Oncotarget

Research Papers:

Advance directives: cancer patients’ preferences and family-based decision making

Yan-Fang Xing, Jin-Xiang Lin, Xing Li, Qu Lin, Xiao-Kun Ma, Jie Chen, Dong-Hao Wu, Li Wei, Liang-Hong Yin _ and Xiang-Yuan Wu

PDF  |  HTML  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:45391-45398. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17525

Metrics: PDF 1625 views  |   HTML 2515 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Yan-Fang Xing1,2,3,*, Jin-Xiang Lin4,*, Xing Li4,*, Qu Lin4,*, Xiao-Kun Ma4,*, Jie Chen4, Dong-Hao Wu4, Li Wei4, Liang-Hong Yin1,2, Xiang-Yuan Wu4

1Department of Nephrology, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, People’s Republic of China

2School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, People’s Republic of China

3Department of Nephrology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, People’s Republic of China

4Department of Medical Oncology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence to:

Liang-Hong Yin, email: [email protected]

Xiang-Yuan Wu, email: [email protected]

Keywords: advance directive, medical decision making, cancer, patients’ preference

Received: February 08, 2017     Accepted: March 21, 2017     Published: April 28, 2017

ABSTRACT

Background: Advance directives are a sensitive issue among traditional Chinese people, who usually refrain from mentioning this topic until it is imperative. Medical decisions for cancer patients are made by their families, and these decisions might violate patients’ personal will.

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the acceptance of advance directives among Chinese cancer patients and their families and patient participation in this procedure and, finally, to analyze the moral risk involved.

Results: While 246 patients and their family members refused official discussion of an advance directive, the remaining 166 patients and their families accepted the concept of an advance directive and signed a document agreeing to give up invasive treatment when the anti-cancer treatment was terminated. Of these, only 24 patients participated in the decision making. For 101 patients, anti-cancer therapy was ended prematurely with as many as 37 patients not told about their potential loss of health interests.

Materials and Methods: Participants were 412 adult cancer patients from 9 leading hospitals across China. An advance directive was introduced to the main decision makers for each patient; if they wished to sign it, the advance directive would be systematically discussed. A questionnaire was given to the oncologists in charge of each patient to evaluate the interaction between families and patients, patients’ awareness of their disease, and participation in an advance directive.

Conclusions: Advance directives were not widely accepted among Chinese cancer patients unless anti-cancer therapy was terminated. Most cancer patients were excluded from the discussion of an advance directive.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 17525