads to aberrant cell signaling and malignant transformation [12, 21, 24, 25]. Unlike ubiquitin whose expression is more or less constant in all cells, the ISG15 protein is highly expressed in the majority of tumor cells. Moreover, the expression of ISG15 is with a high degree of heterogeneity in both tumor cell lines and tumor tissues [26, 27].
Up to now, the role of ISG15 in HCC is still unclear and whether HBV infection-based HCC is correlated to the alterations of ISG15 expression remains to be determined. Here we explore the function of ISG15 in HCC progression and its mechanism using clinical pathological data, cell line and xenograft model. Our results disclose that high expression of ISG15 is an intrinsic feature for HCC and a trigger for tumorigenesis and metastasis. As a poor prognosis marker, the inhibition of ISG15 could provide a therapeutic advantage for HCC patients over-expressing.
ISG15 is highly expressed in HCC cell lines and cancer specimen
We checked ISG15 mRNA level in HCC cell lines, Huh7, hepG2 and 97L with a non-HCC cell line L02 as controls. Real-time PCR revealed that ISG15 mRNA in HCC cell lines were higher than that in L02 (Figure 1A, P < 0.01). Next, we determined whether ISG15 overexpressed in HCC specimens compared to non-tumor counterparts. ISG15 mRNA level of fifty pairs of human HCC samples and their non-tumor counterparts were analyzed, which was 2.4 to 4.2 folds higher in HCC specimens (Figure 1B, P < 0.01). ISG15 protein levels were also examined in the HCC specimens (Figure 1C, D), among which 84% (42/50) of the cases showed relatively higher ISG15 expression than in the non-tumor counterparts (0.88 ± 0.07 vs. 0.50 ± 0.04, P < 0.001). Our data suggest that ISG15 level is higher in HCC.
Figure 1: ISG15 is highly expressed in HCC cells and tissues. The mRNA expression levels of ISG15 in HCC cells (A) and tissues (B). (A), Data were means from three independent experiments with three dishes for each cell line, bars, SD. (**, P < 0.01). (B), four representative results were shown (**, P < 0.01). The difference in Protein expression levels of ISG15 in HCC tissues was compared with the corresponding adjacent tissues by western blot and immunohistochemistry in 50 pairs of human HCC specimens. The representative results were shown in C and D.
Expression of ISG15 is related to HCC histologic differentiation, metastasis and predicts worse 5-year survival
50 human HCC specimens were evaluated for the correlation between ISG15 protein levels and clinicopathologic features by univariate analysis, including patient’s age, gender, HBV infection, alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level, number and size of the lesions, portal vein tumor thrombus and metastasis (Table 1). The results showed that ISG15 protein level was not affected by the patient’s age, gender, HBV infection, AFP level, number and size of the lesions and portal vein tumor thrombus (P > 0.05). In contrast, the ISG15 protein levels were associated with poor HCC histologic differentiation and metastasis (P < 0.01).
Table 1: Relationship of the Expression of ISG15 and Clinicopathological Feature of HCC
Number of Patient
ISG15 Relative Expression
Moderate to well
Portal vein tumor thrombus
Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed simultaneously that ISG15 protein level was remarkably higher in poorly differentiated HCC tissues compared to moderate to well differentiated HCC tissues, suggesting that ISG15 was relevant to HCC differentiation status and malignancy grade (Figure 2A). Furthermore, considering that the protein level of ISG15 was related to HCC histologic differentiation and metastasis, we analyzed the relationship between the expression of ISG15 and 5-year survival of HCC patients by Pearson chi-square test. The HCC patients were divided into the survival patient group and death patient group according to patient’s survival status at 5 year after being diagnosed pathologically as HCC. We found the expression of ISG15 was higher in the non-survivors at 5 years (Figure 2B, P = 0.034), suggesting that ISG15 is a prognostic marker for worse 5-year survival.
Figure 2: Expression of ISG15 is related to HCC histologic differentiation and the worse 5-year survival. (A)HCC tumor tissues with histologic grade were examined to the expression of ISG15 by immunohistochemical analysis. The represented results were shown in (a-b) moderate to well HCC tissues and (c) poor differentiation HCC tissues. A strong immunochemical signal for ISG15 was detected predominantly in the cytoplasm. ISG15 expression was remarkably higher in poorly differentiated HCC tissues with respect to moderate to well differentiated HCC tissues, indicating that the expression of ISG15 protein was relevant to HCC differentiation status and malignancy grade. The black short line at bottom right indicates 50 µm. (B) The 50 HCC patients were divided into two groups according to patient’s survival status at 5 year after being diagnosed pathologically as HCC. We found the expression of ISG15 was higher in the death patient group than in the survival patient group (Figure 2B, P = 0.034), suggesting that the high level of ISG15 increased the risk of death in HCC patients. The relationship between the expression of ISG15 and 5-year survival of HCC patients was analyzed by Pearson Chi-squared test. The height of box represented the interquartile range of ISG15 expression level and the black line in the middle of box represented the median. The short black line on top and bottom outside the box represented respectively the maximum and minimum of ISG15 expression amount in the involved HCC patients.
Knocking down ISG15 inhibits cancerous proliferation, migration and arrested cell cycle at G2/M phase
We developed ISG15 knock-down 97L cells (97L-shISG15) through transfection by pSUPER-shISG15 vector (Figure 3A, left panel) and ISG15 over-expression Huh7 cells (Huh7-ISG15) through transfection by pcDNA3.1-ISG15 vector (Figure 3A, right panel). Knocking down ISG15 markedly reduced incorporation of [3H]-thymidine into DNA of 97L cells at all time points compared with the control vector transfected cells (Figure 3B, left panel, P = 0.003). In contrast, ISG15 over-expression significantly increased incorporation of [3H]-thymidine into DNA of Huh7 cells (Figure 3B, right panel, P = 0.007). We then evaluated the effect of ISG15 on cell cycle using flow cytometry. The proportion of G2/M population in 97L-shISG15 cells was higher than that in control 97L cells (97L-shCtrl) (29.5% vs. 14.2% ), whereas Huh7-ISG15 cells in the G2/M population decreased from 27.3% to 13.1% compared to Huh7 cells (Huh7-Ctrl) (Figure 3C). Consequently, the cyclin B1 and cyclin dependent kinase-1 (CDK1) were also reduced after knocking down ISG15 in 97L cells (Figure 3D, left panel). Opposite results were obtained by using ISG15 over-expression Huh7 cells (Figure 3D, right panel).
As shown in Table 1, ISG15 overexpression significantly correlated with metastasis (P = 0.001). This result suggests that ISG15 is endowed with metastatic features. To test the hypothesis, we examined the migratory abilities of 97L-shISG15 and Huh7-ISG15 cells using transwell migration assay. 97L-shISG15 cells displayed approximately 3-fold lower cell migration efficiency than 97L-shCtrl cells (Figure 3E, upper panel, P < 0.01), and Huh7-ISG15 cells exhibited higher migration ability compared to Huh7-Ctrl cells (Figure 3E, lower panel, P < 0.01).
Figure 3: ISG15 promotes cancerous proliferation, migration and involves in cell cycle. ISG15 was knocked down in 97L cells (97L-shISG15) (A, left pannel) and was overexpressed in Huh7 cells (Huh7-ISG15) (A, right panel). β-actin was probed as a control. (B) 97L-shISG15 cells (left panel, P = 0.003) or Huh7-ISG15 cells (right panel, P = 0.007) were cultured from 24 to 72h followed by incubation with [3H]-thymidine for 4 h. Data are from three independent experiments with three dishes and shown as means ± SD. (C) 97L-shISG15 cells or Huh7-ISG15 cells were analyzed to detect respectively their cell cycle by flow cytometry using propidium iodide (PI) staining. (D) Cell lysates were immunoblotted with antibodies against Cyclin B1 or CDK1. β-actin was used as a loading control. (E) Trans-well migration assays showed that there was a positive correlation between ISG15 expression and HCC cell migration (**, P < 0.01). The HCC cell migration was shown in the microscopic fields .
ISG15 maintains Survivin protein stabilization via XIAP
In our previous study, Survivin is highly expressed in HCC tissues . We also found that the Survivin expression was significantly correlated with the expression of ISG15 (data not shown). To further explore the mechanism, we examined the protein levels of Survivin in 97L-shISG15 cells or Huh7-ISG15 cells. Survivin protein level was lower in 97L-shISG15 cells than that in 97L-shCtrl cell, and higher in Huh7-ISG15 cells than that in Huh7-Ctrl cells (Figure 4A, B). However, there were no difference in Survivin mRNA level between 97L-shISG15 and 97L-shCtrl cells or between Huh7-ISG15 and Huh7-Ctrl cells (Figure 4C, P > 0.05), suggesting that Survivin was regulated at post-transcriptional level rather than at transcriptional level. To determine whether Survivin stability was affected by the proteasomal or lysosomal degradation pathway, 97L cells were incubated with either a proteasome inhibitor (MG-132) or a lysosomal inhibitor (chloroquine). MG132 but not chloroquine reversed Survivin protein levels, indicating that proteasomal degradation pathway was involved in the degradation of Survivin protein (Figure 4D). Moreover, we found direct interaction between recombinant ISG15 and XIAP (Figure 4E). We therefore propose that ISG15 may modulate Survivin ubiquitination via XIAP. Furthermore, we also found that ISG15 markedly weakened the association between XIAP and Survivin (Figure 4F), supporting the hypothesis that ISG15 sequesters XIAP from interacting with Survivin, thereby strengthens Survivin stability (Figure 4G).
Figure 4: ISG15 maintains Survivin protein stabilization via XIAP. Survivin protein was detected using western blotting in 97L-shISG15 cells (A) or Huh7-ISG15 cells (B). β-actin was probed as a negative control. (C) Survivin mRNA was detected using realtime-PCR in 97L-shISG15 cells and Huh7-ISG15 cells. β-actin was probed as a negative control. (P > 0.05). (D) Examination of Survivin protein degradation pathways. 97L cells were incubated with either a proteasome inhibitor (MG-132) or a lysosomal inhibitor (chloroquine). (E) Proteins from lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibody to Flag, and followed by immunoblotting with antibodies to myc. (F) Proteins from lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibody to Flag, and followed by immunoblotting with antibodies to HA, Flag and myc. (G) A model chart described the interaction between ISG15, Survivin and XIAP.
Knocking down ISG15 inhibits tumor growth, angiogenesis and extends tumor-bearing mice lifespan
To determine the in vivo effects of knocking down ISG15 on tumor growth, we established xenografted tumor models by subcutaneously injecting 97L or HepG2 cells into the back of BALB/c nude mice. When tumors reached a size of 0.3 to 0.5 cm in diameter, siRNA-ISG15 or siRNA-Ctrl was admistrated by intra-tumor injection. Silencing ISG15 significantly inhibited subcutaneous tumor growth compared with the control groups by injection of the empty vector. At the end of observation course (30 days), the inhibitory rate of cancerous growth for ISG15 knockdown was 55% and 65%, for 97L and HepG2 group, respectively (Figure 5A, B, P < 0.01). For survival analysis, siRNA-ISG15 can significantly prolong the survival rate of 97L or HepG2 tumor-bearing mice compared with the control group (Figure 5C, P < 0.05). To further investigate whether ISG15 affects the tumor microenvironment, we detected microvessel density (MVD) and cytokines such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) in mouse models of HCC. siRNA-ISG15 significantly reduced mean MVD counts at the observed time points (Figure 5D). siRNA-ISG15 remarkably inhibited VEGF and IL-6 production within tumor tissues (Figure 5E, F). These data not only imply that siRNA-ISG15 could repress tumor proliferation and angiogenesis, but also from the reverse side further confirm that the elevated ISG15 could trigger metastasis of HCC.
Figure 5: ISG15 silencing inhibits tumor growth, angiogenesis and prolongs tumor-bearing mice lifespan. (A, B) Effect of ISG15 on HCC tumor growth in xenografted tumor models (**, P < 0.01). (C) Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival were compared between siRNA-ISG15 and siRNA-Ctrl group (97L cells, P = 0.017 and HepG2 cells, P = 0.023, respectively, log-rank test, n = 12 per group). (D) The xenografted tumor tissues administered intratumor into siRNA-ISG15 or siRNA-Ctrl were stained by anti-CD31 antibody on days 10, 20, 30 for the quantification of mean MVD using immunohistochemistry. Data are the mean ± SD of mean MVD for siRNA-ISG15 or siRNA-Ctrl group as shown in the Histogram (n = 12 per group, *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). (E, F) VEGF and IL-6 levels inside tumors were assayed by ELISA assay. VEGF and IL-6 levels inside tumors significantly decreased in siRNA-ISG15 treated mice (n = 12 per group, *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).
ISG15 is a type I interferon regulated gene that is induced by viral infection through the JAK/STAT signaling pathway [29, 30]. Previous studies have shown that ISG15 is associated with chemotactic activity towards neutrophils, direction of ligated target proteins to intermediate filaments, cell-to-cell signaling, and antiviral activity during viral infections [31, 32]. It was reported that ISG15 was highly expressed in multiple human cancer cell lines, and ISG15 plays crucial roles in modulating cell growth and progression of breast cancer [26, 33, 34]. However, the physiological or pathological functions of ISG15 in HCC have not been clearly elucidated.
Our findings suggested that ISG15 is involved in the proliferation and migration of HCC cells. These data cast light on novel mechanisms of HCC progression. ISG15 mRNA levels in HCC cells and tumor tissues from patients are higher than non-HCC cell and HCC adjacent tissues. Furthermore, using anti-ISG15 antibody clearly indicated ISG15 protein overexpression in HCC cells and tumor tissues from patients. Knocking down ISG15 by shRNA resulted in remarkable reduction of HCC cell proliferation. Concordantly, exogenous ISG15 expression in transfected cells promoted HCC cell growth. Moreover, we find that ISG15 is closely related to cell cycle. Cell cycle checkpoints are important control mechanisms that ensure the proper execution of cell cycle events. One of the checkpoints, the G2/M checkpoint blocks the entry into mitosis when DNA is damaged. Cyclin B1 and CDK1 are essential for G2/M phase transitions of eukaryotic cell cycle [35-37]. ISG15 knockdown can reduce the expression of Cyclin B1 and CDK1 and induce G2/M phase cell cycle arrest. In addition, ISG15 can also boost HCC cells migration. Survivin was originally identified as the smallest IAP family member. It can promote tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion and counteract apoptosis in vitro and in transgenic animals [38, 39]. XIAP has been shown to function as an active center of E3 and to be responsible for the ubiquitination of substrates. A recent report demonstrated that Survivin and XIAP form a complex during cell death and synergistic inhibition of caspase activation [40, 41]. Consistent partially with this result, we found that the Survivin-XIAP complex existed in HCC cells. However, in our study, XIAP promoted the polyubiquitination of Survivin both in vitro and in intact cells (data not shown). We speculate that Survivin is one of the substrates of the E3 activity of XIAP. ISG15 interacts with XIAP, preventing XIAP and Survivin interaction, thereby keeping Survivin from proteasomal degradation pathway. This process ultimately results in HCC tumor progression.
We generated a siRNA against ISG15 and performed intratumor injection in tumor-bearing mice. This siRNA can not only inhibit tumor growth and but also prolong the survival time dramatically. Interestingly, ISG15 silencing affected tumor microenvironment including MVD and cytokines such as VEGF and IL-6. Previous studies have shown that MVD, VEGF and IL-6 are closely related to tumor proliferation and metastasis [42-44]. ISG15 silencing can also decrease MVD, VEGF and IL-6 in vivo obviously. These results show ISG15 was significantly correlated with the HCC proliferation and metastasis.
In summary, our results suggest that ISG15 pathway, aberrantly elevated in HCC, contributes to proliferation and metastasis of hepatocarcinoma cells via inhibiting targeted degradation of Survivin. ISG15 probably is a prognosis marker and its inhibition could develop a therapeutic advantage for HCC patients over-expressing ISG15.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients and specimens
A total of 50 patients of HCC were recruited into this study with 44 males and 6 females. The mean age was 46.3 years (standard deviation, 9.6 years; range, 28 - 74 years). Tumor and para-cancerous tissues were procured from the potential curative tumor resection at the Hepatic Surgery Center of the Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology in 2008. All patients were followed up for 5 year after surgery. All human studies were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Tongji Hospital and written informed consent was provided according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. All the specimens were confirmed to be hepatocellular carcinoma by pathological examination. Tumor differentiation was graded by Edmondson-Steiner’s criteria. Tumors with Edmondson-Steiner’s grade I were considered as moderate to well differentiation and those with grade II-IV were poorly differentiated. Metastasis was defined as the involvement of extrahepatic tissue/organ and distant lymphadenopathy. Specimens were preserved in liquid nitrogen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks. Serial sections of 2-4 μm were prepared from the cut surface of blocks at the maximum cross-section of the tumor.
Cells and animals
The HepG2 and Huh7 human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line and non-HCC L02 cell was purchased from the China Center for Type Culture Collection (CCTCC, Wuhan, China) and was cultured in 1640 complete culture medium (Gibco Inc., USA) with 10% newborn bovine serum (Invitrogen Inc., USA). MHCC97L Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (97L) which have metastatic ability were purchased from Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University (Shanghai, china) . The 97L cell lines were maintained as monolayer cultures in DMEM-high glucose medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 IU/ml streptomycin at 37˚C in a humidified atmosphere, with 5% CO2. All cells were passaged for less than 6 months in our laboratory after receipt or resuscitation. BALB/c nude mice were obtained from the Animal Center of the Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing.
Immunoblot analysis and immunoprecipitation assay
For immunoblotting, immunoprecipitates or whole-cell lysates were resolved by Sodium salt-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad). The immunoblots were probed with the following antibodies: anti-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-hemagglutinin (anti-HA) (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-myc (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich) and anti-ISG15 (Santa Cruz). The proteins were visualized by using Western blotting system (Promega). For immunoprecipitation, cells were collected and then lysed in Nonidet P-40 buffer or sonicated in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) buffer supplemented with a complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). After cell lysates were precleared with normal mouse IgG and protein A/G agarose beads for 1 h at 4°C, whole-cell lysates were used for immunoprecipitation with various antibodies. The primary antibodies were goat anti-human ISG15 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, US), rabbit anti-human Cyclin B1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, US), rabbit anti-human CDK1 (Novocastra Laboratories Ltd, UK), mouse anti-human CD31 (Novocastra Laboratories Ltd, UK), and isotype-matched IgG (Sigma, Germany). Corresponding species-specific horseradish-peroxidase (HRP)-biotinylated (Pierce, US) were used. For immunoprecipitation assays, cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids. Plasmid-transfected cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in IP lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and protease inhibitor mixture). Supernatants were immunoprecipitated with mouse IgG or anti-Flag antibody at 4°C overnight. The immunoprecipitated proteins were eluted from the protein A/G-agarose by boiling for 10 min in 1×SDS-PAGE sample buffer and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies.
The tumor specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Immunohistochemical staining was performed according to the manufacture’s instruction. Briefly, the sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded alcohol and distilled water. Subsequent to antigen retrieval, endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min, followed by rehydration in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubation with 5% goat serum for 60 min to bind the nonspecific antigens. The sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibodies (anti-ISG15, 1/50, Santa Cruz). The immunosignals were detected using the ABC kit at room temperature. Subsequent to rinsing, the sections were incubated with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB), counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted. The sections were then analyzed through standard light microscopy and taken photos. A scoring system was used to evaluate the immunoreactivity, as previously reported . The percentage of positive cells was classified as follows: 0 for ≤5%, 1 for 6–25%, 2 for 26–50%, and 3 for ≥51%. The intensity of immunostaining was graded as follows: 0 for negative, 1 for weakly positive (light brown), 2 for moderately positive (brown), and 3 for strongly positive (dark brown). The overall immunostaining score was calculated as follows: immunoreactivity score (IRS) = percentage score × intensity score. The results were reported positive if the IRS is ≥3, and negative if the IRS is < 3. All slides were independently scored by pathologists who were blinded to the clinical data. A high level of concordance (90%) was achieved. In case of disagreement between the reviewers, the slides were reviewed by both pathologists untill a consensus view is achieved.
Silencing and overexpressing of ISG15
For silencing of ISG15, the RNA sequence against ISG15 for RNAi were designed based on pSUPER system instructions (Oligoengine) and cloned into pSUPER-puro that expresses 19 nt hairpin-type short hairpin RNA (shRNA) with a 9 nt loop. ISG15 shRNA-encoding sequences were as follows: 5’-GATCCCCGCACCTA CGAGGTACGG CTTTCAAGAGAAGCCGTACC
TCGTAGGTGCTTTTTA-3’ (ISG15, sense); 5’-AGCTTAAAAAGCACCTACGAGG
TACGGCTTCTCTTGAAAGCCGTA CCTCGTAGGTGCGGG-3’ (ISG15, antisence). The inserted shRNAs (pSUPER-shISG15) were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The 97L cells were transfected by using Lipofectamin 2000 (Invitrogen, US) as described by the manufacturer. ISG15 silenced cells were selected with puromycin (Sigma, Germany). Empty vectors transfected cells were used as controls. For overexpression of ISG15, human ISG15 was cloned into pcDNA3.1 expression vector. The ISG15 expression vector or Ctrl vector was transfected into cells by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The ISG15 mRNA and protein expressions were detected by PCR and western blot analysis, respectively.
Cell proliferation assay
Proliferation of cells was measured using a [3H]-thymidine incorporation assay. The 97L-shCtrl and Huh7-Ctrl cells, 97L-shISG15 and Huh7-ISG15 cells (2×103 cells/well) were seeded on 96-well culture plates, cultured until the cells reached 70% to 80% confluency, and then serum starved in DMEM for 24 h. After 72 h, cells were pulsed with [3H]-thymidine for 4 h. Cells were harvested and their [3H]-thymidine incorporation was measured in the liquid scintillation counter LKB1219.
Cell migration assay
The cell motility assay was performed using Transwell inserts (6.5-mm diameter, 8-μm pore size polycarbonate membrane) obtained from Corning (Cambridge, MA, US). Cells (1×105) in 0.5 ml serum-free medium were placed in the upper chamber, and the lower chamber was loaded with 0.8 ml medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells that migrated to the lower surface of filters were stained with Wright–Giemsa solution (Sigma-Aldrich), and five fields of each well were counted after 24h of incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2. Three wells were examined for each condition and cell type, and the experiments were repeated three times.
Female 6-week-old BALB/c nude mice with a body weight of approximately 15g were used and kept under specific pathogen-free conditions. Xenografts of 97L cells or HepG2 cells were produced by injecting tumor cells (1×106 resuspended in PBS) subcutaneously into the back of the mice. When tumors reached a diameter of 3 to 5 mm, the mice transplanted with 97L cells or HepG2 cells were grouped (12 mice per group) and administered intratumor siRNA-ISG15 or siRNA-Ctrl three times per week. Tumor size was measured twice per week. The life span of tumor-bearing mice was recorded. At necropsy, the tumors were separated and were fixed with 10% buffered formalin and embedded with paraffin. The tumor was determined by examining serial sections of tumor tissue by microscopy. CD31 staining were counted as MVD, which was obtained by manually counting the positive foci for slides counterstained with hematoxylin. MVD was scored as the number of vessels found in the field, and the final score was the average of the three most vascularized areas on the high power field . Total proteins are extracted from HCC tissues through tissue homogenate and removal of nonprotein components. VEGF or IL-6 ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Inc.) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The assay was performed in triplicate according to the manufacturer’s recommended procedures.
All values were presented as mean±SD. The relationship between the expression level of ISG15 and various clinicopathological factors was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The relationship between the expression of ISG15 and 5-year survival of HCC patients was analyzed by Pearson Chi-squared test. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the cumulative cause-specific survival of tumor-bearing mice. The influence of ISG15 on the growth and migration of HCC was analyzed by the Student’s t test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test or t test were used to determine the difference among treatments. All statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 17.0 software package for Macintosh (SPSS Inc., Chicago, US). A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and P value less than 0.01 was remarkably significant.
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Jun Tian for technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81000944) and Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (No. 10KJB320020), Tianqing Liver Disease Research Foundation(No. 20120024) and Research Foundation for “Reserved Academic Leader” from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University.
3,3-diaminobenzidine(DAB), Control Huh7 cells (Huh7-Ctrl), Cyclin dependent kinase-1 (CDK1), Fetal bovine serum (FBS), Hepatitis B virus(HBV), Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), Horseradish-peroxidase (HRP), IFN regulated factor (IRFs), IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), IFN-stimulated genes 15 (ISG15), Interferons (IFNs), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), ISG15 knock-down 97L cells (97L-shISG15), ISG15 over-expression Huh7 cells (Huh7-ISG15), MHCC97L Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (97L), Microvascular density (MVD), Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), Polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), Propidium iodide (PI), Sodium salt-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis(SDS-PAGE), Standard deviation (SD), Tris-buffered saline(TBS), Ubiquitin cross-reactive protein (UCRP), Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP)
This work was supported by grants for H. Zhu from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81000944) and Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (No. 10KJB320020), Tianqing Liver Disease Research Foundation(No. 20120024) and Research Foundation for “Reserved Academic Leader” from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by all authors.
1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C and Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. International journal of cancer. 2010;127(12):2893-917.
2. Alazawi W, Cunningham M, Dearden J and Foster GR. Systematic review: outcome of compensated cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C infection. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2010;32(3):344-55.
3. Jin GZ, Yu WL, Dong H, Zhou WP, Gu YJ, Yu H, Yu H, Lu XY, Xian ZH, Liu YK, Cong WM and Wu MC. SUOX is a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of hepatology. 2013;59(3):510-7.
4. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D and Bray, F (2013).GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0,Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No.11[Internet].Lyon,France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available from http://globocan.iarc.fr
5. Andreou A, Vauthey JN, Cherqui D, Zimmitti G, Ribero D, Truty MJ, Wei SH, Curley SA, Laurent A, Poon RT, Belghiti J, Nagorney DM and Aloia TA. Improved long-term survival after major resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter analysis based on a new definition of major hepatectomy. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery. 2013;17(1):66-77.
6. El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. The New England journal of medicine. 2011;365(12):1118-27.
7. Sherman M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, surveillance, and diagnosis. Seminars in liver disease. 2010(1);30:3-16.
8. Han YF, Zhao J, Ma LY, Yin JH, Chang WJ, Zhang HW and Cao GW. Factors predicting occurrence and prognosis of hepatitis-B-virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. World journal of gastroenterology. 2011;17(38):4258-70.
9. Laurence A, Pesu M, Silvennoinen O and O’Shea J. JAK Kinases in Health and Disease: An Update. The open rheumatology journal. 2012;6(Sep 07):232-44.
10. Yanai H, Negishi H and Taniguchi T. The IRF family of transcription factors: Inception, impact and implications in oncogenesis. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1(8):1376-86.
11. Ritchie KJ1 and Zhang DE. ISG15: the immunological kin of ubiquitin. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2004;15(15):237-246.
12. Andersen JB and Hassel BA. The interferon regulated ubiquitin-like protein, ISG15, in tumorigenesis: friend or foe? Cytokine & growth factor reviews. 2006;17(6):411-21.
13. Schmid S, Mordstein M, Kochs G, Garcia-Sastre A and Tenoever BR. Transcription factor redundancy ensures induction of the antiviral state. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2010;285(53):42013-22.
14. Genin P, Lin R, Hiscott J and Civas A. Differential regulation of human interferon A gene expression by interferon regulatory factors 3 and 7. Molecular and cellular biology. 2009;29(12):3435-50.
15. Zhang YB and Gui JF. Molecular regulation of interferon antiviral response in fish. Developmental and comparative immunology. 2012;38(2):193-202.
16. Zhang D and Zhang DE. Interferon-stimulated gene 15 and the protein ISGylation system. Journal of interferon & cytokine research. 2011;31(1):119-30.
17. Chairatvit K, Wongnoppavich A and Choonate S. Up-regulation of interferon-stimulated gene15 and its conjugates by tumor necrosis factor-alpha via type I interferon-dependent and -independent pathways. Molecular and cellular biochemistry. 2012;368(1-2):195-201.
18. Jeon YJ, Yoo HM and Chung CH. ISG15 and immune diseases. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2010;1802(5):485-96.
19. Karin BD, Francisco M, Lars DA, Kasper T, Niels F, Anne Sofie BE, Pia PM, Karina DS, Michael B and Torben F. TOX3 (TNRC9) overexpression in bladder cancer cells decreases cellular proliferation and triggers an interferon-like response. J Mol Biomark Diagn. 2013;4:2
20. Satake H, Tamura K, Furihata M, Anchi T, Sakoda H, Kawada C, Iiyama T, Ashida S and Shuin T. The ubiquitin-like molecule interferon-stimulated gene 15 is overexpressed in human prostate cancer. Oncology Reports. 2010;23(1):11-6
21. Desai SD, Reed RE, Burks J, Wood LM, Pullikuth AK, Haas AL, Liu LF, Breslin JW, Meiners S and Sankar S. ISG15 disrupts cytoskeletal architecture and promotes motility in human breast cancer cells. Experimental biology and medicine. 2012;237(1):38-49.
22. Lee J, Li L, Gretz N, Gebert J and Dihlmann S. Absent in Melanoma 2 (AIM2) is an important mediator of interferon-dependent and -independent HLA-DRA and HLA-DRB gene expression in colorectal cancers. Oncogene. 2012;31(10):1242-53.
23. Wood LM, Sankar S, Reed RE, Haas AL, Liu LF, McKinnon P and Desai SD. A novel role for ATM in regulating proteasome-mediated protein degradation through suppression of the ISG15 conjugation pathway. PloS one. 2011;6(1):e16422.
24. Chi LM, Lee CW, Chang KP, Hao SP, Lee HM, Liang Y, Hsueh C, Yu CJ, Lee IN, Chang YJ, Lee SY, Yeh YM, Chang YS, Chien KY and Yu JS. Enhanced interferon signaling pathway in oral cancer revealed by quantitative proteome analysis of microdissected specimens using 16O/18O labeling and integrated two-dimensional LC-ESI-MALDI tandem MS. Molecular & cellular proteomics. 2009;8(7):1453-74.
25. Sumino J, Uzawa N, Okada N, Miyaguchi K, Mogushi K, Takahashi K, Sato H, Michikawa C, Nakata Y, Tanaka H and Amagasa T. Gene expression changes in initiation and progression of oral squamous cell carcinomas revealed by laser microdissection and oligonucleotide microarray analysis. International journal of cancer. 2013;132(3):540-8.
26. Wood LM, Pan ZK, Seavey MM, Muthukumaran G and Paterson Y. The ubiquitin-like protein, ISG15, is a novel tumor-associated antigen for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy. 2012;61(5):689-700.
27. Tsai YC, Pestka S, Wang LH, Runnels LW, Wan S, Lyu YL and Liu LF. Interferon-beta signaling contributes to Ras transformation. PloS one. 2011;6(8):e24291.
28. Zhu H, Chen XP, Zhang WG, Luo SF and Zhang BX. Expression and significance of new inhibitor of apoptosis protein Survivin in hepatocellular carcinoma. World journal of gastroenterology. 2005;11(25):3855-9.
29. Malakhova OA, Yan M, Malakhov MP, Yuan Y, Ritchie KJ, Kim KI, Peterson LF, Shuai K and Zhang DE. Protein ISGylation modulates the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Genes & development. 2003;17(4):455-60.
30. Jeon YJ, Choi JS, Lee JY, Yu KR, Kim SM, Ka SH, Oh KH, Kim KI, Zhang DE, Bang OS and Chung CH. ISG15 modification of filamin B negatively regulates the type I interferon-induced JNK signalling pathway. EMBO reports. 2009;10(4):374-80.
31. Katsounas A, Hubbard JJ, Wang CH, Zhang X, Dou D, Shivakumar B, Winter S, Schlaak JF, Lempicki RA, Masur H, Polis M, Kottilil S and Osinusi A. High interferon-stimulated gene ISG-15 expression affects HCV treatment outcome in patients co-infected with HIV and HCV. Journal of medical virology. 2013;85(6):959-63.
32. Okumura F, Okumura AJ, Uematsu K, Hatakeyama S, Zhang DE and Kamura T. Activation of double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) by interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) modification down-regulates protein translation. Journal of biological chemistry. 2013;288(4):2839-47.
33. Hadjivasiliou A. ISG15 implicated in cytoskeleton disruption and promotion of breast cancer. Expert review of proteomics. 2012;9(1):7.
34. Burks J, Reed RE and Desai SD. ISGylation governs the oncogenic function of Ki-Ras in breast cancer. Oncogene.2013 Jan 14. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012:33(6):794-803.
35. Begnami MD, Fregnani JH, Nonogaki S and Soares FA. Evaluation of cell cycle protein expression in gastric cancer: cyclin B1 expression and its prognostic implication. Human pathology. 2010;41(8):1120-7.
36. Taylor WR and Stark GR. Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53. Oncogene. 2001;20(15):1803-15.
37. Wu W, Ye H, Wan L, Han X, Wang G, Hu J, Tang M, Duan X, Fan Y, He S, Huang L, Pei H, Wang X, Li X, Xie C, Zhang R, Yuan Z, Mao Y, Wei Y and Chen L. Millepachine, a novel chalcone, induces G2/M arrest by inhibiting CDK1 activity and causing apoptosis via ROS-mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in human hepatocarcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34(7):1636-43.
38. Altieri DC. Survivin, cancer networks and pathway-directed drug discovery. Nature reviews Cancer. 2008;8(1):61-70.
39. Ambrosini G, Adida C and Altieri DC. A novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, expressed in cancer and lymphoma. Nature medicine. 1997;3(8):917-21.
40. Severo MS, Choy A, Stephens KD, Sakhon OS, Chen G, Chung DW, Le Roch KG, Blaha G and Pedra JH. The E3 ubiquitin ligase XIAP restricts Anaplasma phagocytophilum colonization of Ixodes scapularis ticks. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2013;208(11):1830-40.
41. Galban S and Duckett CS. XIAP as a ubiquitin ligase in cellular signaling. Cell death and differentiation. 2010;17(1):54-60.
42. Shahneh FZ, Baradaran B, Zamani F and Aghebati-Maleki L. Tumor angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic therapies. Human antibodies. 2013;22(1-2):15-9.
43. He G, Dhar D, Nakagawa H, Font-Burgada J, Ogata H, Jiang Y, Shalapour S, Seki E, Yost SE, Jepsen K, Frazer KA, Harismendy O,Hatziapostolou M, Iliopoulos D, Suetsugu A, Hoffman RM, Tateishi R, Koike K and Karin M. Identification of liver cancer progenitors whose malignant progression depends on autocrine IL-6 signaling. Cell. 2013;155(2):384-96.
44. Xiao YF, Liu SX, Wu DD, Chen X and Ren LF. Inhibitory effect of arsenic trioxide on angiogenesis and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in gastric cancer. World journal of gastroenterology. 2006;12(36):5780-6.
45. Tian J, Tang ZY, Ye SL, Liu YK, Lin ZY, Chen J and Xue Q. New human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line with highly metastatic potential (MHCC97) and its expressions of the factors associated with metastasis. Br J Cancer. 1999; 81(5):814-21
46. Blanco R, Rengifo E, Rengifo CE, Cedeno M, Frometa M and Carr A. Immunohistochemical Reactivity of the 14F7 Monoclonal Antibody Raised against N-Glycolyl GM3 Ganglioside in Some Benign and Malignant Skin Neoplasms. ISRN dermatology. 2011;2011( Apr 10):848909.
47. Rahmah NN, Sakai K, Sano K and Hongo K. Expression of RECK in endothelial cells of glioma: comparison with CD34 and VEGF expressions. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2012;107(3):559-64.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.