Oncotarget

Clinical Research Papers:

Comparison of primary endpoints between publications, registries, and protocols of phase III cancer clinical trials

Fei Liang, Xinmei Guo, Sheng Zhang _, Hongxi Xue, Qiang Chen and Xichun Hu

PDF  |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite  |  Order a Reprint

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:97648-97656. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21459

Metrics: PDF 397 views  |   HTML 856 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Fei Liang1,*, Xinmei Guo2,*, Sheng Zhang1, Hongxi Xue3, Qiang Chen4 and Xichun Hu1

1Shanghai Cancer Center and Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

2Interventional treatment unit, Shandong Chest Hospital, Jinan, China

3Rizhao City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Rizhao, China

4Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Public Health Taishan Medical University, Taian, China

*These authors share first co-authorship of this study

Correspondence to:

Sheng Zhang, email: wozhangsheng@hotmail.com

Keywords: primary endpoints, protocols, randomized controlled trials, cancer

Received: June 21, 2017     Accepted: September 18, 2017     Published: October 03, 2017

ABSTRACT

Background: Decisions by leading journals to require trial registration and to make protocols of phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) publicly accessible were landmark events in clinical trial reporting.

Materials and Methods: We identified phase III cancer RCTs published between 2013 and 2015 in New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), The Lancet, The lancet Oncology, JAMA and Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO).

Results: We identified 345 reports of phase III RCTs of which 217 (62.9%) had available protocols. The availability rates for NEJM, The Lancet, The Lancet Oncology, JAMA and JCO were 98.0%, 33.3%, 22.7%, 55.6% and 88.3%, respectively. Journal and publication year were significantly associated with protocol availability. Eight of 215 trials (3.7%) with English language protocols had a discrepancy in primary endpoints between publication and protocol. Discrepancies of primary endpoints between protocol and registration existed in 16 (7.7%) of 209 trials.

Conclusions: The policy of providing protocols with articles reporting RCTs has not been enforced rigorously. Selective reporting of primary endpoints only remains in a small fraction of phase III trials. Further improvement in consistency between primary endpoints registered and that in protocol is necessary.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 21459