Oncotarget

Research Papers:

Detection of ALK rearrangements in lung cancer patients using a homebrew PCR assay

PDF |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  Order a Reprint

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:7722-7728. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13886

Metrics: PDF 630 views  |   HTML 1215 views  |   ?  

Hui Yu, JianHua Chang, Fang Liu, Qifeng Wang, YongMing Lu, ZhuanXu Zhang, Jiabing Shen, Qing Zhai, Xia Meng, Jialei Wang & Xun Ye _

Abstract

Hui Yu1,7,*, JianHua Chang1,7,*, Fang Liu5, Qifeng Wang2,7, YongMing Lu2,7, ZhuanXu Zhang3,7, Jiabing Shen4,7, Qing Zhai5,7, Xia Meng6,8, Jialei Wang1,7, Xun Ye6,8

1Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

2Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

3Tissue bank, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

4Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

5Department of Pharmacy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

6Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center-Institut Mérieux Lab, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

7Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

8Medical Device Development Department (MD3), bioMérieux Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence to:

Jialei Wang, email: luwangjialei@hotmail.com

Xun Ye, email: yyexun@gmail.com

Keywords: anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), rearrangement, sweyjawbu, lung carcinomas, quantitative real-time PCR

Received: June 08, 2016     Accepted: December 05, 2016     Published: December 10, 2016

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are candidates for targeted therapeutics. However, patients must be tested with a companion diagnostic assay to realize their ALK rearrangement status. We analyzed the publicly available E-GEOD-31210 microarray dataset and identified a non-coding RNA, sweyjawbu, which is strongly associated with ALK rearrangements. We validated these results using quantitative real-time PCR in an independent cohort consisting of 4 cell lines and 83 clinical samples. We could differentiate between ALK rearrangement-positive and -negative lung cancer samples by comparing sweyjawbu expression. Additionally, ALK rearrangement status was determined by comparing the expression of the 5′ and 3′ regions of the ALK transcript or by detecting known ALK hybrid subtypes. Thus, using our homebrew PCR assay, we were able to accurately detect ALK rearrangements, which could be used for diagnostic screening of lung cancer patients. The prototype could potentially be transferred to an automatic multiplex PCR platform (FilmArray) to differentiate between ALK rearrangement-positive and -negative patients in point-of-care settings.


Detection of <i>ALK</i> rearrangements in lung cancer patients using a homebrew PCR assay | Yu | Oncotarget

INTRODUCTION

Genetic alterations that lead to the constitutive activation of kinases are frequently observed in various cancers. Morris et al. first discovered that a translocation could result in fusion of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) to nucleophosmin (NPM) in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cells [1]. Over the past 20 years, numerous other ALK fusions have been identified, which form functional chimeric proteins in human cancers such as ALCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, as well as esophageal squamous cell, breast , colon, thyroid, renal cell, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [2]. These oncogenic fusion proteins are caused by chromosomal translocations or inversions. In many cases, the growth and survival of tumor cells is dependent upon the activity of specific kinases. Therefore, selective kinase inhibitors are effective anticancer therapeutics. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed for personalized medicine for cancer patients [3]. For example, Pfizer has developed the oral first-in-class ALK inhibitor XALKORI® (crizotinib).

There are several commercial assays that can detect ALK rearrangements or hybrids [4]. The Abbott Vysis ALK Break Apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) kit is considered the gold standard for detecting rearrangement of the ALK locus. The Ventana ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay is an alternative to ALK FISH. Additionally, the real-time PCR method developed by AmoyDx was recently approved in China to detect ALK hybrids in lung cancer patients. Although next generation sequencing can detect multiple genetic alterations in a single assay, it may take several weeks to acquire and process the data. In addition, there is insufficient data on the sensitivity, specificity, and clinical validity of this method in a clinical setting. Clinical response to crizotinib therapy has been reported in a few cases with discordant diagnostic results [5].

Globally, approximately 5–7% of lung tumors harbor ALK rearrangements. Testing for ALK rearrangements in patients newly diagnosed with advanced NSCLC is recommended in routine clinical practice [3]. However, less than one-third of Canadian, Japanese, and German patients with advanced NSCLC have had their ALK status adequately defined prior to first-line treatment decision-making. In contrast, more than half of patients in the United States are tested (www.kantarhealth.com/infographics/nsclc). In Canada, cancer patients must wait 2–3 weeks from the time of the initial consultation to obtain the final results. This may delay treatment decisions and treatment initiation [6]. Because patients with stage IV lung cancer have a median untreated life expectancy of approximately 16 weeks, it is critical to avoid delays in diagnosis and treatment [7]. Alternatively, patients can choose to undergo at least one cycle of chemotherapy following histological examination while waiting for ALK hybrid status results. Crizotinib is superior to standard first-line pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK rearrangement-positive NSCLC, which is associated with a greater reduction in lung cancer symptoms and a significant improvement in quality of life [8]. Current testing practices must be improved in order to identify more effective treatments for patients.

In this study, we identified a novel non-coding RNA, sweyjawbu, in microarray data sets that can be used to predict ALK rearrangement status. Real-time PCR experiments indicated that sweyjawbu RNA expression could discriminate between ALK rearrangement-positive and ALK rearrangement-negative tumors. We designed a homebrew PCR assay to detect ALK RNA hybrid status in tissue samples from NSCLC patients. This assay could potentially be transferred to a FilmArray platform, which would substantially decrease the time required for testing.

RESULTS

The expression of sweyjawbu is associated with ALK-activated transcription

By comparing the expression profiles of 11 samples with confirmed ALK translocations with an additional 235 samples from the E-GEOD-31210 dataset, probe set 208212_s_at, corresponding to the ALK transcript, was found to be the second most differentially expressed gene, with a fold change of 29.8 (p = 3.27E-11). Another probe set (242964_at) showed the highest differential expression, with a fold change of 37.4 (p = 8.05E-11) (Figure 1; Supplementary Table S3). Probe set 242964_at corresponded to sweyjawbu RNA based on an alignment of the probe sequences to the human AceView 2010 release (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ieb/research/acembly) [9]. Sequence alignment was performed with the R software and Bioconductor “Biostrings” package (a maximum of 1 mismatch was allowed). The correlation coefficient between the signal intensity of probe sets 208212_s_at and 242964_at reached 0.95.

Probe sets signal intensity in the E-GEOD-31210 microarray dataset.

Figure 1: Probe sets signal intensity in the E-GEOD-31210 microarray dataset. (A) Probe set 208212_s_at, and (B) Probe set 242964_at revealed significant ALK expression in ALK rearrangement-positive samples only (Red), but rarely showed expression in other sample types (Blue: EGFR mutation; Pink: KRAS mutation; Yellow: Negative for ALK translocation and EGFR/KRAS mutation; Grey: adjacent normal tissue).

The expression of sweyjawbu is up-regulated in ALK rearrangement-positive cells

The expression of sweyjawbu RNA has been associated with ALK gene amplification or translocation in various cancers. The correlation coefficient between the signal intensity in probe sets 208212_s_at and 242964_at in 1037 cancer cells (Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia [10], www.broadinstitute.org/ccle) reached 0.92. The signal intensities in four lung cancer cell lines were extracted from the dataset for comparison. Probe set 242964_at only exhibited positive expression in ALK rearrangement-positive cells. The signal intensity were below background in ALK rearrangement-negative cells (Figure 2A). Real-time PCR data also indicated that there was a more than 100-fold difference in sweyjawbu RNA expression between ALK rearrangement-positive cells and -negative cells (Figure 2B).

Differences observed between ALK rearrangement-positive (NCI-H2228) and ALK rearrangement-negative (NCI-H1975, NCI-H460, and NCI-H1703) lung cancer cells.

Figure 2: Differences observed between ALK rearrangement-positive (NCI-H2228) and ALK rearrangement-negative (NCI-H1975, NCI-H460, and NCI-H1703) lung cancer cells. (A) Compare probe set 242964_at log2 transformed signal intensity. The signal intensity for the 242964_at probe set was extracted from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, www.broadinstitute.org/ccle. (B) Compare the relative gene expression (ΔCt) values for the sweyjawbu gene. PCR experiments were performed in quadruplicate.

ALK rearrangement status detected by a homebrew PCR assay

A total of 32 ALK rearrangement-positive and 51 ALK rearrangement-negative samples were included in our study (Figure 3, and Supplementary Table S4). Using a homebrew PCR assay, we detected differences between ALK rearrangement-positive and ALK rearrangement-negative samples. The combination of ΔCtALK3′/5′ and ΔCtsweyjawbu enhanced the differences. Primer pairs were also designed to amplify different ALK hybrid subtypes. We determined that one patient carried a KIF5B-ALK RNA hybrid, while the other patients carried EML4-ALK RNA hybrids. Interestingly, patient number 36 presented with an EML4-ALK fusion based on PCR data, but FISH indicated that this patient was ALK rearrangement-negative since there were very few ALK rearrangement-positive cells (approximately 3%) in the tumor. For this patient, the ΔCtALK3′/5′ and ΔCtsweyjawbu values were significantly higher than those of ALK rearrangement-positive patients. Patient number 6 underwent surgery at another hospital. Therefore, tissue samples were not available for FISH and IHC analysis. The homebrew assay indicated that the ΔCt values for this patient were significantly lower than those of ALK rearrangement-negative patients. Sequencing analysis indicated this patient had an EML4-ALK rearrangement. To confirm these results, we used the RNAScope® assay to analyze the 5′ and 3′ regions of the ALK transcript and sweyjawbu transcript expression. Indeed, we observed increased expression of the 3′ region of the ALK transcript and increased sweyjawbu expression in ALK rearrangement-positive compared to ALK rearrangement-negative tissue (Figure 4).

Differences between ALK rearrangement-positive and ALK rearrangement-negative lung cancer tissue samples.

Figure 3: Differences between ALK rearrangement-positive and ALK rearrangement-negative lung cancer tissue samples. (A) Compare the ΔCt values for the sweyjawbu gene. (B) Compare the ΔCt values for the 5′ and 3′ regions of the ALK transcript. (C) Compare the ΔCt values for the sweyjawbu gene plus the ΔCt value for the 5′ and 3′ regions of the ALK transcript. A total of 59 lung adenocarcinoma, 4 large cell carcinoma, and 20 squamous cell carcinoma samples were included in this study. Overall, a clear difference between ALK rearrangement-positive vs. ALK rearrangement-negative samples was observed in the ΔCtsweyjawbu. A larger difference in the ΔCtALK3′/5′ was observed between ALK rearrangement-positive and ALK rearrangement- negative samples. The greatest difference between ALK rearrangement-positive and ALK rearrangement negative samples was observed when the sum of the ΔCtsweyjawbu plus ΔCtALK3′/5′ was calculated.

RNAscope&#x00AE; RNA in situ hybridization to visualize the expression of the 5&#x2032; and 3&#x2032; regions of the ALK transcript, and sweyjawbu expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.

Figure 4: RNAscope® RNA in situ hybridization to visualize the expression of the 5′ and 3′ regions of the ALK transcript, and sweyjawbu expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. (A) In ALK rearrangement-positive samples, the 5′ region of the ALK transcript was weakly expressed in a few cancer cells. (B) The 3′ region of the ALK transcript was highly expressed in most cancer cells. (C) The sweyjawbu transcript was also expressed in most cancer cells. (DF). In ALK rearrangement-negative samples, the 5′ and 3′ regions of the ALK transcript, and the sweyjawbu transcript were barely expressed.

DISCUSSION

The functions of the sweyjawbu gene are not yet known. It is expressed at relatively low levels, only 5.5% of the average gene in Aceview database. The sequence of sweyjawbu is defined by seven GenBank accessions from 5 cDNA clones, which are derived from different tissue types [9]. We found that sweyjawbu was differentially expressed between ALK rearrangement-positive and ALK rearrangement-negative cells. Additional studies are required in order to understand the mechanisms responsible for the link between sweyjawbu gene expression and ALK gene transcription.

The breakage of the ALK transcript and subsequent rejoining with another fusion partner could drive high expression of the ALK kinase domain and result in unbalanced expression of the 5′ and 3′ regions of ALK transcripts [11]. We designed primer pairs to examine the differential expression of the 5′ and 3′ regions of ALK transcripts. This enabled efficient discrimination between ALK rearrangement-positive from ALK rearrangement-negative samples. Moreover, the addition of sweyjawbu expression had a synergistic effect. RNAScope® analysis also demonstrated higher sweyjawbu expression in ALK rearrangement-positive patients.

We also included 17 primer pairs that could detect 27 different ALK hybrid subtypes in NSCLC patient samples, including the following potential fusion partners: EML4, KIF5B, STRN, KLC1, TFG, CUX1, TPR, and HIP1 (Supplementary Table S2). We aimed to detect the most common ALK fusion proteins simultaneously. However, it was difficult to cover all the hybrid variants since new discoveries are still emerging [12, 13]. Thus, there could have been some false negative results in the detailed subtype analysis compared to the FISH analysis.

In this study, we developed a quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay to measure ALK rearrangement status in cancer patients at three levels: (1) expression of the non-coding RNA sweyjawbu; (2) comparison of the expression of the 5′ and 3′ regions of the ALK transcript; and (3) expression of known ALK hybrid subtype variants. However, there were a limited number of cases in our study. Future studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to establish the cutoff values. Based on PCR results, positive samples could be referred for FISH analysis to confirm ALK rearrangement status, while negative samples could be referred for further tests, like EGFR mutation or ROS1 rearrangement. This approach could save time and help determine the most appropriate treatment protocol for late-stage lung cancer patients.

This prototype could be transferred to a FilmArray platform, which is a multiplex PCR system that integrates sample preparation, amplification, detection, and analysis [14]. It has the potential to be an efficient and convenient point-of-care multiplex PCR screening methodology that could be used to select specimens for ALK FISH testing, which may lead to better patient care. This platform has the following advantages: (1) it utilizes fresh samples, biopsy or plural fluid, and could reduce the experimental failure rate; (2) it detects ALK fusion at three levels, which could reduce the false positive and false negative rates; (3) it is a standardized platform that requires only a few minutes of hands-on-time and returns results in approximately 1 hour; and (4) the nested multiplexed PCR design can largely reduce the volume of sample required for testing, which means that the remaining sample could be used to detect other gene fusions or mutations (Supplementary Figure S1). The VENTANA ALK IHC test is a common, efficient, and convenient method for screening patient ALK rearrangement status. However, it would take 7 working days at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center to report test results from the Ventana ALK IHC test. There are several factors that increased the workload at the main cancer hospitals in China, and decreased their efficiency. For example, air pollution, the large overall population size, and the insufficient of professional pathologists in rural areas. The putative FilmArray ALK test would be a good complementary diagnostic for current clinical practice, since it is potentially a point-of-care test and requires limited human resources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Public gene expression data and bioinformatics analysis

As a result of the rapid evolution of microarray technology over the last decade, multiple studies have characterized cancer cell lines and tumor tissue using standardized, genome-wide microarrays, which has generated large volumes of gene expression data. The HG-U133Plus2 gene expression microarray was manufactured by Affymetrix (Santa Clara, CA, USA), and contained 54,000 probe sets for the measurement of 38,500 human genes including coding and non-coding RNAs. The E-GEOD-31210 dataset (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) included expression profiles for 226 lung adenocarcinomas (11 with EML4-ALK fusions, 127 with EGFR mutations, 20 with KRAS mutations, and 68 triple negative cases) as well as 20 profiles for adjacent normal tissue [15]. Raw data were collected from the CEL files and analyzed using the R software and the Bioconductor package. After preprocessing with Robust Multi-chip Average for background correction, quantile normalization, and median polish summarization, a set of probe ID-centric gene expression values were available for downstream analysis. Differentially expressed genes were identified using the significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) method. To reduce false positives, SAM analysis was performed using stringent statistics variables with a permutation of 1,000 and a false discovery rate (FDR) less than 0.05. The FDR estimates the expected proportion of incorrect rejections among the rejected hypotheses.

Cancer cell lines and clinical samples

The ALK rearrangement-positive cell line NCI-H2228 (adenocarcinoma, NSCLC) and three ALK rearrangement-negative cell lines, NCI-H1975 (adenocarcinoma, NSCLC), NCI-H460 (large cell, NSCLC), and NCI-H1703 (squamous cell, NSCLC) were utilized. ATCC Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM L-glutamine, in 6 cm dishes. Approximately 1 × 106 cells were collected using the RNAprotect® cell reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). After homogenizing the lysate with the QIAshredder® spin column (Qiagen), total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen).

We analyzed 83 NSCLC tumor samples (59 adenocarcinomas, 4 large cell carcinomas, and 20 squamous cell carcinomas) in our study (Supplementary Table S1). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee and the procedures performed according to the ethical standards of the Responsible Committee on Human Experimentation of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Frozen tissue resected from lung cancer patients were levigated into TRIZOL using a mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted using the RNAeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen). RNA quality was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis followed by ethidium bromide staining. RNA quantity and purity were evaluated based on the absorbance at 260 nm and 280 nm, which was measured using a spectrophotometer.

Primer design

Primer pairs were designed using the Beacon Designer software (Premier Biosoft, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Sequence information for the 27 different ALK fusion hybrid subtypes was obtained from various publications. The sequences of the primers were compared using the UCSC SNP database. The primers and template plasmids harboring the hybrid regions were synthesized by GeneScript® Co. Ltd (Nanjing, China). The synthetic plasmids were used as templates to characterize the primer pairs. The final concentration of each primer was 0.3 μM. Primer pairs resulted in efficient amplification, and single melt curves were retained for further analysis (Supplementary Table S2).

Real-time PCR detection

The QuantiTect® Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen) was used to synthesize cDNA from 1 mg RNA. Quantitative real-time PCR to detect templates from cell lines or tissue samples was performed on an ABI 7900HT instrument using the QuantiFast® SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen). After initial activation for 5 min at 95°C, two-step cycling was performed for 40 cycles, with 10 s at 95°C and 30 s at 60°C, followed by melting curve analysis. Gene expression was normalized to the expression of the HPRT1 and ESD genes in lung cancer tissue [16].

RNAscope® RNA in situ hybridization

The RNAScope® probe targeting sweyjawbu was designed and synthesized by Advanced Cell Diagnostics (Heyward, CA, USA). The RNAScope® probe targeting human ALK exon 1 to exon 18 (corresponding to the 5′ region of the ALK transcript), and probe targeting human ALK exon 19 to exon 29 (corresponding to the 3′ region of the ALK transcript) were also obtained from Advanced Cell Diagnostics. RNA expression was detected using the RNAscope® 2.5 High Definition (HD)-RED Assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Advanced Cell Diagnostics). The images were acquired with an Olympus u-tv0.63xc microscope.

Confirmation of patient ALK rearrangement status

Patient ALK rearrangement status was evaluated either by FISH (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA), or IHC (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), by pathologists in the Department of Pathology at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center using standard protocols. FISH-positive cases were defined as those with two positive ALK rearrangement patterns. Positive cases were defined as more than 15% break-apart signals or isolated red signals in 50 tumor cells. Finally, FISH-negative cases were defined as those with overlapping red and green signals (yellowish) in tumor cells, which was indicative of no ALK rearrangement. IHC staining was scored by two pathologists as follows: 0 (no staining); 1 (faint, cytoplasmic staining); 2 (moderate, smooth cytoplasmic staining); 3 (intense, granular cytoplasmic staining) in more than 10% of the tumor cells. Anti-ALK IHC staining results were interpreted using a binary scoring system: positive (3+ or 2+) or negative (1+ or 0). ALK hybrid amplification-positive samples were subjected to sequencing analysis in order to determine the specific fusion partner.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank MengHong Sun (Tissue bank, FDUSCC) for assistance with the preparation of the manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None.

FUNDING

This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81501965 (Dr. Hui Yu) and No. 81401892 (Dr. Jialei Wang).

REFERENCES

1. Morris SW, Kirstein MN, Valentine MB, Dittmer KG, Shapiro DN, Saltman DL, Look AT. Fusion of a kinase gene, ALK, to a nucleolar protein gene, NPM, in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Science. 1994; 263:1281–4.

2. Minoo P1, Wang HY. ALK-immunoreactive neoplasms. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2012; 5:397–410.

3. Chan BA, Hughes BG. Targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: current standards and the promise of the future. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015; 4:36–54.

4. Leighl NB, Rekhtman N, Biermann WA, Huang J, Mino-Kenudson M, Ramalingam SS, West H, Whitlock S, Somerfield MR.Molecular testing for selection of patients with lung cancer for epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32:3673–9.

5. Pekar-Zlotin M, Hirsch FR, Soussan-Gutman L, Ilouze M, Dvir A, Boyle T, Wynes M, Miller VA, Lipson D, Palmer GA, Ali SM, Dekel S, Brenner R, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing for detection of EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer. Oncologist. 2015; 20:316–22.

6. Lim C, Tsao MS, Le LW, Shepherd FA, Feld R, Burkes RL, et al. Biomarker testing and time to treatment decision in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26:1415–21.

7. Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Beasley MB, Chitale DA, Dacic S, Giaccone G, Jenkins RB, Kwiatkowski DJ, Saldivar JS, Squire J, Thunnissen E, Ladanyi M. Molecular Testing Guideline for Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for EGFR and ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. J Thorac Oncol. 2013; 8:823–59.

8. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, Wu YL, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T, Felip E, Cappuzzo F, Paolini J, Usari T, Iyer S, Reisman A, Wilner KD, et al. First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371:2167–77.

9. Thierry-Mieg D, Thierry-Mieg J. AceView: a comprehensive cDNA-supported gene and transcripts annotation. Genome Biol. 2006; 7:S12.1–14.

10. Barretina J, Caponigro G, Stransky N, Venkatesan K, Margolin AA, Kim S, Wilson CJ, Lehár J, Kryukov GV, Sonkin D, Reddy A, Liu M, Murray L, et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature. 2012; 483:603–7.

11. Wang R, Pan Y, Li C, Hu H, Zhang Y, Li H, Luo X, Zhang J, Fang Z, Li Y, Shen L, Ji H, Garfield D, et al. The use of quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR for 5′ and 3′ portions of ALK transcripts to detect ALK rearrangements in lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18:4725–32.

12. Iyevleva AG, Raskin GA, Tiurin VI, Sokolenko AP, Mitiushkina NV, Aleksakhina SN, Garifullina AR, Strelkova TN, Merkulov VO, Ivantsov AO, Kuligina ESh, Pozharisski KM, Togo AV, et al. Novel ALK fusion partners in lung cancer. Cancer Lett 2015; 362:116–21.

13. Kim RN, Choi YL, Lee MS, Lira ME, Mao M, Mann D, Stahl J, Licon A, Choi SJ, Van Vrancken M, Han J, Wlodarska I, Kim J. SEC31A-ALK Fusion Gene in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 48:398–402.

14. Poritz MA, Blaschke AJ, Byington CL, Meyers L, Nilsson K, Jones DE, Thatcher SA, Robbins T, Lingenfelter B, Amiott E, Herbener A, Daly J, Dobrowolski SF, et al. FilmArray, an automated nested multiplex PCR system for multi-pathogen detection: development and application to respiratory tract infection. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e26047.

15. Okayama H, Kohno T, Ishii Y, Shimada Y, Shiraishi K, Iwakawa R, Furuta K, Tsuta K, Shibata T, Yamamoto S, Watanabe S, Sakamoto H, Kumamoto K, et al. Identification of genes upregulated in ALK-positive and EGFR/KRAS/ALK-negative lung adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res. 2012; 72:100–11.

16. Gresner P, Gromadzinska J, Wasowicz W. Reference genes for gene expression studies on non-small cell lung cancer. Acta Biochim Pol. 2009; 56:307–16.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PII: 13886