Oncotarget

Research Papers:

Therapeutic strategies and genetic profile comparisons in small cell carcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung using next-generation sequencing

Masaoki Ito, Yoshihiro Miyata, Shoko Hirano, Shingo Kimura, Fumiko Irisuna, Kyoko Ikeda, Kei Kushitani, Yasuhiro Tsutani, Daisuke Ueda, Norifumi Tsubokawa, Yukio Takeshima and Morihito Okada _

PDF  |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:108936-108945. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22426

Metrics: PDF 1597 views  |   HTML 2380 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Masaoki Ito1, Yoshihiro Miyata1, Shoko Hirano2, Shingo Kimura2, Fumiko Irisuna2, Kyoko Ikeda2, Kei Kushitani3, Yasuhiro Tsutani1, Daisuke Ueda1, Norifumi Tsubokawa1, Yukio Takeshima2 and Morihito Okada1

1Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

2Analysis Center of Life Science, Natural Science Center for Basic Research and Development, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

3Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

Correspondence to:

Morihito Okada, email: [email protected]

Keywords: next generation sequencing; small cell lung cancer; large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; genetic variants; therapeutic targets

Received: March 10, 2017     Accepted: August 07, 2017     Published: November 14, 2017

ABSTRACT

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung are classified as variants of endocrine carcinoma and subdivided into pure or combined type. Clinical benefit of target therapy has not been established in these tumors. This study aimed to compare genetic and clinicopathological features between SCLC and LCNEC or pure and combined types, and explore the possibility of target therapy using next-generation sequencing. In 13 SCLC and 22 LCNEC cases, 72 point mutations, 19 deletions, and 3 insertions were detected. As therapeutically targetable variants, mutations in EGFR (L858R), KRAS (G12D, G12A, G12V), and PIK3CA (E545K) were detected in 5 cases. The case harboring EGFR mutation showed response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, there are no clinicopathological features associated with therapeutically targetable cases. And there was no significant genetic feature between SCLC and LCNEC or pure and combined types. In conclusion, although patients with SCLC and LCNEC may benefit from target therapy, they were not identifiable by clinicopathologic background. And there was not significant genetic difference between SCLC and LCNEC, including between pure and combined types. Classifying SCLC and LCNEC in same category is reasonable. However, distinguishing the pure type from combined type was not validated. Comprehensive genetic analysis should be performed to detect targetable variants in any type of SCLC and LCNEC.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 22426