Oncotarget

Research Papers:

Dose invasive apocrine adenocarcinoma has worse prognosis than invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: evidence from SEER database

Ning Zhang, Hanwen Zhang, Tong Chen and Qifeng Yang _

PDF  |  HTML  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:24579-24592. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15597

Metrics: PDF 1692 views  |   HTML 2478 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Ning Zhang1, Hanwen Zhang1, Tong Chen1, Qifeng Yang1,2

1Department of Breast Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China

2Pathology Tissue Bank, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence to:

Qifeng Yang, email: [email protected]

Keywords: apocrine adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, surveillance, epidemiology and end result (SEER), prognosis

Received: January 09, 2017     Accepted: February 13, 2017     Published: February 21, 2017

ABSTRACT

Background: Invasive apocrine adenocarcinoma (AAC) of breast is a rare histopathological subtype of breast carcinomas. We aim to investigate the different characteristics and prognostic outcomes between AAC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of breast cancer.

Results: AAC patients presented with older ages, more aggressive behaviors, lower ER and PR proportions, higher HER2 amplification rates and less application of breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy compared to IDC patients. Long-term OS and DSS were both worse in ACC patients (p = 0.006, p = 0.012 respectively) than in IDC patients by Kaplan-Meier analysis. However, no significant difference was detected in DSS (p = 0.181) and OS (p = 0.116) between the matched two histological subtypes. Further subgroup analysis indicated that AJCC stage, ER status, PR status and HER2 status may be principal confounders for AAC prognosis.

Materials and Methods: With accession to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database, a total of 260,596 patients met the eligibility criteria. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared between groups using Chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Subgroup analyses summarized the hazard ratio (HR) of AAC versus IDC using a forest plot.

Conclusions: AAC had unique clinicopathological characteristics and it tended to be a more aggressive type than IDC. However, the worse prognosis was diminished after matching for demographic and clinicopathological factors. Deeper insights into AAC are in need to contribute to individualized and tailored therapy, which thereby may improve clinical management and outcomes.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 15597