Research Papers:

Enhanced antitumor efficacy of cisplatin for treating ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo via transferrin binding

PDF |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite  |  Order a Reprint

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:45597-45611. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17316

Metrics: PDF 664 views  |   HTML 1226 views  |   ?  

Huifang Peng, Hongwei Jin, Huiqin Zhuo and Heqing Huang _


Huifang Peng1,*, Hongwei Jin2,*, Huiqin Zhuo3,4 and Heqing Huang1,5,6

1State Key Laboratory of Stress Cell Biology, School of Life Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361004, China

2Xiamen Center of Clinical Laboratory, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361004, China

3Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361004, China

4Institute of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Medical College of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361004, China

5State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Oceanography and Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361004, China

6The Key Laboratory for Chemical Biology of Fujian Province, College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361004, China

*These authors have contributed equally to this work

Correspondence to:

Heqing Huang, email: hqhuang@xmu.edu.cn

Huiqin Zhuo, email: zhuohuiqin@xmu.edu.cn

Keywords: cisplatin, transferrin, targeted drug delivery, ovarian cancer, antitumor treatment

Received: May 12, 2016    Accepted: April 02, 2017    Published: April 21, 2017


Cisplatin is a widely used anticancer drug, while non-targeted delivery, development of drug resistance, and serious side effects significantly limit its clinical use. In order to improve the tumor-targeting properties of cisplatin, transferrin (Tf) was employed as a carrier to transfer cisplatin into cancer cells via transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) mediated endocytosis. The binding ability of cisplatin and Tf could be improved by pretreating Tf with 10% ethanol, and the binding number of cisplatin for each Tf molecule could reach to 40 without structural or functional impairment of Tf. The Tf-cisplatin complex could be delivered into human ovarian carcinoma cells high efficiently. In tumor-bearing nude-mice model, the Tf-cisplatin complex inhibited tumor growth in vivo more effectively than free cisplatin, with less toxicity in other tissues. Tumor targeting efficiency of the Tf-cisplatin complex was supported by in vivo and ex vivo imaging and platinum residues detected in each ex vivo organ. These data suggested that Tf-cisplatin  was more effective and less drug-resistance than cisplatin, with targeting to tumor cells. Therefore, Tf-mediated delivery of cisplatin is a potential strategy for targeted delivery into tumor cells.

Enhanced antitumor efficacy of cisplatin for treating ovarian cancer <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> via transferrin binding | Peng | Oncotarget


Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynaecologic cancer, and it is estimated that 22,280 new diagnoses and 14,240 deaths from this neoplasm will occur in United States in 2016 [1]. Standard treatment is platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapy and surgical debulking of the tumor. There is a high proportion (~ 70%) of advanced stage cases at diagnosis, and the overall 5-year survival rate is less than 40% across all stages [2]. Ovarian cancers overall are comprised of a variety of tumor types with different histopathological features and biological behaviour. Although most ovarian cancer patients present with advanced-stage disease, response to front-line Pt-based chemotherapy is high, of the order of 75% [3].

Cisplatin is a DNA-damaging anti-tumor agent that activates nuclear and cytoplasmic signaling pathways involved in regulation of the cell cycle, damage repair, and programmed cell death [4]. Cisplatin is also one of the most actively used drugs for the treatment of ovarian cancer, and the resistance is easily seen in patients during treatment [5]. Cisplatin is a neutral Pt (II) complex that enters cells by passive diffusion [6], so the toxicity is equivalent between cancer cells and normal cells. Therefore, the clinical use of cisplatin is limited by its severe side effects in many systems and organs, including nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity [7]. Strategies for altering the entry of cisplatin into cancer cells may be helpful for reducing side effects and resistance while increasing therapeutic efficacy.

Transferrin (Tf) is the iron transport protein responsible for delivering iron and a variety of other metals such as aluminium, Pt, gallium, and indium into cells [8]. The closed conformation (iron-bound) of Tf is recognized by the transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) found on cytomembrane [9]. Expression of transferrin receptors on membranes of various types of cancer cells has been shown to be elevated 2 - 7 times higher than that in normal cells, with an affinity to Tf that is 10 - 100 times higher compared with that in the case of normal cells [10, 11]. Therefore, the Tf/TfR1 system is a viable anti-cancer target for drug delivery [12]. The feasibilities of using Tf as a tumor-targeted carrier conjugating with nanomaterials or drugs have been demonstrated in previous studies. Transferrin-coupling nanoparticles exhibit certain notable properties, including prolonged circulation time, low reticuloendothelial system uptake, and in vivo accumulation and internalization in tumor tissues [13-15]. Some chemical anticarcinogenic drug (triapazamine, docorubicin, etc) and plant extract medicines (curcumin, paclitaxel, etc), conjugated directly or via nanoparticles to transferrin, were designed for tumor-targeting delivery to increase the efficacy of therapy, meanwhile decreased side effects [16-19]. Utilization of a targeted delivery strategy takes advantage of long drug circulation times, increased cellular uptake, decreased systemic toxicity, and effective delivery of therapeutic compounds to the disease site [20].

There are many published reports on different molar ratios of Tf-cisplatin complexes obtained by incubating Tf and cisplatin. Elliott et al. [21] reported binding of 1 - 2 cisplatin molecules with one Tf molecule. Hoshino et al. [22] reported cisplatin binding ratios of 3:1, 7:1, and 15:1 after incubating Tf in a water buffer for different times. Luo et al. [23] reported that Tf had the potential to bind with 22 cisplatin at different pH.

In current study, we developed an effective cisplatin delivery system with reduced side effects and better targeting using the binding of Tf to tumor cells. Our methods incorporated a pretreatment step using a diluted organic solvent to relax the structure of Tf, without functional impairment before incubating with cisplatin. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were employed to identify the number of cisplatin molecules bound to Tf. We expected that cisplatin conjugated with Tf would enter cells through the Tf-TfR1 pathway and target tumor cells. In vitro and in vivo experiments using ovarian cancer cell lines and tumor-bearing mice demonstrated the efficacy of Tf-cisplatin targeted to tumor cells. These results may help in development of strategies for exploiting anticancer drug targeting delivery systems.


Preparation of high purity Tf

Identification and purity of isolated proteins were determined by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and MALDI-TOF-MS analysis. Native gradient PAGE was used to separate proteins. Other weak bands were visible in the gel as shown in Figure 1A, suggesting contamination of the analyte. Therefore, proteins were extracted a second time with native gradient PAGE, resulting in detection of a single, pure band, which was removed for preparation of peptide mass fingerprinting. Spectra from peptide mass fingerprinting were matched to Tf by a database search.

Tf and Tf-cisplatin.

Figure 1: Tf and Tf-cisplatin. (A) Native-PAGE and peptide mass fingerprinting map of transferrin (Tf). (1) Tf purified after single gel electrophoresis. (2) Tf twice purified with gel electrophoresis. (B) Native-PAGE of Tf-cisplatin. (1) Control (ultrapure water treated Tf). (2) 1% TFA pretreated Tf. (3) 10% acetone pretreated Tf. (4) 10% ethanol pretreated Tf. (5) 1% formic acid pretreated Tf. (6) 10% acetonitrile pretreated Tf. (7) 10% methanol pretreated Tf. (C) MALDI-TOF MS maps of Tf and Tf-cisplatin with Tf pretreated with 10% ethanol.

Improvements in organic solvent-induced binding

Different organic solvents were used to pretreat Tf in order to determine the ideal candidate for maximizing cisplatin binding. After organic solvents pretreatment, ratio of Tf to cisplatin binding was changed as expected. As shown in Figure 1B, the gel bands from Tf-cisplatin pretreated with organic solvents were higher than bands without pretreatment. In addition, protein molecular weights were altered, and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), formic acid pretreated Tf had the most significant molecular weight changes. In order to acquire more precise information about Tf-cisplatin complexes, MALDI-TOF-MS and ICP-MS were performed to determine number of cisplatin molecules binding to Tf. Calculation results were listed in Table 1. Binding numbers tested by MALDI-TOF-MS and ICP-MS were equivalent. Each Tf molecule bound 8 molecules of cisplatin naturally in presence of water. While pretreatment with organic solvents could increase 2 - 5 folds of the ratio, and 10% acetone or ethanol pretreatment was the most effective for increasing cisplatin binding to Tf. Mass spectra of Tf and Tf pretreated with ethanol were shown in Figure 1C. The molecular mass of Tf consisted with previous reports. Molecular mass of Tf-cisplatin obtained by 10% ethanol pretreatment was as much as 91,992.66, attributable to approximately 40 cisplatin molecules binding to Tf.

Table 1: Identification of the number of cisplatin molecules bound to Tf by MALDI-TOF MS and ICP-MS














































MW: Molecular weight of Tf-cisplatin; No.: Number of cisplatin molecules bound to Tf; 0, normal Tf,

For explanation of labels 1 - 7 see Figure 1C.

The iron release and circular dichroism (CD) spectra were used to evaluate the structure and function of Tf after organic solvents pretreatment. Results of iron release kinetics were shown in Figure 2A. Initially, natural release of iron from Tf occurred rapidly, and stabilized after approximately 16 min. The iron release rate for whole process was 0.125 Fe3+·Tf-1·min-1, which was generally in accord with a previous report [24]. When prepared according to the methods described here, activity of Tf was well maintained. In addition, the iron release kinetics of Tf pretreated with 10% ethanol before cisplatin incubation and rotary evaporation were similar to controls, reaching a balance at 18 min with a rate of 0.111 Fe3+·Tf-1·min-1. After ethanol was removed, Tf recovered to its active state, which closely resembled controls. The kinetic results also indicated that cisplatin binding did not occupy or destroy the iron binding sites.

Characterization of Tf/Tf-cisplatin.

Figure 2: Characterization of Tf/Tf-cisplatin. (A) Iron release kinetics of control and 10% ethanol pretreated Tf. (B) CD spectra of Tf. (a) Control (Tf without any treatment). (b) Tf pretreated with 10% ethanol incubated for 30 min without rotary evaporation. (c) Sample b rotary evaporated to remove ethanol. (d) Sample b incubated with cisplatin for 2 h without rotary evaporation. (e) Sample d rotary evaporated to remove ethanol. (C) Image of Tf-cisplatin in A2780CP70 cells using LSCM. (C-1) cells incubate with FITC labeled Tf. (C-2) cells pretreated with 200 μg/mL of Tf for 1 h, then incubated with FITC labeled Tf. (C-3) cells incubate with FITC labeled Tf-cisplatin. (C-4) cells pretreated with 200 μg/mL of Tf for 1 h, then incubated with FITC labeled Tf-cisplatin.

CD spectroscopy is an optical technique that provides information about the secondary and tertiary structures of proteins, including α-helices, inter-chain hydrogen bonded β-structures and a fully extended parallel or anti-parallel arrangement of peptide chains. CD spectra of Tf under different conditions were shown in Figure 2B. The CD spectrum of native Tf showed a positive peak at 192 nm and negative peaks at 208 nm and 222 nm [Figure 2B(a)]. The peaks of Tf pretreated with 10% ethanol were formed at 197 nm (positive) and 206 nm [Figure 2B(b)]. After removal of ethanol by rotary evaporation, the peaks [Figure 2B(c)] were almost the same as those of control. The structure change was reversible. Cisplatin was added to pretreated Tf for combination before ethanol removal, and the CD spectrum [Figure 2B(d)] was much different from Figure 2B(a) or (b), but removing ethanol from mixture made the differences between complete recovery. Owing to temporary structural changes in Tf with ethanol pretreatment, a number of cisplatin binding sites exposed, enabling the Tf to carry more cisplatin, and after ethanol removal, Tf in Tf-cisplatin was still to maintain its overall structure.

The stability of Tf-cisplatin was shown in Table 2. When maintained in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer at room temperature, the number of bound cisplatin molecules was 54.85 and 44.35 during the first two days respectively. And between the third and seventh day, number of cisplatin molecules bound per Tf molecule was maintained at 41, suggesting that Tf-cisplatin remains stable in PBS buffer at room temperature for at least one week.

Table 2: The stability of Tf-cisplatin


Pt binding with 40 μg Tf (μg)

Number of cisplatin molecules bound per Tf






















Pt: Platinum

Intracellular uptake and distribution of Tf-cisplatin

The distribution of cisplatin inside or outside the cells after cisplatin or Tf-cisplatin treatment was shown in Table 3. The average content of cisplatin inside the cells in cisplatin group was significantly lower than that of Tf-cisplatin group, no matter after 5 min or 3 h treatment. A sharp decline of cisplatin content inside the cells (from 1.84 to 0.42 μg) was detected in Tf-pretreated Tf-cisplatin group at 5 min, but no significant content difference was detected between without and with pretreatment after 3 h incubation. Moreover, as we expected, the pretreatment had no influence on cisplatin group.

Table 3: The contents of cisplatin in cells and medium by ICP-MS.


Tf pretreatment

Cisplatin group

Tf-cisplatin group

Cisplatin in cells (μg)

Cisplatin in medium (μg)

Cisplatin in cells (μg)

Cisplatin in medium (μg)

5 min











3 h











*: P <0.05, significant difference of cisplatin in cells (μg) between with Tf pretreatment and without at 5 min in Tf-cisplatin group. #: P <0.05, significant difference of cisplatin in cells (μg) between 5 min and 3 h treatment without Tf pretreatment in Tf-cisplatin group. §: P <0.05, significant difference of cisplatin in cells (μg) between cisplatin group and Tf-cisplatin group at 3 h without Tf pretreatment.

The recognition and binding abilities of Tf-cisplatin with TfR on cells were estimated using laser-scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM). As shown in Figure 2C, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) labeled Tf-cisplatin bound to the cell membrane in A2780CP70 cells, with a portion being transported into the cells, and the uptake was continuous increase as time. With 200 μg/mL of Tf for 1 h pretreatment, the fluorescence signal of FTIC labeled Tf-cisplatin was significantly decreased at 5 min, but with no differences at 3 h. The fluorescence signal changes of FTIC labeled Tf-cisplatin were consistent with that of FITC labeled Tf in cells.

The two results (ICP-MS and LSCM analysis) complemented each other for a better understanding of Tf-cisplatin binding and entering into cells. Tf pretreatment declined the combination of Tf-cisplatin to TfR, and reduced its transport into cells in the first period. The influence was disappeared as time, that might because the surface-bound, intracellular, and recycled characteristics of TfR mediated endocytosis.

Increased cytotoxicity of Tf-cisplatin in cancer cells

Differences in cytotoxicity between free cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin were determined using MTT assay and flow cytometry in vitro. IC50 values and the dose-response curves were shown in Table 4 and Figure 3A, which were calculated using probit method. The IC50 of free cisplatin was 1.53 μg/mL for A2780S cells and 10.39 μg/mL for A2780CP70 cells. The resistance factor of A2780CP70/A2780S was 6.8. IC50 of Tf-cisplatin was 0.78 μg/mL (cisplatin) for A2780S cells and 4.23 μg/mL (cisplatin) for A2780CP70 cells, which was significantly lower than that of free cisplatin. These data suggested that inhibition of cell growth attributable to Tf-cisplatin was better than free cisplatin for both A2780S and A2780CP70 cell lines. IC50 of HK-2 cells was 2.5 μg/mL for free cisplatin and 4.61 μg/mL (cisplatin) for Tf-cisplatin. Tf-cisplatin was efficacious for inducing cytotoxicity at a relatively lower concentration compared to free cisplatin in cancer cells and a higher concentration in non-cancer cells.

Table 4: IC50 values of cisplatin/Tf-cisplatin incubated with A2780CP70, A2780S, and HK-2 cell lines for 48 h.


Cell lines




IC50 (μg/mL)

Free cisplatin








Inhibitory effect of Tf-cisplatin on cells.

Figure 3: Inhibitory effect of Tf-cisplatin on cells. (A) Cells inhibition of Tf-cisplatin and cisplatin treatment for 48 h using MTT assay. (B) Flow cytometry dot plot analysis of cell apoptosis. (C) The cells proportion of flow cytometry analysis. Q1: Necrotic cells. Q2: Late apoptotic cells. Q3: Early apoptotic cells. Q4: Viable cells. A2780CP70, A2780S and HK-2 cells induced by indicated dose of cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin for 48 h, stained with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI). There are significant differences between control and cisplatin treatment, control and Tf-cisplatin treatment of Q2, Q3, Q4 respectively which were not marked. *: P<0.05.

Three cell lines were employed in this study and bivariate Annexin V-FITC/PI maps and data of cells after treatment with various levels of cisplatin or Tf-cisplatin were shown in Figures 3B&3C, Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1. Percentage of apoptotic cells in Tf-cisplatin group, whether early (Q3) or late apoptosis (Q2), were higher than that in cisplatin group, meanwhile, the percentage of viable cells (Q4) was lower in A2780CP70 cells at concentrations of 2.5, 5 or 10 μg/mL after 48 h incubation. Similar results were observed in A2780S cells at concentration of 0.625, 1.25, or 2.5 μg/mL. In contrast, in non-cancer HK-2 cells, significantly lower early apoptosis (Q3) and higher viability (Q4) was detected in Tf-cisplatin group in comparison with cisplatin group.

qRT-PCR analysis

To explore the mechanisms leading to altered intracellular Pt concentrations, we measured the expression levels of three genes encoding copper transport proteins, including human copper transporter 1 (hCTR1), ATPase, copper transporting, alpha polypeptide (ATP7A), and ATPase, copper transporting, beta polypeptide (ATP7B). These genes have recently been shown to take part in uptake and efflux of Pt drugs (e.g., cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin) [25-27]. In addition, we analyzed the expression levels of three genes associated with drug resistance, including multiple drug resistance 1 (MDR1), excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) and lung resistance protein (LRP) in A2780S and A2780CP70 cells, and the results were shown in Figure 4.

Relative expression of related genes in A2780S and A2780CP70 cells.

Figure 4: Relative expression of related genes in A2780S and A2780CP70 cells. (A) hCTR1. (B) ATP7A. (C) ATP7B. (D) MDR1. (E) ERCC1. (F) LRP. (a) Control. (b) Cisplatin treatment. (c) Tf-cisplatin treatment (n=3, mean ± SD). The concentration of cisplatin for drug treatment is 1.5 μg/mL for A2780S and 10.0 μg/mL for A2780CP70. Treatment time is 48 h. *: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01.

The cisplatin-sensitive cell line, A2780S, expressed a significantly higher level of hCTR1 than cisplatin-resistant cell line, A2780CP70, regardless of treatment. These data suggest that A2780S cells have an increased capacity for transporting cisplatin via copper transporting channels. After cisplatin treatment for 48 h, mRNA expression of hCTR1 was up-regulated in A2780S and significantly down-regulated in A2780CP70 cells (Figure 4A). These results were consistent with reports that A2780CP70 cells reduce cisplatin uptake by decreasing hCTR1 expression [28, 29]. Tf-cisplatin treatment did not significantly change hCTR1 expression in both cell line compared to controls, suggesting Tf-cisplatin uptake was not through hCTR1.

In A2780CP70 cells, both treatments did not induce significant changes in ATP7A gene expression. But ATP7A was significantly upregulated after both treatments compared to controls in A2780S cells (Figure 4B). The expression of ATP7B was significantly down-regulated by cisplatin and up-regulated by Tf-cisplatin treatment compared to controls in A2780CP70 cells. Furthermore, cisplatin treatment resulted in a dramatic up-regulation of ATP7B in A2780S cells (Figure 4C). The ATP7A transporter sequesters Pt drugs in secretory vesicles, and over-expression of the ATP7A transporter results in increased accumulation of Pt drugs in ovarian carcinoma cells [30, 31]. Similarly, the ATP7B transporter increased cisplatin resistance by transporting Pt out of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells [32]. Tf-cisplatin treatment could made more cisplatin into both A2780S and A2780CP70 cells (Table 3), but ATP7A and ATP7B expression results suggested that Tf-cisplatin treatment could decrease cisplatin excretion via ATP7A and ATP7B.

MDR1 plays an important role in the development of drug resistance in cells, according to actively effluxes a wide array of anticancer drugs, including cisplatin and paclitaxel [33]. ERCC1 expression levels determined the sensitivity of cells to Pt in part [34], and LRP expression was associated with resistance to anti-cancer drugs including cisplatin, carboplatin, doxorubicin, etoposide and paclitaxel in vitro [35]. Expression of MDR1 was higher in A2780CP70 cells than that in A2780S cells. Cisplatin treatment increased MDR1 mRNA expression, whereas Tf-cisplatin treatment did not change MDR1 mRNA levels compared to controls in both A2780S and A2780CP70 cells (Figure 4D). ERCC1 and LRP expression levels in A2780CP70 were in accord with MDR1. In A2780S cells, there were no obvious changes of ERCC1 expression between cisplatin, Tf-cisplatin and controls; however, LRP expression after cisplatin treatment was significantly down-regulated with no obvious changes between Tf-cisplatin treated cells and controls (Figures 4E & 4F). The lack of obvious changes in expression of MDR1, ERCC1 and LRP after treatment with Tf-cisplatin might be explained by reduced resistance to cisplatin in A2780S and A2780CP70 cells.

Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging

To further verify the active tumor targeting and in vivo real-time distribution of Tf-cisplatin, a whole animal NIRF imaging approach was carried out in A2780CP70 tumor xenograft nude mice. The near-infrared dye Cy7.5 was conjugated to Tf (Tf-cisplatin) and then injected into mice, resulting in the observance of fluorescent signals as shown in Figure 5A. In mice injected with free Cy7.5, the strongest fluorescent signal was observed in liver, and whole body fluorescence faded over time and nearly disappeared by 24 h. In mice injected with Cy7.5-labeled Tf-cisplatin, the fluorescent signals gradually shifted to liver and tumor tissues within 24 h after injection. After 48 h, fluorescent signals had shifted to tumor tissue and then kidney at 72 h post-injection. The distribution of Tf-cisplatin in different tissues was also demonstrated by NIRF imaging in excised organs (Figure 5B). A strong fluorescent signal was only detected in liver and tumor tissue, and a weak signal was observed in kidney of mice injected with Cy7.5-labeled Tf-cisplatin which were consistent with the in vivo NIRF imaging. As a main metabolism organ, Tf-cisplatin, cisplatin, Tf and dye were cleared out of the mouse body via liver related metabolic pathway. In Cy7.5 group, fluorescent signal in liver was lasting for about 24 h, and Tf conjugation prolonged the circulation time. As time pass by, the fluorescent signal accumulated in tumor tissue, which was stronger than that in liver at 48 h in Tf-cisplatin treatment.

NIRF imaging of Cy7.5-labeled Tf-cisplatin and free Cy7.5 in A2780CP70 tumor-bearing mice.

Figure 5: NIRF imaging of Cy7.5-labeled Tf-cisplatin and free Cy7.5 in A2780CP70 tumor-bearing mice. (A) In vivo NIRF imaging at 3 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after tail injection. (B) Ex vivo fluorescence imaging of tissues from tumor-bearing mice with different treatments.

In vivo therapy of Tf-cisplatin in mice

PBS, free cisplatin, and Tf-cisplatin (equivalent to 10 mg/kg of free cisplatin) was injected into tumor-bearing mice (10 days after subcutaneous implant of A2780CP70 cells) via the tail vein twice a week for 1 month to evaluate therapeutic potential. Body weight changes in all mice were recorded and are shown in Figure 6A. Four weeks after initiating treatment, reduced body weights in Tf-cisplatin and cisplatin treated mice were observed, and effect was less dramatic in Tf-cisplatin treated mice compared to free cisplatin treated mice.

Detection of cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin in tumor-bearing mice.

Figure 6: Detection of cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin in tumor-bearing mice. (A) Body weight changes in tumor-bearing mice during different drug treatments. (B) Pt residues in each tissue of tumor-bearing mice after different treatments. (C) Subcutaneous tumor microscopy images showing H&E staining. A1: × 100 of PBS group. A2: × 400 of PBS group. B1: × 100 of cisplatin treatment group. B2: × 400 of cisplatin treatment group. C1: × 100 of Tf-cisplatin treatment group. C2: × 400 of Tf-cisplatin treatment group. (D) Changes in tumor volume in tumor-bearing mice during different treatments. Drug treatments were via tail injection twice every week. *: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01.

Residual Pt in each tissue was detected using ICP-MS (Figure 6B), which could indicate whole-body distribution of cisplatin in drug-treated groups. The residual Pt detected in various tissues of PBS treatment mice was used for establishing baseline values. In all non-tumor tissues, residual Pt (μg/g dried tissues) was lower in Tf-cisplatin treatment group compared to free cisplatin group, especially in liver and spleen where the difference had reached highly significant levels (P < 0.01). In subcutaneous tumor tissues, cisplatin accumulation in Tf-cisplatin treatment group was approximately 5 times of free cisplatin treatment group. These data suggested that Tf-cisplatin treatment increased the distribution of cisplatin to tumor tissues. Extended Tf-cisplatin treatment (twice a week for one month) resulted in remarkable less accumulation of cisplatin in liver compared to free cisplatin treatment group, and increased distribution of cisplatin in tumor tissues, which suggested a good curative effect with fewer side effects.

Morphological changes in tumor tissues from different treatment groups were observed using histology (Figure 6C). Cells in tumor tissues of control (PBS) group presented distinctive boundary, regular arrangement, even distribution, clear nuclei and cytoplasm [Figures 6C (A1 & A2)]. In treatment (cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin) groups, tumor tissues showed loose arrangement, cytoplasmic overflow, and cell death [Figures 6C (B1, B2, C1, C2)]. There was more extensive cell death and much looser tissue structure was observed in tumor tissue of tumor-bearing mice with Tf-cisplatin treatment. Thirty days after initiating treatment, the tumor volumes in mice of Tf-cisplatin and cisplatin groups were partially controlled (Figure 6D). Tumor volume of three treatment groups had a slow growth rate for the first two weeks. Two weeks after initiating treatment, tumor volume of PBS group rapidly increased until the end of the study. In contrast, tumor growth rates of cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin treatment groups were significantly reduced, and side effects observed in Tf-cisplatin group were fewer compared to free cisplatin group. At the end of treatment period, tumor volume of PBS group had reached 418 mm3, whereas tumor volumes of cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin treatment groups were 178 mm3 and 93 mm3 respectively. Differences between treatment groups were highly significant. RTV and relative tumor proliferation rate (%) after 30 days of treatment are shown in Table 5. At the end of treatment period, RTVs of cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin groups were lower than control (PBS) group. And RTV of Tf-cisplatin group was significantly lower than cisplatin group. Relative tumor proliferation rate (%) in cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin treatment groups were 43.09 and 23.53, respectively. A relative tumor proliferation rate (%) less than 60% was suggestive of a positive treatment outcome. Treatment with both cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin resulted in a relative tumor proliferation rate (%) under 60. These data suggested that cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin treatment could effectively inhibit the growth of subcutaneous tumor tissue in tumor-bearing mice. Furthermore, Tf-cisplatin was more effective for inhibiting tumor growth than free cisplatin.

Table 5: Tumor suppression effect of different treatments in tumor-bearing nude mice for 30 days


Tumor volume (mm3)

Relative tumor volume (RTV)

Relative tumor proliferation rate (%)

Tumor volume before treatment

Tumor volume after treatment
















*: P <0.05


In this study, the method with some interesting innovations was established for Tf-cisplatin preparation. First, our study for the first time reports the benefits of organic solvents pretreatment, which significantly increases the binding ability and minimally affects the functions of Tf after evaporation. Second, by the pretreatment, the cisplatin binding number is up to 41 per Tf, which is far more than 15 - 22 molecules as previous reports [29, 30, 36, 37]. Third, the native gradient PAGE method for extraction of Tf from human serum, instead of existing methods (mainly by salt precipitation, SDS-PAGE and chromatography) was established by our group, which was relatively close to the physiological state of the protein. Finally, the whole preparation process of Tf-cisplatin is convenient to operate. By pretreated with 10% ethanol, iron release and CD spectra (Figures 2A & 2B) indicated pretreatment with 10% ethanol did not significantly influence structure and function of Tf. These results were likely explained by temporary changes to the Tf microenvironment, attributable to treatment with organic solvents. Specifically, structurally integrity of Tf was relaxed after treatment with 10% ethanol, exposing additional cisplatin binding sites and increasing the combination ratio of cisplatin and Tf. Once ethanol was volatilized, the structural integrity of Tf molecule was restored, resulting in a stable Tf-cisplatin (Table 2). These results had significant implications for treatment of cancer both in vitro and in vivo.

As increased cisplatin/TF ratio, delivery of Tf-cisplatin to cancer cells was more efficient, and Tf-cisplatin had better inhibition effect for cancer cells than free cisplatin under the same cisplatin concentration in general (Figure 3, Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Treatment of cells with Tf-cisplatin induced similar apoptosis at a lower concentration than free cisplatin. The effect remained consistent in cisplatin-resistant cell line, A2780CP70, and was reflected in the expression changes of related genes and proteins. There was reported that Tf-cisplatin treatment could increase expression of 23 proteins related to chemotherapeutic cytotoxicity and resistance in HepG2 cells [23]. Cisplatin resistance could be accompanied by changes of copper metabolism. In this work, we measured expression levels of copper transporting and drug-resistance related genes (Figure 4). Cisplatin treatment induced obvious changes in expression of drug-resistance related genes, while there were no significant changes after Tf-cisplatin treatment. These data suggested that Tf-cisplatin might attenuate the incidence of cisplatin resistance. Furthermore, uptake of Tf-cisplatin in cancer cells was not mediated by copper (cisplatin) transporting proteins, which may explain the lack of changes in expression levels of MDR1, ERCC1 and LRP in Tf-cisplatin treated cells compared to controls.

Cy7.5-labeling of Tf-cisplatin enabled real-time bio-photonic imaging of Tf-cisplatin transport. Fluorescent intensity in mice injected with Cy7.5-labeled Tf-cisplatin was greater and more prolonged than free Cy7.5 (Figure 5). This elevated fluorescent signal of Cy7.5-labeled Tf-cisplatin in tumors was likely attributable to an extended residence time in tumor. Tf-cisplatin treatment resulted in reductions in subcutaneous tumors tissue from tumor-bearing nude mice compared to free cisplatin treatment using an equivalent cisplatin dosage. This was determined by reduction in tumor volume, increased cell death and structural disorganization within tumor tissue (Figures 6C&6D). Results of NIFR imaging suggested that Tf-cisplatin targets delivery of cisplatin to tumor tissue, thereby reducing residual accumulation of Pt in normal tissues. This likely explains the fewer side effects observed with Tf-cisplatin compared to free cisplatin. Taken together, these results suggested that Tf-cisplatin effectively targets cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, with improved therapeutic effects and fewer side effects.


In the present study, we increased Tf binding with cisplatin without structural or functional damage by pretreating Tf molecule with 10% ethanol. We demonstrated efficacy of Tf-targeted delivery of cisplatin to tumor cells and tissues using ovarian cancer cell lines and in vivo tumor mouse model. Data demonstrated that Tf could be an effective carrier for transporting cisplatin into cells via Tf-TfR1 pathway. This delivery method increased cellular uptake of cisplatin, avoided drug resistance and targeted delivery of drug in tumor-bearing mouse model.


Tf purification

These studies were conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen, China. Human serum was supplied by Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen, China) and informed consent was obtained from the donors, and the date were analyzed anonymously. 8 mL serum was diluted with 2 mL sample buffer (× 5,600 μL of 1 M Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 5 mL of glycerol, 1.0 mL of 1% bromophenol blue, 3.4 mL of distilled water) and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min. Then, supernatant fractions were collected and separated by 4 - 10% native gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. After 18 h, a visible nacarat protein band (the native colour of Tf) was cut from the gel followed by electron transfer for 1 h. Ultrafiltration with a 30 kDa cutoff was used to concentrate the extract, and process was duplicated for further separation and purification. Finally, nacarat protein extract was collected and stored at - 20°C until further use. The purity of Tf was confirmed using native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (native-PAGE, T = 8%) and MALDI-TOF (Bruker ultrafleXtreme, Germany) analysis. The in-gel digestion and peptide mass fingerprinting were performed according to a previous report [23]. Observed peptide mass fingerprints were sent to NCBI’s database at MASCOT (http:www.matrixscience.com), with mass accuracies within 0.3 Daltons; both hydroxymethylation and oxidation were considered.

Binding ability of Tf with cisplatin

Tf was diluted to 40 μg/μL with PBS. The Tf solution (1 μL) was pretreated with 20 μL of different organic solvents as follows: 1) double distilled water (ddw) as control, 2) 1% TFA, 3) 10% acetone, 4) 10% ethanol, 5) 1% formic acid, 6) 10% acetonitrile, 7) 10% methanol. Then, samples were incubated at 37°C for 30 min, and 30 μL of cisplatin (1 μg/μL, Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., LTD) was added to each sample and incubated for an additional 2 h. Organic solvents were slowly evaporated from the mixture using a centrifugal vacuum concentrator (Eppendorf, concentrator plus, Germany) for 30 min. The residual cisplatin was eliminated by ultrafiltration with a 30 kDa cut-off. MALDI-TOF-MS and ICP-MS (Agilent 7700, USA) analyses were employed to determine the Tf-cisplatin binding rate.

For MALDI-TOF-MS analysis, 1 μL mixture of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) and analyte solution (10 mg/mL of Tf) of equal volume were loaded onto stainless steel plate wells with natural air-drying. MALDI-TOF-MS instrumental conditions included a positive linear mode, a 40 μs delayed extraction of ions, and 2-ns pulse width laser beam. For ICP-MS analysis, a Tf (50 μL) or Tf-cisplatin (40 μg/mL of Tf) solution was digested with 250 μL ultrapure HNO3 for 60 min at 60°C. The digested solution was then diluted to 5.0 mL by deionised water. Standard Pt solutions, prepared together with test samples, were used to generate calibration curves, and 5% (v/v) ultrapure HNO3 was used as blank control. All of solutions were analysed using external calibration curve; background values were subtracted. The operation and calibration of instrument were carried out according to specifications. Parameters were set as follows: plasma power output: 1,300 W, RF generator frequency: 40 MHz, analog stage voltage: 1,850 V, pulse stage voltage: 800 V, number of data acquisition replicates: 5, external flow: 13 L/min, carrier gas flow: 0.85 L/min, isotope monitored: 195 Pt, collision/reaction gas: H2 with flow of 2.5 mL/min, QP bias: 11 V, octapole bias: 13 V, and extraction: - 3.5 V. Three independent replicates of each sample were analysed.

Release of iron

Iron release kinetics of purified Tf were determined using 10% Na2S2O4 and 1% α,α’-bipyridine solvents as electronating agent and chelating agent. Tf (1 μL of a 40 μg/mL solution), 10% Na2S2O4 (100 μL) and 1% α,α’-bipyridine (100 μL) were mixed in 96-well plates before analysis. OD520nm values were determined using a microplate system (Spectra Max M2, USA) every 10 s for 30 min.

CD spectra

The protein samples used for CD spectrum measurements (Jasco 810, Japan) were diluted to a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL. Samples were divided into five groups: a) control Tf, b) Tf pretreated with 10% ethanol at 37°C for 30 min, without rotary evaporation, c) sample from b rotary evaporated for 30 min to remove ethanol, d) Tf pretreated with 10% ethanol at 37°C for 30 min and incubated with cisplatin for 2 h, without rotary evaporation, e) sample from d rotary evaporated for 30 min to remove ethanol. Instrument parameters were set as follows: scanning wavelength: 180 - 250 nm, bandwidth: 2 nm, sensitivity: standard, response time: 2 s, scanning speed: 500 nm/min, optical path: 1 mm at room temperature. Each sample was tested in triplicate.

Stability of Tf-cisplatin

Tf-cisplatin was prepared using the method described above in PBS buffer at room temperature. Tf (40 μg) and cisplatin (16 μg) were used to initiate the reaction. The residual cisplatin was eliminated by ultrafiltration with a 30 kDa cut-off by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The retention solution was collected to check Pt content using ICP-MS and to calculate the number of cisplatin bound to Tf per reaction.

Tf-cisplatin intracellular distribution

Cells were gifted by Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen, China and cultured in accordance with normal way. The A2780CP70 cell line was treated with approximately 2 μM cisplatin every 3 - 5 passages to maintain cisplatin resistance. Cisplatin contents outside and inside the cells under treatment of free cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin were detected using ICP-MS. A2780CP70 cells (2 × 106 cells per well) were cultured in 6-well, and divided into cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin treatment group, then each group was divided into two sub-groups, namely with or without 200 μg/mL of Tf pretreatment for 1 h before cisplatin or Tf-cisplatin treatment (with 5 μg/mL of cisplatin). After 5 min or 3 h treatment, cells and medium were collected to test cisplatin distribution using ICP-MS, respectively. Every treatment has triple samples.

Uptake of FITC-labeled Tf and Tf-cisplatin was determined in A2780CP70 cells by confocal microscopy. Cells were cultured in Millicell EZ-SLIDE 8-well plates (Millipore) and divided into four treatment groups: 1) FITC-labeled Tf, 2) FITC-labeled Tf with 200 μg/mL of Tf pretreatment for 1 h, 3) FITC labeled Tf-cisplatin, 4) FITC labeled Tf-cisplatin with 200 μg/mL of Tf pretreatment for 1 h. After 5 min or 3 h incubation, cells were fixed at 4% formaldehyde for 15 min, washed 3 times with PBS, counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Invitrogen). Cells were imaged using a laser scanning confocal microscope (CarlZeiss LSM780, Germany). Ten visual fields of each slice were quickly scanned for 400 points along the X and Y axes with an intensity of 40 - 60% and laser intensity of 300 mW.

MTT assay

Preliminary cytotoxicity of cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin was estimated using MTT assay. Cells (3 × 103) were plated onto 96-well culture plates using 100 μL fresh culture medium and then incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were allowed to adhere overnight prior to exposure to different concentrations (Figure 3A) of cisplatin or Tf-cisplatin for 48 h. Then, the medium was replaced by MTT solution at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. After a 2 h incubation, MTT solution was carefully replaced with 0.1 mL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Solubilisation of the formazan crystals was enhanced by agitation of the plate for 15 min before the optical density was measured at 570 nm, and use to calculate inhibition rate. SPSS 19.0 and Probit regression (logit model) method were used to calculate the IC50 of cisplatin and Tf-cisplatin for cells.

Cellular apoptosis

Cells were cultured in 12-well cell culture plates using 3 × 105 cells per well. Then cisplatin or Tf-cisplatin was added in doses from 0 - 10 μg/mL. After 48 h incubation, cells were harvested and stained with AnnexinV-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) in accordance with the instructions of a cellular apoptosis detection kit (Nanjing KeyGEN Biotech. Co. Ltd). Apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry (Beckman, Gallios, USA). Flow rate and cell concentration of samples were adjusted to keep acquisition lower than 500 cells/s. At least 104 cells were acquired for analysis. Data were collected and further analysed using FlowJo 7.0 (Emerald Biotech Co., Ltd. FlowJo China).

Gene expression

Approximately 106 cells (A2780CP70 or A2780S) were plated in 6-well plates and incubated with 2 mL medium at 37°C and 5% CO2 overnight. The following day, medium was replaced with fresh medium (control) or medium containing cisplatin or Tf-cisplatin (concentration of cisplatin was 1.5 μg/mL for A2780S and 10.0 μg/mL for A2780CP70) and then incubated for an additional 48 h. Cells were harvested for total RNA extraction using TRIzol. cDNA was obtained using the Takara PrimeScriptTM RT-PCR Kit. Real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed according to the manual of SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM II (Perfect Real Time) Kit. Genes involved in the uptake and efflux of Pt that are associated with Pt-drug resistance were tested using quantitative RT-PCR. Housekeeping genes (β-actin and GAPDH) were used as internal controls. Primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

In vivo and ex vivo fluorescence imaging

Male athymic BALB/c (Balb/C-nu) mice, 4 - 6 weeks of age and weighing 18 - 20 g were purchased from the Model Animal Research Center of Xiamen University and housed under laminar flow and sterile conditions. Animal handling was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Xiamen University. In order to develop subcutaneous tumor-bearing mouse models, A2780CP70 cells were harvested and resuspended in PBS. The BALB/c mice were then subcutaneously injected with 0.2 mL of a cell suspension containing 5 × 106 A2780CP70 cells in the upper right flank. Tumor growth was monitored daily until the tumor volumes were approximately 30 - 50 mm3.

Cy7.5 NHS ester (Lumiprobe Corporation, USA) was chosen as the in vivo imaging dye and used in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. The number of required Cy7.5 conjugated to each Tf was determined to be not less than 8. When mouse tumors reached volumes up to 50 mm3, the mice were randomly divided into three groups (n = 4 per group) and injected with either 0.2 mL of PBS, free Cy7.5 (0.05 mg/kg) or Cy7.5-labeled Tf-cisplatin (1 mg/mL Tf, 0.01 – 0.1 mg/kg Cy7.5) via tail vein. Images were taken using an IVIS® Lumina II in vivo imaging system (Caliper LifeScience, USA) at 3 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h post injection with wavelengths of 745 nm excitation and 810 - 875 nm emissions. After in vivo imaging, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Tissue from organs, including the heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, and brain, and tumor tissue were excised and imaged using the IVIS® Lumina II in vivo imaging system as described above.

In vivo tumor-targeted therapy with Tf-cisplatin

Tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into three groups (n = 4 per group) and intravenously treated with PBS, cisplatin (10 mg/kg), or Tf-cisplatin (equivalent to 10 mg/kg cisplatin). Mice in each group were treated twice a week for one month and monitored daily for survival. Before every treatment, mouse weights were taken and tumor size was measured using Vernier calipers (volume = length × width2 × л/6) [38]. Relative tumor volume (RTV) and tumor proliferation rate (%) were calculated according to the following equations:

RTV = Vt/V0

where V0 is the tumor volume at the begin of treatment and Vt is the tumor volume at t day after treatment, and

relative tumor proliferation rate (%) = (TRTV/CRTV) × 100

where TRTV is tumor volume of drug-treatment group (free cisplatin treatment group and Tf-cisplatin treatment group) and CRTV is tumor volume of control group (PBS group).

At the end of the treatment period, mice were sacrificed and heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney and brain tumor tissues were excised immediately. Half of the organ volumes were flash fixed in Bouin’s Fluid for hematoxylin and eosin staining (HE stain). The remaining organ halves were dried for the detection of Pt.

Determination of residual Pt in each tissue

The excised tissues were dried in an 80°C oven and then ground into powder for ICP-MS analysis. The powder (0.02 g) was digested with 1 mL HNO3 for 12 h in a 60°C water bath. The concentration of HNO3 in the mixture was diluted to 2% before ICP-MS analysis. The operation and instrument calibrations were the same as described above.

Statistical analysis

The data are expressed as means ± SD of triplicate experiments. Significant differences among groups were determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by the LSD post-hoc test. Probabilities of p< 0.05were considered to be statistically significant.


The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


This work was funded by grants from the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (No. 81370048 and No. 30870515); the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (no. 2016J01631 and 2016-ZQN-88); the Key Projects for Technology Plan of Xiamen Province in China (No. 3502Z20100002 and No. 3502Z201262), and the PCSIRT Project, China (IRT0941).


1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66:7-30.

2. Selle F, Sevin E, Ray-Coquard I, Mari V, Berton-Rigaud D, Favier L, Fabbro M, Lesoin A, Lortholary A, Pujade-Lauraine E. A phase II study of lenalidomide in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25:2191-2196.

3. Dobbin ZC, Katre AA, Steg AD, Erickson BK, Shah MM, Alvarez RD, Conner MG, Schneider D, Chen D, Landen CN. Using heterogeneity of the patient-derived xenograft model to identify the chemoresistant population in ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2014; 5:8750-8764. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2373.

4. Cepeda V, Fuertes MA, Castilla J, Alonso C, Quevedo C, Perez JM. Biochemical mechanisms of cisplatin cytotoxicity. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2007; 7:3-18.

5. Zhao H, Wei W, Sun Y, Gao J, Wang Q, Zheng J. Interference with the expression of beta-catenin reverses cisplatin resistance in A2780/DDP cells and inhibits the progression of ovarian cancer in mouse model. DNA Cell Biol. 2015; 34:55-62.

6. Gil S, Carmona A, Martinez-Criado G, Leon A, Prezado Y, Sabes M. Analysis of platinum and trace metals in treated glioma rat cells by x-ray fluorescence emission. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2015; 163:177-183.

7. Zuur CL, Simis YJ, Verkaik RS, Schornagel JH, Balm AJ, Dreschler WA, Rasch CR. Hearing loss due to concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2008; 89:38-43.

8. Mujika JI, Lopez X, Rezabal E, Castillo R, Marti S, Moliner V, Ugalde JM. A QM/MM study of the complexes formed by aluminum and iron with serum transferrin at neutral and acidic pH. J Inorg Biochem. 2011; 105:1446-1456.

9. Wei Y, Xing D. Transferrin, a cell pilot and iron provider based on its interaction with the overexpressed transferrin receptors. Receptors Clin Investig. 2015; 2:e873-e875.

10. Miyajima Y, Nakamura H, Kuwata Y, Lee J, Masunaga S, Ono K, Maruyama K. Transferrin-loaded nido-carborane liposome: tumor-targeting boron delivery system for neutron capture therapy. Bioconjug Chem. 2006; 17:1314-1320.

11. Cardoso AL, Simões S, de Almeida LP, Pelisek J, Culmsee C, Wagner E, Pedroso de Lima MC. siRNA delivery by a transferrin-associated lipid-based vector: a non-viral strategy to mediate gene silencing. J Gene Med. 2007; 9:170-183.

12. Tortorella S, Karagiannis TC. Transferrin receptor-mediated endocytosis: a useful target for cancer therapy. J Membr Biol. 2014; 247:291-307.

13. Zong T, Mei L, Gao H, Cai W, Zhu P, Shi K, Chen J, Wang Y, Gao F, He Q. Synergistic dual-ligand doxorubicin liposomes improve targeting and therapeutic efficacy of brain glioma in animals. Mol Pharm. 2014; 11:2346-2357.

14. Zhuo H, Peng Y, Yao Q, Zhou N, Zhou S, He J, Fang Y, Li X, Jin H, Lu X, Zhao Y. Tumour imaging and interferon-gamma-inducible protein-10 gene transfer using a highly efficient transferrin-conjugated liposome system in mice. Clin Can Res. 2013; 19:4206-4217.

15. Hwang AA, Lu J, Tamanoi F, Zink JI. Functional nanovalves on protein-coated nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo controlled drug delivery. Small. 2015; 11:319-328.

16. Wu L, Wu J, Zhou Y, Tang X, Du Y, Hu Y. Enhanced antitumour efficacy of cisplatin by tirapazamine-transferrin conjugate. Int J Pharm. 2012; 431:190-196.

17. Xu S, Olenyuk BZ, Okamoto CT, Hamm-Alvarez SF. Targeting receptor-mediated endocytotic pathways with nanoparticles: rationale and advances. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013; 65:121-138.

18. Mulik RS, Monkkonen J, Juvonen RO, Mahadik KR, Paradkar AR. Transferrin mediated solid lipid nanoparticles containing curcumin: enhanced in vitro anticancer activity by induction of apoptosis. Int J Pharm. 2010; 398:190-203.

19. Lu Y, Wang ZH, Li T, McNally H, Park K, Sturek M. Development and evaluation of transferrin-stabilized paclitaxel nanocrystal formulation. J Control Release. 2014; 176:76-85.

20. Kim ST, Saha K, Kim C, Rotello VM. The role of surface functionality in determining nanoparticle cytotoxicity. Acc Chem Res. 2013; 46:681-691.

21. Elliott RL, Stjernholm R, Elliott MC. Preliminary evaluation of platinum transferrin (MPTC-63) as a potential nontoxic treatment for breast cancer. Cancer Detect Prev. 1988; 12:469-480.

22. Hoshino T, Misaki M, Yamamoto M, Shimizu H, Ogawa Y, Toguchi H. Receptor-binding, in vitro cytotoxicity, and in vivo distribution of transferrin-bound cis-platinum (II) of differing molar ratios. J Control Release. 1995; 37:75-81.

23. Luo LZ, Jin HW, Huang HQ. Transferrin-cisplatin specifically deliver cisplatin to HepG2 cells in vitro and enhance cisplatin cytotoxicity. J Proteomics. 2012; 77:237-250.

24. Harris WR, Wang Z, Brook C, Yang B, Islam A. Kinetics of metal ion exchange between citric acid and serum transferrin. Inorg Chem. 2003; 42:5880-5889.

25. Samimi G, Varki NM, Wilczynski S, Safaei R, Alberts DS, Howell SB. Increase in expression of the copper transporter ATP7A during platinum drug-based treatment is associated with poor survival in ovarian cancer patients. Clin Can Res. 2003; 9:5853-5859.

26. Yang T, Chen M, Chen T, Thakur A. Expression of the copper transporters hCtr1, ATP7A and ATP7B is associated with the response to chemotherapy and survival time in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2015; 10:2584-2590.

27. Safaei R, Otani S, Larson BJ, Rasmussen ML, Howell SB. Transport of cisplatin by the copper efflux transporter ATP7B. Mol Pharmacol. 2008; 73:461-468.

28. Holzer AK, Katano K, Klomp LW, Howell SB. Cisplatin rapidly down-regulates its own influx transporter hCTR1 in cultured human ovarian carcinoma cells. Clin Can Res. 2004; 10:6744-6749.

29. Wang X, Jiang P, Wang P, Yang CS, Wang X, Feng Q. EGCG enhances cisplatin sensitivity by regulating expression of the copper and cisplatin influx transporter ctr1 in ovary cancer. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0125402.

30. Safaei R. Role of copper transporters in the uptake and efflux of platinum containing drugs. Cancer Lett. 2006; 234:34-39.

31. Samimi G, Safaei R, Katano K, Holzer AK, Rochdi M, Tomioka M, Goodman M, Howell SB. Increased expression of the copper efflux transporter ATP7A mediates resistance to cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin in ovarian cancer cells. Clin Can Res. 2004; 10:4661-4669.

32. Yoshizawa K, Nozaki S, Kitahara H, Ohara T, Kato K, Kawashiri S, Yamamoto E. Copper efflux transporter (ATP7B) contributes to the acquisition of cisplatin-resistance in human oral squamous cell lines. Oncol Rep. 2007; 18:987-991.

33. Niu X, Liu W, Wang Y, Liu X, Zhang H, Li Z, Li H, Iwakura Y, Deng W. IL-17A exacerbates cisplatin-based resistance of OVCA via upregulating the expression of ABCG2 and MDR1 through Gli1-mediated Hh signalling. Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 18. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10655. [Epub ahead of print].

34. Li C, Liu M, Yan A, Liu W, Hou J, Cai L, Dong X. ERCC1 and the efficacy of cisplatin in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. Tumour Biol. 2014; 35:12707-12712.

35. Huang W, Mao Y, Zhan Y, Huang J, Wang X, Luo P, Li LI, Mo D, Liu Q, Xu H, Huang C. Prognostic implications of survivin and lung resistance protein in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Oncol Lett. 2016; 11:723-730.

36. Allardyce CS, Dyson PJ, Coffey J, Johnson N. Determination of drug binding sites to proteins by electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry: the interaction of cisplatin with transferrin. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2002; 16:933-935.

37. Khalaila I, Allardyce CS, Verma CS, Dyson PJ. A mass spectrometric and molecular modelling study of cisplatin binding to transferrin. ChemBioChem. 2005; 6:1788-1795.

38. Tang H, Sampath P, Yan X, Thorne SH. Potential for enhanced therapeutic activity of biological cancer therapies with doxycycline combination. Gene Ther. 2013; 20:770-778.

Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 17316