Oncotarget

Research Papers:

Genetic variation in PPARGC1A may affect the role of diet-associated inflammation in colorectal carcinogenesis

Young Ae Cho _, Jeonghee Lee, Jae Hwan Oh, Hee Jin Chang, Dae Kyung Sohn, Aesun Shin and Jeongseon Kim

PDF  |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:8550-8558. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14347

Metrics: PDF 2235 views  |   HTML 2190 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Young Ae Cho1, Jeonghee Lee1, Jae Hwan Oh2, Hee Jin Chang2, Dae Kyung Sohn2, Aesun Shin1,3, Jeongseon Kim1

1Molecular Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea

2Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea

3Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Correspondence to:

Jeongseon Kim, email: [email protected]

Aesun Shin, email: [email protected]

Keywords: diet, inflammation, polymorphism, PPARGC1A, interaction

Received: September 02, 2016     Accepted: December 07, 2016     Published: December 29, 2016

ABSTRACT

The role of inflammation in colorectal carcinogenesis may differ according to individuals’ genetic variations. Therefore, we investigated whether genetic susceptibility alters the association between inflammatory potential of diet and the risk of colorectal cancer within the Korean population. We genotyped four polymorphisms in four genes (IL1B, TNF, PPARG, and PPARGC1A) and calculated the dietary inflammatory index (DII) in a case-control study with 701 colorectal cancer patients and 1,402 controls. Among the investigated polymorphisms, heterozygous carriers of rs3774921 in PPARGC1A showed a higher risk of colorectal cancer (OR [95% CI] = 1.26 [1.02–1.55] for TC vs. TT). When the data were stratified by rs3774921 genetic variant, the association of a pro-inflammatory diet with colorectal cancer risk was more prominent among homozygous variant allele carriers (OR [95% CI] = 5.15 [2.35–11.29] for high vs. low DII) (P for interaction = 0.009). When stratified by anatomic site, this association was much stronger for rectal cancer patients (OR [95% CI] = 8.06 [2.67–24.16] for high vs. low DII) (P for interaction = 0.006). Additionally, this interaction was stronger among those older than 50 years and not exercising regularly. Conversely, no association or interaction was found for the other investigated polymorphisms. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that a pro-inflammatory diet may have a differential effect on colorectal cancer risk based on PPARGC1A genetic variation. This interaction may differ by anatomic location and other risk factors.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 14347