Oncotarget

Clinical Research Papers:

Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on carbon dioxide embolism during pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic hepatectomy

PDF |  HTML  |  How to cite  |  Order a Reprint

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:27502-27509. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15492

Metrics: PDF 680 views  |   HTML 972 views  |   ?  

Yu Hong, Yu Xin, Fei Yue, He Qi and Cai Jun _

Abstract

Yu Hong1, Yu Xin2, Fei Yue2, He Qi3 and Cai Jun1

1 Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

2 Department of Anesthesia, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

3 Lincoln Christian School, Lincoln, NE, USA

Correspondence to:

Cai Jun, email:

Keywords: anesthetics, carbon dioxide embolism, laparoscopic hepatectomy, transesophageal echocardiography

Received: August 29, 2016 Accepted: February 06, 2017 Published: February 18, 2017

Abstract

Laparoscopic hepatectomy carries a high risk of gas embolism due to the extensive hepatic transection plane and large hepatic vena cava. Here, we compared the influence of inhaled and intravenous anesthetics on gas embolism during laparoscopic hepatectomy. Fifty patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy were divided into two groups to receive sevoflurane anesthesia (group S, n = 25) or intravenous propofol anesthesia (group p, n = 25). During the operation, gas emboli were detected by transesophageal echocardiography and graded according to their size. Venous CO2 emboli were detected in all patients, and the embolism grades did not differ between the two groups. However, the mean embolism episode duration was longer in group S than group P (51.24±23.59 vs. 34.00±17.13 sec, p < 0.05). At the point of the most severe gas embolism, the PTCO2 was higher in group S than group p (44.00±4.47 vs. 41.36±2.77 mmHg, p < 0.05), while the PO2/FiO2 (450.52±54.08 vs. 503.80±63.18, p < 0.05) and pH values (7.35±0.05 vs. 7.38±0.02, p < 0.05) were lower in group S than group P. Patients with a history of abdominal surgery or liver cirrhosis had higher gas embolism grades. Thus volatile anesthetics may lengthen the duration of embolism episodes and worsen hemodynamics and pulmonary blood gas exchange during surgery.


020158r1.html

Introduction

In recent years, laparoscopic liver resection has come to be regarded as an effective and safe surgical procedure for liver disease in selected patients. However, this procedure can be complicated by two well-known problems: bleeding and CO2 gas embolism (GE). As clinical experience increases and surgical technique improves, bleeding can be minimized or avoided in highly skilled hands. On the other hand, GE is less common but is potentially life-threatening. Aside from the long operative duration, the unique hepatic anatomy full of large-venous and vena- cava can allow gas to enter into the circulatory system through high-pressure insufflations when there are vessels injuries during dissection of the extensive liver parenchyma [1]. Therefore, the risk of GE may be elevated during the procedure of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH). However, there is no consensus on what conditions cause embolisms or how frequent and serious they are. Most studies have focused on modulating the central venous pressure (CVP) and intraperitoneal pressure to limit this complication [2,3]. However, other risk factors for GE are involved in pneumoperitoneum, such as abdominal surgery history [4], positive end-expiratory pressure [5], liver cirrhosis [6], drug treatment [7], and surgical instrumentation [8]. If the risks of potential hazards are to be minimized, possible parameters influencing the occurrence of GE need to be investigated.

Sevoflurane and propofol are inhaled and intravenous anesthetics, respectively, and are extensively used in clinical anesthesiology. Previous animal studies have demonstrated different anesthetics may influence the severity of experimental venous air emboli, and the filtration capacity of lung would be greatly impaired by the use of halothane [7]. However, these data have never been precisely verified in a clinical setting. In the present study, we assessed the incidence and severity of embolic events when inhaled or intravenous anesthetics were used during LH procedures.

materials and Methods

After approval was received from the Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects at Sir Run Run Shaw Medical Center, Zhejiang University, written informed consent was obtained, and 50 consecutive patients having attempted LH were enrolled in the present study.

Patients with histories of valvular or congenital heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, or esophageal disease (e.g., esophageal perforation, hiatal hernia, esophageal stenosis, esophageal varix and so on) were excluded from this study. In addition, patients for whom the surgical approach was changed to open were excluded from the analysis.

A computer-generated 1:1 randomization protocol was used to assign participants to either the sevoflurane or the propofol group for the maintenance of anesthesia. An opaque envelope was opened by the anesthetic assistant who was on duty before the operation contained each subject’s random group assignment. The anesthesiologists involved in the study were blinded to the group assignments. Fifty adult patients, ASA I-III, Child-Pugh A and B for attempted LH, were assigned to the sevoflurane (Group S, n=25) or propofol (Group P, n=25) group. All operations were performed by the same attending surgical group (Dr. Cai XJ’).

In Group S, anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane (4-6 vol %), sufentanil (0.6 μg/kg) and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), and maintained with sevoflurane (2-3 vol %) and remifentanyl infusion (0.1-0.2 μg/kg-1min-1). In Group P, anesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg/kg) and maintained with propofol infusion (4-6 μg/kg-1min-1) and remifentanyl infusion (0.1-0.2 μg/kg-1min-1). The anesthesia depth was maintained consistently in the two groups with an entropy index ((E-ENTROPY-01, GE Healthcare, Helsink, Finland)) between 40 and 60. Patients were ventilated with a tidal volume of 8-10 mL/kg at a rate of 8-16 breaths/min with a 50% concentration of O2 to maintain an end-tidal CO2 (ETco2) level of 30-40 mmHg.

After the induction of anesthesia, a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe was inserted via an esophagotomy, and the existence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) was checked before the surgery. Patients were infused with 1 liter of Lactated Ringer’s solution before the operation. During the operation, special attention was paid to the right atrium (RA), right ventricle (RV) and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). TEE images were videotaped throughout the surgery. An independent cardiac anesthesiologist categorized GEs into five grades according to Schmandra’s classification system [9]: Grade 1, no bubbles in the RA, RV or RVOT; Grade 2, a single gas bubble in the RA, RV or RVOT; Grade 3, gas bubbles filling less than half the diameter of the RA, RV or RVOT; Grade 4, gas bubbles filling more than half the diameter of the RA, RV or RVOT; Grade 5, gas bubbles completely filling the diameter of the RA, RV or RVOT. Severe GE encompassed grades 4 and 5.

Before hepatic dissection, the CVP was adjusted to 8 mmHg and maintained during the resection procedure. Arterial blood pressure, pulse oximetric saturation, peak airway pressure and ETco2 levels were monitored throughout the surgery. A sudden decrease in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) by >30% of the baseline value and/or an acute fall in SPO2 were defined as hemodynamic instability. Electrocardiogram changes related to ST elevation and depression (ST elevation >0.1 mV, ST depression <0.05 mV), bradycardia (HR <60 bpm) and tachycardia (HR >100 bpm) were also recorded. A minor resection was defined as a resection of one or two segments, while a major resection was defined as a resection of three or more segments, according to the Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections [10]. Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed histologically.

Pneumoperitoneum pressure was set at 15 mmHg throughout the operation. The measurements of echocardiographic variables included the grades and durations of the most severe embolism episodes. Arterial blood samples were drawn before the induction, 5 min after the peritoneal insufflation and every 10 min during the liver resection, for the measurement of PO2, PCO2, and pH values. The end of the GE period was defined as a bubble-free interval for at least 5 sec. The blood gas was measured at the closet point to the most severe GE.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 20.0. Data are presented as the mean±SD. Patients’ demographic and surgical characteristics were compared through a chi-square test. Differences in the incidence of GE between the two groups were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. The embolism durations and the MAP, HR, CVP, ETCO2, PO2/FiO2 and pH values at the severe periods during surgery were compared through Student’s t-test. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Fifty patients were enrolled in the present study, but one patient in the S group was excluded from the analysis due to a change of the laparoscopy to an open procedure. The demographic and surgical characteristics were similar in the two groups (Table 1). One patient in the S group had a PFO, and none of patient in the present study had a history of cirrhosis and abdominal surgery.

Table 1: Demographic and surgical characteristics of the two groups of patients

Group S (N= 24)

Group P (N= 25)

P value

Age (y)

52.57±14.23

54.07±13.31

0.772

Gender

Male/Female

10/14

9/16

0.773

BMI (kg/m2)

23.40±2.89

23.83±4.24

0.673

MAP (mmHg)

85.63±10.01

88.20±7.53

0.313

ASA (I /II /III)

5/19/0

3/20/2

0.434

Child-Plug (A/B)

14/10

14/11

0.774

Cirrhosis (Y/N)

6/18

8/17

0.754

PFO (Y/N)

1/23

0/25

0.312

Operative time (min)

138.00±67.64

141.00±61.96

0.871

CVP (mmH2O)

6.86±1.51

6.73±1.39

0.820

Pneumoperitoneal time (min)

126.79±70.07

99.33±38.59

0.198

Liver section time (min)

18.58±11.32

18.68±9.25

0.973

Blood loss (mL)

250.00±257.80

384.00±386.15

0.155

Fluid (mL)

Crystal

Colloid

1278.00±429.17

850.00±375.00

1340.00±624.50

947.92±255.16

0.684

0.293

Arrhythmias

2

1

0.598

Surgical type

Major resection

Minor resection

10

14

12

13

0.776

Diagnosis

Hepatolith

Hemangioma

Carcinoma

Focal nodular hyperplasia

5

2

15

2

4

7

14

0

The values are mean ± SD

GEs occurred in 100% of the patients. As shown in Figure 1, five-grade embolism was detected by TEE during LH. The distributions of GE grades were similar in the two groups (Table 2). The frequencies of severe GEs (stage 4-5) were 54.2% and 76.0% in the P and S groups, respectively, but this difference was not statistically significant. A total of 20.8% of patients (n=5) in the S group and 16% of patients (n=4) in the P group experienced a severe GE of stage 5.

Table 2: Embolism grades and durations of the two groups

Group S (N=24)

Group P (N= 25)

P value

TEE Grade (1-5)

0 / 3/ 8/ 8/ 5

0/ 0/ 6/ 15/ 4

0.138

TEE Grade (4-5)

13/24

19/25

0.108

Embolism Time (sec)

51.24±23.59

34.00±17.13

0.005*

The values are mean ± SD

*There was a significant difference between the two groups

Five-grade embolism detected with TEE in one patient.

Figure 1: Five-grade embolism detected with TEE in one patient. RA: right atrium, LA: left atrium, RVOT: right ventricular outflow tract.

The PTCO2 at the point of the occurrence of the most severe GE was higher in the S group than in the P group (44.00±4.47 mmHg, p<0.05). The MAP and pH values were significantly lower in the S group than in the P group (MAP: 73.14±8.73 vs. 81.73±7.93 mmHg, p<0.05; pH: 7.35±0.05 vs. 7.38±0.02, p<0.05). PO2 and PO2/FiO2 were much lower in the S group than in the P group (PO2: 272.52±32.54 vs. 317.84 ± 45.22 mmHg, p<0.05; PO2/FiO2: 450.52±54.08 vs. 503.80±63.18, p<0.05). With respect to the HR, CVP, ETco2, and increase in ETco2, no differences were observed between the two groups (Table 3). In addition, there were no differences in operative blood loss or fluid administration between the groups.

Table 3: BP, HR, CVP, ETco2 and blood gas values at the point of the most severe gas embolism in the two groups

Group S (N=24)

Group P (N=25)

P value

MAP (mmHg)

73.14±8.73

81.73±7.93

0.010*

HR (beats/min)

63.29±6.41

65.33±6.84

0.414

CVP (mmH2O)

7.00±1.58

6.76±1.45

0.579

ETco2a (mmHg)

35.16±1.21

35.28±1.99

0.798

ETco2b (mmHg)

43.48±4.25

41.80±2.69

0.102

ETco2b-a (mmHg)

8.32±4.46

6.52±2.45

0.083

PTCO2 (mmHg)

44.00±4.47

41.36±2.77

0.015*

PO2 (mmHg)

272.52±32.54

317.84±45.22

0.000*

PO2/FiO2

450.52±54.08

503.80±63.18

0.002*

PH

7.35±0.05

7.38±0.02

0.007*

*There were significant differences between the two groups

ETco2a: end-tidal carbon dioxide before the pneumoperitoneum

ETco2b: End- tidal carbon dioxide at the point of the most severe GE

ETco2b-a: ETco2b-ETco2a

The mean duration of the most severe GE was much longer in S group than in the P group (51.24±23.59 sec vs. 34.67±17.13 sec, p=0.033).

One patient in the S group experienced a severe GE (grade 5) with low blood pressure and ETco2 values, and bubbles filling the RA and RVOT, as detected by TEE (Figure 2 and Video 1). However, the patient was discharged from the hospital without any complications.

The GE grades in patients undergoing LH were higher in those with liver cirrhosis than in those without, and the durations of severe GE were longer in patients undergoing major hepatectomy than in those undergoing minor hepatectomy (Table 4).

Table 4: Embolism grade and severe embolism duration in patients with cirrhosis, abdominal surgery history, or major/minor hepatectomy

Variables

TEE Grade (4-5)

P Value

Embolism Time (sec)

P Value

Cirrhosis

0.01*

0.096

Yes

13 (14)

51.00±23.89

No

19 (35)

39.36±20.93

Abdominal history

0.031*

0.080

Yes

17 (18)

38.50±22.39

No

18 (31)

49.94±20.38

Major hepatectomy

16 (21)

0.229

50.00±23.19

0.036*

Minor hepatectomy

16 (28)

36.82±19.89

*There were significant differences between the two groups

Bubbles filling the RA and RVOT were detected by TEE in one patient in the S group during hepatic parenchymal resection.

Figure 2: Bubbles filling the RA and RVOT were detected by TEE in one patient in the S group during hepatic parenchymal resection. The patient exhibited notable hypotension and a decrease in end-tidal carbon dioxide (from 37 mmHg to 12 mmHg). RA: right atrium, LA: left atrium, RVOT: right ventricular outflow tract.

Discussion

The keys to performing LH safely are minimizing bleeding and avoiding CO2 GE. Methods such as the Pringle maneuver, along with the available technology, regional occlusion of inflow and outflow, etc., are known to be useful for reducing intraoperative bleeding [11, 12]. Recently, more attention has been paid to air embolism under pneumoperitoneum [3, 5, 9]. The clinical presentation of GE may be asymptomatic or may lead to arrhythmia, cardiovascular collapse, and even death [13]. And changes in the systemic circulation, such as changes in the MAP or pulse rate, are not specific or sensitive for GE, except in the very late, fatal phase. Therefore, clinicians must be aware of this silent but dangerous entity. However, there is no consensus yet on how frequently GEs occur or how they can be prevented. Most previous studies have focused on modulating the intraperitoneal pressure and CVP during laparoscopic surgery [3, 13]. If the risks of the potential hazards are to be minimized, additional parameters need to be considered, such as the learning curves of the operators, duration of pneumoperitoneum, types of resection and instruments, and use of positive end-expiratory pressure.

In the present study, we investigated the influence of different types of anesthetics on the occurrence and duration of GE during LH. TEE, the most sensitive method [14], was applied. The results demonstrated that the incidence of CO2 emboli during LH could be as high as 100%. With the exception of one patient, even high-grade GE did not lead to severe hemodynamic instability. In addition, we found that patients with liver cirrhosis or abdominal surgery history experienced more severe GEs than their respective counterparts.

We also found that GEs took place throughout all phases of the dissection, but predominantly occurred during two distinct periods: the liver capsule opening, and the deeper plane of parenchymal transection. Four to fifteen episodes of embolism per patient were detected during CO2 pneumoperitoneum, and more than 80% of these embolisms occurred during parenchymal resection. It seems that the passage of insufflants along pressure gradients into large open venous sinuses during deeper liver parenchymal resection makes it easy for GE to occur. The mechanisms promoting the occurrence of GE at the point when the capsule is opened are still not clear. An explanation might be that the intact and dense liver capsule is the first barrier against GE during pneumoperitoneum.

We compared not only the grades of GE events, but also the durations of the most severe GE occurrences during the procedure between the two groups. Our results indicated that the duration of the most severe GE episode was much longer in the sevoflurane group than in the propofol group. Furthermore, the patients had significantly higher PTCO2 values and lower MAP, PO2/FiO2 and pH values in the S group than in the P group. The significantly lower MAP was caused by reduced cardiac output due to the longer retention of bubbles in the RVOT. Above all, the longer duration of severe GE in the S group influenced the hemodynamics and pulmonary blood gas change much more seriously than that in the P group.

The pulmonary circulation and alveolar interface are effective reservoirs for intravascular gas dissipation. Once bubbles enter the lungs, elimination occurs primarily via the alveoli, while part of the gas is dissolved in the blood and adjacent tissues, though to a lesser degree. The physiologic filtering capacity of the lungs is easily overwhelmed when a certain amount of GE is exceeded, especially in case of inhaled anesthetics [15, 16]. Thus, it was not surprising that more time was needed for embolism absorption, resulting in serious respiratory gas exchange and hemodynamic disturbances in the S Group. The mechanism whereby different anesthetic drugs impair the gas filtering capacity of the lungs remains elusive. In a previous study, Kaze et al. reported that compared to intravenous anesthetics, inhaled drugs decreased the diameter of the pulmonary vessels, which lead to a more serious gas embolization. [17]. Yahagi et al. determined that intravenous anesthetics such as fentanyl or ketamine increased the mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance in dogs [7]. This may have been due to changes in pulmonary blood flow at the level of the capillaries, shunt vessels or arterioles. A further study revealed that continuous insufflation of one type of gas (such as sevoflurane) might lead to the diffusion of other types of gas (mainly oxygen and carbon dioxide) into the carbon dioxide emboli [18], thus increasing the time required for embolic absorption. Therefore, we speculated that impairment of the pulmonary filtration capacity by inhaled anesthetics inhabited the passage of bubbles across the lungs by reducing the pulmonary vascular tone, and that the effects of the emboli were enhanced by different gases. Moreover, there is increasing evidence to support the notion that an extended absorption time may be responsible for permanent injuries and deaths after carbon dioxide embolisms [19, 20].

One patient in the S Group exhibited cardiorespiratory instability during the hepatic parenchymal resection. The reason for this may have been be that the entry of CO2 through the open middle hepatic vein in a short time led to a state of circulation failure, with a notable reduction in ETco2 (from 37 mmHg to 12 mmHg) and subsequent lung hypoperfusion. The TEE monitor displayed the amount of gas accumulating in the RVOT (Figure 2 and Video 1). The transient accumulation of gas in the pulmonary artery caused an “air lock” of the right heart cavities and reduced inflow into the left side of the heart, which could have induced acute hypotension or even cardiac arrest. Overall, the clinical influence of GE depends on the balance between the volume of gas entering the circulation and the amount of gas that is removed [21].

Interestingly, we observed that high-grade GE occurred in patients with cirrhosis and abdominal surgery history. Peritoneal adhesions and further vascular injury after a previous surgery might have facilitated the entry of CO2 into the circulation system during pneumoperitoneum [4]. The reason that patients with cirrhosis were more prone to severe GE is still unclear. We propose that the hepatic venous sinus and hepatic vein may have been pressed by hepatic cirrhosis nodules, thus impairing the buffering capacity of the liver sinus for gas absorption. Moreover, fibrotic parenchyma caused by atrophic change and chronic inflammation may have increased the operative difficulty and the risk of GE. The incidence of intacardiac right to left shunt was reported to reach 47% in patients of cirrhosis compared to only 20% in the normal population 6. In addition, direct intrapulmonary artery venous shunting is common in chronic liver cirrhosis patients. Although there were no patients with adverse neurologic outcomes in this study, neurological damage due to a paradoxical GE is more likely to occur in cirrhosis patients. Therefore, clinicians must be aware of this silent but dangerous event in advanced chronic liver disease patients.

In an effort to reduce the effects of other factors that could have influenced the incidence of air embolism, we adopted the methodology of randomization. We previously reported that CVP decreased 37% when patients were in the reverse Trendelenburg position during LH [22]. Considering that CVP can be influenced by many factors, we infused patients with 1 liter of Lactated Ringer’s solution to increase the CVP during anesthetic induction, and maintained the CVP at the level of 6-7 mmHg while patients were in the Trendelenburg position during the operation. Also, in order to avoid fluid bubbles caused by the administration of fluid and agents, we reduced the fluid infusion rate to a low rate (50 mL/min) and stopped the TEE video recording when a bolus of medication was given. Additionally, the surgeons preforming the procedure were all experienced, according to the learning curve of LH in our center [23].

The incidence of GE in patients undergoing LH was 100%. No single surveyed factor can explain the phenomenon of GE, and the reaction to GE is also hard to predict, although it is likely to depend on the gas volume, entrance rate, and so on. We found that even high-grade GE was clinically insignificant. As patients with preexisting cardiopulmonary disease were excluded from our study, and the operations were performed by experienced surgeons, our results strongly suggest that PFO and liver cirrhosis are possible risk factors for paradoxical air emboli. Therefore, additional monitoring or preparation for early intervention should be performed for patients with major hepatic resection, cardiopulmonary diseases, abdominal surgery history, or liver cirrhosis. Moreover, total intravenous anesthetics are preferred for these patients, and TEE monitoring is valuable for reducing the occurrence of fatal GE.

In conclusion, multiple factors influence GE during LH. Careful monitoring, suitable drug treatment and skilled surgeons are important for minimizing the severity and frequency of GE, especially for patients with abdominal surgery history or liver cirrhosis.

Limitations

One potential limitation of this study was that we did not measure the mean pulmonary artery pressure or pulmonary vascular resistance to detect the mechanism whereby the filtration of lung was impaired. Another limitation was the small number of the cases; a further study with a larger volume would be needed to validate our conclusions.

Abbreviations

Gas embolism, GE; Laparoscopic hepatectomy, LH; Central venous pressure, CVP; Transesophageal echocardiography, TEE; Patent foramen ovale, PFO; Right atrium, RA; Right ventricle, RV; Right ventricular outflow tract, RVOT; Mean arterial pressure, MAP.

Author contributions

Design of the analysis plan: Caixiujun; Data analysis: Yuhong and Heyuqi; Drafting the manuscript: Yuxin; Revision of the manuscript after clinical review: all authors.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests

Funding

The study was supported by a project of the public health bureau of Zhejiang Province (wst15KYA08).

References

1. Scoletta P, Morsiani E, Ferrocci G, maniscalco P, Pellegrini D, Colognesi A, Azzena G. Carbon dioxide embolization: Is it a complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Minerva Chir. 2003; 58:313-520.

2. Eiriksson K, Fors D, Rubertsson S, Arvidsson D. High intra-abdominal pressure during experimental laparoscopic liver resection reduces bleeding but increased the risk of gas embolism. British Journal of surgery. 2011; 98: 845-852.

3. Otsuka Y, Katagiri T, Ishii J, Maeda T, Kubota Y, Tamura A, Tsuchiya M, Kaneko H. Gas embolism in laparoscopic hepatectomy: what is the optimal pneumoperineal pressure for laparoscopic major hepatectomy? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013; 20:137-140.

4. Cottin V, Delafosse B, Viale JP. Gas embolism during laparoscopy: A report of seven case inpatients with previous abdominal surgical history. Surg Endosc. 1996; 10: 166-169.

5. Fors D, Eiriksson K, Arvidsson D, Rubertsson S. Elevated PEEP without effect upon gas embolism frequency or severity in experimental laparoscopic liver resection. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2012; 109: 272-278.

6. Hopkins WE, Waggoner AD, Barzilai B. Frequency and significance of intrapulmonary right to left shunting in end-stage hepatic disease. Am J Cardiol. 1992; 70: 516-519.

7. Yahagi N1, Furuya H, Sai Y, Amakata Y. Effect of halothane, fentanyl and ketamine on the threshold for transpulmonary passage of venous air emboli in dogs. Anesth Analg. 1992; 75:720-723.

8. Jersenius U, Fors D, Rubertsson S, Arvidsson D. Laparoscopic parenchymal division of the liver in a porcine model: comparison of the efficacy and safety of three different techniques. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21:315-320.

9. Schmandra TC, Mierdl S, Bauer H, Gutt C, Hanisch E. Transesophageal echocardiography shows high risk of gas embolism during laparoscopic hepatic resection under carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Br J Surg. 2002; 89: 870-886.

10. Pang YY. Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB. 2000; 2: 333-339.

11. Vibert E, Perniceni T, Levard H, Denet C, Shahri NK, Gayer B. Laprascopic liver resection. Br J Surg. 2006; 93: 67-72.

12. Cai XJ, Yu H, Liang X, Wang YF, Zheng XY, Huang DY, Peng SY. Laparoscopic hepatectomy by curettage and aspiration. Experiences of 62 cases. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20:1531-1535.

13. Jayaraman S, Khakhar A, Yang H, Bainbridge D, Quan D. The association between central venous pressure, pneumoperitoneum, and venous carbon dioxide embolism in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23: 2369-2373.

14. Glenski JA, Cucchiara Rf, Michenfelder JD. Transesophageal echocardiography and transcutaneous O2 and CO2 monitoring for detection of venous air embolism. Anesthesiology. 1986; 64:541-545.

15. Spencer MP, Oyama P. Pulmonary capacity for dissipation of venous gas emboli. Aerospace Medicine. 1971; 42: 822-827.

16. Butler BD, Hills BA. Transpulmonary passage of venous air emboli. J Appl Physiol. 1985; 59; 54-47.

17. Katz J, Leiman BC, Butler BD. Effects of inhalation anaesthetics on filtration of venous gas emboli by the pulmonary vasculature. Br. J. Anaesth. 1988; 61: 200-205.

18. Stauffer HM, Durant TM, Oppenheimer MJ. Gas embolism; roentgenologic considerations, including the experimental use of carbon dioxide as an intracardiac contrast material. Radiology. 1956; 66: 686-692.

19. Lantz PE, Smith JD. Fatal carbon dioxide embolism complicating attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomy- case report and literature review. J Forensic Sci. 1994; 39: 1468-1480.

20. Hatano Y, Murakawa M, Segawa H, Nishida Y, Mori K. Venous air embolism during hepatic resection. Anesthesiology. 1990; 73: 1282-1285.

21. Yau P1, Watson DI, Lafullarde T, Jamieson GG. Experimental study of effect of embolism of different laparoscopy insufflation gases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2000; 10: 211-216.

22. Yan CY, Cai XJ, Wang YF. Effect of selective inflow occlusion on hemodynamic conditions during laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy effect of selective inflow occlusion on hemodynamic conditions during laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012; 59: 501-514.

23. Cai X1, Li Z, Zhang Y, Yu H, Liang X, Jin R, Luo F. Laparoscopic liver resection and the learning curve: a 14-year, single-center experience. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28: 1334-1341.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 15492