Research Papers:

Identification of Kinase Inhibitors that Target Transcription Initiation by RNA Polymerase II

Metrics: PDF 1994 views  |   HTML 2773 views  |   ?  

José M. Morachis, Ruo Huang and Beverly M. Emerson _


José M. Morachis1,2, Ruo Huang1, Beverly M. Emerson1

1Regulatory Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA

2Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

Keywords: RNA polymerase II, transcription therapy, core promoters, kinase inhibitors, p53, p21, Fas/APO1

Received: January 21, 2011; Accepted: January 25, 2010; Published: January 27, 2010;


Beverly M. Emerson, e-mail:


Our current understanding of eukaryotic transcription has greatly benefited from use of small molecule inhibitors that have delineated multiple regulatory steps in site-specific initiation and elongation of RNA synthesis by multiple forms of RNA polymerase (RNAP). This class of "transcription" drugs is also of therapeutic interest and under evaluation in clinical trials. However, to date very few small molecules that directly abolish transcription have been identified, particularly those that act at the level of RNAP II initiation. Using a biochemical assay that measures transcription from recombinant, natural p53-responsive promoters and an artificial "super" promoter, we have identified three distinct small molecules that inhibit mRNA synthesis in vitro. Unexpectedly, these are kinase inhibitors, Hypericin, Rottlerin, and SP600125, with known substrates, which we find also strongly impair transcriptional initiation (IC50s = µM range) by targeting specific components of the RNAP II pre-initiation complex. When measured before and during transcription in vitro, one common target of inhibition by all three compounds is modification of the TATA Binding Protein (TBP) within the RNAP II holocomplex as it converts to an active transcribing enzyme. On this basis, by blocking the critical step of TBP modification, transcriptional initiation is effectively abolished even on structurally distinct core promoters.


Eukaryotic RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) and basal transcription factors, such as TFIID, TFIIH, TFIIB, assemble into versatile pre-initiation complexes (PIC) on core promoters to regulate initiation of mRNA synthesis. Core promoters extend from ~-50 to + 50 bp relative to the start site of transcription at +1 and are composed of different combinations of specific DNA sequence motifs such as the TATA box, initiator (INR), TFIIB recognition element (BRE), downstream promoter element (DPE), and motif ten element (MTE). The exact combination of these DNA motifs can differentially modulate the assembly of PIC complexes, start site precision of initiation, and transcriptional kinetics from specific promoters [1, 2]. After PIC assembly, multiple enzymatic processes must take place for productive mRNA synthesis to occur at the sequential steps of initiation, elongation, and RNA processing. Because transcription is dependent on diverse enzymatic reactions such as phosphorylation, ubiquitinylation, and acetylation, it is possible to inhibit mRNA production using specific pharmacological agents. For example, the transition from RNAP II pre-initiation to initiation and finally elongation is influenced by modifications within its carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD), which then functions as a platform for the ordered assembly of different pre-mRNA processing machinery [3]. Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdk) Cdk7 and Cdk9 abolishes RNAP II phosphorylation at specific serine residues in the CTD and prevents transcriptional elongation [4]. DRB (5,6-dichloro-1-b-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole), which specifically inhibits CTD phosphorylation at serine 2, has been a particularly useful reagent in the transcription field because it has facilitated the dissection of multiple elongation steps and led to the identification of important transcription factors [5]. Advanced analogs of DRB such as Flavopiridol have also been developed and have shown promising therapeutic potential for several types of human cancer [6]. Known Cdk inhibitors act by competing for the ATP binding site on target kinases and have broad-spectrum substrate specificities, including Cdk2/cyclin E, Cdk7/cyclin H and Cdk9/cyclin T [7]. Interestingly, Flavopiridol and other drugs that affect basal transcriptional steps were initially thought to inhibit kinases involved in cell cycle progression or other signaling pathways [8-10].

It has been proposed that the transcription machinery itself may be a pivotal stress sensor that directs cell fate decisions by gauging the severity of damage and activating the p53 tumor suppressor pathway [11]. In this regard, several studies have shown that blocking global cellular mRNA synthesis in human cancer cell lines by the Cdk inhibitors Roscovitine (Seliciclib, CYC202), Flavopiridol, DRB, and H7 induces a strong stress response resulting in nuclear accumulation of p53, induction of certain p53 target genes, and apoptosis [12-14]. On this basis, selective interference of transcription has become an active area of pursuit for the development of potential anti-tumor therapeutics [13]. Indeed, Flavopiridol and UCN-01 were the first Cdk inhibitors to be tested in clinical trials and have shown promising results, particularly in treating certain chronic leukemias or in combination therapy [14-16]. With the increasing availability of commercial drug libraries, it is now possible to identify novel small molecules that promote apoptosis through transcription interference. Our aim was to use in vitro transcription assays to identify new transcription inhibitors that act at a defined step in mRNA synthesis, initiation. To date, very few inhibitors of eukaryotic RNA initiation have been identified, with the exception of the mushroom toxin, alpha-amanitin, a cyclic peptide that acts by binding directly to RNAP II and preventing its translocation [17].

In this study, we analyzed the impact of multiple kinase inhibitors on the activity of three recombinant DNA templates containing distinct core promoter structures: two natural p53-responsive promoters and an artificial “super” promoter using a well-characterized in vitro transcription assay. This enabled us to identify three compounds, Hypericin, Rottlerin, and SP600125 that are each strong inhibitors of RNA synthesis. In contrast to DRB or Flavopiridol, drugs that abolish elongation by decreasing bulk cellular levels of phosphorylated CTD serine 2 phosphorylation, these compounds specifically inhibit early steps in transcription initiation by affecting enzymatically engaged RNAP II/Promoter complexes. A shared target of all three compounds is inhibition of modification of the TATA Binding Protein (TBP) within the RNAP II holocomplex as it converts to an actively transcribing form. In addition, we observe drug-specific effects on CTD phosphorylation of both bulk cellular and promoter-bound RNAP II. This reveals an unexpected role for diverse protein kinase inhibitors in directly regulating transcriptional initiation and expands their known substrate specificities to include essential factors that function on structurally distinct core promoters.


Screening compound libraries by in vitro transcription

To test the ability of a library of kinase inhibitors to affect RNAP II-dependent transcription, we employed an in vitro assay that uses nuclear protein extracts from human tissue culture cells [18], as a source of RNAP II and transcription components. These reactions were programmed with supercoiled plasmids containing recombinant promoters that drive expression of reporter genes. This assay can distinguish between two distinct steps in transcription, initiation of RNA synthesis by RNAP II and elongation of RNA transcripts. Although several inhibitors of elongation are known (DRB, Flavopiridol) [19], very few agents that impair initiation have been identified, except a-amanitin. For this reason, we specifically measured RNAP II-dependent initiation in our assays. The recombinant DNA templates we analyzed consisted of two natural human promoters, p21 and Fas/APO1, and one synthetic promoter, the Super Core Promoter (SCP1). p21 and Fas/APO1 are physiologically important p53 target genes that regulate cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, respectively [20-22]. Both p21 and Fas/APO1 were previously characterized by in vitro transcription and can drive robust RNA synthesis in this assay [23]. Furthermore, p21 and Fas/APO1 represent two structurally distinct types of natural promoters (Figure 1A). p21 contains multiple classic core promoter elements such as a TATA box, initiator (INR), and downstream promoter element (DPE). Whereas Fas/APO1 lacks these canonical elements but contains a critical NF-Y response element near the +1 start site of transcription. NF-Y is a bifunctional transcription factor that regulates basal expression of Fas/APO1 in vivo [23]. The SCP1 promoter is a synthetically designed chimeric promoter constructed by using sequence motifs from viral as well as cellular genes [24]. We included the SCP1 template in all of our transcription reactions, containing either p21 or Fas/APO1 plasmids, as a positive internal control because of its strong activity in vitro. Importantly, use of these three DNA templates allowed us to screen for compounds that could inhibit the initiation of RNAP II transcription from structurally diverse promoters.

Figure 1: Screening compound libraries by in vitro transcription (A) Structures of the p21, Fas/APO1, and SCP1 promoters used as in vitro transcription templates. Specific core promoter regulatory elements are defined in the text. (B) Diagram of the in vitro transcription assay showing: (1) Pre-initiation complex (PIC) formation and initiation of RNA synthesis, (2) RNAP II elongation and production of mRNA, (3) assay of in vitro synthesized RNA by annealing of radioactively labeled DNA primer, (4) primer extension and detection by PAGE. (C) Transcriptional analysis of p21, Fas/APO1, and SCP1 as a function of increasing amounts of DMSO.

In the in vitro transcription assay, mRNA synthesis is detected by primer extension, in which purified transcripts are annealed to a short, 32P-labeled DNA primer followed by Reverse Transcriptase-mediated extension to generate transcripts of known length, and visualized by PAGE (Figure 1B). Due to the multiple steps involved in this assay, it is not well-suited for use in high-throughput screening of large compound libraries. However, this approach has multiple advantages that make it attractive to screen a small collection of compounds. For example, one can selectively analyze the effect of compounds or other therapeutics in targeting distinct steps in transcription, such as PIC assembly, initiation (up to 100 bp), elongation and termination. In the present study, we directly measured RNAP II-directed initiation only, which was independent of chromatin structure, nuclear localization, or other upstream processes that complicate the interpretation of cell-based assays, thus greatly simplifying our analyses. To begin, we tested the sensitivity of in vitro transcription to DMSO since drugs are commonly dissolved in this solvent. Activity from the three promoters was robust in buffers containing up to 4% DMSO (v/v) (Figure 1C), which set the limit for the volume of compound that could be added to each reaction.

Identification of specific kinase inhibitors that directly impair transcriptional initiation

We screened 80 commercial kinase inhibitors (BIOMOL International, see Supplemental Table 1) for their activities towards early steps in transcription on the p21, Fas/APO1, and SCP1 promoters. To facilitate screening, the 80 kinase inhibitors were first combined into 20 cocktail mixes each containing four drugs. The 4-drug cocktails were added (50µM final concentration) to the transcription reactions before initiating RNA synthesis with nucleotide triphosphates (NTPs) (Figure 2A). The resulting transcripts were measured by primer extension, followed by PAGE, and compared using a phosphoimager. Using this strategy, we identified four cocktail mixes (C-7, C-8, C-14, and C-16) that significantly reduced transcriptional activity from each of the three promoters (Figure 2B).

Figure 2: A kinase inhibitor screen identified 4 cocktails that block in vitro transcription (A) Diagram of the in vitro transcription drug screen using 80 kinase inhibitors from BIOMOL (BML-2832). The 80 compounds were mixed into 20 cocktails containing 4 drugs each at final concentrations of 50µM in the transcription reactions. (B) Four of the drug cocktails significantly reduced in vitro transcription of all three templates, p21, Fas/APO1, and SCP1, relative to controls.

The four cocktail mixes were further investigated by testing each of the compounds individually. We observed that only a single compound from cocktails C-7, C-14, and C-16 significantly inhibited transcriptional activity (Figure 3). Interestingly, none of the individual compounds in cocktail 8 were able to reduce transcription, which suggests a requirement for combinatorial inhibition in this particular mix. The three active compounds identified using this strategy were Hypericin, Rottlerin, and SP600125. These three small molecules have not previously been implicated, to our knowledge, in blocking basal transcription initiation. Hypericin induces apoptosis in cancer cells and is a potent antiviral agent [25-27]. Hypericin has also been used as a photocytotoxic compound, becoming active towards other targets upon intense light activation. This drug has been shown to inhibit protein kinase C (PKC), irreversibly damage the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum and other cellular membranes, decrease cellular pH, and inhibit mitochondrial function [27-29]. Rottlerin (mallotoxin) is considered to be a strong inhibitor of PKC delta but several studies have reported that it can inhibit other targets without affecting PKC delta [30-32]. SP600125 is a novel and selective inhibitor of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) (5). These three compounds have very different substrate targets, yet each can effectively impair RNAP II initiation on the structurally distinct promoters that we examined.

Figure 3: Identification of specific drugs that inhibit RNAP II-dependent initiation Three active compounds within the drug cocktails were identified that effectively inhibited transcriptional initiation and are highlighted with red rectangles. In vitro transcription reactions were performed in duplicates. The compounds are Hypericin (from cocktail #7), Rottlerin (from cocktail #14), and SP600125 (from cocktail #16).

We further characterized these compounds by analyzing their half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) to measure their individual effectiveness of the drugs towards transcription, specifically using the p21 promoter template. The approximate IC50 values were: Hypericin, 12.6µM; Rottlerin, 3.52µM; and SP600125, 5.03µM (Figure 4). Hypericin has been reported to be an effective inhibitor of epidermal growth factor with IC50 values between 0.37-8.7µM [25]. Our data demonstrate that photo-inactivated Hypericin can inhibit transcription at slightly higher concentrations. Rottlerin has been frequently used as a specific inhibitor of PKC delta and has been reported to have an IC50 of 3-6µM [31, 33]. Another study examining multiple compounds found that Rottlerin does not inhibit PKC delta but instead inhibits PRAK and MAPKAP-K2 potently, with IC50 values of 1.9µM and 5.4µM, respectively [30]. Our results suggest that Rottlerin inhibits RNAP II transcription initiation with comparable specificity as that towards its known substrates, PKC delta, MAPKAP-K2, and PRAK. SP600125, a well-characterized inhibitor of JNK, can block c-Jun phosphorylation in cells with an IC50 of 5–10 μM. However, biochemical assays using purified components produced IC50 values of 0.11μM [34]. SP600125 is an ATP competitor, thus the observed differences in IC50 values from biochemical and cell-based assays most likely reflects high ATP levels in cells. We used non-limiting amounts of ATP in the in vitro transcription reactions and our observed IC50 of 5.03μM probably represents a more “in vivo” concentration.

Figure 4: Analysis of the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for kinase inhibitors of transcription initiation Increasing concentrations (0-160µM) of Hypericin, Rottlerin, and SP600125 were added individually to in vitro transcription reactions using the p21 promoter template. Reactions were analyzed as described and quantified using a phosphoimager.

Effect of specific kinase inhibitors on components of the transcription initiation complex

Known kinase inhibitors that interfere with transcription, such as Flavopridol and DRB, typically block phosphorylation of the RNAP II C-terminal domain (CTD), which abolishes elongation. We tested Hypericin, Rottlerin, and SP600125 for their ability to inhibit serine 2 or serine 5 phosphorylation of the RNAP II-CTD in human colon cancer HCT116 cells. We found that each drug had relatively little effect on bulk, cellular RNAP II CTD phosphorylation compared to DRB (see Supplemental Data). To refine this analysis and explore how these compounds may inhibit transcription when RNAP II is actually assembled on a target promoter, we tested their individual activities towards several components of the initiation complex using immobilized DNA templates. In this assay, the transcriptional machinery in HeLa extracts is “recruited” to p21 promoter templates that are immobilized on magnetic beads, excess unbound protein is then washed from the beads leaving engaged RNAP II “pre-initiation” complexes on the promoters. Transcription is subsequently initiated by the addition of NTPs, which converts the RNAP II machinery to a “post-initiation” phase (diagrammed in Figure 5A). Capturing these functionally distinct RNAP II complexes on immobilized p21 promoters enabled us to examine the effect of each kinase inhibitor on the protein composition and modification status of several transcription components by Western blotting using appropriate antibodies. As shown in Figure 5B, nearly equal amounts of RNAP II were assembled and retained after NTP addition on promoters in the presence or absence of the each of the kinase inhibitors, with the exception of Hypericin which showed a slight decrease in bound RNAP II. Similarly, no effect of any drug was observed on TFIIB, a required initiation factor that interacts with the BRE core promoter element; or Cdk9, a kinase that is required for RNAP II elongation through phosphorylation of CTD-serine 2 and the target of inhibition by DRB and Flavopiridol [19]. Interestingly, only SP600125 demonstrated a clear inhibition of phosphorylation of promoter-bound RNAP II at both serine 2 and serine 5 within the CTD. Whether SP600125 inhibits distinct kinases that phosphorylate each residue or a single kinase that acts upstream of these events is unknown at present. One common feature of each of the three drugs is the striking loss of mobility shift of the promoter-bound TATA Binding Protein (TBP). In the absence of drug (DMSO lanes), TBP migrates as a single band when part of the pre-initiation complex (lane 1). However upon NTP addition, which activates transcription by RNAP II, bound TBP appears to undergo a series of post-translational modifications as indicated by a trailing shift to higher molecular weight species (compare lanes 1 and 2). These are most likely phosphorylated isoforms because they are inhibited by each of the three drugs. Thus, a common target of inhibition by Hypericin, Rottlerin, and SP600125 is TBP modification within the RNAP II holocomplex as it converts to an active enzyme. On this basis, by blocking the critical step of TBP conversion, transcriptional initiation is effectively abolished.

Figure 5: Immobilized transcription and recruitment assay. (A) Diagram of the immobilized transcription and recruitment assay (see text for details). (B) HeLa nuclear extracts and p21 promoters immobilized on magnetic beads were mixed in the presence or absence of 50µM Hypericin, Rottlerin, or SP600125. RNA synthesis was initiated with NTPs and RNAP II complexes captured during active transcription. Initiation complexes were then analyzed by Western blotting using the indicated antibodies to components of the initiation complex. In lane 1, NTPs were omitted in order to compare pre-initiation to transcriptionally active, post-initiation complexes.


Using an in vitro transcription assay, we examined the effect of 80 previously characterized kinase inhibitors specifically on the initiation of RNA synthesis by human RNAP II from three structurally diverse core promoters. This assay, although labor intensive, is unique in providing a semi-purified cell-free system in which to directly analyze drug activity on components of the transcriptional machinery. To facilitate screening the library of 80 commercially available kinase inhibitors, we initially tested drug cocktails containing combined compounds. We discovered four cocktails that demonstrated significant reduction in transcriptional activity and further characterized each compound separately. This led to the identification of three novel inhibitors of RNAP II-dependent transcriptional initiation: Hypericin, Rottlerin, and SP600125. These three compounds are thought to have alternative targets and, in fact, many kinase inhibitors are pan-specific, yet they are routinely used to block “specific” enzymes. Thus, studies using Hypericin, Rottlerin, or SP600125 and many other protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) are likely to have pleiotrophic effects, particularly in cell-based studies. It is therefore striking that novel and unexpected targets of these broad-spectrum PKIs could be identified in such a direct and defined assay as one that measures transcriptional initiation.

We characterized the strength of inhibition towards transcription by calculating the IC50 for each compound. This revealed that the specific activity of these compounds was relatively strong. Rottlerin was the strongest inhibitor of initiation, with an IC50 of approximately 3.52µM. The compounds SP600125 and Hypericin were also effective in the micromolar range, with IC50 values of 5.03µM and 12.6µM, respectively. Previous reports using these compounds demonstrated their potential towards reducing transcription. For example, exposure of human Jurkat T-cells to Hypericin resulted in down-regulation of global mRNA synthesis, culminating in a strong, time-dependent cytotoxicity [34]. Our finding that Hypericin directly targets components of the RNAP II transcription complex to impair initiation may provide mechanistic insight into this observation. In addition, SP600125 was reported to reduce mRNA expression of the COX-2 gene in cell-based studies, potentially by inhibiting JNK [35]. It is possible that down-regulation of COX-2 expression can be attributed to the ability of SP600125 to directly inhibit transcription complexes bound to the COX-2 promoter.

Most kinase inhibitors that block transcription usually function by preventing global cellular phosphorylation of RNAP II at serine 2 within the CTD, which affects elongation rather than initiation. Interestingly, our experiments reveal that Hypericin, Rottlerin, and SP600125 have relatively low inhibitory activity towards CTD phosphorylation of global RNAP II (Figure S1). Only by analyzing phosphorylation of promoter-bound RNAP II initiation complexes using immobilized DNA templates were we able to detect blockage of RNAP II CTD phosphorylation at both serine 2 and 5, specifically by SP600125. Using the immobilized assay, we also observed a shift in electrophoretic mobility (presumably due to protein modification) of promoter-bound TBP upon addition of nucleotide triphosphates (NTPs) to initiate transcription. Surprisingly, conversion of TBP to transcription-dependent modified isoforms was completely blocked by each of the three compounds; the TBP modification disappears and looks exactly like TBP bound before transcription initiation. A previous study demonstrated that yeast TBP could be phosphorylated by CK2, which copurifies with the TFIID holocomplex and by DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) [36-38].

Additional studies will be required to fully understand the mechanism of action of these compounds and their relevant kinase targets. It is noteworthy that the three compounds inhibit TBP phosphorylation from architecturally diverse promoters, revealing a requirement for TBP within the TFIID complex from both TATA box-containing (p21 and SCP1) and TATA-less (Fas/APO1) promoters. The identification of these compounds adds to the limited toolbox available to scientists studying transcription regulation. Hopefully, they will aid in finding new mechanistic information and provide additional drugs beyond those currently used to study RNAP II transcription. In addition, analogues of these compounds may provide new therapeutic candidates to treat some types of human diseases.

Many therapeutic drugs have been used to treat specific diseases without understanding their mechanism of action. In this regard, in vitro transcription analyses may be quite valuable, especially when adapted to a high-throughput format, since this assay is highly sensitive and has been used extensively to decipher fundamental mechanisms of transcription from core promoter elements, activators, and repressors. Moreover, this versatile assay can be modified to assess the effects of chemical and biological agents on transcription that is regulated by specific activators (i.e. p53-dependent transcription), repressors, or enzymatic complexes. In addition, any DNA template can be assembled into nucleosomal structures and used to assay the effect of compounds on such regulatory steps as protein-targeted chromatin remodeling, histone modification, or other epigenetic events [18, 39, 40]. Consequently, the effect of small molecules or biologics on gene regulation can be analyzed at a very precise mechanistic level.


In vitro transcription assays

Nuclear protein extracts from HeLa cells were prepared as described (Dignam et al. 1983). Transcription reactions included 10µl (~5-6µg/µl) HeLa Nuclear Extract (HNE), 15µl HeLa Dialysis Buffer (HDB) (20mM Hepes-pH7.9, 50mM KCl, 1mM DTT, 0.2mM EDTA, 10% glycerol) and 25µl transcription mix (0.4mg/ml BSA, 20mM HEPES-pH 7.9, 70mM KCl, 3mM DTT, 1.2mM NTPs, 1-3mM MgCl2, 0.5µl RNase inhibitor per reaction) and 500ng supercoiled plasmid DNA templates. For the drug inhibition screen, NTPs were omitted from the transcription mix and the PIC was allowed to form for 30min at room temperature before adding 2µl of NTP mix to start the reaction (final volumes were adjusted with HDB). Transcription reactions were incubated in a 30°C water bath. Reactions were stopped and processed using reagents from Zymo Research (RNA Clean-up Kit-5) by adding 200µl of RNA binding buffer, applying the mixture to columns, washing two times with wash buffer and then eluting with 8µl of RNAse-free water.

Primer extension analyses

Primer extension was performed by adding 3µl of primer annealing mix (10mM Tris, 1mM EDTA, 1.25M KCl) to each reaction and heating at 75°C for 2-3 minutes in heating blocks. Reactions were removed from the heat blocks and allowed to slowly cool to about 37°C. This was followed by addition of 23µl reverse transcription mix (20mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 10mM MgCl2, 0.1mg/ml Actinomycin D, 5mM DTT, 0.33mM dNTP) and 0.5µl M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega) per reaction and incubation at 37°C for 1 hour. Final reactions were precipitated, washed with ethanol, and placed in a speedvac for 5 minutes. DNA pellets were each resuspended in 10µl formamide with EDTA (1mM)/NaOH(0.1mM) (2:1) and heated to 95°C for 2-3 minutes followed by snap cooling on ice. Samples were electrophoresed through 8% polyacrylamide/TBE gels (SequaGel-8, National Diagnostics).

Immobilized DNA recruitment assay

For transcription reactions using immobilized DNA templates, plasmids containing the p21 promoter were first linearized by restriction enzyme cleavage with NotI, followed by cleavage with a second restriction enzyme, EcoRI, to generate sticky ends that were filled-in by Klenow DNAP with biotinylated dATP and dUTP. After removal of excess nucleotides, the biotinylated fragments were incubated with streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Dynal, Invitrogen) and purified from un-biotinylated DNA using a magnet. The immobilized p21 templates (250 fmoles) were each incubated with HeLa nuclear extract and reagents similar to in vitro transcription as previously reported [23]. Protein complexes were allowed to form a PIC on the promoter followed by treatment with the drug compounds. Transcription was initiated by adding NTPs and active transcription complexes were subsequently captured.

Western blotting

Captured proteins from the recruitment assay were electrophoresed through 10% polyacrylamide/TBE gels and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Immunoblots were probed using antibodies to P-Ser5 CTD (H14) and P-Ser2 CTD (H5) from Covance; and antibodies to RNAP II (sc-9001), TBP (sc-273), TFIIB (sc-225), and CDK9 (sc-8338) from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies.


This work was supported by grants to B.M.E. from the NIH and to J.M.M. from NIGMS.


The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.


1. Juven-Gershon T, Hsu JY, Theisen JW, Kadonaga JT: The RNA polymerase II core promoter - the gateway to transcription. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008, 20(3):253-259.

2. Juven-Gershon T, Kadonaga JT: Regulation of gene expression via the core promoter and the basal transcriptional machinery. Dev Biol 2010, 339(2):225-229.

3. Palancade B, Bensaude O: Investigating RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) phosphorylation. Eur J Biochem 2003, 270(19):3859-3870.

4. Krystof V, Uldrijan S: Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors as anticancer drugs. Curr Drug Targets, 11(3):291-302.

5. Yamaguchi Y, Takagi T, Wada T, Yano K, Furuya A, Sugimoto S, Hasegawa J, Handa H: NELF, a multisubunit complex containing RD, cooperates with DSIF to repress RNA polymerase II elongation. Cell 1999, 97(1):41-51.

6. Krystof V, Uldrijan S: Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors as anticancer drugs. Curr Drug Targets 2010, 11(3):291-302.

7. Dai Y, Grant S: Small molecule inhibitors targeting cyclin-dependent kinases as anticancer agents. Curr Oncol Rep 2004, 6(2):123-130.

8. De Azevedo WF, Jr., Mueller-Dieckmann HJ, Schulze-Gahmen U, Worland PJ, Sausville E, Kim SH: Structural basis for specificity and potency of a flavonoid inhibitor of human CDK2, a cell cycle kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93(7):2735-2740.

9. Pippin JW, Qu Q, Meijer L, Shankland SJ: Direct in vivo inhibition of the nuclear cell cycle cascade in experimental mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis with Roscovitine, a novel cyclin-dependent kinase antagonist. J Clin Invest 1997, 100(10):2512-2520.

10. Blagosklonny MV: Flavopiridol, an inhibitor of transcription: implications, problems and solutions. Cell Cycle 2004, 3(12):1537-1542.

11. Ljungman M, Lane DP: Transcription - guarding the genome by sensing DNA damage. Nat Rev Cancer 2004, 4(9):727-737.

12. Ljungman M, Zhang F, Chen F, Rainbow AJ, McKay BC: Inhibition of RNA polymerase II as a trigger for the p53 response. Oncogene 1999, 18(3):583-592.

13. Derheimer FA, Chang CW, Ljungman M: Transcription inhibition: a potential strategy for cancer therapeutics. Eur J Cancer 2005, 41(16):2569-2576.

14. Demidenko ZN, Blagosklonny MV: Flavopiridol induces p53 via initial inhibition of Mdm2 and p21 and, independently of p53, sensitizes apoptosis-reluctant cells to tumor necrosis factor. Cancer Res 2004, 64(10):3653-3660.

15. Sausville EA: Cell cycle regulatory kinase modulators: interim progress and issues. Curr Top Med Chem 2005, 5(12):1109-1117.

16. Senderowicz AM: Inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase modulators for cancer therapy. Prog Drug Res 2005, 63:183-206.

17. Bushnell DA, Cramer P, Kornberg RD: Structural basis of transcription: alpha-amanitin-RNA polymerase II cocrystal at 2.8 A resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99(3):1218-1222.

18. Kadam S, McAlpine GS, Phelan ML, Kingston RE, Jones KA, Emerson BM: Functional selectivity of recombinant mammalian SWI/SNF subunits. Genes Dev 2000, 14(19):2441-2451.

19. Chao SH, Price DH: Flavopiridol inactivates P-TEFb and blocks most RNA polymerase II transcription in vivo. J Biol Chem 2001, 276(34):31793-31799.

20. Muller M, Wilder S, Bannasch D, Israeli D, Lehlbach K, Li-Weber M, Friedman SL, Galle PR, Stremmel W, Oren M et al: p53 activates the CD95 (APO-1/Fas) gene in response to DNA damage by anticancer drugs. J Exp Med 1998, 188(11):2033-2045.

21. Abbas T, Dutta A: p21 in cancer: intricate networks and multiple activities. Nat Rev Cancer 2009, 9(6):400-414.

22. el-Deiry WS, Tokino T, Velculescu VE, Levy DB, Parsons R, Trent JM, Lin D, Mercer WE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B: WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 1993, 75(4):817-825.

23. Morachis JM, Murawsky CM, Emerson BM: Regulation of the p53 transcriptional response by structurally diverse core promoters. Genes Dev 2010, 24(2):135-147.

24. Juven-Gershon T, Cheng S, Kadonaga JT: Rational design of a super core promoter that enhances gene expression. Nat Methods 2006, 3(11):917-922.

25. de Witte P, Agostinis P, Van Lint J, Merlevede W, Vandenheede JR: Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase activity by hypericin. Biochem Pharmacol 1993, 46(11):1929-1936.

26. Tang J, Colacino JM, Larsen SH, Spitzer W: Virucidal activity of hypericin against enveloped and non-enveloped DNA and RNA viruses. Antiviral Res 1990, 13(6):313-325.

27. Karioti A, Bilia AR: Hypericins as potential leads for new therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci 2010, 11(2):562-594.

28. Ritz R, Wein HT, Dietz K, Schenk M, Roser F, Tatagiba M, Strauss WS: Photodynamic therapy of malignant glioma with hypericin: comprehensive in vitro study in human glioblastoma cell lines. Int J Oncol 2007, 30(3):659-667.

29. Miskovsky P: Hypericin--a new antiviral and antitumor photosensitizer: mechanism of action and interaction with biological macromolecules. Curr Drug Targets 2002, 3(1):55-84.

30. Davies SP, Reddy H, Caivano M, Cohen P: Specificity and mechanism of action of some commonly used protein kinase inhibitors. Biochem J 2000, 351(Pt 1):95-105.

31. Gschwendt M, Muller HJ, Kielbassa K, Zang R, Kittstein W, Rincke G, Marks F: Rottlerin, a novel protein kinase inhibitor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994, 199(1):93-98.

32. Soltoff SP: Rottlerin: an inappropriate and ineffective inhibitor of PKCdelta. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2007, 28(9):453-458.

33. Susarla BT, Robinson MB: Rottlerin, an inhibitor of protein kinase Cdelta (PKCdelta), inhibits astrocytic glutamate transport activity and reduces GLAST immunoreactivity by a mechanism that appears to be PKCdelta-independent. J Neurochem 2003, 86(3):635-645.

34. Gertsch J, Guttinger M, Sticher O, Heilmann J: Relative quantification of mRNA levels in Jurkat T cells with RT-real time-PCR (RT-rt-PCR): new possibilities for the screening of anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic compounds. Pharm Res 2002, 19(8):1236-1243.

35. Nieminen R, Lahti A, Jalonen U, Kankaanranta H, Moilanen E: JNK inhibitor SP600125 reduces COX-2 expression by attenuating mRNA in activated murine J774 macrophages. Int Immunopharmacol 2006, 6(6):987-996.

36. Maldonado E, Allende JE: Phosphorylation of yeast TBP by protein kinase CK2 reduces its specific binding to DNA. FEBS Lett 1999, 443(3):256-260.

37. Chibazakura T, Watanabe F, Kitajima S, Tsukada K, Yasukochi Y, Teraoka H: Phosphorylation of human general transcription factors TATA-binding protein and transcription factor IIB by DNA-dependent protein kinase--synergistic stimulation of RNA polymerase II basal transcription in vitro. Eur J Biochem 1997, 247(3):1166-1173.

38. Wang Y, Fairley JA, Roberts SG: Phosphorylation of TFIIB links transcription initiation and termination. Curr Biol 2010, 20(6):548-553.

39. Espinosa JM, Emerson BM: Transcriptional regulation by p53 through intrinsic DNA/chromatin binding and site-directed cofactor recruitment. Mol Cell 2001, 8(1):57-69.

40. Lusser A, Kadonaga JT: Strategies for the reconstitution of chromatin. Nat Methods 2004, 1(1):19-26.

Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 212